Featured Image -- 5484

Did British Intelligence Murder Scottish Independence? (James Roberstson… Crimes Of Empire). VOTE FRAUD IN SCOTTISH REFERENDUM?… Election Rigging/ Electoral Fraud/ Vote Rigging… Aanirfan, Global Research… Russia cries foul over Scottish independence vote

joekano76:

Russia cries foul over Scottish independence vote

Russian observers say referendum count took place in rooms that were too big and did not meet international standards

WHY SCOTLAND SHOULD VOTE YES




Some things are just too important to be left to the plebs to decide – they don’t know what’s good for them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbJif7vISQg#action=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru79UKlZE_k#action=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUR-HgAtwtg#action=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8Mc01RuuO0#action=share

And many more are surfacing. As someone once said:

It’s not the vote that counts, it’s who counts the vote

The British plan to steal Scotland’s independence referendum

By Wayne Madsen, September 10 2014.

September 10-11, 2014 – The British plan to steal 


1. Informed British sources have revealed that the British government… has colluded with the British media to downplay in articles, news … and … opinion polls the actual strength of the pro-independence ‘Yes’ campaign in Scotland.
2. The hyped news reports, including “news” about a looming terrorist threat and a new royal baby, as well as skewed polling numbers, according to our sources, is to prepare the country for a razor-thin loss for the pro-independence “Yes” vote in…

3. Our sources report that the actual “Yes” for independence vote is leading the “No” vote by a full 11 percentage points…


http://www.dailymail.co.uk.

5. Knowledgeable British sources say that massive election manipulation, including tampering with the absentee postal votes, is what is in store for Scotland on referendum day… 
6. The vote will be immediately declared by the media and British government to be “conclusive” as the “will of the Scottish people.”

Of course, any suggestion that the vote was rigged will be immediately be discounted as an unfounded “conspiracy theory.” …

Moving On For Social Justice

by craig on September 19, 2014

The referendum result is the loss of a chance to dispute the hegemony of the neo-con corporate elite in the international world. My heart is still bursting with pride that 45% of Scots – a people devoid of political autonomy for three hundred years – had the nerve, intellect and will to see through the avalanche of propaganda from the entire mainstream media, political establishment, banking sector and corporate world. I met numerous voters who had received letters from their employers – including Diageo, BP, RNS and many others – telling them to vote No or their job was in danger. I met the old lady in Dundee who was told by the Labour Party that independent Scotland would flood the country with immigrants, and a Romanian building worker in Edinburgh who had been told by the Labour Party that Independent Scotland would deport all East Europeans.

Yesterday the Daily Telegraph, Daily Express and Daily Mirror in Scotland all had precisely the same full page photo on their front cover – not a startling news snap, but an arty concoction of male silhouettes and union and Scottish flags. The Mirror had photoshopped it to remove the blue from the union jack, but it was the same distinctive photo. There could be no more stark example of the fake diversity of the mainstream media.

Just as the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have been startlingly shown up as precisely the same creatures of corporate masters offering no policy differences whatsoever, merely a false tribalism. As they partied together at Better Together last night – the only party in the whole of Scotland, at which everybody present lives very, very well at taxpayers’ expense – it was impossible to tell which brand of Tory was which.

Keeping the popular momentum going, keeping all those wonderful people I met and spoke to engaged in trying to engineer a different society, is going to be a hard struggle. But we always knew that. The goal of independence must remain as a powerful unifying factor.

Through media onslaught people were convinced that a No vote was a vote for Devo Max. Actually after a fortnight of pontificating it will fall off the news agenda of the mainstream. Nothing significant will happen. The Westminster view is that we can have any powers we want at our glorified council in Scotland as long as we still don’t get the revenue from oil or whisky – and still provide cannon fodder for neo-con wars abroad, house Trident and are subject to draconian Westminster imposed attacks on civil liberties.

Anyway the dress rehearsal is over. At the next referendum – which is only five years away, after the UK has voted to leave the EU – we will not be putting forward Salmond’s Independence Lite, (I am not criticising, he carried it superhumanly far). We will be proposing a fully independent Scottish Republic, out of NATO, with its own currency, sweeping land reform to give Scotland’s land back to its people, nationalisation of railways and public utilities, a genuine minimum wage you can live on, a humane benefits system and strict regulation and controls on banks and bankers.

Originally posted on shirlz007:

scot rig
‘without the extreme profanity and ritual humiliation please Danny… it doesn’t help anyone’

‘right… but it’s time for Captain fucking Mannering and the remaining cast of ‘Dad’s Army’ to fuck off!’

‘What just happened? A load of people just got caught with their pants down by CIA and MI6… fuck just happened!’

There’s child abuse inquiries, and fake beheading video’s, CIA and Mossad running amok in Middle East…  and a war in Europe for people to be concentrating on!… GAZA’

secret-intelligence-service
mi5
skyfall 2
skfall
skyfall 6
mi5 scot

WE HAVE A PROBLEM… THE SCOTTISH INDEPENDANCE ELECTION WAS RIGGED BY BRITISH INTELLIGENCE
(MI5… with a little help from CIA we suspect)
… EVERYONE KNOWS IT!

Sincere apologies to Gordon Duff of Veterans Today, who wrote ‘Scotland: Vote YES ”Anyway”‘. Gordon Duff and people at VT knew it was rigged.
(and that’s why the Americans where so quiet on the matter)

‘well.. we ALL knew it was on the cards. It was suspected…

View original 4,681 more words

The Illustrated Protocols of Zion

The Illustrated Protocols of Zion

By Dr. David Duke — davidduke.com May 20, 2014

The Illustrated Protocols of Zion will probably make more impact than any previous book that I have ever written. The original Protocols of Zion have been read by countless millions of people over the last 117 years.  It is still the most common Internet search item when it comes to the Jewish Question.   This book takes the basic assertions of the protocols and proves them in the present time.  It is a brand new edition of the classic work which takes the “old” Protocols of Zion and shows, using present-day practical examples, its prescience and astonishing accuracy—despite being more than century old!   Almost everybody knows of the “original” Protocols of Zion—and their historical background. They were probably complied by Czarist agents towards the end of the nineteenth century as a weapon in their war against the large-scale Jewish Communist uprising which they faced. The Protocols have been derided as a forgery, slander, and lies—yet remain one of the most widely read books in the world on the Jewish Question.   In my new book, I show that it is actually irrelevant if the original Protocols were written by Czarist agents or not. In fact, as I point out, they are in reality a highly predictive work of “fiction”—much like George Orwell’s 1984, or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.   Although the characters and storyline in both those works are “fiction”, the idea which underlay both those books was most certainly fact. Thus, they were works of “fiction”—just like the Protocols of Zion.   I show that in the case of the protocols, truth is stranger than fiction! For in this illustrated book, I show documents, quotes, photographs and facsimiles of Jewish Supremacist extremism that far exceeds even the assertions contained in the Protocols.   The original Protocols claim Jewish control over international banking. The Illustrated Protocols proves this in both text and illustrations.   The original Protocols claims that the Jewish extremists control the press. The Illustrated Protocols proves this with Jewish headlines and illustrations.   The original Protocols  claims that Jewish extremists control major governments. The Illustrated Protocols proves this with illustrations, examples and quotes from leading Jewish Supremacists themselves.   The original Protocols talked about Jewish dictatorship through a tyrannical world government. The Illustrated Protocols quotes the most famous Jew of the 2oth Century, David Ben-Gurion, where he states his vision that the Jews will be worshiped  in their world headquarters in Jerusalem, and that Israel will possess the Supreme Court of mankind. Truth is stranger than fiction!   Whereas the original Protocols could certainly make one think, the Illustrated Protocols of Zion will leave no doubts.   Whoever wrote the original Protocols possessed a remarkable insight into how Jewish Supremacists operated—and because it contains that remarkable predictive power, it remains a resource study for anyone wishing to gain an understanding of the psychology of Jewish Supremacism.   My new book is not, however, “just” the “old” Protocols. In it, I show that the reality of present-day Jewish Supremacism—in terms of media control, financial manipulation, control of governments and outright Jewish racism—were all accurately predicted and mapped out in the Protocols.   Using real, current-day examples of Jewish Supremacist domination, I show that in fact the reality of today is actually much worse than even what the Protocols dared predict!   This is without question one of the most important books ever written on Jewish Supremacism, and is guaranteed to be another work which will go down in the annals of history as an earth-shaking opinion changer.

Authenticity of Protocols of Zion Affirmed

September 17, 2014 Bermeister1938.jpg A little-known 1938 booklet rejected the 1935 decision of a Berne Court (overturned on appeal) that the Protocols of Zion were a forgery. It foresaw that World War Two was an Illuminati (Masonic) Jewish trap. “Their world war is a necessity in order that, in the name of indivisible peace, all that portion of mankind who wish to cast off the Jewish yoke, may be laid low.” Revue internationale des sociétés secrétes, April,1937 by Karl Bergmeister (The World Jewish Conspiracy, 1938) (Excerpt pp.18-22 edited by henrymakow.com) The Jewish prophets have laid down the political objectives of the Jewish people. Isaiah in particular, in chapters XL to LX promises quite undisguisedly world-domination to the chosen people. The same thing exactly is the aim of the Protocols, which may be said to differ only in the sense that they are a modern strategic plan, drawn up in a manner more suited to present-day conditions. Countless statements from Rabbinical sources, and by Jewish politicians agree in astonishing fashion with the general lines of the Protocols. The following fact moreover cannot be refuted namely, that the political occurrences of the present day, taking place as they do under the influence of Jewish Freemasonry, are developing in exact accordance with the lines laid down in the Protocols, and that more particularly in Soviet Russia, under “the leadership of Jewry, the Protocols have already become an accomplished fact. priest martyr.jpg(Priest faces firing squad in Masonic ruled Mexico) It is only necessary to think of the destruction of the Christian religion as ordered in the Protocols, of the destruction of all estates, of the moral poisoning of youth, and of the undermining of the family, of the enslavement of the working people, and of the famines created in a fashion so conscienceless, of the way in which Moscow organizes agitation and incitement of the masses in all countries, more especially in the case of Spain, of the continuous strikes and economic crises in France, and of the subsidized and controlled revolutionary movements in Mexico and in China, to come to the only possible conclusion namely, that Jewry with the help of Bolshevism, Marxism and Freemasonry, is undeviatingly carrying out what is prescribed in the Protocols, in order to obtain for the Jewish people that world-domination which is promised to them by their God Jehovah. WORLD DOMINATION This fight for world-domination has been in full swing ever since Italian Fascism put an end to the destructive activities of Freemasonry, that most dangerous of all Jewish secret societies, and since Germany has declared openly that it is the Jew, and the Jew alone who is the driving force behind the destruction of political order among the different peoples. In complete accordance with the sense of Protocol 7, the dogs of war are to be let loose against those states who desire to free themselves from the Jewish reign of terror, such states as Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Poland. On the above subject, the following forms an interesting extract from the “Revue internationale des sociétés secrétes, No 7, April 1937:  “A new war in defence of democracy and of alleged law is being prepared in all haste. An alliance of all the Jewish groups is already complete; it bears the official title of the alliance of the three great democracies, the English, the American, and the French. . . . Israel requires world war and soon!  . . . Israel is positively of the opinion that time is getting short. To the mind, their world war is a necessity in order that, in the name of indivisible peace, all that portion of mankind who wish to cast off the Jewish yoke, may be laid low.” It is just the three countries above mentioned who to-day are completely under Jewish-Masonic control. Practically every member of their respective governments is a Freemason. In their case also in all key positions, men of Jewish origin are to be found, or persons who either as a result of marriage, or of financial obligation, are open to Jewish influence. IMG_0223.jpgI will in general refrain from mentioning names. I should like however to point to one man only, in regard to whom Jewry are always proclaiming that he is not a Jew namely, Stalin. But Stalin in point of fact is married to a Jewess, and his all powerful Secretary of State is his brother-in- law Kaganowitsch. Only statesmen completely blind fail to recognize that the fate of the peoples entrusted to their charge no longer depends upon themselves, and that they will most certainly bring their peoples under the Jewish Bolshevist yoke if they do not first of all unite to fight the Jewish world danger. It is neither from Germany, Italy, nor Japan that danger threatens, but solely and only from the direction of Jewry, who in every country play a pretendedly patriotic role, but at the same time, by means of their international press, incite one country against the other, in complete accordance with the directions of Protocol 7: “Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. … We must compel the governments of the Goyim to take action in the direction favored by our widely- conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly prompted by us through the means of that so-called “Great Power” – the Press which with few exceptions that may be disregarded, is entirely in our hands.” THE PLAN IS APPARENT The plan of Jewry as developed in the Protocols, becomes from year to year more clear and more terrible. Whoever still persists in refusing to recognize it, is either seriously incapable, or else guilty of a crime against his own people. And once again I will take as my authority a Jew, who unconditionally stands for the authenticity of the Protocols, and who asserts that Jewish mentality alone could draw up a programme like that of the Protocols, so that if only on these grounds, it is not possible to doubt the authenticity of the document. 220px-Arthur_Trebitsch.jpg(Trebitsch, left, a German Jewish writer who opposed the agenda outlined in the Protocols) The authority referred to is the late Arthur Trebitsch, author of Deutscher Geist oder Judentum, published 1921, on page 74 of which we find the following: “Anybody who like the author, has long since realized, seen, and heard with ominous dread, all the thoughts, aims and intentions derived from the entirety of our economic, political and intellectual life, and expressed in those secret documents, can with absolute confidence assert that they present the most genuine and unalloyed expression of that versatile spirit which is striving towards world-domination; and that an Aryan mind, however far it might have been driven along the road of forgery and calumny by Anti-Semitic rancour, could never, under any circumstances have devised these methods of action, these underhand expedients and these swindles as a whole.” A Conference of the World Service , the international organization for defense against Jewish aggression in all countries, took place in Erfurt from the 2nd to the 5th of September of this year. Distinguished experts, authors and political leaders, more especially from the following countries, took part: Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Great-Britain, Finland, Greece, Holland, Italy, Yugoslavia, Canada, Lettland, the U.S.A., Norway, Austria, Poland, Russia (Emigration), Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, South Africa, Czechoslovakia and Hungary. After the commission appointed to inquire into the authenticity of the Protocols had rendered a report of its two years of activity, the Congress unanimously adopted … the following resolution relative to the authenticity of “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”: That the verdict given in Berne May 14 1935 to the effect that the Protocols are a forgery is a faulty verdict. That it only became possible in consequence of the Judge having erroneously based his judgement upon the expertises of the two Swiss experts recommended by the Jewish side C.A. Loosli and Professor A. Baumgarten, after he had heard the 16 witnesses for the Jewish side, and after having refused to hear any single one of the 40 witnesses brought by the Aryan side. The verdict in Berne has not shaken the authenticity of the Protocols. For their authenticity the following irrefutable fact, among many others, bears witness namely, that Jewry in the social, political, and religious sphere, persistently model all their actions along the lines laid down in the Protocols. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion  are accordingly the authentic programme of Jewish world politics. ——- Related- US Policy Makes No Sense except as Illuminati Jewish World Domination —————

First Comment by Tony Blizzard: As in the statements I wrote which appeared on the back cover of a 1998 Barnes Review edition of “Waters Flowing Eastward,” I’m certain that these satanists, in whatever they may call their organizations today, have periodic meetings wherein the protocols are updated to fit the modern world. For instance, their remarks on their control of the press in the only copy ever to escape their hands are today obsolete.  It is now the media, more importantly, the Internet, wherein, to this time, people such as yourself have been able to counter their agenda, or at least expose it, to a point.  It would be interesting to be able to read what their plans are today for denying truth on the Internet in the near future.  You can be certain that whatever governments do to quash the truths coming out will be that which has been designed by these same satanist cabals. People must realize that it was basically a fluke that over a century ago, one Jew stole these protocols of the conspiratorial speech for the periodic meeting of this satanic/talmudic cabal and sold them to the wife of the Russian legate in Paris.  (Whatever his motive, that man paid shortly thereafter in Egypt with his life.)  Otherwise the world would never have heard of them.  This conspiracy against mankind, against God, has never been static, it continues secretly to work on improvements in method and will do so until finally destroyed. Basically, what is revealed in the protocols is the devil’s battle plan, using those Talmudist fanatics as his myrmidons, in the war on earth between himself and God for the souls of men.

Why I Call Myself a Holocaust Denier by Paul Eisen

Why I Call Myself a Holocaust Denier by Paul Eisen

My family were ordinary folk – ‘twice-a-year Jews’ we used to call them. But like most of us second and third generation, upwardly mobile, North London Jews, our Jewishness filled our lives. And, at that time, that meant Zionism and the Holocaust. For me, my family and our friends, a post-Holocaust Israel meant quite simply ‘never again’.

But, while seemingly ordinary, my family was also rather extraordinary. My father was unusually tolerant and free-thinking, and my mother too was unusually lively in her thinking. A born rebel, there was nothing she loved more than to burst a balloon. As for me, I started off, first as the family tsaddik – awfully concerned with God and my Jewishness (though always strangely at odds with other Jews) – then the family dissident-intellectual. By young adulthood, you would have found me somewhere on the Zionist left – unquestioning in my support for the Jewish state but wishing it would not behave quite so badly and stop embarrassing me in front of my friends. However, when it came to the Holocaust, my faith was unwavering.

This is me in 1978 at Yad Vashem:
Then through the museum and its unfolding narrative: Concentration, Deportation, Selection, Extermination. It wears you out, it really does. Like countless others, we stand dumb in front of the little slave-labourer’s shoe in the glass case and also like countless others, we know we’ve had enough.

Then to the shrine itself:

The bunker with its dulled metal floor, off-centre the smoky flame flickers, through the hole in the roof, a trickle of black smoke, a world destroyed. Then outside, from the gloom into the brilliant Mid-Eastern sunshine and up the few steps, and there it is: after the fall, redemption and the future – the blazing panorama of Jewish Jerusalem. We Jews really do do these things awfully well.

From We Stand with Israel by Paul Eisen
That was 1978 and I didn’t then know what I now know: that, as I came out of that bunker – that universally known symbol of Jewish suffering, and took in that perfect view – I was looking straight at that completely unknown symbol of Palestinian suffering, the village of Deir Yassin. Of course, I didn’t know then about Deir Yassin, and even if I had known, I probably wouldn’t have much cared.

Thinking back, I suspect my response would have been something like: Ah yes, Deir Yassin, the one stain on an otherwise unblemished Zionist record. (The line had come, pretty much verbatim from my reading (age eleven) of the blockbuster Exodus.) And anyway, I would have reasoned, was not the fevered anguish of the Zionist leadership (later referred to by me as ‘Jewish breast-beating’) yet more evidence of an essential Jewish moral grandeur?

Sure, I’d known about Deir Yassin – both the village and the massacre – but I had not known, nor probably wanted to know, about the close to five hundred other destroyed or depopulated Palestinian villages or about the seventy known massacres which accompanied the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

Like the child who does not, cannot, or will not see the lamb chops on his plate as skipping round the farmyard, so for now, I did not, could not and would not see those refugees, terrorists or biblical shepherds on my TV screen as those same folk – those safely de-personalized and de-humanized ‘Arabs’ – who had lived in what was, and as far as I was concerned, had always been, Israel.

But I must not blame myself. I do not blame myself. Even after digging through the accumulated layers of indoctrination to which any Jewish child could expect to be subjected, this was still some story. After two thousand years of exile, an ancient people return to their ancient homeland – a land given to them by God, or, (for the more secular amongst us), by History.

Because mine was no run-of-the-mill Zionism. What was claimed by so many Jews (particularly of the anti-Zionist, Marxist variety) to be an essentially political ideology, just a Jewish version of imperialism or an add-on – an essentially practical solution to an ever-present anti-Semitism, was for me – and I now know, deep-down, for most Jews – a deep, emotional, spiritual, even religious affiliation. For my Zionism was a true sense of my Jewishness – a feeling that came deep from within Jewish history and even destiny – a feeling that I, with all Jews, had stood at the foot of Mount Sinai and, also with all Jews, had marched through history – a history which, at the time, I had not yet dreamt of questioning.

But question it I did. Here I am again in 1996 on the phone to the first name listed under “Palestine” – PSC: the Palestine Solidarity Campaign:

“Hello, look, I’m doing a bit of research, trying to find the name of a Palestinian village on the site of a particular kibbutz…I used to stay there….”
“Which one?”
“I’m sorry…?”

“Which kibbutz?”

“Yad David. It’s in the north, about five miles from….”

“Hang on…..” Then fifteen seconds later…

“It’s al Zawiyyeh”

“How did you do that?

“We’ve got a list… It’s from a book. It lists all the villages…”

“Can I get a copy?”

“Well, you may get it in a couple of bookshops… Try Al Hoda on the Charing Cross Road.”

One hour later I arrived at the Al Hoda Islamic bookshop in the Charing Cross Road and headed for the shelves marked ISRAEL (OCCUPIED PALESTINE). This is heady stuff, and there’re some interesting things too, “The Zionist in Literature” is one, with an intriguing essay on Ari Ben Canaan, which I really must read sometime, but nothing really on the villages. Most of it’s about this-way-to-peace or that-way-to-peace, so I’m there about three quarters of an hour before I find what I came for. It’s been misplaced on the wrong shelf – so that’s why I missed it, and it looks like it’s been there for quite a time. Not surprising, when I see the forty-five pound price tag. But it is what I’ve come for, All That Remains by Whalid Khalidi, with the names, locations and the fate of four hundred and sixteen Palestinian villages destroyed since 1948.

“By the end of the 1948 war, hundreds of entire villages had not only been depopulated but obliterated, travellers of Israeli roads and highways can see traces of their presence that would escape the notice of the casual passer-by: a fenced-in area, often surmounting a gentle hill, of olive and other fruit trees left untended, of cactus hedges and domesticated plants run wild. Now and then a few crumbled houses are left standing, a neglected mosque or church, collapsing walls along the ghost of a village lane, but in the vast majority of cases, all that remains is a scattering of stones and rubble across a forgotten landscape.”

There are photos too, mainly of piles of rubble, which, to tell the truth, are a bit disappointing. After all, when you’ve seen one pile of rubble… a few stones… rubble…deserted site… rubble, overgrown with thorny plants… rubble… a few carob trees, piles of stones, crumbling terraces… rubble… a few stones… no landmarks… rubble…rubble… rubble.

But then there is something. As I hold the book in my hands it’s as if I’m holding something important, a record, a testimonial, a symbol of resistance, if you like.

I move on to the business at hand. District of Tiberias, 23 out of 26 villages destroyed… District of Bisan, all 28 villages destroyed… District of Safed, 68 out of 75 villages… Safed! Yad David is near Safed. Then I spot something… Kfar Yitzhak… I know that place. It’s a couple of kilometres from Yad David. I used to cycle there… Founded in 1943 on the site of the village of Qaytiyya… population predominantly Muslim… from agriculture and animal husbandry… had its own grain mill…

…at midnight June 5th 1949 army trucks encircled the village and Israeli troops swept down… rounded up the villagers and dumped them on a hillside south of Safed… villagers treated with brutality… kicks and curses… All that remains are a few stones… much of the lands absorbed by the settlement of Kefar Yitzhak…

I cannot believe what I’m reading, but I manage to turn the page just one more time and see what I’ve come here for:
“Yad David… founded in 1946 one kilometre north of the village of al Zawiyyeh…The village now lies under the cotton fields of Yad David.”

As I’m going out, I show the man the slip of paper on which I’ve written the name al Zawiyyeh and I ask what it means. He looks at the paper. “Corner?” He says as if asking me whether such a thing could really be so. Then, as I’m leaving and just as an afterthought I ask:

“There’s this word I keep seeing. Nakba. What does it mean?”

al Nakba… the Catastrophe
From “1996”by Paul Eisen

In 1998, I met Dan McGowan founder of the Palestinian solidarity organisation “Deir Yassin Remembered,” but not once in our short conversation or in the extended interview he gave afterwards did Dan mention the proximity of Deir Yassin to Yad Vashem. I read about that later, in the leaflet Dan gave me, on the London Underground, somewhere between Gloucester Road and Holloway Road.

“The Holocaust museum is beautiful, and the message ‘never to forget man’s inhumanity to man’ is timeless. The children’s museum is particularly heart-wrenching; in a dark room filled with candles and mirrors, the names of Jewish children who perished in the Holocaust are read aloud with their places of birth. Even the most callous person is brought to tears. Upon exiting this portion of the museum, a visitor is facing north and is looking directly at Deir Yassin. There are no markers, no plaques, no memorials, and no mention from any tour guide. But for those who know what they are looking at, the irony is breathtaking.”
From “Deir Yassin Remembered” by Dan McGowan

For Dan, a conservative American patriot, no more was needed than to note both the fact and the irony. But for me, with my leanings and obsessions, searching as I was for some meaning to the jumbled mass of my Jewish childhood and to the Holocaust, Israel and Palestine, it was epiphany. Deir Yassin was one thing but Deir Yassin in clear sight of Yad Vashem was quite another.

Of course, it was only much later, long after I had begun to think, write and speak about these things, that I was able to properly articulate even to myself that it was precisely this ‘breathtaking irony’ of Dan’s that had so held my attention. But even if I didn’t then know it, I certainly hung onto it – from that moment I was a messenger who had found his message.

And takers there were a-plenty. Palestinians, long resigned to Jewish suffering being placed at the centre of their own tragedy, were still pleased with the surge of publicity that the story and the resulting Jewish participation brought to their cause, and Jews were, as ever, delighted to have themselves and their suffering once more centre-stage. Deir Yassin gave Palestinians a new and effective narrative for resistance, and Jews an activism, sufficiently challenging to seem courageous and meaningful, but not so challenging as to necessitate any loosening of tribal bonds. And the rest – the Christians, the Marxists and the various non-aligned – well, as usual, they just went along with the Jews.

Now I had it all – Palestinian suffering/Jewish suffering, ab­used/ab­user. Okay, so, my much-loved Jewish victim was now the perpetrator but no matter, Deir Yassin could be viewed only from Yad Vashem – and the suffering of the Palestinian people could be seen only through the prism of my beloved Jewish suffering.

Unfortunately or fortunately (it really does go both ways) it didn’t stop there. Here I am in 2004:

It is understandable that Jews might believe that their suffering is greater, more mysterious and meaningful than that of any other people. It is even understandable that Jews might feel that their suffering can justify the oppression of another people. What is harder to understand is why the rest of the world has gone along with it.
And…
That Jews have suffered is undeniable. But acknowledgement of this suffering is rarely enough. Jews and others have demanded that not only should Jewish suffering be acknowledged, but that it also be accorded special status.

Jewish suffering is held to be unique, central and most importantly, mysterious. Jewish suffering is rarely measured against the sufferings of other groups. Blacks, women, children, gays, workers, peasants, minorities of all kinds, all have suffered, but none as much as Jews. Protestants at the hands of Catholics, Catholics at the hands of Protestants, pagans and heretics, all have suffered religious persecution, but none as relentlessly as Jews. Indians, Armenians, gypsies and aborigines, all have been targeted for elimination, but none as murderously and as premeditatedly as Jews.

Jewish suffering is held to be mysterious, and beyond explanation. Context is rarely examined. The place and role of Jews in society – their historical relationships with Church and state, landlords and peasantry – is hardly ever subject to scrutiny, and, whilst non-Jewish attitudes to Jews are the subject of intense interest, Jewish attitudes to non-Jews are rarely mentioned. Attempts to confront these issues are met with suspicion, and sometimes hostility, in the fear that explanation may lead to rationalisation, which may lead to exculpation, and then even to justification.
from Speaking the Truth to Jews by Paul Eisen
And again a few months later…
The issue (of Jewish suffering) is complex and cannot be fully debated or decided here, but the following points may stimulate thought and discussion.

During even the most terrible times of Jewish suffering such as the Crusades or the Chmielnitzky massacres of seventeenth century Ukraine, and even more so at other times in history, it has been said that the average peasant would have given his eye-teeth to be a Jew. The meaning is clear: generally speaking, and throughout most of their history, the condition of Jews was often far superior to the mass of the population.
The above-mentioned Ukrainian massacres took place in the context of a peasant uprising against the oppression of the Ukrainian peasantry by their Polish overlords. As has often been the case, Jews were seen as occupying a traditional position of being in alliance with the ruling class in their oppression of the peasantry. Chmielnitzky, the leader of this popular uprising, is today a Ukrainian national hero, not for his assaults on Jews (there are even references to his having offered poor Jews to join the uprising against their exploitative co-religionists – the Jews declined) but for his championing of the rights of the oppressed Ukrainians. Again, the inference is plain: outbreaks of anti-Semitic violence, though never justified, have often been responses to Jewish behaviour both real and imaginary.
In the Holocaust three million Polish Jews died, but so did three million non-Jewish Poles
Similarly, the Church burned Jews for their dissenting beliefs but then the church burned everyone for their dissenting beliefs. So again, the question must be asked: what’s so special about Jewish suffering?
And…
The Holocaust, the paradigm for all anti-Semitism and all Jewish suffering, is treated as being beyond examination and scrutiny. Questioning the Holocaust narrative is, at best, socially unacceptable, leading often to social exclusion and discrimination, and, at worst, in some places is illegal and subject to severe penalty. Holocaust revisionist scholars, named Holocaust deniers by their opponents, have challenged this. They do not deny a brutal and extensive assault on Jews by the Nazi regime, but they do deny the Holocaust narrative as framed by present day establishments and elites. Specifically, their denial is limited to three main areas. First, they deny that there ever was an official plan on the part of Hitler or any other part of the Nazi regime systematically and physically to eliminate every Jew in Europe; second, they deny that there ever existed homicidal gas-chambers; third, they claim that the numbers of Jewish victims of the Nazi assault have been greatly exaggerated.

But none of this is the point. Whether those who question the Holocaust narrative are revisionist scholars striving to find the truth and are shamelessly persecuted for opposing a powerful faction, or whether they are crazy Jew-haters denying a tragedy and defaming its victims, the fact is that one may question the Armenian genocide, one may freely discuss the Slave Trade, one can say that the murder of millions of Ibos, Kampucheans and Rwandans never took place and that the moon is but a piece of green cheese floating in space, but one may not question the Jewish Holocaust. Why? Because, like the rest of the Jewish history of suffering, the Holocaust underpins the narrative of Jewish innocence, which is used to bewilder and befuddle any attempt to see and to comprehend Jewish power and responsibility in Israel/Palestine and elsewhere in the world.
From Jewish Power by Paul Eisen
It was while writing the above and more that I came across Joel Hayward’s ill-fated M.A. thesis The Fate of Jews in German Hands 1933-1945. That Hayward recanted mattered not one jot, and his credibility was only enhanced by his own clear astonishment at what he was writing – an astonishment fully matched by my own at what I was reading. That the Holocaust was exploited and abused, I had understood, but its veracity? No way. Now, for the first time ever, there could be doubts.

Holocaust Denier

It’s always worth defining your terms. Not that it does that much good – the inquisitors will see what they want to see and claim what they want to claim. But for the record here’s what I do and do not question. First, what I do not question:

Ø I do not question that the National Socialist regime brutally persecuted Jews.

Ø I do not question that Jews in Germany were discriminated against, violently assaulted, dispossessed, imprisoned in camps and expelled and that many Jews died as a result.

Ø I do not question that Jews in countries occupied by Germany or within the German sphere of influence were pitilessly assaulted, dispossessed and subjected to brutal deportations, many to forced labour camps where many hundreds of thousands died.

Ø I do not question that many Jews were executed by shooting in the East.

But enough of this negativity – here’s what I do question:

Ø I question that there ever was an official plan on the part of Hitler or any other part of the National Socialist regime systematically and physically to eliminate every Jew in Europe.

Ø I question that there ever existed homicidal gas-chambers.

Ø I question the figure of six million Jewish victims of the Nazi assault and I believe that the actual figure was significantly less.

And finally, one more thing I do not and do question: I do not question the horror of what was done to Jews by National Socialists or the right of Jews (including myself) to regard that horror any way they wish. I do, however, question their right to compel the rest of the world to feel the same.
Deny the Holocaust!
For my money, a child of six can see that something’s not right about the Holocaust narrative, and the science simply confirms what I already suspect. But I differ from the Holocaust Revisionists. They are scholars – historians and scientists who apply ‘truth and exactitude’ to determine the truth or otherwise of the Holocaust narrative. I’m no scholar. I care nothing for the chemical traces in brickwork or the topological evidence for mass graves. But I’ve read the literature, and it just doesn’t add up.

That Jews suffered greatly from 1933-1945 is not in question, but the notion of a premeditated, planned and industrial extermination of Europe’s Jews with its iconic gas-chambers and magical six million are all used to make the Holocaust not only special but also sacred. We are faced with a new, secular religion, a false god with astonishing power to command worship. And, like the Crucifixion with its Cross, Resurrection etc, the Holocaust has key and sacred elements – the exterminationist imperative, the gas chambers and the sacred six million. It is these that comprise the holy Holocaust which Jews, Zionists and others worship and which the revisionists refuse.

Nor is this a small matter. If it was, why the fuss, why the witch-hunt, why the imprisonment of David Irving, Ernst Zündel and Germar Rudolf? And it’s not just them. What may be a massive lie is being used to oppress pretty much all of humankind. The German and Austrian peoples who, we are told, conceived and perpetrated the slaughter; the Russian, Polish, Ukrainian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian, Romanian  Hungarian, peoples etc. who supposedly hosted, assisted in and cheered on the slaughter; the Americans, the British, the French, the Dutch, the Belgians, the Italians (but not the Danes and the Bulgarians) etc. who apparently didn’t do enough to stop the slaughter; the Swiss who earned out of the slaughter, and the entire Christian world who, it seems, created the faith-traditions and ideologies in which the slaughter could take place, and now the Palestinian, Arab and Muslim peoples who seemingly want to perpetrate a new slaughter – in fact, the Holocaust oppresses the entire non-Jewish world and indeed much of the Jewish world as well. Stand up and have done with it.

So here’s something else. The Holocaust revisionist scholars and researchers are dedicated and skilled students of historical evidence, and for them‘Holocaust denier’ is but a term of abuse to be hurled as ‘witch’ might have been hurled in the Middle Ages. But for me, ‘Holocaust Denier’ is a label I accept. This is not because I don’t think anything bad happened to Jews at the hands of the National Socialists – for what it’s worth the real story of brutal ethnic cleansing moves me far more than any ‘Holocaust’ – and it’s certainly not because I think any such assault is right and proper. No, I deny the Holocaust because, as constituted, exploited and enforced, the Holocaust narrative is a false and abusive god, and I wish to put as much moral distance between it and myself as I can.

Solzhenitsyn breaks last taboo of the revolution

Nobel laureate under fire for new book on the role of Jews in Soviet-era repression

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his writing career – the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet purges.In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together – a reference to the 1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the Russian Jewish population – contains three chapters discussing the Jewish role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet Russia.But Jewish leaders and some historians have reacted furiously to the book, and questioned Solzhenitsyn’s motives in writing it, accusing him of factual inaccuracies and of fanning the flames of anti-semitism in Russia.Solzhenitsyn argues that some Jewish satire of the revolutionary period “consciously or unconsciously descends on the Russians” as being behind the genocide. But he states that all the nation’s ethnic groups must share the blame, and that people shy away from speaking the truth about the Jewish experience.In one remark which infuriated Russian Jews, he wrote: “If I would care to generalise, and to say that the life of the Jews in the camps was especially hard, I could, and would not face reproach for an unjust national generalisation. But in the camps where I was kept, it was different. The Jews whose experience I saw – their life was softer than that of others.”Yet he added: “But it is impossible to find the answer to the eternal question: who is to be blamed, who led us to our death? To explain the actions of the Kiev cheka [secret police] only by the fact that two thirds were Jews, is certainly incorrect.”Solzhenitsyn, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1970, spent much of his life in Soviet prison camps, enduring persecution when he wrote about his experiences. He is currently in frail health, but in an interview given last month he said that Russia must come to terms with the Stalinist and revolutionary genocides – and that its Jewish population should be as offended at their own role in the purges as they are at the Soviet power that also persecuted them.”My book was directed to empathise with the thoughts, feelings and the psychology of the Jews – their spiritual component,” he said. “I have never made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to the contrary, was trying to stand back. The Jewish subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about us.”But Solzhenitsyn’s book has caused controversy in Russia, where one Jewish leader said it was “not of any merit”.”This is a mistake, but even geniuses make mistakes,” said Yevgeny Satanovsky, president of the Russian Jewish Congress. “Richard Wagner did not like the Jews, but was a great composer. Dostoyevsky was a great Russian writer, but had a very sceptical attitude towards the Jews.”This is not a book about how the Jews and Russians lived together for 200 years, but one about how they lived apart after finding themselves on the same territory. This book is a weak one professionally. Factually, it is so bad as to be beyond criticism. As literature, it is not of any merit.”But DM Thomas, one of Solzhenitsyn’s biographers, said that he did not think the book was fuelled by anti-semitism. “I would not doubt his sincerity. He says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright, decent, anti-Stalinist people.”Professor Robert Service of Oxford University, an expert on 20th century Russian history, said that from what he had read about the book, Solzhenitsyn was “absolutely right”.Researching a book on Lenin, Prof Service came across details of how Trotsky, who was of Jewish origin, asked the politburo in 1919 to ensure that Jews were enrolled in the Red army. Trotsky said that Jews were disproportionately represented in the Soviet civil bureaucracy, including the cheka.

“Trotsky’s idea was that the spread of anti-semitism was [partly down to] objections about their entrance into the civil service. There is something in this; that they were not just passive spectators of the revolution. They were part-victims and part-perpetrators.

“It is not a question that anyone can write about without a huge amount of bravery, and [it] needs doing in Russia because the Jews are quite often written about by fanatics. Mr Solzhenitsyn’s book seems much more measured than that.”

Yet others failed to see the need for Solzhenitsyn’s pursuit of this particular subject at present. Vassili Berezhkov, a retired KGB colonel and historian of the secret services and the NKVD (the precursor of the KGB), said: “The question of ethnicity did not have any importance either in the revolution or the story of the NKVD. This was a social revolution and those who served in the NKVD and cheka were serving ideas of social change.

“If Solzhenitsyn writes that there were many Jews in the NKVD, it will increase the passions of anti-semitism, which has deep roots in Russian history. I think it is better not to discuss such a question now.”

RED CROSS EXPOSES “JEWISH” HOLOCAUST HOAX: INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS (IRC) DOCUMENT CONFIRMS 271 THOUSAND NOT 6 MILLION DIED IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS

OFFICIAL INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS RECORDS RELEASED

Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the Official IRC records reveal the actual Concentration Camp total death toll was 271,301

For years, people around the world – “the West” in particular – have been told that “six million Jews were systematically murdered by Germans in ‘Concentration Camps’ during World War 2.”

Thousands of honest people disputing this claim have been viciously smeared as a hateful anti-Semite. Several countries around the world have jailed and heavily fined people for disputing the claim that “6 Million” Jews were killed.

Provided here is a scanned image of an Official International Red Cross document, proving the so-called “Holocaust” [the long-and-often-claimed-6-million Jews] is just plain wrong. Jews around the world have intentionally exaggerated and perpetually lied for the purpose of gaining political, emotional and business advantages for themselves.

They committed willful, criminal FRAUD upon millions of trusting people around the world!

Please NOTE that the truth has been known since long before 1979!!! The above compiler, replying to a letter, had to rely on information that was already in existence!!!

Tax-payers of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Poland and other nations have had multiple Millions of dollars taken from their wages to be paid out to “holocaust survivors” and their descendants for something that DID NOT HAPPEN.

The tax-payers of these United States of America spend Billion$ each year in direct, indirect and military support of the State of Israel (which is not Biblical Israel).

This is intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive as to be almost incomprehensible.

Red Cross and East German government figures put the total deaths at every camp as 272.000, and 282,000 respectively which includes homosexuals, communists, gypsies, murderers, paedophiles etc. The 6 Million figure is a Kabbalist number, a magickal figure which featured in news papers in the early 1900′s

Where do the innocent Germans, Americans and others go to get a refund?

I call for criminal prosecution of individuals and groups who filed false lawsuits to obtain holocaust reparations and financial damage awards and perpetrating deliberate fraud upon Courts.

I call for the removal of Holocaust references in History books and educational materials.

I call for the removal of Holocaust Memorials worldwide.

It is long overdue that this intentional fraud be halted and those who perpetrated it be brought to justice for over 60 years of National Blood Libel against Germany and other nations through vicious lies and financial fraud.

Two of the most important surveys of the Jewish question in Europe during World War II are David Irvings examination of the Russian archives after the wall came down. Irving published his findings in his book, “Hitler’s War” and said not one word about gas chambers.

When question about this omission he said that there was no reference to gas chambers in the archives and therefore he did not discuss the question of gas chambers. Irving was arrested in several countries for hate speech for his scholarly omission.

The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications: “Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946) and “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947).

In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Russian camps which were far more harsh.

The German camps held both political prisoners (Schutzhaflinge) and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners.

Grateful prisoners sent letters of thanks from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others.

“The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).

Regarding Theresienstadt, the Red Cross said, “”where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75).

“The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions … From information gathered by the Commmee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6, 1945.

They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642).

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation.

The aid then ceased and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians.

The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.

However. food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

NO MENTION OF GAS CHAMBERS

One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war.

Says the Report: “in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.

Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results.

Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp .I.” (Vol. III, p.83).
Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able.

The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78). B

By October 2, 1944, the ICRC had warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of ‘gas chambers’.

The original 1946 edition did not even talk of ‘extermination’ or ‘death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ (Vol. 1 p. 641) and ‘extermination camps’ (Vol. I p. 645).
However, no means of’extermination’ is indicated.

In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a
‘gas chamber’. It acknowledges that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but’ its complete silence
on the subject of’gassings’ is ample refutation of the ‘Holocaust’ legend.

NOT ALL WERE INTERNED
Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.

This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing every single Jew he could lay his hands on,” In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportian of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland.

Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation.

“The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognise the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645).

As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.

The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary, ” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States… now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. 1, p. 649).

David Cole at Auschwitz

Zionism and the Holocaust

 By Mr Chicken.

Zionism is a major strand of the Elite control structure imposed upon this entire planet.  It is an undeniable fact that most large organisations are controlled and run by Zionists, primarily Jews.  Zionist Jews have an almost absolute monopoly in the media in all its forms and also in the entertainment industry, from Hollywood to the major recording labels etc. plus finance and banking.

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”  Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel, 3rd October 2001.

“You know very well and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House.  You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable.  What can they [Americans] do to us?  We control Congress, we control the media, we control showbiz and we control everything in America.  In America you can criticise God, but you can’t criticise Israel…”  Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache.

 

“These are the facts of Jewish media control in America.  Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy.  I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least.  Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mould our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests.  Interests, which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people.  By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.”  Pakalert Press, 2011.

“Goebbels was somewhat of a prophet pariah, he understood organized Jewry like few Americans do today, he understood that their collective calls of anti-Semitism directed at the Nazi leadership and indeed the German people themselves was a technique they had successfully used, even perfected, in order to advance their interests while at the same time suppressing any dissent from the gentile majority.  We see this same technique at work today, all around the world, anytime anyone honestly divulges the actions of a Jew in some crime; they are immediately smeared with the label of ‘anti-Semitism’.”  Curt Maynard, researcher.

This ‘label’ of ‘anti-Semitism’ is actually utterly meaningless, yet it has been hijacked by a small group of people to inhibit you (and indeed everyone) from criticising their actions.  To fully comprehend this point, it is firstly necessary for me to define three commonly misunderstood or even possibly unfamiliar terms.

Judaism – The Jewish religion.  Jews can be split into two distinct sub-groups, Ashkenazi (Khazarian) Jews who comprise by far the majority (over 90%) and Sephardic Jews.  These two sub-groups are racially as different as chalk and cheese and so, despite what you may believe or more accurately have been urged to believe; Judaism is a ‘religion’ and not a ‘race’.  In fact many people of Jewish background and parentage are not even religious and so their being described as ‘Jews’ is actually erroneous.

Zionism – a political movement that was originally established to lobby for a Jewish homeland and now exists to promote the superiority of Israel above all other countries, with the ultimate goal of a one-world government based in Tel Aviv.  Zionism is comprised primarily of Jewish people, but many non-Jews are Zionists and indeed many Jews are anti-Zionist.

Semitism – Not the state of being Jewish as is generally believed and promoted by Zionism for its own ends but simply the racial group to which inhabitants of a small area of the Middle East belong.  Semites may be Sephardic Jews or they may be Arabs, there is no racial difference between the two.  However Ashkenazi Jews, despite their loud and raucous protestations to the contrary are definitely not Semitic.

“… it is important that you understand what Zionism really is.  Zionist propaganda has led the American people to believe that Zionism and Judaism are one and the same and that they are religious in nature.  This is a blatant lie”.  Jack Bernstein, assassinated by the Mossad.

“The meaning of the term ‘anti-semite’ has significantly changed in recent years.  There was a time when this term referred to those who despised Jews.  Later, the term referred to those who promoted myths about a global Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.  Today the term ‘anti-semite’ is used by the ruling elite to lambast human rights activists who advocate equal rights between Jews, Christians and Muslims, the right of return of Palestinian refugees to their homeland and the vision of a common, democratic state for both Palestinians and Israelis.  The word ‘anti-semite’, which initially conveyed a negative and even sinister meaning, refers now to positive and highly commendable attitudes that can be carried with honour.  One may lament this change of meaning, but one should remember that a word does not carry any particular meaning.  It is merely a conventional symbol that refers to external contents.  By convention, society could agree to name animosity towards Jews ‘xakaculca’, democracy ‘zbzb’ and elephants ‘democracy’.   Inasmuch as the term ‘anti-semite’ now refers to human rights advocates and radical democrats, I declare myself a radical anti-semite.”  Elias Davidsson, June 2011.

“Zionists from the beginning welcomed anti-Semitism as a means of undermining what Zionists believed was the sense of false security of Jews in western, liberal societies, and as the means by which Jews would be kept in a permanent state of neurosis.  Large and powerful organizations such as the US-based Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith exist mainly for the purpose of exaggerating the extent of anti-Semitism in order to keep Jews under the Zionist heel and keep Israeli coffers filled.”  Rabbi Silverstein, ‘The Lies of Zionism’.

“Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.”  Theodor Herzl, founder of Zionism in the 19th century.

It is important here to make the point that Zionists are not the friends of the Jews in any way despite what many Jews believe.  Jews worldwide have been and continue to be used, often unknowingly in the Zionists plotting and scheming for world domination.

Ashkenazi Jews originated from the plains of South-Eastern Europe / Western Asia and were originally a large nomadic tribe, the Khazars, who inhabited these regions in the Dark and early Middle Ages.  They converted en-masse to Judaism, not through faith but simply in order to bring respectability to their previously god-less reputations when integration with other societies became necessary, more than a thousand years ago.  This was the group of ‘Jews’ who were discriminated against for centuries and expelled from many European nations for their usury, anti-social practices and their own discriminatory practices against non-Jews.  I repeat that these people had no racial or genetic ties to the ‘Holy Land’ whatsoever and so the oft-repeated cries for a Jewish state in their ancestral ‘homeland’ in the early to mid-twentieth century, was simply Zionist propaganda and deception.  Sephardic Jews however, are native to the Holy Land or Palestine and were the original biblical Jews.

So, in effect the Zionists have deliberately blurred the boundaries, between race, religion and politics to prevent criticism of their actions.  They have hi-jacked the term ‘anti-Semitism’, strictly speaking an accusation of racism and managed over time to associate this with discrimination against Jews in general by deceitful social engineering, whilst also turning the distinction between ‘Jewish’ and ‘Zionist’ into a grey area, to the same effect.  How have they achieved this?  Their almost total control of banking, media and the entertainment industries makes this task fairly straightforward via their vast propaganda machine.  Many Hollywood movies subtly promote the superiority of the Jews and the weakness and immorality of non-Jews.  Anyone who criticises or stands up to them in any way is subtly and sometimes unfortunately, not so subtly, destroyed.  At the very least their detractors are accused of being, shock-horror, anti-Semitic with all the attendant stigma this terminology carries.  Anti-Semitism is closely related and linked to Nazism in the minds of most people today.  The immense power of propaganda, social engineering and mind control should be underestimated only at one’s peril.

“We must distinguish between political and racial anti-Semitism.  It’s obvious that organized Jewry has a political program synonymous with the Rothschild satanic world government agenda.”  Henry Makow, Jewish-born researcher and author of ‘A Cruel Hoax’.

Think about this for a moment.  Political criticism is valid today (at least for now anyway) whilst racial criticism (racism) is totally frowned upon and even legislated against.  In making their cause a racial rather than a political one by rendering the two distinctly separate terms ‘Jewish’ and ‘Zionist’ interchangeable, they have succeeded in duping the world and protecting their own insidious views and actions from any form of censure on pain of being branded by them as an anti-Semite and therefore by implication, a Nazi sympathiser.

So, an ‘anti-Semite’ strictly speaking, by definition is someone who discriminates against people of the area known as the ‘Holy Land’, Palestinian Arabs and Sephardic Jew alike and not simply someone who is a ‘Jew-hater’ as it has been engineered to be construed.

Personally speaking, I am not anti-Semitic (or anti-Jewish, to be clear).  Jews have been duped and suffered at the hands of these wolves in sheep’s clothing more than any other group and in many ways still are.  I believe strongly in the freedom of all to do as they choose as long as it harms no-one, but I am definitely anti-Zionist politically, as their actions and beliefs are calculated to cause maximum harm to those who do not share their fascist, racist views.  However, the views expounded herein will no doubt have me labelled as anti-Semitic by the Zionist attack-dogs.  If anti-Semitism did not exist, the Zionists would have to invent it.  Actually, they already have done so.

Of course there are anti-Jewish people in the world (anti-Semites if you will).  To deny that fact would be ridiculous.  But there are also anti-British, anti-American, anti-Muslim and anti-almost-anything-you-can-name elements abounding throughout the world today, too.  However, in my view it is highly significant that to be anti-anything-else does not carry the same stigma as being ‘anti-Semitic’.  This has been successfully inured into our culture to become a heinous act far more serious than any other form of prejudice.

But the Zionists are not content with merely labelling you or I as a ‘Nazi’ for any criticism, overt or implied, of their actions and policies.  No, by using their enormous influence over western societies and governments alike it has now actually become illegal not just to deny that the holocaust of WWII took place but to even question their sacred number of 6 million dead.  Yes you did read that correctly, it is illegal in the Zionist-controlled EU where communitarian European law now trumps that of each individual nation, Canada, USA and Australia / New Zealand (amongst other places) to question the myths and legends of the holocaust on pain of a mandatory prison sentence.  Although you could not actually be prosecuted in the UK for holocaust denial, a UK citizen can certainly be extradited to Germany to face charges even if the ‘offence’ was committed for example, in England.

Please now think a moment on this point; if anything is the truth, why would it need to be protected by law?  If something, anything is the truth then it is surely a simple matter to prove it, is it not?  If this is not the case, then the question needs to be asked why this course is not taken rather than passing laws to protect a point of view.

Is it illegal to question or criticise any aspect of Christianity or Muslim culture?  Is it illegal to question the numbers of American dead in Vietnam or the numbers of British soldiers killed in Afghanistan or even the victims of 9/11 for example?  Is it actually specifically illegal to simplyquestion anything else at all?  You may well be unjustly criticised by your masters and even your peers for having the sheer audacity to question Government-supplied figures, but illegal?  The spirit of ‘1984’ and the ‘thought-police’ is alive and well.

“You can tell if something’s the truth or not by this one criterion.  If they pass a law that says you have to believe a certain story in a certain way, you can be certain that that certain story they’re trying to get you to believe is a lie.”   John Kaminski, researcher, ‘A Certain Truth’, 28th January 2011.

“What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?”   John Swinton, editor New York Times, 1863.

“What they did with their holocaust laws was to make the questioning of their version of what happened during ‘the war’ sacrosanct and undeniable.  What this means is that it doesn’t matter how many irrefutable facts you may have, the law says you can’t question, period.  This fact escapes many people.  You are not allowed to mount a defence and it is inadmissible in any and all cases.”  Les Visible, researcher, April 2011.

Stifling open discussion and debate also does a gross injustice to the other, many non-Jewish victims of the Nazi concentration camps; the Romany people, black people, Polish and Russian soldiers and citizens, Jehovah’s Witnesses, assorted political prisoners, homosexuals and the mentally and physically disabled.  It marginalises the slave labourers starved, beaten and worked to death in German war industries and the horrors suffered by anyone expressing anti-Nazi views.

The real threat to the Zionists posed by ‘deniers’ is that others might be influenced to undertake further in-depth study and uncover embarrassing facts that would refute Israel’s ‘victim’ status.  This would threaten Israel’s moral legitimacy, underpinned by the world’s supposed, collective  shame for looking the other way.  All it takes to invoke that shame is the term ‘anti-Semite’, either stated or implied.

The previously well-respected British historian, David Irving was first labelled a Neo-Nazi and then jailed for 3 years in the last decade for daring to question ‘official’ holocaust dogma – all at the behest of the Elite, Zionist thought-police through their corrupt and controlled legal and courts systems.  In fact, most such ‘revisionist’ historians are of the opinion that Irving does not go far enough with his questions regarding the validity of the Zionists claims.  Irving merely publicly queried the 6 million number, not the event itself.

“If the Holocaust undoubtedly occurred as alleged, then why are laws needed to support said allegations?  Why not simply confront deniers with facts instead?  Recent court cases in Germany have shown that judges are unwilling (unable?) to present facts; they hide behind ‘Offenkundigkeit’ (obviousness).  Their claim: The Holocaust obviously happened, so there’s no need to substantiate it any further.  In any other trial, ‘obviousness’ would not stand up in court; the defendant is always allowed to present his/her evidence.  One has to also wonder why, if all is ‘obvious,’ this book had to be written?  If the Holocaust has been investigated and evidence exists proving without any doubt that mass murder was committed, then why not present this evidence — why the laws?”  Inconvenient History, 18th February, 2011.

On 13th May 1988 the historian, Professor Ernst Zündel was sentenced by Judge Ronald Thomas of the District Court of Ontario, in Toronto, to nine months in prison for having distributed a revisionist booklet entitled, ‘Did Six Million Really Die?’

 “No-one in the USA was more knowledgeable about the functioning of [penitentiary] gas chambers than Fred A. Leuchter, an engineer from Boston.  I went to visit Leuchter on February 3 and 4, 1988 and found that he had never asked himself any questions about the ‘gas chambers’ in the German camps.  He had simply believed in their existence.  After I began to show him my files, he became aware of the chemical and physical impossibility of the German ‘gassings’ and he agreed to examine our documents in Toronto.

 

After that, at Zündel’s expense, he left for Poland with a secretary (his wife), a draftsman, a video-cameraman and an interpreter.  He came back and drew up a 192-page report (including appendices).  He also brought back 32 samples taken, on the one hand, from the crematories of Auschwitz and Birkenau at the site of the homicidal ‘gassings’ and, on the other hand, in a disinfection gas chamber at Birkenau.  His conclusion was simple: there had never been any homicidal gassings at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Majdanek.”  Robert Faurisson, historian

 “After reviewing all of the material and inspecting all of the sites at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, your author finds the evidence as overwhelming.  There were no execution gas chambers at any of these locations.  It is the best engineering opinion of this author that the alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have then been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.” Fred Leuchter 1988, p.33; Leuchter et al 2005, p.57

Dr. Fredrick Töben, an Australian scholar and educator, was taken into custody in Mannheim, Germany on 8th April 1999 and detained without bail, for having disputed holocaust extermination allegations.  Töben is a leading holocaust revisionist writer and publicist in Australia, where he founded and directed the Adelaide Institute, a prominent revisionist research and publishing centre.

At the conclusion of his three-day trial on 10th November 1999, a Mannheim district court found Töben guilty on charges of incitement to racial hatred, insulting the memory of the dead and public denial of genocide, because he had disputed holocaust extermination claims in writings sent to persons in Germany.  Presiding Judge Klaus Kern said that there is no doubt that Töben is guilty of ‘denying the holocaust’ and that because there is no sign that he would relent his views and activities, a prison sentence was required.  The court then sentenced him to ten months imprisonment.

Taking into consideration the seven months he had already served in custody, Judge Kern ruled that Töben could be released on payment of a fine of DM6000 (about US$3500 or £2500) in lieu of the three months remaining of his prison sentence.  German sympathisers raised this money and he was freed within 24 hours of the verdict.

A really disturbing neo-Orwellian by-product of Töben’s imprisonment was that his defence lawyer was also indicted for the same ‘offence’ merely for having the audacity to attempt to defend him.  So, to be clear, apparently not only is it a crime to merely question the supposed ‘truth’ and put forward an opposing viewpoint, it is also by implication now a crime to attempt to legally defend someone who has committed this so-called crime.  Would we condemn the legal defender of a murderer or other criminal in this way as being complicit in their crimes?  Absolutely not.  Truly outrageous I am sure you will agree.

How can a political opinion, especially when backed by factual evidence be treated as a crime in the civilised society in which we are supposed to live?  Sadly, the answer is that we do not live in a civilised society any longer, if indeed we ever have done so.  We exist in a quasi-police state, governed by dupes and shills whose sole aims are to fulfil the whims and orders of their Elite masters whilst totally subjugating its own citizens and eliminating all forms of dissent in any way deemed necessary either within or if necessary, outside the laws of the land.  Even if all these ‘dissenters’ are genuinely mistaken, after rationally considering all the evidence, surely prison is not the answer to so-called ‘thought-crimes’ and differences of opinion.  However, what was good enough for the Nazis….!

Step by step, this is how we are being slowly but surely condemned ultimately to a life of slavery under the Elite, Zionist jackboot.  Amazing is it not how the people who dare to question or speak out against their blatant lies, deceptions, statements, proclamations and motives have somehow become the ‘Nazis’, the ‘terrorists’ or whatever other label they wish to pin on them, thus enabling the guilt to be deflected from themselves onto their detractors and by so doing give them an inside track through to their ultimate goals, virtually unchallenged?  I would suggest that the holocaust, playing the role it was originally designed to play, has been another major leap down the route of fulfilling their sadistic agenda.

However, for the biggest ‘shock to the system’ and de-bunk of all the propaganda and lies disseminated by the Zionists and the Nazis, it is necessary to backtrack a little once again, to the mid-1930s.

The simple truth is that the Zionists in their quest to set-up a Jewish homeland in Palestine were funded covertly by the Nazis.  Yes, you did read that correctly.  Captured SS records after the war documented an agreement between the SS and the Haganah, the forerunner of the Israeli Defence Force (IDF).  Under this arrangement the Haganah was permitted to run training camps for Jewish youths inside Germany.  These young people, as well as other Jews driven out of Germany by the Nazis, were financially encouraged to immigrate to Palestine.

Haganah, in return, agreed to provide the SS with intelligence about British activities in Palestine.  Captured German records claim that Haganah’s view was that the increasingly brutal Nazi persecution of the Jews could be turned to Zionist advantage, at least temporarily, by compelling Jewish immigration to Palestine and that the Haganah commander’s sole source of income was by way of secret funds from the SS.  Thus, German brutality against and repression of the Jews wasopenly encouraged by Zionists.

It is also known that the Nazi regime actually offered all of Europe’s Jews to the Zionist leadership, unharmed on condition that they were re-settled somewhere outside Europe.  For instance, Madagascar was proposed at one stage but this was turned down out of hand by the Zionists on the basis that several million dead Jews would be more likely to fulfil their twisted agenda than several million merely displaced ones.

European Jews were in fact betrayed by the Zionist leadership.  Zionists collaborated with the Nazis to victimise and expel Jews and conspired to manipulate the facts of the holocaust in order to strengthen the case for a Jewish homeland through sympathy for ‘Jewish suffering’.  Furthermore, Zionists in effect were responsible for the creation of Hitler as a ‘bogeyman’ to fulfil the role of the persecutor of the Jews, simply in order to build up a strong case for a Jewish homeland.

The vast majority of German Jews vehemently rejected Zionism as an enemy from within as they saw themselves as Germans, first and foremost.  80,000 German Jews had fought in the trenches of WWI and 12,000 died.  “Nowhere was the opposition of Jews to Zionism so widespread, principled and fierce as in Germany.” a Zionist historian wrote.

In order to manipulate Jews into leaving for Palestine, Germans had to be painted with a racist nationalist ideology just like Zionism and in fact, Julius Streicher and other Nazis admitted that their ‘Master Race’ ideology was modelled on Zionism.  Through their bogus, contrived ‘conflict’, Zionism and Nazism were subsequently able to advance the Elite goal of establishing a private army, secret service and nuclear arsenal in Israel.

Past Jewish suffering at the hands of these Elite-controlled Zionists, exhibits parallels with today.  Their leadership was usurped by Freemasons (ie. Zionism is a Masonic order) bent on sacrificing them to advance the grand plan and now we are all in the same situation.  The banksters today are using debt to disinherit and enslave us.   Bush, Clinton, Obama, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg, Sarkozy et al are all 33rd degree Freemasons who agreed to assume trillions of dollars of ‘debt’ on behalf of us all, from the Elite masonic banksters who are in reality all working towards the same ends.

A contemporary example of how Zionist symbolism infiltrates and influences almost all of our lives on a daily basis can be seen in the case of the official logo of the London 2012 Olympic Games.

Although it cannot be proven beyond doubt that this is another example of our arrogant Zionist leaders mocking the ordinary people of the world as they continue to covertly act against our best interests, I believe there to be a strong chance that this is the case.  People of the ilk of the openly Zionist, Lord Sebastian Coe (former athlete and now the British 2012 Olympics chief) and all senior politicians are merely puppets of the Zionist Elite, lapdogs to their every whim.

If our so-called leaders represented the interests of the ordinary people, they would let banks fail as they did in Iceland and default on all debt created by banksters out of ‘thin air’.  This is a warning to us all and we will continue to be permanently enslaved (and much worse) as long as we continue to elect and accept leaders who are 100% in league with the Elite-Zionists.

 

 

The Holocaust – the real truth

Firstly, a short quiz for you:

Question 1.  How many British died in World War II?

Question 2.  How many Americans died in World War II?

Question 3.  How many Germans died in World War II?

Question 4.  How many Russians died in World War II?

Question 5.  How many people died in World War II in total, to the nearest 10 million?

How are you doing so far?  Not too well I suspect.  OK let’s make it a little easier…

Question 6.  How many Jews died in World War II?

So, you scored one out of six then?

How do I know?  Could it be because since as long as all post-war generations can remember, we have had this almost sacred figure of six million dead Jews constantly force-fed to us until it has become indelibly imprinted in our psyche and woven deeply within the very fabric of our culture to such an extent that it has become unthinkable that it may be inaccurate?

“The Western World has been inundated with Holocaust documentaries, Holocaust movies, Holocaust museums, Holocaust books, and Holocaust curriculums.  The aim?  To immunise Jewry and Israel from valid criticism and most conveniently, to obscure the Allied war crimes perpetrated against millions of German civilians.  Perhaps the ‘Holocaust fatigue’ now infecting German youth will create a thirst for what REALLY happened during World War II and an appreciation of their own, factually-substantiated, Holocaust.  And that, ironically to say, will be a very ‘inconvenient’ history lesson for world Jewry.”  Brother Nathanael Kapner, October 2011.

Actually, you were also wrong with your answer to question no. 6.

Six million is quite easily proven as false and this is not just mere supposition or statistical juggling on my part or on the part of any other serious researcher on the topic.  Consider this for a moment:

In the 1950s a plaque was placed at the entrance to the ‘death camp’ at Auschwitz.  Firstly, it categorically stated that 4.1 million Jews died there.  Then some time later it was surreptitiously replaced with one denoting a figure of 2.6 million.  Now, the plaque has been changed again to claim that ‘about 1.5 million’ ‘mainly’ Jews died in Auschwitz and discussions are already being mooted to decide whether or not this figure should be further lowered to around 700,000.  Is it not strange indeed then that these reductions never seem to be deducted from the sacrosanct 6 million total still quoted and treated as indisputable today?  Meticulously administered, independently audited Red Cross figures after the war had ended, stated that around 280,000 European Jews actually perished from all causes including ‘old age’ during the war whilst noting the fact that the Jewish population of Europe actually increased by around half a million between 1939 and 1945.  How strange.  However in the mid-1990s the Red Cross, of course by this time now totally infiltrated and controlled by Zionists anyway, ‘apologised’ for its previous statement.

In answer to question 5 above, although figures vary somewhat, my research has led me to conclude that approximately 65-75 million people in total, lost their lives in this hideous conflict, so it seems incredibly strange to me that we are meant to honour and laud one tiny percentage of that figure and ignore the other 60 or 70 million that died the most futile of deaths in a war waged to secure a Jewish homeland amongst other reasons.  Perhaps all those other people’s lives were not as important?  Yes, that must be the reason.

For well over six decades now, the world has been held under political blackmail with the story of the slaughter of millions of Jews in the gas chambers of the Third Reich and this has received the full treatment of the Zionist propaganda machine, primarily via Hollywood and the media, which still continues to this day in the form of the seemingly endless and  innumerable ‘holocaust’ and WWII movies and documentaries emphasising the suffering of the ‘six million’ and the brutality of the Germans, still being relentlessly churned-out.  Apparently, there are ‘over one million Jewish survivors’ of the death camps still living today (2011), 70 years after the event and still claiming reparations payments from Germany whilst Germany’s own Zionist leadership happily continues to fund them.

From whence did all these ‘millions’ originate when it is known for certain and recorded by several independent and impartial sources that there were only 500,000 Jews in Germany prior to the war and only approximately two million in total in the countries bordering Germany?

In fact this was not the first time that similar ‘holocaust’ stories have been propagated by these people.  There are literally dozens of other examples.  In the Talmud (the Jewish holy book), Gittin 57b claims that four million Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar.  Gittin 57b also claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans.  Thirdly and more recently, the precise figure of 6 million saw light of day for the first time shortly after WWI.  “Six million [Jewish] men and women are dying” in the Ukraine, announced The American Hebrew periodical on the 31st October 1919, the very same claim that the Zionists made twenty-odd years later.  It would appear that the tendency for extreme exaggeration, if not downright lies, remains alive and well in certain quarters.

The Zionists actually thought that Israel would become a reality immediately following WWI, due to the Balfour Declaration’s promise of Palestine in exchange for America entering into the war against Germany.  And since Jewish Talmudic prophecy demands that there be a ‘6 million’ holocaust offering prior to the Jews returning to the Promised Land, it was incumbent upon them to fabricate the holocaust in order for the prophecy to materialise.  The Talmud calls for cleansing the ‘chosen souls’ through the sacrifice of ‘6 million’ (that ever-popular figure again) in ‘burning ovens’, since unclean souls could not be allowed to return to the Promised Land.   That alone is the real source of the ‘6 million’ myth, as well as the myth of the ‘ovens.’

However, Britain was unable to deliver Palestine to the Zionists as promised by Arthur Balfour in 1917, since Palestine was still governed by Turkey at this time.  It took another twenty years and another World War to fulfil Balfour’s illegal promise.  The original 6 million lie was allowed to die a silent death once it was realised that the Homeland would have to be postponed, only to be resurrected again during WWII, prior to the entry of America into the conflict.  The exact same claim about 6 million Jews dying was made, as part of the propaganda to once again force America to enter a war in which it had no stake-holding whatsoever.

“Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s ‘The Second World War’ (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954) and the Mémoires de Guerre de General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959).  In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.   Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de Guerre is 2,054 pages.  In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers’, a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”  Dr. Robert Faurisson, historian and historical document expert

“It is certain that if there had been ‘killing factories’ in Europe murdering millions of civilians, then the Red Cross, the Pope, humanitarian agencies, the Allied governments, neutral governments and prominent figures such as Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill, Eisenhower and many others would have known about it and would have often and unambiguously mentioned it and condemned it.  They didn’t.  Winston Churchill wrote the six volumes of his monumental work, ‘The Second World War,’ without mentioning a program of mass-murder and genocide.  Maybe it slipped his mind?  Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his memoir ‘Crusade in Europe,’ also failed to mention gas chambers.  Was the weapon used to murder millions of Jews unworthy of a passing reference?  Was the future President being insensitive to Jews?”  Unknown source

Moreover, there are apparently no media references to any ‘holocaust’ of any kind nor radio, film newsreel or newspaper stories until towards the end of the war when the myth had been propagated and was just beginning to gain momentum.  Is it really credible that this supposed heinous act was taking place so openly without the knowledge of the Allies and their vast intelligence network in Europe at that time?  I believe not.  Had it really been happening, the Allied propaganda machine against the Germans would have been cranked-up into overdrive and stories of the atrocities would have been widespread.  Why would the Allies need false stories of German atrocities if there were real ones to be had?  The railway lines to and from the ‘death camps’ would also have been destroyed, especially in the latter stages of the war when the Allies were attacking targets both military and civilian all over Germany and Eastern Europe with impunity and with little danger of retaliatory attacks due to German defences being in total disarray or non-existent.  In fact the transport trains themselves were often the victims of Allied attacks and many Jews died as a result of these.

Auschwitz has become synonymous with the holocaust, as the place of methodical extermination of the Jews.  Such is the power of propaganda that if anything, true or false, is repeated often enough and forcefully enough, it becomes accepted without any real attempt to verify the facts.  Surely ‘they’ would not lie to us on this scale would they?  Errr, yes they would, actually and ‘they’ have done so many, many times over the millennia.

Could such an alleged house-of-horrors as Auschwitz is popularly depicted have been equipped with (for the use of the inmates) a post office, a library, a theatre complete with its own resident orchestra, a hospital staffed by 20 Jewish doctors and 300 nurses complete with an intensive care unit and operating theatre?  There was also a swimming pool where inmate swimming galas were known to have been regularly organised in the summer months and the camp also staged regular soccer matches complete with its own mini-leagues?  There was also a fully-equipped court room for the trial of prisoners accused of misdemeanours.  Strange is it not that the Germans would actually bother with trials when they were supposedly randomly murdering millions of people indiscriminately and without need of a trial?  How about brothels too?  Auschwitz is known to have had a brothel for the inmates staffed by female Jews and as it was illegal and punishable by death for a non-Jewish German to have sexual relations with a Jew, this could hardly have been a facility for the use of the SS guards.  Indeed, they had their own similar ‘facility’ in any event, populated by good Aryan stock.

Are we also supposed to believe that the thousands of babies and children survivors from Auschwitz and other ‘death camps’, would not have immediately been selected for extermination upon arrival at the camp as we are told over and over in Zionist propaganda that the only ones to survive the ‘selection’ process were ones who were able to contribute to the Nazi war effort?  They could hardly have been used as work-horses for the Nazi war machine as were the other survivors, yet many survived.  For example, take the case of Anne Frank of ‘diary’ fame.  She was sent to Bergen-Belsen a so-called ‘death camp’ in late 1944 where she lived for at least two months before finally succumbing to Typhus along with many thousands of others.  As a (by this time) very sickly fifteen year old girl, surely she should not have survived the ‘selection’ process.

Indeed, all the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the Jewish inmates were not able to work but nevertheless were not killed.  For example, an internal German telex message dated 4th September 1943, from the chief of the Labour Allocation department of the SS Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of approximately 25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates, some 21,000+ or about 85 percent, were unable to work.

In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm counter-measures.  The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated 28th December 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps.  It sharply criticised the high death rate of inmates due to disease and ordered that “…camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps.”  Furthermore, it ordered:  “The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp commandants … The camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labour places are improved as much as possible… The Reichsfuhrer SS [Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced.”

Official camp regulations also make it abundantly clear that Auschwitz was not an extermination centre.  They stated:

“New arrivals are to be given a thorough medical examination and if there is any doubt about their health, they must be sent to quarantine for observation. 

 

Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp physician.  If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to a hospital for professional treatment.

 

The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply.  Any deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.

 

Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.

 

Prisoners who are to be released or transferred must first be brought before the camp physician for medical examination.”

 

Not exactly what one would expect of a ‘death camp’ is it?  The truth is that Auschwitz-Birkenau was in fact a labour camp (the preserved sign over the entrance is somewhat of a clue, the almost Orwellian – ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ – work makes you free) and included many different races, religions and political persuasions.  There is no dispute that many thousands of people died miserably in Auschwitz and all the other so-called ‘death camps’ before, during and after the war, some possibly even from the alleged callous Nazi experimentation at the hands of the so-called ‘Dr. Death’, Dr. Mengele, but the simple fact is that no-one died in gas chambers.

A problem that always faces any group of people living in unsanitary conditions, severe privation or close confinement is lice and the multitude of diseases they cause.  Auschwitz and the neighbouring camp at Birkenau had a serious outbreak of typhus in the summer of 1942, during which many people died, both inmates and guards.  To contain the outbreak, the ‘gas chambers’ were used for disinfection of the inmates’ clothes using the ‘Zyklon B’ disinfectant.  And towards the end of the war when the German nation was on the point of collapse, the fact that the transportation system was in disarray – as a result incidentally of the Allies indiscriminate carpet-bombing of civilian road and rail transport links, totally contrary to the Geneva Convention – and that no supplies of any kind, neither food nor medical assistance were getting through, only exacerbated the situation.  Hundreds, if not thousands of innocents subsequently died of starvation and hunger-related diseases (on both sides of the divide).

“Mike’s real name was Olitsky and he was a Lithuanian Jew who’d fled into Germany to escape Stalin’s Red Army.  He wound up in Dachau for four years.  He inadvertently introduced me to Holocaust ‘revisionism’ when I ventured to ask him about his experience.  He shrugged and said, ‘It was a factory.  We worked during the day and stayed in a dormitory at night’.  ‘But what about the, uh, the…‘?  ‘The what?’  ‘You know, the killings’.  ‘I never saw any of that’.  Four years in Dachau, never saw any of that?  OK, he did see the US Army ‘liberate’ the camp in April, 1945.  The SS and Alpine troops recuperating there had negotiated surrender to the Americans, who entered the camp and started shooting the guys who thought they were surrendering.  Then the Americans marched the surviving soldiers (all the prison guards had fled days earlier) up to a wall near the hospital and set up a machine gun.  Three hundred and forty-six German soldiers on R&R [rest and recuperation] were slaughtered in a few minutes, five hundred and twenty in all, that morning.”  J. Bruce Campbell, ‘Veterans Today’

I am afraid it is all an elaborate hoax.  We have all been ‘propagandised’ and duped over the decades into believing that 6 million Jews were systematically and brutally exterminated by a Jew-hating race (the Germans) for no other reason than their religion (race).

“Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the number one weapon in Israel’s propaganda armoury would disappear.”  Prof. William Rubinstein, Melbourne University.

The enormity of this utter lie and the abundant evidence available to counter it, is so overwhelmingly huge that I barely know where to start.  However, here are a few simple facts to consider (in no particular order):

Many detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979.  These photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematoria chimneys or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly alleged and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz had been the busy extermination centre it is alleged to have been, despatching thousands of Jews daily.

The Germans were known as an efficient race and indeed still are.  They were the kind of people who meticulously and methodically documented every single action they took.  Why then amongst the hundreds of tonnes of official Nazi documents recovered after the end of the war is there not a single document in existence that even alludes to the ‘final solution’ being a genocide of the Jews?  Could it have been because the Germans destroyed them all before they could fall into Allied hands?  This I believe is highly unlikely.  Surely at least one or two would have evaded destruction as with many other incriminating policy documents that were painstakingly unearthed by the Allies.

Then could it have been because the Germans did not document their policy of genocidal gassings for fear of it being discovered after the war?  Also unlikely in the extreme.  At the time the ‘final solution’ was allegedly proposed at the Wannsee conference in January 1941, the Germans were comfortably winning the war and it is simply unrealistic to assume that they considered that they would ever end up, let alone forward plan for being, on the losing side.  Indeed, war crimes trials were the last thing they would ever consider as there was no such concept until 1946.  War crimes trials had never been utilised to deal with the losers in past wars.  The Nazis had no reason to try to create an illusion for posterity because they thought they were going to be posterity.  They never, ever imagined that they would need to answer to anyone for anything they did and yet are we now supposed to believe that even in 1941 they were planning ahead to a post-war era in which it would be necessary to cover up their actions?

“The ‘Final Solution’ spoken of in the German documents was a program of evacuation, resettlement, and deportation of Jews with the ultimate objective of expulsion from Europe.  During the war, Jews of various nationalities were being moved east, as one stage in this Final Solution.  The legend claims that the movements were mainly for extermination purposes.”  Arthur Butz, ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century’.

“If there were documents covering the whole sequence of events, then there would be no such thing as revisionism.  The problem is that the documents one would expect to find do not exist.  We have documents relating to every aspect of the war, including every aspect of the holocaust, except for the gassing of the Jews.  It is not possible to gas six million people, or to do anything else involving millions of people, without leaving a paper trail.  If the gassing happened, there would be thousands of documents to verify it, starting with the planning stages and continuing throughout the course of events.  But no such paper trail exists.”   geniebusters.org

On the contrary in fact, a paper-trail making the whole scenario impossible does exist and more of that shortly.

If there were photographs of the entire sequence of events, including photographs of piles of corpses in gas chambers, then the question would be a non-issue and revisionism would not even be an issue.  That would absolutely and definitively settle the matter immediately.  The problem is that no such pictures exist.  We have photographs of every aspect of World War II, including every aspect of the ‘holocaust’, except for the gassing of the Jews.  There are photographs of Jews being coerced on to the trains, disembarking from the trains, photographs of Jews in the camps and photographs of bodies in mass graves and piled in heaps on the ground (many of which incidentally are the remains of German soldiers and civilians murdered by starvation by the Allies after the war), but there are no photographs at all of anyone being gassed, thus rendering all the other evidence merely circumstantial.  We already know that the Nazis transported thousands of Jews (and others) in cattle wagons and we already know that there were piles of bodies at camps after outbreaks of disease and extreme food shortages.  We also know that Jews were taken to de-lousing facilities and made to undress en-masse, so what exactly do these photographs prove, I would venture to ask?

I recently sat through the full ten hours of the ‘epic’ 1970s, supposedly definitive, but in my view frankly risible, Hollywood docu-drama cum Zionist propaganda-piece ‘Holocaust’, for research purposes – not in a single-sitting I may add, I value my sanity a little more than that.  This abject piece of over-sentimentalised, corny, nonsensical, melodramatic drivel actually ‘won’ no less than eight ‘Emmys’ (TV’s equivalent of ‘Oscars’) – hardly surprising really when we take into account who runs the TV and film industry, I suppose.  Its historical inaccuracies are legion but that does not really matter as it serves its purpose extremely well in aiding the re-writing of modern history and the propagandising of the masses.  Indeed, I would argue that it was this series that was responsible almost single-handedly for the propagandisation of my generation, the so-called ‘baby-boomers’, into all things ‘holocaust’, such was the impact that the programme made upon western society.

In one of the last scenes, at or near the end of the war, the fictional character SS Major Erik Dorf played by the American actor Michael Moriarty, is confronted by his American captors who show him a sequence of photographs depicting the various stages of the supposed extermination process.  Dorf is shown photographs of the Jews being rounded-up, deported on the trains, being ‘selected’ for gassing, being led to the ‘gas chambers’ and undressing, all of which are shown ‘on camera’ and then… whilst his American interrogator is saying ‘being gassed’ the camera immediately cuts from the series of photographs to the horrified face of the Dorf character and then immediately resumes the photographic sequence… bodies being moved to the crematoria etc. etc.  Obviously and unfortunately for them, the Zionist/Jewish producers of this slick piece of propaganda, unsurprisingly as there are none, could not find one single appropriate photograph for this particular part of the alleged event.

What about the thousands (millions?) of eye-witnesses though?  Not only were 6 million Jews supposedly exterminated but there also, even in the second decade of the twenty first century, more than 70 years after the event, seems to be many millions more ‘survivors’ still alive.  Incredible really when there were only probably a maximum of 4 million Jews in the entire continent of Europe in 1939 according to official, audited Red Cross figures.

1) There are also six other important points that need to be made about so-called witnesses to the events. The witnesses are far from consistent in their allegations.  Some witnesses said nothing at all about gas chambers.  For example, Jan Karski wrote a report in the autumn of 1942 in which he stated that he visited the camp at Belzec to investigate rumours of extermination.  He said that Jews were being killed by electrical shocks in a room with a metallic floor and in 1944, he published a book in which he said that the Jews were being loaded into wagons filled with quicklime and left to die outside the camp.  Neither the article nor the book says anything about gas chambers.  And of course, the ‘official’ history of Belzec says nothing about electrical shocks or wagons filled with quicklime.  We are now supposed to believe that the Jews at Belzec were killed in gas chambers but Jan Karski, who was there at the time (so he said), said nothing at all about gas chambers.

2) Many witness testimonies about gas chambers do not stand up to close examination.  For example, one of the most well-known witnesses quoted as an authoritative source is Dr. Miklos Nyiszli, the supposed author of ‘Auschwitz, a Doctor’s Eyewitness Account’.  Dr. Nyiszli did actually exist.  He was a Hungarian doctor who was sent to Birkenau (not Auschwitz), where he worked in the pathology laboratory under the command of the infamous Dr. Josef Mengele.  After the war, he testified at the Nuremburg trials and he died in 1949, his book being published in 1951.  Throughout the book, the author says he was in Auschwitz and that there were four crematoria at Auschwitz.  In fact, there was one crematorium at Auschwitz, and four at Birkenau. Obviously anyone who was there would know that and also they would doubtless know which camp was which.  At the end of the book (page 206), in the section describing the evacuation of Auschwitz in the January of 1945, the author says:

“We left, filled with the feverish sensation of liberation.  Direction: the Birkenau KZ, two kilometres from the crematoriums.”

Dr. Nyiszli certainly did not leave Auschwitz and go in the direction of Birkenau as he was already in Birkenau.  This is one of the most glaring impossibilities in a book full of much impossibility and as a result of this I would strongly suggest that this book was not written by Dr. Nyiszli at all.  It certainly could not have been written by anyone who was there and yet this book is cited by apologists as one of the most authoritative of all witness statements.

 

3) Witness testimony alone proves nothing.  Suppose a hundred thousand witnesses claim that something happened, does that constitute absolute proof that it happened?  There are probably more than one hundred thousand people who have ‘seen a UFO’ at one time or another in the last fifty years.  Does that prove that flying saucers exist?  Our Elite run and controlled media would say ‘definitely not’ in that example yet there are thousands of people who say they have not only seen UFOs, they have been abducted into them.  They will tell you in vivid detail about their experiences and these people have no obvious motive for lying, unlike holocaust ‘survivors’.

4)  Witnesses can easily be ‘bought’ and influenced by the promise of large amounts of money in the form of ‘holocaust reparations’ and it is my firm view that this is exactly what enticed most of them.  It is also fairly easy to convince someone that an event happened in a certain way and encourage them to link these fictional events to their own experiences.  This will then have the effect of creating a false memory which over time becomes more and more embellished until that person actually believes those events really happened.

5)  To the contrary, many former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of extermination at Auschwitz at all.  For example, an Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988.  She was interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced labourer.  On the long train journey to the camp, a gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz.  Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower.  The terrified women were sure that they were about to die, but then instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads – to their enormous relief.

Auschwitz was certainly no holiday-camp, Maria confirmed.  She witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by hunger and disease, particularly typhus and more than a few committed suicide.  But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination programme.

A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly being gassed and cremated daily.  She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of ‘gas chambers’ during the time she was interned there.  She heard the gassing stories only later, after the war had ended.

Some Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were even released and returned to their home countries.  If Auschwitz had actually been a top-secret extermination camp, the Germans would certainly not have released inmates who ‘knew’ what was happening in the complex.

6)  Wiesel is one of the most celebrated eye-witnesses to the alleged Holocaust, yet in his supposedly autobiographical book Night, he makes absolutely no mention of gas chambers at all.  He claims instead to have witnessed Jews being burned alive, a story now dismissed by all historians.  Wiesel gives credence to the most absurd stories of other ‘eyewitnesses’ and he spreads fantastic tales of 10,000 Jews sent to their deaths each day in two flaming pits in Buchenwald – one for the adults and another for the children.

… Conventional historians account for the lack of photographs and documents by claiming that the holocaust was so secret that no photographs were ever taken, and no incriminating documents were allowed to exist.  This is supposed to have been true even when the ‘Final Solution’ was in the planning stages, as far back as 1941.  However, Hitler talked about exterminating or annihilating the Jews on many occasions.  For example, here is a sentence from Mein Kampf.  Hitler wrote:

“The nationalisation of our masses will succeed only when, aside from all the positive struggles for the soul of our people, their international poisoners are exterminated.”

So we are supposed to believe that Hitler announced to the world that he would have liked the Jews to be exterminated and yet at the same time went to great lengths to maintain the pretence that they were not being systematically exterminated?  The intention was declared openly, but the action itself was so secret that the Nazis never even discussed it among themselves?  This is abject nonsense akin to clutching at straws I am afraid.

He also said this:

“If at the beginning of the War and during the War twelve or fifteen thousand of these Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas, as happened to hundreds of thousands of our very best German workers in the field, the sacrifice of millions at the front would not have been in vain.  On the contrary, twelve thousand scoundrels eliminated in time might have saved the lives of millions of Germans, valuable for the future.”

At this point the ‘secret’ was now out.  Having broached the idea of gassing the Jews in Mein Kampf, it would make no sense for Hitler to pretend it was not happening, if he was actually doing it, but there is no other reference to gassing in anything else he ever said or wrote.

There are voluminous records of everything Hitler, Himmler, and the other senior Nazis said in public and much of what they said in private and there is no mention of gassing anywhere, even on occasions when they were talking about getting rid of the Jews.  For example, when Himmler addressed a private meeting of the senior officers of the SS (the Poznan speech), even if he wished to refrain from mentioning gassing publicly, he would have felt free to speak plainly at a private meeting of the SS.  But the fact is that nothing was said about gassing, even though he was discussing the transportation of the Jews to concentration camps.

The Nazis were certainly not coy about killing people.  They committed atrocities openly and even flaunted it.  There are pictures of Nazi soldiers shooting Jews (and other prisoners) in cold blood and laughing about it and these pictures were not taken surreptitiously by someone else, they were taken by the Nazis themselves, but we are supposed to believe that the gas chambers were so secret that no photographs were ever taken.   Are we also supposed to believe that it would be possible to cover up an action involving six million people or that they would not openly flaunt the fact that the killings were taking place?  Really?

The mechanics of the extermination process are alleged to have been:

A train-load of Jews arrives at Auschwitz railway station or indeed any other alleged ‘death camp’.  They are then immediately separated into two groups, the so-called ‘selection’ of those who are fit for labour and those who are not.  The latter group is led directly to the gas chambers immediately.  Firstly they enter the changing room, where under protest they are told to remove their clothes and leave behind their possessions.  They are then led into another room, which is ‘mocked-up’ to resemble a shower room or a delousing room.  Once in this room, they are locked-in and gassed using Zyklon B granules poured through an open hatch or window in the roof or the top of the wall, the deadly fumes supposedly emanating from the fake shower-heads or even just simply being poured-in directly.  A few moments later the guards enter, hose down the bodies (the last act of any victim of asphyxiation/gassing apparently is to involuntarily defecate and urinate) and then drag the bodies out and take the saturated bodies to the ovens on handcarts to be cremated and immediately make the gas chambers ready for the next batch of victims to keep the ‘conveyer belt’ rolling.

Firstly the commonly described and widely accepted, casual approach to the manual ‘pouring-in’ of Zyklon B granules is utterly risible.  As will be demonstrated later, this dangerous substance, a) once it is stimulated to produce cyanide gas is absolutely and totally deadly and could not safely be handled by anyone using such a casual approach, even whilst wearing a gas mask and b) in order to make the substance unstable enough to begin vapourising, it has to first of all reach the relatively high temperature of at least 26 degrees Celsius (Centigrade) again unachievable by the simple act of pouring directly from a can by hand.

So, if six million Jews were gassed, this scenario must have been repeated thousands of times.  Even being generous, if on average 100 at a time were gassed (a much higher average figure than claimed), this scene must have played-out sixty thousand times at all the different camps, over a period of several years.

Assuming for purposes of illustration of the point that these were split equally over 10 ‘death’ camps, that is six thousand events per camp and over a time period of 3 years (1942-45).  This means that on average at each camp there were 2000 gassings per year of 100 people at a time.  Break these figures down even further and this produces an average figure of 550 people per day, every day, gassed and cremated for 3 years at every single camp.  I submit that this is totally ludicrous in the extreme and such figures if presented as evidence in any impartial court of law would quite rightly be rejected as nonsensical.  In addition, please consider that these figures only take account of the alleged six million Jews and not all the hundreds and thousands, if not millions of non-Jews said to have suffered the same fate but obviously not emphasised to the same extent.

In 1998 Frederick Töben the historian, visited all the major death camps still in existence in order to inspect the facilities and gather information.  He was not alone.  He also took with him, independent scientists and engineers in order to elicit their opinions about the practicalities of the Zionist claims.  In conjunction with his many years of intensive study of documents and eye-witness testimonies he had already concluded that the collaboration between the Zionist leaders and the Nazis had led to the establishment of the camps in the first place as evacuation or emigration would not produce the Zionists desired results ie. the inception of a Jewish homeland.

Concentration camps were not unique to the Nazis, neither were they their invention.  In the Boer War in South Africa, another manufactured conflict at the behest of the Elite banksters, the British occupiers constructed several camps resulting in the deaths of several hundred thousand Boer men, women and children through disease and malnutrition.  Even in WWII, the Americans herded thousands of Japanese-American citizens into camps as did the Australians with their Japanese residents.  The Swiss also had such camps for refugees from Nazi-occupied Europe.

Worse still, in the aftermath of WWI, Poland built several dozen camps to house the ethnic German residents of the formerly German territories they ‘acquired’ as a result of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919, many of whom suffered terribly from disease and starvation, resulting in hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths of innocents.

However back to the subject in hand, the prisoners of Auschwitz and all its ‘sister’ camps scattered through eastern Germany and eastern Europe, were given rations of 1300-1700 calories per day, according to captured documents and whilst this is nowhere near the standard, modern diet of today especially for those partaking in gruelling physical labour, it is considerably better than the average German citizen received in the last two years of the war.  They were lucky to receive 1000 calories per day and often had to make do with much less.

Töben’s conclusions about the gas chamber scenario may be summarised as follows:

The rooms and buildings named as being those which were used for the executions of millions of people, firstly were easily provable as fakes.  Giveaways such as non-airtight doors, the lack of holes or shafts down which to administer the Zyklon B granules, the lack of any kind of heating equipment to stimulate the emission of the gas, ventilation or extraction systems to deal with the deadly fumes are but a few of the improbabilities, if not downright impossibilities noted by Töben in his research.

For example, are we expected to believe that the gas chamber, open to the public at Auschwitz which is a mere twenty metres from the Commandant’s quarters and the SS dining hall was actually used in anger?  The dangers of this particular arrangement should be apparent to anyone who understands the way hydrogen cyanide gas kills.  Every time the doors were opened, hundreds of cubic metres of deadly fumes would have leaked outside, instantly killing anyone and any other living thing in its path.  There were provably no filtration units to automatically safely disperse or neutralise the ‘used’ gas, either then or now.

The real gas chambers used at Auschwitz, Töben believes were nothing more or less than fumigation chambers for the delousing of clothes and bed sheets.  These are also available for inspection by the public and are placed well away from the inhabited areas of the camp and are fitted, as one would sensibly expect, with all the necessary heating (for the raw granules), pumping and filtration equipment.  However as stated previously, the alleged ‘human’ gas chambers contain no evidence whatsoever of any of this equipment.

Zyklon B was used worldwide in the 1920s, 30s and 40s as a pesticide against rats, fleas and lice.  Its primary reason for being in situ at the camps was to save human lives and not to kill.

After Zyklon B has been used, according to the manufacturer’s own instructions which still survive intact, the room or chamber must be thoroughly aerated for at least 10 hours before entering and gas masks would have been effective for 10 minutes only, before the poison saturated the filters, killing the wearer.  It is also known however, having had access to all supply requisitions, invoices and manifests that there were no gas masks of any kind present at Auschwitz.   Another telling argument against the practicality of its large scale use is that the granules only begin to emit the deadly cyanide gas at a temperature sustained at over 26⁰ Celsius, equivalent to a very hot summer day.  There is no evidence whatsoever that the rooms named as human gas chambers were ever heated at all and Central Europe experiences some bitterly cold winters with temperatures often in double-figures below zero.

Dr. Töben interviewed on film, an Australian expert on crematoria and the disposal of human bodies without actually explaining to him the background reasons for his questions to avoid possibly compromising the answers with pre-existing prejudices of any kind.  The expert maintained several opinions and divulged facts that prove absolutely fatal to the gas chamber myths and legends.

Modern, present day crematoria ovens burn at 800-1000⁰ Celsius (whereas the Auschwitz ovens were probably able to manage around half that temperature with the available technology of 70+ years ago).

One single corpse takes around two hours to burn to ash at this temperature (1000⁰) and even then it does not fully incinerate the bones.  The bones have to be powdered as a further separate exercise.  If the corpse is excessively cold or wet it would take almost twice as long to incinerate.  If two or more corpses were burned together then these times would be increased in ratio.  (Remember that according to the myth, all the bodies were thoroughly hosed-down immediately prior to transportation to the crematoria).

Regarding the oft-cited by so-called eye-witnesses ‘body-burning pits’, simply pouring copious amounts of fuel on a pile of bodies and setting them alight is just simply fiction.  Living and recently deceased bodies contain at least 75% water and this severely impacts on their flammability meaning that witnesses (and there are many, including one of the most feted, Elie Wiesel) who blithely state that they saw the Germans pile thousands of bodies in large pits, liberally dose them with petrol (gasoline) and burn them to ashes in a few hours (some have said 20 minutes!) are nothing less than outright liars and charlatans.

Auschwitz was constructed on extremely wet, marshy land sited as it was at the confluence of three rivers and with an unusually high water table making it impossible to bury bodies in the ground due to the extreme danger of polluting the drinking water, which was extracted from small reservoirs in the surrounding land.  It is this wetland environment that encouraged the proliferation of diseases and the vermin that cause them.  Over 74,000 people, friend and foe were officially recorded as Typhus victims alone at Auschwitz.

It is a well-known scientific principle that a fire needs free oxygen (ie. not oxygen mixed with hydrogen in the form of water) in order to burn and that is one major ingredient that would be completely missing once we go further down than the top-most layer of bodies.  The amount of fuel that would be needed to incinerate one small pit of bodies would probably be considerably more than the entire German army would use in one day, one suspects.  Petrol (gasoline) or indeed any other fuel will always burn itself out long before it has had time to cause combustion in predominantly water-based substances such as human bodies.  And this of course all presupposes that the pits themselves were dry which is of course impossible due to the presence of the aforementioned, abnormally high water-table.  Indeed the whole scenario would be truly laughable were it not so serious a subject.

The crematoria expert also made the point that even in the most fiercely-burning house fires and for example, after an airplane crash, bodies are only superficially charred and not reduced to ash, even after being subjected to direct flames for many hours.

In addition, Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematorium in Calgary, Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremations story is technically impossible.  The allegation that 10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944 in crematoria and open pits is ‘simply preposterous’ and ‘beyond the realms of reality’, he declared under oath.

However, another issue fatal to the credibility of this huge improbability is the absolute impossibility of the disposal of all the bodies in crematoria in the time allowed and by the methods deemed to be used.  A single body according to our expert requires 40kg (90 lbs) of coke to incinerate it whilst still leaving the bones to be disposed of separately.  Put another way, one tonne of coke could incinerate 25 bodies.  If the body was damp or wet then it would require as much as double this amount, so the following facts and figures are all absolutely, exceptionally generous, best-case scenarios.

We know how many tonnes of coke were ordered by the quartermasters at Auschwitz because all the invoices and delivery manifests are all still in existence.  The period of greatest consumption of coke was an 8 month period including the winter of 1942-43, where 641 tonnes of coke were ordered and consumed.   641 tonnes of coke is the equivalent of 16,025 cremations, erring grossly on the generous side.  16,000+ cremations in 8 months and this is the busiest period at by far the largest, most prolific camp?  The numbers simply do not stack-up.  These figures, extrapolated over the three years that the alleged gassings took place, would produce a grand total of 72,000 cremations only.  Furthermore, it is known for a fact that the camp’s heating system and food ovens were coke-fired.  These figures account for no coke being set-aside for use in the heating boilers and the food ovens.

Also, generously assuming that the Zionist-quoted death figures are correct, how were the literally millions of unburned bones destroyed?  There is no evidence whatsoever of any machinery designed to perform this task nor is there any evidence of the requisitioning or delivery of such a machine.

Furthermore, as proof of the reluctance of even bone-dry substances to burn freely and easily, Dr. Töben enlisted the services of a skilled pyrotechnic expert in order to try to replicate, albeit on a much smaller scale, the body-burning pits alleged to have been in use at Auschwitz.  A small drypit was dug – around 0.5 cubic metres in size and in it were placed 4 dry normal size telephone books one on top of the other.  A fire was then set using a liberal amount of a mixture of methylated spirits and highly flammable oil.  The fire burned quite strongly for about 10 minutes then slowly petered-out.  When the pit contents were then examined it could be seen that the top 10% only of the top book had burned, but even then only around the very edges.  When the pages were fully opened, the middle portions were entirely untouched by fire.  So, another attempt was made, this time the proportional equivalent of 1500 litres (totally impossible at Auschwitz) was used and the fire indeed became a raging inferno, albeit a relatively small one.  Twenty minutes passed and again the fire burned itself out.  Even with the air able to circulate freely, less than half of the top book was burned and again the bottom three books remained virtually untouched apart from the exposed edges which were slightly scorched – and all this please remember, was dry paper under totally dry conditions.  Wet bodies upon wet bodies in wet earth would have no chance whatsoever of burning to ashes.

Töben also set-up another experiment, again on film, whereby two volunteers were locked in a tiny room about the size of a small garden shed, complete with a stone surface, upon which a generous amount of hydrogen cyanide (exactly like Zyklon B) granules were manually poured – mere inches from their exposed faces.  They wore no protective clothing, no gas masks of any kind and were locked in the room for a total of two hours.  The room was then unlocked and they casually walked out, laughing and talking as normal.  How is this possible?  It is easily possible when the ambient room temperature is maintained at less than 26⁰ Centigrade.

The granules are only stimulated to produce the deadly gas once this critical temperature is attained.  Until that specific point, the granules are entirely harmless and as the volunteers knew that this temperature would not be reached, they were perfectly happy to take part.

However, let the last words on the subject be these from P. Samuel Foner in ‘The Spotlight’, Volume XIX No. 2, 31st May 2004:

“In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview, Dr. Franciszek Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz State Museum admitted on camera that ‘Krema 1,’ the alleged ‘homicidal gas chamber’ shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by the Soviet Union – apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.

 

What Piper said – in effect and on camera – was that the explosive 1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took place in the buildings designated as ‘homicidal gas chambers’ at Auschwitz.

 

With this admission by none other than the respected head of the Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred ‘facts’ of history has been destroyed.  This ‘gas chamber’ is the major historical ‘fact’ on which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western nations since WWII is based.

 

It is the basis for the $100+ billion in foreign aid the United States has poured into the state of Israel since its inception in 1948 – amounting to $16,500 for every man, woman and child in the Jewish state and billions more paid by Germany in ‘reparations’ – not to mention the constructing of Israel’s national telephone, electrical and rail systems…all gifts of the German people.  It is the basis for the $10 billion ‘loan’ (read ‘gift’) made to Israel for housing its immigrants in the occupied territories… while Americans sleep on the streets and businesses are bankrupted by the thousands.  As of 2004, not a single ‘loan’ of US tax money made to the state of Israel by Washington has ever been paid back.

 

Germany is paying ‘reparations’ – the United States is making major contributions – to atone for the ‘gassings at Auschwitz’ and elsewhere.  If the ‘homicidal gas chambers’ were post-war creations of the Soviets, in which no one was gassed regardless of race, creed, colour or country of national origin, then these ‘reparations’ were unnecessary, and were based on fraud. 

The videotape on which Dr. Piper makes his revelations was made in mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole and follows 12 years of intensive investigation by dozens of historians, journalists and scientists who have tried to get to the bottom of what really happened at Auschwitz.

 

Like most Americans, since his youth, Cole had been instructed in the ‘irrefutable fact’ that mass homicidal gassings had taken place at Auschwitz.  The number of those executed – also declared irrefutable – was 4.1 million.

 

Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988 which was followed with an official ‘re-evaluation’ of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to 1.5 million).  As a budding historian – and a Jew – Cole was intrigued.

 

Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted or questioned the official 4.1 million ‘gassing’ deaths at Auschwitz was labelled an anti-Semite or neo-Nazi at the very least. Quietly, because of revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.5 million.  No mention was made of the missing 2.6 million.

 

The Cole videotape interview proves that the people who run the Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating ‘proofs’ of homicidal gassings.  Keep in mind that over the years millions of tourists have been told that ‘Krema 1′ is in its original state, while officials knew that ‘original state’ is a lie.

 

The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of this proof of no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be measured.  Coupled with the Leuchter Report, the Cole interview with Dr. Piper on videotape proves that what Western governments have taught about the Auschwitz gas chambers since WWII is a lie.  It proves that what televangelists such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have been telling their flocks is simply not true.

 

No one, regardless of race, creed, colour or country of national origin was gassed to death in any building so designated at Auschwitz.  And without ‘homicidal gas chambers’ at Auschwitz, where is the reasoning for the special treatment of the state of Israel?”

Suffice to say that David Cole has been in hiding, in fear of his life for the past, almost 20 years, labelled by the Zionists, as is their custom in these circumstances as a ‘self-hating Jew’.

David Cameron announces cash boost for Holocaust education

Prime Minister David Cameron speaking to survivors at the Holocaust Educational Trust dinner on MondayPrime Minister David Cameron speaking to survivors at the Holocaust Educational Trust dinner on Monday

A new group will investigate ways for future generations in Britain to commemorate the Holocaust, David Cameron has revealed.

The Prime Minister announced the creation of the cross-party, multi-faith commission at the Holocaust Educational Trust’s 25th anniversary dinner in central London on Monday evening.

The group will be led by Jewish Leadership Council chairman Mick Davis, with Mr Cameron hosting its first meeting later this year.

A further £300,000 for Holocaust education will be provided by the government, bringing its total funding of HET’s Lessons from Auschwitz programme to £1.85 million.

PM said a new cross-party commission would look at ways to commemorate the Holocaust

Speaking to the JC, Mr Cameron said setting up the commission had been a “very personal decision” and that there were “vital questions” still to be answered about keeping the memory of the Shoah alive for future generations.

He said: “I want my children and their children to learn about what happened in the Holocaust. But they won’t have Holocaust survivors with them sharing their memories first hand. And for them, the history of the Holocaust will feel increasingly distant and remote.

“This is an issue for Britain’s Jewish community. But it is also, vitally, an issue for our whole society. We have a national duty to fight antisemitism — and to ensure that Britain always remembers and learns from what happened in the Holocaust. That’s why it’s right for me as Prime Minister to take this leading role.”

The commission will look at the possibility of creating a “permanent and fitting” Shoah memorial.

In his speech at the dinner, Mr Cameron said: “It is sickening to have to say this, but today — even in the face of survivors going through the pain and suffering of retelling their stories — there are some who try to deny that it ever happened.

“There are some who try to make excuses for it, who try to draw completely inappropriate parallels with other political causes, or who try to suggest it somehow wasn’t quite as bad as others have said.

“And there are some who, probably with much better intentions, fall into the trap of using loose and lazy language, bandying around the term Holocaust when talking about other things.”

Praising HET’s work, including its collaboration with the Football Association, Mr Cameron said it was important to become “ever more imaginative” in keeping survivors’ stories relevant for British schoolchildren. He held a private meeting ahead of the dinner with four Shoah survivors and also met all 30 survivors who attended.

The Prime Minister said he would visit Auschwitz next year. He will ask the new commission to report back to him ahead of the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Bergen-Belsen in April 2015 following consultations with Jewish communal groups, including the Board of Deputies.

He asked: “Should we do more to record the memories and the testimony of the survivors? Can we learn anything from the memorials and commemorations in other countries — like in America or Germany?

“Earlier this year on a visit to Berlin, I sat in the shadow of the Holocaust museum with my family and first tried to explain to my children the enormity of what happened.”

Mr Cameron concluded: “I believe that remembering for the future is vital for us all. When I visited Yad Vashem in 2006 I wrote that: ‘We owe it to those who died — and those who survived — to build a world in which this can never happen again.’

“That is my pledge. That is why Britain will remember. That is why Britain will never stand by. And that is why I stand here as Prime Minister and say to the survivors here tonight: the past will never die and your courage will never be forgotten.”

dogman Says:

Well then Camoron, why no shrines to any of the following then:
The Soviet Holocaust of Christian Russian Kulak farmers. (1924-1930) – 15 million
The Holocaust of the Ukranian farmers, (1930-1933) – 7 million starved to death.
The Holocaust of Russian political prisoners, (1919-1949) – 12 million perished.
The Pol Pot Communist Holocaust in Cambodia (1975) – 2.5 million slaughtered.
Armenian Holocaust by the Turks, (1915) – 1.5 million people killed.
How about Mao Te Tung & Stalin’s overall totals 60+million & 25+million
Very selective in the use of the term holocaust.
Why does Israel get over $3 billion p.a. from the US?
And last but not least:
More then 40 recorded famines happened in the British Raj.
A total of 60 million Indians starved (British sources)
Shhhh………………bad form to talk about that, don’t you know!

Could there be anything more twisted than these Holocaust fantasists? How more and more people are making up memoirs about witnessing Nazi crimes

By GUY WALTERS

PUBLISHED: 22:17 GMT, 21 June 2013

Joe Corry claims in a book that he was at a death camp that never existed Joe Corry claims in a book that he was at a death camp that never existed

Just four days before the end of the war in Europe, a unit of Canadian soldiers was advancing through a thick forest in the north-east of Holland. Accompanying them was a member of the highly secret British Special Service Unit, a man called Joe Corry.

By any measure, Corry had had an eventful war. He had assassinated a Nazi scientist with a crossbow, watched D-Day from a house on the landing beaches, rescued the nuclear scientist J Robert Oppenheimer (the so-called father of the atom bomb) from Holland, attached limpet mines to U-boats, been shipwrecked off Newfoundland, and had even worked with the future James Bond author, Ian Fleming, himself an intelligence officer.

But despite everything he had seen, nothing could prepare Corry for what he would witness that day. For hidden deep in the forest was a Nazi ‘experimental’ extermination camp, the sight of which would remain with him for ever.

‘The living and dead evidence of horror and brutality beyond one’s imagination was there,’ wrote Corry years later. ‘People were lying, crawling and shuffling about, in stinking ankle-deep mud and human excrement.’

A young girl came up to him, crying for help, but there was little that Corry could do. A rabbi then approached and kissed the back of Corry’s hand, mumbling what Corry could only assume was a prayer.

As Corry walked around the camp, he was presented with increasingly horrific sights, including heaps of corpses and rows of ‘living skeletons’ crammed into blockhouses.

A few days later he returned, and saw two inmates tearing flesh from a long-dead horse and ‘gulping huge bites’.

What Corry saw that day nearly seven decades ago was an all-too-vivid example of the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were murdered on the orders of Adolf Hitler.

No wonder that earlier this year publishers Simon & Schuster jumped at the opportunity to re-issue his extraordinary memoir, first published to little fanfare in 1990.

Herman Rosenblat told Oprah Winfrey that he met his wife when she threw him fruit over a camp fenceHerman Rosenblat told Oprah Winfrey that he met his wife when she threw him fruit over a camp fence

The new edition, out in 2014, has been described by Corry’s editor as ‘everything you’d want to read in a World War II memoir — it’s a gripping, rollercoaster account of extreme bravery and resourcefulness, that also packs a powerful and emotional punch’.

There is, however, just one problem: it simply isn’t true.

There were no such ‘experimental extermination camps’ in Holland, and the concentration camps that had been on Dutch soil had been discovered well before May 4 — the day of the German surrender in Holland.

In fact, nearly everything Corry claims about his wartime experiences is fictitious. There was no ‘Special Service Unit’; Professor Oppenheimer was in the U.S. throughout the war; there were no British troops hiding in houses on the D-Day beaches.

The list of falsehoods is astonishing and blatant. Little wonder that Mike Jones, editorial director of Simon & Schuster, now says: ‘We publish a vast range of non-fiction, and we have acquired the book on the basis of what we are being told.

‘There is no way on earth we would want to publish a book that is inaccurate and is made up. Now this has been brought to our attention by an expert, we shall look into these allegations and we shall talk to the author and agent.’

Binjamin Wilkomirski invented a wartime childhood in Auschwitz Binjamin Wilkomirski invented a wartime childhood in Auschwitz

Sadly, Corry’s tale is part of a growing problem within the publishing industry, which is selling to the public a growing number of ‘memoirs’ about the Holocaust and World War II that should really belong on the shelves marked ‘fiction’.

This issue has been highlighted again by the recent publication of Felix Weinberg’s moving — and genuine — Holocaust memoir, Boy 30529: A Memoir.

Sadly, Professor Weinberg, who taught for many years at Imperial College in London, died before his book came out in April, but he has left not only a powerful piece of documentary record but also a well-aimed blast at unscrupulous ‘survivors’ and their editors. I have always tended to avoid Holocaust literature,’ he wrote, ‘and find some of the recent fictional accounts masquerading as true stories profoundly disturbing.

‘It is tantamount to desecrating war graves. We ought at least to show [the dead] enough respect to refrain from making up false stories about how their lives ended.’

One of the earliest examples of a false story about the Holocaust was a book called Fragments: Memories Of A Wartime Childhood, published by a musician called Binjamin Wilkomirski in Germany in 1995.

Like so many of his fellow fabricators, Wilkomirski kept his account of life in camps such as Auschwitz and Majdanek vague, and presented his experiences — as the book’s title suggests — in a very fragmentary way.

Shocking and powerful, as Holocaust memoirs tend to be, the book was critically acclaimed by academics and the public alike, and sold in at least 11 countries.

However, in 1998, Wilkomirski was exposed as a liar by a Swiss journalist, who revealed the author had been nowhere near the camps; that he was in fact called Bruno Grosjean, and had been raised in an orphanage.

After the exposure of Fragments, one might have hoped publishers would have taken more care in vetting manuscripts, but this has not proved to be the case.

After all, the Nineties were the decade in which ‘misery memoirs’ became fashionable, and a Holocaust tale is the ultimate misery memoir.

In 1996, Herman Rosenblat appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show with an incredible story to tell.
As a boy, Rosenblat had been incarcerated in a concentration camp called Schlieben, which was a sub-camp of the infamous Buchenwald.

Every day for seven months, Rosenblat was thrown apples and bread over the camp’s fence by a young Jewish girl called Roma — food that kept him alive.

Misha Defonesca said she'd survived the Warsaw ghetto and then been raised by wolvesMisha Defonesca said she’d survived the Warsaw ghetto and then been raised by wolves

Then, Rosenblat was moved to another camp, and he thought he would never see Roma again.
By the Fifties, Rosenblat was living in Brooklyn in the United States, and one day in 1957, he went on a blind date with an attractive young woman. Amazingly, the date was none other than Roma, and — in true Hollywood fashion — they got married.

Curiously, it took a long time for Rosenblat’s story to attract the attention of publishers, but finally, in 2008, it was sold for an undisclosed sum to Berkley Books, an imprint of Penguin, and scheduled to be published as Angel At The Fence the following year.

In addition, a £17 million feature film was scheduled to start shooting in March. Rosenblat was about to become immensely rich.

But then the book came to the attention of Holocaust scholars and those who had survived Schlieben.

They didn’t believe it was possible for Roma and Rosenblat to have met at the camp’s fence.

The public road near the fence was closed, and prisoners could only approach it at the risk of death. There was simply no way the story of the ‘angel’ could have happened.

In December 2008, the book was withdrawn from publication.

‘I wanted to bring happiness to people,’ Rosenblat said, unconvincingly. ‘I brought hope to a lot of people. My motivation was to make good in this world.’

Walters believes that the fake memoirs encourages extremists who deny the holocaust ever happenedWalters believes that the fake memoirs encourages extremists who deny the holocaust ever happened

Unfortunately, falsifying Holocaust memoirs to make money does anything but good.

As early as December 2007, renowned American historian Deborah Lipstadt, Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University in Atlanta, stated that Rosenblat’s story ‘has so many shortcomings that one hardly knows where to begin’.

t that such memoirs, by distorting the historical record, have a very damaging side-effect. ‘Not only do we need to be historically accurate for the simple sake of history,’ she stated, ‘but on top of that, this kind of stuff is fodder for Holocaust-deniers.’

This a key point. Holocaust deniers love false memoirs, as they can be used to ‘prove’ that in fact most Holocaust memoirs are untrue.

When Misha Defonseca published in 1997 her entirely false Misha: A Memoir Of The Holocaust Years, in which she claimed to have survived the Warsaw ghetto and been raised by wolves, the deniers had a field day.

 ‘It’s tantamount to desecrating war graves’

It hardly helped when Defonseca uttered the ludicrous justification for her actions that ‘it’s not the true reality, but it is my reality’.

Unfortunately, despite all these examples, publishers are still wilfully selling suspect memoirs based on the Holocaust and the war.

In 2011, I showed how Denis Avey’s claims to have broken into Auschwitz in his book The Man Who Broke Into Auschwitz, were riddled with so many discrepancies that serious questions were raised about his story.

What made it particularly suspect was an interview he had given in which he had recalled trying to meet an Australian who stoked the crematorium where the bodies of the dead Jews were disposed of.
That recollection seems false, as the Australian was called Donald Watt, who had published a memoir in 1995 about his Holocaust experiences which was shown to be complete rubbish.

For historians, books by the likes of Avey and Watt are seen as ‘junk history’ — pages that sate the appetite, but do not provide any historical nutrition.

Every time I pick up a memoir written by a Tommy in his twilight years, I find passages that make me raise an eyebrow.

Take the example of the recent Survivor Of The Long March: Five Years as a PoW 1940-1945 by Charles Waite. At one point, Waite recalls how he witnessed a Jewish baby being snatched from its mother by a guard. ‘The baby started crying,’ Waite writes, ‘and he threw it onto the ground and started kicking it like a football along the track.’ The screaming mother was then shot in the back of the head, and the baby left dead on the ground.

Can this story be true? It is possible, but we only have Waite’s word for it, and he died last year.

There are many stories about guards murdering babies (usually, as is the case in Avey’s book, their heads are smashed in), and undoubtedly some are true.

Unfortunately, we are now entering a situation where nearly every Holocaust memoir features such a scene. It is almost a compulsory fixture — although in truth such events were incredibly rare, for the simple reason that killing babies in front of their parents is not the best way to pacify a train full of prisoners.

The famous 'Arbeit macht frei' sign at the former Nazi death camp Auschwitz in Oswiecim, Poland. One person said he had spent his childhood thereThe famous ‘Arbeit macht frei’ sign at the former Nazi death camp Auschwitz in Oswiecim, Poland. One person said he had spent his childhood there

Besides, most guards had no wish to kill children — one of the reasons gas chambers were created was to spare the killers witnessing the gruesomeness of murder.

However, the increasing frequency in which such horrific stories of infanticide are starting to appear, so many decades after the war, suggests some of the accounts are likely to be fabrications, or false memories generated by those who have been overly immersed in Holocaust literature.

Another fixture of Holocaust memoirs is that sinister figure, the SS doctor Josef Mengele. Again, nearly every memoir written by an Auschwitz survivor will recollect Mengele at a ‘selection’, determining who will be sent to the gas chambers. More often than not, he is whistling a Wagnerian aria and wearing a spotless white coat.

In truth, Mengele was just one of many ‘doctors’ employed at the camp, and he was by no means at every selection.

Just last month, yet another memoir appeared that raises many questions. The book, Do The Birds Still Sing In Hell?, tells the story of a British soldier called Horace Greasley, who ‘escaped over 200 times from a notorious German prison to see the girl he loved’.

As with so many of these accounts, the book is rumoured to be made into a film.

Mysteriously, Greasley’s PoW record held at the National Archives does not make one mention of these 200 ‘escapes’.

Working camps for NCOs such as Greasley were not the tightly-guarded places conjured up by our collective imagination, which is weaned on images from Colditz and The Great Escape. In fact, bunking out of one’s camp to fraternise with local girls was hardly unusual, and certainly not ‘escaping’ in the sense most of us understand it.

No doubt there will be more books of this type. With publishers fighting it out to sell the latest tale of World War II derring-do, or Holocaust misery, it seems unlikely this is a genre that will die out.

Yet there is something profoundly distasteful about this distorting and milking of the faltering memories of old men for the last drops of cash.

Anybody reading these books should stop and ask themselves whether what they hold in their hands is, in fact, true.

We should all share the repugnance felt by the late Professor Weinberg, and read his book instead.

But how could the Holocaust not be true? by Paul Eisen

How could the Holocaust not be true?  How could such a delusion and deception have taken place?  How could all those survivors be so wrong in their testimonies?  How could all those perpetrators be so wrong in their confessions?  How could all those documents, unspecific as they are, have been falsified?  Arthur Butz called his groundbreaking revisionist study “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century”, but a hoax of this size and nature just defies belief.  Conspiracy theories rarely convince, nor do those who propagate them, so surely the sheer absurdity of the revisionists’ claim tells us all we need to know.  So, if revisionism is to have any credibility at all, it must demonstrate how, if false, the Holocaust narrative, as we know it, came to be.

 

Soviet troops liberate the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp on January 27, 1945.

The first reports of the mass slaughter of Jews by the Germans were propagated in the spring of 1942 by Jewish and Zionist agencies and published in the Jewish press.  These entirely uncorroborated reports received immediate and unmatched credibility by being broadcast (on one occasion in Yiddish) back into Poland by the BBC, and by repetition in the American press, particularly the New York Times.  They spoke for the first time of extermination, but not only by gas.  According to these reports Jews were being steamed to death, suffocated to death, pressed to death and electrocuted as well as being gassed.  It is only later in reports compiled by the Soviet authorities, when they liberated the camps of Majdanek and  Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1944 and 1945, that gassing emerges as the main method of slaughter and even later, as just one element in the shower-gas-cremation sequence which now lies at the heart of the Holocaust narrative.

It is with these Soviet reports, plus others from the World Refugee Board, that the now-familiar extermination narrative emerges.  The victims disembark from trains for selection.  Those designated for extermination are taken to complexes designed to look like disinfection facilities.  There they are separated into sexes and led to undressing rooms where they undress.  Then they are led, 600-700 at a time, into huge rooms resembling shower rooms.  When the rooms are crammed full, Zyklon B pellets are dropped from apertures in the roof and, as the temperature rises, hydrogen cyanide gas is released.  The victims take about five to fifteen minutes to die, watched all the time through glass peepholes in the doors by SS personnel.  An interval of about half an hour is allowed for the gas to clear, assisted by a ventilation system, after which a Jewish Sonderkommando (special detachment) enters with gas masks, rubber boots, gloves, hooks and hoses to disentangle, hose down and remove the bodies.  The bodies are taken to mortuaries, where gold teeth etc. are extracted with pliers, and they are then transported to crematoria where they are burned to ashes.  If the number of corpses should prove to be too great for the cremation facilities, then those remaining are taken to be burned in specially designed open pits.

But if such a narrative is false, it is interesting to speculate as to how it took the form it did.  Possible answers may be found in the 50-100 year history of Europe prior to the events under investigation.  This period saw huge movements of people westwards, many of them Jews and many of them migrating to or throughGermany.  All over central and western Europe, but particularly in Germany, there was a problem with, and a fear of epidemics, particularly of typhus – and many of the receiving authorities, and particularly the German authorities, were intent of developing and implementing mass disinfection and disinfestation procedures.  These included mobile and stationery mass steam and shower baths and mobile and stationery facilities for the disinfestation of clothing by gas. The gas used for disinfestation was of course hydrogen cyanide gas in the form of Zyklon B pellets.

This use of gas for delousing and disinfestation must be set against the background of the very real use of poison gas as a weapon in the Great War and in various other areas of conflict both real (such as by the Italians in Abyssinia) and imaginary (as by the Martians in The War of the Worlds radio broadcast of 1938).  It should also be noted how after the introduction of gas onto the battlefield in 1915, stories of homicidal gassings of civilians began to appear in atrocity propaganda.  In March 1916 the Daily Telegraph reported that the Austrians and Bulgarians had murdered hundreds of thousands of Serbians using poison gas.

At roughly the same time cremation was increasingly being used for the disposal of bodies and particularly for the mass disposal of epidemic victims.  Cremation as a means of corpse disposal was widely promoted by the German National Socialist regime – a regime noted for its modern attitudes to technology – and it was also universally used in its euthanasia programme.  One result of the use of cremation in these euthanasia killings, was that it fed the general suspicion that cremation was used to conceal the cause of death by gas poisoning (deaths in the euthanasia programme are now thought more likely to have been by lethal injection) which was widely (and falsely) believed to cause disfigurement.  So cremation became associated with attempts to deceive the population about the cause of death.  In effect, all these techniques of disinfection and cremation, considered to be at the very cutting-edge of modernism by enlightened western Europeans, were viewed by large sections of the European masses – and particularly by immigrants, usually poor, conservative and deeply superstitious, and even more particularly by the eastern Jewish masses with their additional religious concerns about mass undressing and cremation etc – with the deepest suspicion.

Jewish refugees – 1882

It’s not so crazy if you put yourself in the shoes of a poor Jewish immigrant fleeing the conditions of Tsarist Russia.  You arrive exhausted and terrified together with a mass of similarly exhausted and terrified folk at a German border station where you are confronted with uniformed guards and officials shouting at you in a language you barely understand.  They want to separate you from your men- and women-folk, to undress you and to put you into large cold and forbidding chambers.  You’ve heard the stories as you stand naked and shivering under the showerheads and wait for what you have been told will be water, but for what a part of you fears will be gas. An account from a surprising quarter illustrates the point – Ingrid Rimland writing about when as a small child in 1945, she and what was left of her family treked westward with the retreating Wermacht back to Germany.

“I remember fairly clearly one such “experience” sometime in 1944. This was during the Wehrmacht retreat from the Eastern front, when huge refugee treks of ethnic Germans traveled westward with horse-drawn wagons under German Army protection, experiencing horrendous hardships from hunger and cold, the advancing Red Army ever in our backs.

 My family belonged to German-descent Mennonites, a fundamentalist Christian community who had come to theUkrainein 1789, but we still considered ourselves to be Germans and still spoke the German language.  Ever since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution – which happened when my grandmother was still a young woman and my mother was only four years old – my people had been savagely persecuted by the Communists.  Many of my cousins, aunts, uncles, more distant relatives perished in waves of ethnic cleansings.  This persecution started before I was born and became deadly in 1938, affecting practically every male age 14 and over. My own father was exiled to Siberia when I was only five years old in 1941, and our entire family escaped exiling only at the last moment, literally hours before the German Army overran the Ukraine in September of that year – only weeks after my father was taken from us forever

When the (for us) voluntary retreat to Germany began two years later, in the fall of 1943, there were four of us left – my grandmother, my mother, my baby sister and I.  The rest of our family had either been exiled to Siberia, been killed, or simply disappeared in the havoc of those horror years since 1917.  Now we were running for our lives from the Red Army – almost all of us women and children.
We entered Nazi-occupied Poland sometime in 1944 and were invited to be officially naturalized as Germans.  I remember the city as Litzmannstadt (Lodz) but I cannot be sure.

But first we had to be deloused.  Naturally!  As far as I know, this was routine for everybody entering German-occupied territory and certainly Germany proper, an obligatory health measure to control epidemics such as typhus, a disease that was carried by lice. Everybody who was coming from the East was infested with lice in those days – Russians, Poles, Germans, Jews – soldiers and civilians.  There was no way not to have lice, unless you underwent delousing.  We were made to enter a long train.  Whether that train took us to a building, or if it ended in a building, I don’t remember any more.  Somehow the rumor sprang up that we were going to be gassed.  I have no idea who started it.  As a seven-year old, I do remember how terrified I was.

 We were all stripped naked, had our hair shorn, and then, while we were all sitting, old and young, in long rows of benches, water and soap, probably mixed with insecticide, rained down on us from shower heads above. 

I don’t remember the relief, only the fear. Similarly, the rumor sprang up on that train that the Germans were looking for “yellow blood”, presumably Jewish, by clipping our ear lobe.  I was just as terrified of that one. “

So these Soviet reports with their now-detailed descriptions of the shower-gas-cremation procedure of extermination, coming after three years of other terrifying reports of exterminations of Jews and others by the Germans, and also in the context of fears in Europe about the use of gas as a weapon used against civilians and of cremation as a new and unfamiliar method of the disposing of bodies, could possibly have been instrumental in laying the foundations of the Holocaust gas-chamber narrative as we know it.  Certainly from the time of those reports, the mere presence of showers, disinfestation gas chambers and crematoria had become in itself evidence of mass homicidal gassing.

So when the western armies came across the German concentration camps at Belsen, Dachau and Buchenwald sites at which it is now known that there were no mass extermination facilities, and saw the now familiar images of skeletal, diseased inmates and piles of discoloured corpses and discovered sealed rooms, showers and crematoria which we now know had been used only for disinfection and disinfestation, and encountered inmates who were prepared to tell them tales of mass exterminations, they were both able and willing to interpret it all in terms of what they had heard, rather than what, in this instance at least, was the truth.

Whatever conditions might have been in the German camps throughout the war, by 1945 and the final defeat ofGermany the system, and particularly the camp system, had collapsed and conditions were catastrophic and it was the results of this collapse which the western armies came across.  The Americans and the British saw these things, and, most critically, filmed and photographed them, as clear evidence of a planned genocide, rather than what they were: the result, particularly in the form of typhus epidemics, of a breakdown of Germany generally and the camp system in particular, under the onslaught of the allied saturation bombing.

Although it cannot entirely be ruled out that some of these authorities knew that they were propagating a myth, it seems most likely that the Jewish authorities who first spread reports of exterminations, were reacting only from a real concern for their fellow-Jews, known to be under ferocious assault by the Germans who, at the time of those first reports, were ratcheting up their assault on the Jews by beginning brutal deportations to the East.  But what of the other authorities involved – the Americans, the British and the Soviets?  These authorities surely would have been happy to accuse the Germans of absolutely anything and possibly not averse to a little falsification of the evidence if needed.  After all, these same authorities had been perfectly prepared to continue to accuse the Germans of the massacre of over 4000 Poles at Katyn – a deed they knew full well had been perpetrated by the Soviet NKVD. In fact, the only cases where there is any evidence of contrived fabrication occur at the liberation of the camp at Majdanek by the Red army, at which time the Soviet authorities closed the site for a month and then presented to the world some highly questionable evidence of mass extermination of Jews. A similar conscious fabrication may also have taken place atAuschwitz. In any event, intentional or not, all was now ready for the story to take off.

The defendants at Nuremberg

Any story, true or false, is easily spread if there are fabricators, peddlers and believers, and this is all the more so if all three are combined.  The Holocaust had plenty of all three.  Moving down the chain of command we find plenty of examples at the Nuremberg trials where the alleged crimes of the vanquished were formalised by the victors.  The Nuremberg investigators, as they worked their way through the mountains of alleged eyewitness testimonies, believed that there were gas chambers as they strove to establish the truth.  The army interrogators, as they punched and pummeled their way through the hapless defendants, believed that there were gas chambers and that they were merely trying to get at the truth.  The lawyers, as they presented highly questionable documents as hard evidence, believed that there were gas chambers and

Rudolf Hoess, Commandant of Auschwitz during his interrogation

nor do we need much to persuade us that the Jewish leadership might have been ready and willing to propagate and believe such a tale.  Jews suffered terribly under National Socialism – nobody denies that, neither revisionist or non-revisionist.  They had been persecuted, expelled and assaulted.  They had been forcibly deported and incarcerated in brutal labor camps where thousands upon thousands had died from exhaustion, malnutrition and maltreatment.  In the East many Jews had been shot. Jews had little reason to love the Germans.

 
The Temple destroyed

Nor would it be the first time that Jews have accepted and propagated stories, true, false or a mixture of both, of their suffering.  The Holocaust is only the latest, albeit the worst of a series of tragic calamities to have befallen the Jewish people, and Hitler sits well with Pharaoh, Amalek, Haman, Tomas de Torquemada and Bogdan Chmielnitski – all enduring hate-figures in the Jewish martyrology.  Nor would this be the first time that Jewish chroniclers (or any other chroniclers for that matter) have used some poetic license in describing their suffering.  The Talmud tells that at the time of the destruction of the second temple – held in Jewish history to be the one historical precedent for the Holocaust – the Romans slew ‘four billions,” the blood of the Jewish victims was so great that it became a ‘tidal wave carrying boulders out to sea’, and staining the water for four miles out. The bodies of the Jews were used as ‘fence posts’ and Jewish children were “wrapped up in their Torah scrolls – and burned alive all 65 million of them.”  In a context like this, the utterances of Elie Wiesel, become a little more understandable.

” Not far from us blazed flames from a pit, gigantic flames.  They were burning something.  A lorry drove up to the pit and dumped its load into the pit.  They were small children.  Babies! Yes, I had seen it, with my own eyes”

But for a story of this magnitude to be spread, many more believers were needed, than a few over-mighty politicians and soldiers and thousands of traumatized and broken survivors, and, save for a few insightful cynics at the very top of the British, American, Soviet and Jewish leaderships, believe it they did.  True, there was little hard evidence, but what there was could so easily be made to fit.  After all, everyone knew that the Germans had engaged in purposeful mass extermination of Jews therefore “special treatment” and “deportation to the East” must be euphemisms for extermination, and any sealed chamber attached to a crematorium, especially if used for disinfestations by gas, must have been a homicidal gas chamber.

Once momentum is achieved, all that is needed is an extended game of Chinese whispers to result in a Holocaust narrative, conceived in the real and terrible wartime suffering of Jews, portrayed as imagined in newsreels and photo-reportage, framed and formalized at Nuremberg and subsequent trials and then, most critically of all, later turned into religious dogma.  Set all this in the context of a western world obsessed by Jews and its own ambivalence about Jews and Jewish suffering, a Jewish population traumatized by its very real and recent suffering, an immensely influential Jewish culture which places suffering at the core of its self-identity, and a Zionist leadership desperate to win world sympathy for a Jewish state in Palestine, and the idea of such a story, even if false, gaining near universal acceptance, really isn’t that hard to believe. After all, people once believed the earth was flat and sat on the back of four elephants riding on a turtle.  They believed the earth was the centre of the universe and persecuted skeptics with the same fervor and with about as much justification as they do today’s Holocaust revisionists.  People today believe that JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman with a magic bullet.  They believe in astrology and fortune telling, in bodily auras and out-of-body experiences. They believe that the Children of Israel were guided in the desert by a pillar of smoke by day and of fire by night, that Jesus was born of a virgin, died and was resurrected, and that the Prophet Mohamed ascended to heaven after seeing Mecca and Jerusalem. Why, they even believe that Palestine was a land without a people for a people without a land! So what is so hard to believe about the planned and premeditated slaughter of six million Jews by modern industrial methods, loaded in their millions onto trains and taken to industrialized killing centers where they are done to death thousands at a time in huge slaughter halls, their bodies burned to ashes and their bones ground into dust?  People believe in heaven and they believe in hell – so why not the hell of the Holocaust?

The above is an edited extract from “The Holocaust Wars” http://pauleisen.blogspot.co.uk/2005/04/holocaust-wars.html

Saturday, March 16, 2013 10:05

(Before It’s News)

(NOTE: I am not a holocaust denier or an anti-semite I know this is a taboo topic but given the picture above and I’ve seen others, I feel the need to post it here on Beforeitsnews.  I love a good conspiracy and that is what this is.  All I ask is that you keep as open a mind with this as you do with 9/11 or JFK. )
No Evidence Of Genocide The Jews And The Concentration Camps:
A Factual Appraisal By The Red Cross.
There is one survey of the Jewish question in Europe during World War Two and the conditions of Germany’s concentration camps which is almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, the three-volume Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War, Geneva, 1948.This comprehensive account from an entirely neutral source incorporated and expanded the findings of two previous works: Documents sur l’activité du CICR en faveur des civils détenus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946), and Inter Arma Caritas: the Work of the ICRC during the Second World War (Geneva, 1947). The team of authors, headed by Frédéric Siordet, explained in the opening pages of the Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality, and herein lies its great value.The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the Germany authorities. By contrast, the ICRC was unable to gain any access to the Soviet Union, which had failed to ratify the Convention. The millions of civilian and military internees held in the USSR, whose conditions were known to be by far the worst, were completely cut off from any international contact or supervision.The Red Cross Report is of value in that it first clarifies the legitimate circumstances under which Jews were detained in concentration camps, i.e. as enemy aliens. In describing the two categories of civilian internees, the Report distinguishes the second type as “Civilians deported on administrative grounds (in German, “Schutzhäftlinge”), who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces” (Vol. 111, p. 73). These persons, it continues, “were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.” (P.74).The Report admits that the Germans were at first reluctant to permit supervision by the Red Cross of people detained on grounds relating to security, but by the latter part of 1942, the ICRC obtained important concessions from Germany. They were permitted to distribute food parcels to major concentration camps in Germany from August 1942, and “from February 1943 onwards this concession was extended to all other camps and prisons” (Vol. 111, p. 78). The ICRC soon established contact with camp commandants and launched a food relief programme which continued to function until the last months of 1945, letters of thanks for which came pouring in from Jewish internees.
Red Cross Recipients Were Jews
The Report states that “As many as 9,000 parcels were packed daily. From the autumn of 1943 until May 1945, about 1,112,000 parcels with a total weight of 4,500 tons were sent off to the concentration camps” (Vol. III, p. 80). In addition to food, these contained clothing and pharmaceutical supplies. “Parcels were sent to Dachau, Buchenwald, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Flöha, Ravensbrück, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, to camps near Vienna and in Central and Southern Germany. The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jews” (Vol. III, p. 83).In the course of the war, “The Committee was in a position to transfer and distribute in the form of relief supplies over twenty million Swiss francs collected by Jewish welfare organisations throughout the world, in particular by the American Joint Distribution Committee of New York” (Vol. I, p. 644). This latter organisation was permitted by the German Government to maintain offices in Berlin until the American entry into the war. The ICRC complained that obstruction of their vast relief operation for Jewish internees came not from the Germans but from the tight Allied blockade of Europe. Most of their purchases of relief food were made in Rumania, Hungary and Slovakia.The ICRC had special praise for the liberal conditions which prevailed at Theresienstadt up to the time of their last visits there in April 1945. This camp, “where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75). According to the Report, “‘The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions. From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy. . . two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6th, 1945. They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p . 642).The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jews until the time of the Soviet occupation. The aid then ceased, and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians. The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile. However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.
No Evidence Of Genocide 
One of the most important aspects of the Red Cross Report is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps toward the end of the war. Says the Report: “In the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1st, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC, and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp …” (Vol. III, p. 83).Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatever at the camps in Axis occupied Europe of a deliberate policy to exterminate the Jews. In all its 1,600 pages the Report does not even mention such a thing as a gas chamber. It admits that Jews, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of planned extermination is ample refutation of the Six Million legend. Like the Vatican representatives with whom they worked, the Red Cross found itself unable to indulge in the irresponsible charges of genocide which had become the order of the day. So far as the genuine mortality rate is concerned, the Report points out that most of the Jewish doctors from the camps were being used to combat typhus on the eastern front, so that they were unavailable when the typhus epidemics of 1945 broke out in the camps (Vol. I, p. 204 ff) – Incidentally, it is frequently claimed that mass executions were carried out in gas chambers cunningly disguised as shower facilities. Again the Report makes nonsense of this allegation. “Not only the washing places, but installations for baths, showers and laundry were inspected by the delegates. They had often to take action to have fixtures made less primitive, and to get them repaired or enlarged” (Vol. III, p. 594).
Not All Were Interned
Volume III of the Red Cross Report, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population,” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps, but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population. This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Höss memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing “every single Jew he could lay his hands on.”In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland. Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15th, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. “The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. I, p. 645).As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the. Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jews continued.The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary,” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States … now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. I, p . 649).Biedermann agreed that in the nineteen instances that “Did Six Million Really Die?” quoted from the Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War and Inter Arma Caritas (this includes the above material), it did so accurately.A quote from Charles Biedermann (a delegate of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Director of the Red Cross’ International Tracing Service) under oath at the Zündel Trial (February 9, 10, 11 and 12, 1988).The above is chapter nine from the book “Did Six Million Really Die?”For the entire book “Did Six Million Really Die?”, click here.
http://www.ihr.org/books/harwood/dsmrd01.htmlPHOTO DESCRIPTION: A scanned image of the Official Death Total report from the International Red Cross.DISCLAIMER: “One cannot and must not try to erase the past merely because it does not fit the present.” – Golda Meir [Fourth Prime Minister of Israel]SOURCE: http://just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com.au/2007/06/official-records-from-international-red.html

— with Janne Välimäki.

SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HD

BUMP BACK TO THE TOP in reply to an email that questioning the “Six Million Jews” is “hurtful.” I imagine that little children are hurt when the learn there really is no Santa Claus or Easter Bunny, but that is hardly a reason for adults to go on pretending otherwise.

Long before WW2, the myth of six million was already being used to garner sympathy and political support for Jewish interests.

Fool me once …

UPDATE: A reader went over to the New York Times and confirmed the existence of one of the articles in the video above.

UPDATE 2: Yet another reader has independently confirmed another pre-WW2 newspaper article where the “Six Million” lie was used for propaganda purposes!

Click for larger image

UPDATE 3: Another reader sent in this list of dozens more known references to the “Six Million Jews” pre-dating WW2.

UPDATE 4: Yet another list, this one with scans of many original news articles pushing the “Six Million Jews” propaganda, before WW2.

UPDATE 5: That Magical #6

UPDATE 6: Ryan Dawson’t collection of pre-WW2 articles about “Six Million Jews.”

UPDATE 7: Number of Jews living in Nazi occupied Europe: 2.6 million. Number of Jews living in Russia at the same time, 2.1 million. Total: 4.7 million. Number of Jews sent to the Nazi camps according to the new Holocaust fish story (i.e. the fish gets bigger with every re-telling) from the US Holocaust Memorial: 15-20 million.

Here is the point. The “Six Million Jews” is a propaganda device that has been in use for over a century at least, and certainly well before the events of WW2. Like the myth of Prester John, it is revived whenever it is needed but has no basis in actual fact. SeeOF THE LIARS, BY THE LIARS, AND FOR THE LIARS

Israel’s incoming defense minister evaded war crimes arrest, called Palestinians “cancer”

Asa Winstanley

Israel’s next “defense” minister poses for a photo with notorious racist blogger Pamela Geller(Wikipedia) 

March 14, 2013

This is Moshe Ya’alon, the Likud parliamentarian set to become minister of “defense” in Israel’s new hard-right coalition government due to be sworn in early next week.

In a 2002 interview with Israeli paper Haaretz, when he was Chief of Staff of the Israeli army, Ya’alon said the “Palestinian threat” was “like cancer” and an “existential threat.” He explained that his solution was “applying chemotherapy.”

The “chemotherapy,” was the massive destruction his forces visited on Palestinian society during the second intifada. Israeli forces infamously fired over a million bullets at Palestinian demonstrators within the first few days of that popular uprising.

Under pressure, Ya’alon later back-pedaled, saying his statements were “inopportune,” but that he had been “taken out of context” reported financial publication Globes in Hebrew.

War crimes

In 2005, the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a lawsuit against Ya’alon, charging him with war crimes for his role in the Israeli army’s 1996 attack on a United Nations compound in Qana, Lebanon that killed more than 100 Lebanese civilians who had taken shelter there, injuring many more.

At the time of the lawsuit, Ya’alon was a fellow at the AIPAC-founded Washington Institute for Near East Policy in Washington, DC.

In 2006 a federal judge dismissed the case on the grounds that Ya’alon enjoyed immunity under the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act. But Ya’alon’s legal problems did not end there.

He was invited to a 2009 fund-raising event for Israeli soldiers in London, but had to cancel the trip for fear of arrest on suspicion of war crimes.

The charges to have been brought against him related to the infamous 2002 Israeli bombing of an apartment block in Gaza, which killed 14 civilians, including children. Hamas military leader Salah Shehadeh was also killed in the attack.

This is the same incident for which the Palestinian Centre for Human Rightsbrought a case against Ya’alon and Israeli air force commander Dan Halutz in the Spanish National Court in 2008. An appeal against a lower court decision to close the case was pending before Spain’s constitutional court as of 2011.

Ya’alon had been invited to London in 2009 by the Jewish National Fund. According to The Guardian, one of the lawyers who advised Ya’alon not to travel was Daniel Taub, now the Israeli ambassador in London.

Notorious Islamophobe

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Ya’alon is vaunted by Pamela Geller, a notorious Muslim-hater and leading demagogue among racist bloggers.

Geller once described him as “Israel’s best shot for the right leadership” and boasts of having interviewed him alongside other Zionist bloggers.

In that interview, Ya’alon seemed to concur with some of Geller’s disturbing ideology, agreeing with Geller that:

Yes, this is the main challenge… to create what I call an awakening in the West. The West is sleeping. In many terms it reminds of the situation before World War II. It’s very clear, the threat [of Islamic jihad] is very clear.

Geller was one of the key inspirations for the Muslim-hating, pro-Israel, convicted terrorist Anders Breivik, so it is grimly fitting she would take inspiration from killers like Ya’alon.

With thanks to Ali Abunimah for his contribution, and Dena Shunra for translation from Hebrew, research and analysis.

Source


 

Aida Camp residents drilled hole in Apartheid Wall

By John Space – March 12, 2013

Photo by John Space.

Sixteen year old Saleh Elamareen was shot in the head with a dumdum bullet on January 18 and was pronounced dead several days later. But the full circumstances surrounding Elamareen’s death, who was shot several days after an Israeli invasion of Aida refugee camp in response to the discovery that a hole had been drilled in the Apartheid Wall, have never before been reported.

“By burning the tower, it will be destroyed”

On the night of January 13, several days before Elamareen was murdered by occupation forces, a small group of youths from Aida camp (located inside Bethlehem) gathered at a section of the Wall adjacent to the camp with a hand drill and lights to illuminate their work. The section of the Wall they decided to drill in is directly next to an Israeli watchtower frequently used to shelter soldiers as they fire tear gas, rubber bullets and live ammunition into the camp during military raids.

The Palestine Monitor spoke with several witnesses to the drilling and saw a video of the youths drilling the hole. Photos taken after the drilling was done show a hole several feet high and perhaps a foot wide, large enough for children to pass through.

Salah Ajarma, the director of the Laje’oon Center, located several hundred meters from the site of the drilling and directly above the spot where Elamareen was killed, said the idea to make a hole in the wall came from an activist identified only as “Ali Wall,” who began a campaign against the barrier in Aida camp shortly after its completion in 2006.

On the night of January 13, a small group of youths from Aida camp gathered at a section of the Wall adjacent to the camp with a hand drill and lights to illuminate their work

His dream was to make a hole and go to the other side to play in the field,” Ajarma said. “For more than a month, he made a fire there every day. And he made a small hole, like you can see the other side.”

Ali Wall was sentenced to nine years in Israeli jail for attempting to destroy the Wall. He was released during the Gilad Shalit prisoner swap, but was rearrested last year for participating in clashes with Israeli soldiers, Ajarma said.

During Israel’s last assault on Gaza known as Pillar of Cloud, the youth of Aida camp reactivated Ali’s tradition of trying to burn down the Wall, focusing especially on the guard tower.

“They don’t want to see the tower and especially the Wall close to their areas. And they started to burn the tower in that time [during the assault on Gaza]. And they feel like maybe [by] burning the tower, the tower will be destroyed,” Ajarma said.

In January, several youth from Aida camp decided to take a more drastic form of action against the Wall. Choosing a spot next to the guard tower, where the Wall had already been weakened by a continual burning of tires, a small group began drilling a hole with an electric hand drill. After two nights of work, the hole was large enough for children to pass through, and on the morning of January 15, two children did.

“In the morning when they make the big hole, some of the children entered through that hole to the other side of the Wall. And some of them, they wanted to play football there,” Ajarma said. “And when the Israeli soldiers saw the children on the security road behind the Wall, the Israeli soldiers raided the camp. From Rachel’s Tomb, they opened the gate and more than 30 soldiers came into the camp and started shooting at the people tear-gas and live bullets.”

The purpose of the hole was not to launch attacks on Israel or otherwise endanger the Zionist state’s security, Ajarma said. The hole was drilled by the camp’s residents out of a simple and universal desire for freedom.

“They don’t want the wall close to them, they don’t want the towers, they don’t want to see the Israeli army in the camp… That’s how they feel. Like if we open a hole, [there's the belief that] we can reach every space, we can reach Jerusalem, or we can go to have a picnic or to have barbecue on the other side of the Wall. Because that’s what children want,” he said. “They don’t want walls, they don’t want towers, they don’t want bullets. They want a free area and free space for them to play.”

Shot near the drilling in the Wall despite no clashes

Several Aida camp residents interviewed by the Palestine Monitor said that on January 15, the day the hole was discovered by Israeli soldiers, the camp was occupied by Israeli forces from 8 am until 8 pm and the hole was covered over with a metal plate.

Mohammad al Azzeh, the Photography Department Coordinator for the Laje’oon Center, said that the following day, Israeli soldiers stationed themselves in the watchtower and shot at anyone who stopped near the sealed-off hole. Al Azzeh said the soldiers shot at him with rubber bullets when he went to take pictures of the hole.

Two days later, on January 18, the situation in Aida was still tense, although there had been no more clashes between camp residents and occupation forces. The residents of Aida camp were unsure if Israeli soldiers stationed in the watchtower would allow them to use the road adjacent to the Wall.

It was in this context that Saleh Elamareen was killed. Al Azzeh, a friend of the Elamareen family, said the youth was on his way to a print shop when he was shot with no warning. Contrary to some media reports at the time, there were no clashes in Aida camp at the time of the shooting. Security-camera footage of Elamareen’s death, provided to the Palestine Monitor by the Laje’oon Center, confirms that there was no demonstration or riot happening at the time of Elamareen’s death.

The video shows around a dozen people cautiously gathered at the entrance to the street adjacent to the Wall. The shot is fired from the watchtower, not visible in the footage, and a group of men run and retrieve Elamareen’s body, also out of frame. The other Aida residents that can be seen in the video run away as the group carries the body back into the frame and around a corner.

“They are standing, and you can it’s see quiet,” al Azzeh said. “The people hear [a sound] like rubber bullets, but they are not scared much. But the real bullet, we know how that sounds. So when they hear that, they start just running. And (a group of) five of them, they come running to Saleh to carry him. “

Elamareen was pronounced dead on January 23. Since that time, at least two more minors have been shot by Israeli forces in Aida camp, and both are still in critical condition. Mohammad al Kirdi was shot in his back and leg by live ammunition, while Odai Sarhan shot in the head with a rubber bullet.

The Wall remains intact, preventing residents of Aida camp from praying at al-Aqsa Mosque or visiting family members in Jerusalem.

“Behind the Wall used to be a big space of land… Maybe the young, they don’t know that land, but I remember it very well. We used to play there,” al Azzeh said. “And all the people came during the drilling. ‘Tomorrow, we will go to Jerusalem.’ The only thing they wanted was just to go to the other side.”

Paul Eisen

Thursday, 6 June 2013

The day the the gas-chamber myth died

This is Fred Leuchter.Fred Leuchter was the specialist in designing U.S. execution facilities who was called on, in the mid-eighties,  by Ernst Zundel’s defense team to examine the ‘gas-chambers’ at Auschwitz. Leuchter duly obliged and published his findings in the “Leuchter Report”. Flawed but essentially truthful, its findings were later confirmed by Germar Rudolf and, I believe, by the Auschwitz Museum authorities themselves.For revisionists, the day Leuchter’s findings were presented to the Toronto court was the day the myth of the homicidal gas-chambers was finally laid to rest.
PINK  not   BLUE


Cyanide gas produces two different colours, both vitally important for the debate over the German labour-camps. In the human body, it produces a red-pink colour as it kills – whereas, as it soaks into brick walls, it will very slowly produce a blue hue. These got rather confused in wartime testimony. Zyklon-B was the commercial name for the cyanide held in granular form, as it was delivered to the labour-camps. A whole lot of testimonies of blue dead bodies were given after the war – caused by gassing – and we here argue that these are simply impossible.



BLUE TESTIMONIES


The insecticide Zyklon was known as Zyklon-B and often called Zyklon-Blau because of the way it turned the walls blue.1 False witnesses kept testifying that blue-hue corpses were seen, imagining that the Zyklon somehow produced that.2

The so-called ‘Aktion Reinhardt’ camps, in the East of Poland – Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor – have stories of carbon monoxide gassing, with up to two million allegedly dead. These stories have no reference anywhere to pink corpses being seen at these camps.


Fake testimonies with impossible blue colour:

Dario Gabbai, “some of them were black and blue from the gas” (1:55 mins into this Shoah Foundation video) Gabbai also states this in Laurence Rees’ 2005 BBC program on Auschwitz, in episode 4, at 5:30. 

Ya’akov Silberberg: 

Q: When you took out the bodies, were they warm or cold? 

A: Warm. They were blue, black, and swollen. What I saw in the gas chamber was ghastly, a horrible scene…

Q: What color were the bodies after the gassings?

A: After the gassings they had a totally natural color, but after the blisters burst they turned red as fire. 

Interview by Joseph Sacker in Gideon Grief’s book “We Wept Without Tears,”

Milton Buki: Of those gassed in a bunker: “the bodies were all naked and some had blue stains on them.” -Mattogno, The Bunkers of Auschwitz, p. 116, declaration released on December 15, 1989, in Jerusalem. 

Natalia Zarembina: “the greenish tinge on the dead bodies does not disappear: it seems rather to become more distinct now in the new light of day. One of the grave-diggers, holding a corpse in his arms to throw it back on the cart, gazes into the greenish-grey face for a while. Years ago he saw similar faces: a deserted trench with corpses of soldiers. The same ghostly pallor. It is the discolouration of poison gas.” Quoted, Mattogno, Auschwitz: the first gassing, pp. 34-36,1943 Polish pamphlet.

Witnesses describing alleged gassed corpses agreed on the bodies being “greenish” (Kula), “bluish” (Banach), “green” (Hałgas), “blue” (Wolny), “bluish” (Kurant), “blue, almost purple-black” (Kielar), “bluish” (Weber), “bluish” (Gemański), “blue-black” (Petzold), “bluish” (Broad), whereas Natalia Zarembina speaks of a “ghostly pallor.” Mattogno Ibid., section 6.5.

Walter Petzold: “The nature of the corpses, on account of the terrible effect of the poison gas, was such that one could see only blue-black, bloated, and mushy flesh that had once belonged to human beings. Cyklon ‘B’ has the property of disintegrating a human body almost completely, of causing the human lung to burst and of turning the rest of the body into a jelly-like state” – quoted by Mattogno.

Stangl allegedly saw at Treblinka, ‘the pits full of black-blue corpses’ – Wiki, Treblinka

‘Their faces were blue, almost purplish’ – at Auschwitz, a recollection of mass gassing of Russian Prisoners of War in September 1941. Chil Raichman, The Last Jew of Treblinka, Pegasus Books LLC, 2011, p. 65ff., p. 67. 
Yankel (Jankiel, Yankiel) Wiernik “There was no longer any beauty or ugliness, for they all were yellow from the gas. 


Kurt Gerstein:“The bodies were tossed out, blue, wet with sweat and urine, the legs smeared with excrement and menstrual blood. ” one of his reports, PS-1553, p. 7.  

Filip Müller: “Many had their mouths wide open, on their lips traces of whitish dried-up spittle. Many had turned blue, and many faces were disfigured almost beyond recognition from blows” – Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers, 1979, published by Ivan R Dee, Inc , 1999, p. 117 

Daniel Bennahmias: “When the door finally was opened, the Sonderkommando was assaulted by an overhelming stench and the ghastly sight of putrid flesh. The bodies had turned blue and were bloated to double and treble their normal size, and Danny was among those who had to extricate them.” Rebecca Camhi Fromer, The Holocaust Odyssey of Daniel Bennahmias, Sonderkommando. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 1993, p. 53. 

Polish officer who was sent to Treblinka with his Jewish wife on September 6, 1942, but escaped, in a report sent to the Polish government-in-exile in London on March 31, 1943: “I do not know what kind of gas is used, but I know from a colleague who worked three weeks in ‘Treblinka II’ that the corpses have a bluish color.” Mattogno/Graf Treblinka



BLUE

Two colours have a central relevance to use of cyanide gas in WW2. 

Firstly, there is the blue/turquoise colour which glows on the walls of the old delousing chambers, due to ferrocyanide, as in a tube of paint, ‘Prussian blue’. Iron in the wall bonded with the cyanide as it was absorbed into the walls seventy years ago. The Leuchter and Rudolf reports changed forever the whole Revisionist debate, by showing that the blue walls of the little delousing chambers in the German labour-camps, written out of History at Nuremberg, were the one places where cyanide was used on a regular basis. Those old walls are blue inside and out, showing how the cyanide gas penetrated right through them. 


Seven tons of cyanide were delivered to Auschwitz just in the year 1942. That’s a lot. It was averred at Nuremberg that it was used for human gassing. Fortunately, Science can now resolve this big question for us. 

Both Leuchter and Rudolf chipped away dozens of wall-samples from the old buildings, then measured the cyanide; and their results showed five thousand parts per million of total cyanide on average in the little old delousing-chamber walls, the ones that are generally a deep blue colour; and only one to three parts per million in what are alleged in the big textbooks to be where the mass human gassing took place: buildings which do not have any trace of blue in the walls. They found similar ‘normal’ levels in wall samples from the old kitchens and bathrooms – suggesting they were fumigated maybe once or twice a year with cyanide, as a hygiene precaution.

That’s a fairly open and shut case. Science results don’t come much better than that: a two-thousandfold differential, telling us where the cyanide was used – and where it wasn’t; indicating that the cyanide was used for a hygienic and not homicidal purpose.



PINK


Then, there is the pink. A body killed by inhaling hydrogen cyanide dies through oxygen-denial, as cyanide blocks the body’s oxygen-metabolism. It cannot pass from blood into the body tissues, and in the death-struggle the body will end up bright pink. But, no-one ever heard of a bright pink pile of bodies in a German labour-camp, that’s for sure.

Two gases were used to murder millions of Jews, so the official story has been telling us: cyanide and carbon monoxide. Hundreds of books have alleged this. 

Carbon monoxide was supposed to be present in Diesel exhaust –  except that it isn’t, but that’s another story.Holocaust orthodoxy claims One third of the Holocaust was caused by gassing with carbon monoxide, using Diesel exhaust fumes, the other two-thirds being gassed by cyanide. The latter was supposed to happen in big, long rooms with holes in the ceiling, the former more in travelling, mobile vans. There are (of course) no photos available of these alleged mobile death-vans.

It happens that death by carbon monoxide also leaves a bright pink body. Like cyanide gas it kills by denying oxygen to the body – but does so differently, by forming carboxyhaemoglobin in the blood. After that, the blood cannot any longer carry oxygen. So the two main gases allegedly used by the Germans to mass murder Jews both leave bright pink bodies. No one realised this around the time of Nuremberg, or indeed for several decades afterwards. It is a relatively recent argument. How could that be? No one will ever show you a pile of bodies allegedly gassed. No such remains were ever detected in any German labour-camp. But, you will be shown piles of very emaciated bodies which have clearly died from two causes: starvation, plus typhus. Those two were the killers. Sometimes if a body is anaemic this pink hue may not appear. But, that was not notably the case for labour-camp inmates. One would have expected at least 90% of deaths to show the pink hue, had CO or cyanide been a cause of death



MEDICAL REFERENCES

1. In all of the fatalities from acute carbon monoxide poisoning in which the victim was found dead at the scene, a conspicuous finding was the characteristic pink or cherry red post-mortem lividity of carboxyhemoglobin in the skin of the dependent portions of the body. These are readily distinguishable, because of their color, from ordinary post-mortem lividity.’ – American Journal of Public Health, March 1952, p.262 (Source: F. Berg) 

2.   Carbon monoxide poisoning may be diagnosed easily, because its inhalation in lethal quantities produces a characteristic cherry red coloration in the areas of hypostasis. A similar reddish hue is seen in cases of cyanide poisoning. D.A.L. Bowen “Medical Investigations in Cases of Sudden Death,” British Medical Journal, 1 April 1967, page 35 

3. Picture (above) from Textbook of Maritime Medicine . “Fig. 10.9.2: Bright red lividity on the dorsal side of the body as the expression of lethal carbon monoxide poisoning. Livor mortis is bright red in cases of carbon monoxide or hydrocyanide poisoning (or in cases where the corpse is kept in cold storage).

4. When carbon monoxide binds with haemoglobin in the blood or myoglobin in the muscles it forms carboxyhaemoglobin and carboxymyoglobin respectively and they are responsible for the pink coloration. There are cases in which carbon monoxide poisoning does not result in the formation of a cherry pink coloration (Carson & Esslinger, 2001) and it can be difficult to spot when the victim is dark skinned – though it may be apparent in the lighter regions such as the palms of the hands or inside the lips or the tongue. – Alan Gunn, Essential Forensic Biology, 2009 pp. 21-22 

5. Autopsy findings in CO deaths are fairly characteristic. In Caucasians, the first impression one gets on viewing the body is that the person looks very healthy. The pink complexion is caused by coloration of the tissue by carboxyhemoglobin, which has a characteristic cherry-red or bright-pink appearance that can be seen in the tissue. Cherry-red livor mortis suggests the diagnosis even before autopsying the individual – Vincent DeMaio, Dominick DeMaio. Forensic Pathology, 2nd ed. 2001 p. 395.

6. A pink lividity, rather than the usual purple-red, raises the possibility of death from carbon monoxide poisoning, cyanide or hypothermia – Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences / edited by Jay Siegel, Geoffrey Knupfer, Pekka Saukko, 2000 p. 1158, article “Autopsy” 

7. Cyanide overdose can be fatal six to eight minutes after ingestion. Rapidly causes weakness, confusion, coma, and pink skin from high blood oxygen saturation. Produces an almond-like odor. –  Forensic Science: Fundamentals and Investigations / Anthony J. Bertino 2012 p. 258 



CONCLUSION

There were conditions of deep horror at the camps, as found when they were liberated by the Allies, but that horror was not designed by the Germans to be there. The lie at Nuremberg of mass human gassing was mainly a case of the Allies believing their own propaganda: the BBC started promulgating the gassing stories in 1942. 

The chemical evidence clearly shows that Zyklon was used from mid-1942 onwards exactly as the Germans said it was used viz for delousing clothes, in purpose-built delousing chambers; and that diesel exhaust is not lethal, because it does not contain sufficient carbon monoxide to kill people.

study of alleged carbon monoxide poisoning concluded, ‘witnesses such as Reder, “Szlamek” and Rosenberg would have observed a very large number of bodies showing cherry red discolouration. That not a single one of the alleged eye-witnesses to mass gassings at the above listed camps mention the highly eye-catching type of discolouration that most often accompany lethal carbon monoxide poisoning is in itself enough to throw doubt upon the alleged truthfulness of their statements’ 

1 There was an earlier Zyklon-A which had the cyanide in liquid form.

2 See the CODOH thread, ‘Testimonies on corpse colour.’

Do you want to look at all the evidence and form your own opinion? 

Whatreallyhappened.info is based in the United Kingdom and devoted to free inquiry into historical events.

We are mainly, though not exclusively, interested in the Second World War and the German treatment of Jews during that conflict, since this is the area where free enquiry is most actively and efficiently suppressed—by force of law and imprisonment in some countries and by taboo in all. We don’t like the term Holocaust; we think it represents a dishonest approach used to impose a narrative and to suppress enquiry, rather than encourage actual study of what happened. It has entered the vocabulary relatively recently, promoting a politically-motivated, anti-intellectual, emotional and manipulative memorialism, which was analysed by Dr Norman Finkelstein (a Jewish-American university professor) in his best-selling book The Holocaust Industry.We are not neo-Nazis; we are not so-called “White Nationalists” or any other kind of racist; we do not believe “it was all a Jewish conspiracy”, but we do have genuine and sincere doubts, based on our reading of the historical record, most of which is completely absent from the mass media which serve a hysterical diet of tear-jerking accusations but very few verified facts.

Though individuals behind the site have differing personal views, the one thing we are unanimous on is the right to investigate freely.

We will also point you to aspects of history that, although indisputably true, are almost entirely absent from the mainstream media. For example, take a look at a map of pre-war Germany and compare it with a map of Germany today. The 15 million Germans in that “missing” area, as well as the Sudetenland and other areas, wereGermans expelled from Czechoslovakia driven out with extreme brutality, including mass rape and murder, by Russians, Poles, Czechs, Serbs and others,with hundreds of thousands, perhaps as many as two million deaths. They too were transported in “cattlewaggons” (which were actually goods vans, but that doesn’t have the same emotive ring). It was the largest of many deportations and expulsions in Eastern Europe.They have fallen into history’s memory hole. How much have they received in reparations? When did you last see a TV programme, a film or a newspaper article about any of them? The present writer knows of only one: Shadow Over Europe made by Charles Wheeler for BBC4 in 2002. It has only recently become available on YouTube.

We welcome views that differ from our own, provided always that they are presented objectively, calmly and courteously without resort to rudeness or invective, and we promise to do our best to show similar courtesy to others. We are looking for historical evidence and dialogue, not polemic and confrontation. We don’t seek to demonise, sanctify or whitewash anyone. Not Hitler, not Stalin, not Churchill or anyone else…
Do we deny the Holocaust?

Like “When did we stop beating our wives (or husbands)?” the question is impossible to answer as it is based on a false assumption. “Holocaust denial” is a simplistic Newspeak term, designed to shut down discussion by falsely presenting the issue as black or white, all or nothing, and implying that anyone questioning any part of it must have malicious motives. The truth is more complex.

Much of what is called the Holocaust did beyond question take place:

  • The National Socialist or Nazi regime intensely disliked Jews and prior to the war succeeded in expelling two thirds ofthem from Germany. They had the cooperation of the Jewish Zionist movement, which wanted Jews to move to Palestine.
  • Following the outbreak of war, most Jews in the areas under German control (though not most French Jews) were confined in ghettos, concentration camps and labour camps, where conditions varied from the low standards common in most prisons to the utterly appalling, and where many died (and were cremated) from a wide range of causes which included privation, exposure, disease, neglect, maltreatment (often by the common-criminal prisoners who were placed in authority) and execution.
  • The war on the Eastern front was one of the most barbaric wars in history and civilians were routinely killed by both sides as reprisal or simply to spread terror. It was savage warfare, but it has its parallels in Algeria and Vietnam, for example. Given both official and personal attitudes to Jews on the German side, and the high number of Jews among both partisans and Communist commissars, Jews were likely to figure prominently among the victims.
  • In 1945, conditions of utter horror, with thousands of unburied emaciated dead, were found when camps such as Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau were liberated.

We in no way dispute these component parts of the larger event which since about 1980 has become labelled as the Holocaust. 

But other main components are far from “proven beyond reasonable doubt”. 

There is no convincing evidence that:

  • there was mass murder in gas chambers (There were small gas chambers which were used to kill disease-spreading lice in clothing and bedding using Zyklon B, a legitimate commercial product, stabilised hydrogen cyanide, used in all German military facilities and still produced today under the trade name Uragan D2 uragan is a direct Czech translation of zyklon, cyclone or storm)
  • the Nazi regime sought to exterminate the European Jews (or any other group)
  • the totemic figure of six million Jewish deaths has a basis in fact
  • the appalling conditions with thousands of dead bodies found in Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau were a consequence of deliberate German brutality or neglect

The last point should not be at issue. All historians and other knowledgeable people now accept that that these horrific scenes were caused by epidemics and starvation in the in the total collapse of infrastructure at the end of the war and by massive overcrowding as inmates of the camps in Poland were moved to camps in Germany that had no space for them, but little effort has been made to communicate this knowledge to the general public and photographs taken at these camps are regularly and falsely presented in the media as “proof of the Holocaust”.

The accusations of mass killing in gas chambers rely entirely on:

  • a small number of documents: many simply unverified copies or translations, typed and unsigned, that have never been properly tested for authenticity, presented by American, British or Soviet Intelligence services. Remember the “dodgy dossier” of 2003, the “Kuwaiti baby incubators” of 1991 or, to go further back, the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964?

Both gas chambers and extermination were regarded by the Nuremberg Tribunals and the later SS trials in Germany as “facts of common knowledge” and therefore unquestionable. For a defendant to dispute them was a sure way to the hangman’s noose or a very long time in prison. The only possible defence or mitigation was to say that these things happened but to deny or play down your own role in them. Some received lighter sentences for confessing or for testifying against others (plea bargaining). The Commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Höss, said at Nuremberg that 3 million had died in the camp of whom 2.5 million were murdered. The official figure today is just over 1 million, with no attempt to distinguish, the public being left to assume that all were gassed. So even if we accept the official figure, we know that Höss was forced to exaggerate.

No actual homicidal gas chambers or gas vans have ever been found. The alleged gas chamber at Auschwitz 1, shown to tourists, was “reconstructed” by the Russians in 1947 on the site of a crematorium and morgue, later used as an air raid shelter (with gas-tight door). Until the mid-nineties, it was presented to visitors as “original”. Even today the public are encouraged to believe it is in its original state and you will only be told it is a “reconstruction” if you actually ask, or go to a very obscure corner of their web site (last paragraph on that page). At Auschwitz 2 there are only ruins of buildings whose plans and specifications in the Auschwitz Construction Office are for crematoria and morgues, with nothing to identify them as gas chambers; the ovens are standard crematorium design for individual bodies and their capacity is far too low for the mass murderous use claimed for them. Majdanek has gas chambers used to kill lice in clothing and bedding, using Zyklon B, which it is alleged, without evidence, were also used to kill people.

This comes as a great surprise to most people, who have been taught that the Holocaust is “the most documented event in history” and that it is beyond dispute that six million Jews were killed. In reality, the deportations, the camps and the crematoria are thoroughly documented, but that is all.

Since the universal image of the Nazis as unique symbols of evil incarnate is based on these beliefs, we no longer accept this extreme view of the German Hitlerite regime, though we are certainly are in no way apologists for it: we see it as comparable with the brutal Stalinist regime in Russia, our ally to whom we handed over half of Europe, turning it into a world superpower. We look at the historical record and try to get an objective picture of what happened and to understand why individuals, groups and nations acted as they did. What are viewed as war crimes in comfortable armchair retrospection must be seen in the context both of brutal total war and of similar or comparable actions by our own side.

If there really is little evidence to support these allegations of deliberate mass murder, how can it be that they are near-universally believed?
This is a complex issue, but in outline:


After the war:
Wartime propaganda was successful and simply continued to be believed.

  • There was a need to justify the most destructive war in history to people at home, to our own troops and to the world in general. It was to be “The Good War” to defeat Evil:
  1. Germany was to be occupied and pacified. Any popular sympathy for the former regime had to be destroyed.<class=”western”>
  2. Attention had to be distracted from Allied carpet bombing of German and Japanese citiesRussian mass murder and rape of civilians and the brutal expulsion of 10-15 million Germans from their homes in the East.
  • An image of gas, showers and burning was created around the actual showers and crematoria, and the small gas chambers where Zyklon B was used for its legitimate purpose:  to destroy lice.
  • It suited the Western powers, the Soviet Union and Jewish organisations alike. The overwhelming majority of those involved almost certainly did not question it.
  • There was witness testimony of mass murder in gas chambers in camps all over Germany and the Americans created a film about the Dachau camp and its alleged gas chamber  [at 3' 40"] which was shown at the Nuremberg tribunal. This is no longer believed since as long ago as 1960. Only the camps in Poland, then conveniently unavailable for inspection behind the Iron Curtain, continued to be considered “death camps”. Since they became accessible Auschwitz 1 has been acknowledged to be a fake by the Auschwitz Museum authorities and ground surveys at Treblinka and Belzec have produced little of substance.


Since the late 70s:

  • a “Holocaust Industry” has emerged. The subject is ever-present in the media in a way that was never the case in the thirty years that followed the war.
  • belief in “the Holocaust” is imposed on Western society by a combination of:
    • force of law: in most of Europe people are jailed for years or heavily penalised financially for “denying the Holocaust”. Most of these laws do not date from the post-war period but were introduced in the last twenty or thirty years, in Hungary as recently as 2011
    • intellectual and academic taboo: academics who raise questions are persecuted and excluded (Joel Haywardfor example), with the result that only those who are prepared to toe the party line dare address “the Holocaust”
    • media censorship: critical perspectives are totally absent from the mainstream media, which simply regurgitate everything they are fed by the Holocaust Industry and actively promote it (see above)
    • a campaign of memorialisation that has turned “the Holocaust” into a dogmatic religious belief that may not be questioned, on pain of being branded a heretic and an outcast
    • emotional “education” programmes which ignore objectivity, context, evidence and historical methodology in general and are little more than brainwashing; they are often taught in Religious Studies rather than in History
    • branding any attempt at objective assessment as “Holocaust denial” and implying that all “deniers” are antisemitic, racist, neo-Nazi thugs

This is the only event in the history of the world that is surrounded by such an electric fence of taboo and criminalisation, forbidding any objective historical investigation. We want to open up the memory holes so that all relevant evidence can be seen and evaluated, and to establish a fair and balanced assessment of what really happened. 

Churchill wrote a 6-volume History of the Second World War. He did not mention gas chambers or extermination. Neither did Eisenhower nor De Gaulle in their memoirs.

Was the extermination of 6 million people really so unimportant? 

Or did they, too, have their doubts?

Here is an outline of the Holocaust Revisionist position by Bradley Smith and Mark Weber

THERE IS NO BUSINESS LIKE SHOA BUSINESS

TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 2013 AT 1:42PM GILAD ATZMON

By Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday, the Independent reported  “Astonishing new research shows Nazi camp network targeting Jews was twice as big as previously thought.” But The Independent was quick and kind enough to give us an insight into the  implications of this new Shoa affair. “The team behind the research, based at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC, told The Independent that they believe the evidence could also be crucial to survivors trying to bring cases for compensation against Germany and other countries for time spent in camps whose existence was hitherto obscure or undocumented.”

Legendary (and very perceptive) Israeli diplomat Abba Eban had already sussed it out in the 1950s when he told us that: “There’s no business like Shoa business”

For years, I’ve been opposing European Holocaust denial laws. Among other things, I believe that those laws are designed primarily to maintain the primacy of Jewish suffering and divert attention from the sins of Zionism and Israel. But now I realise that I could have been wrong. As the Holocaust Industry runs out of steam, some Jewish institutions are engaged in sustaining the Holocaust as the mother and father of all genocides and, as we read above, they certainly know how to convert suffering into shekels. So now I grasp that Holocaust Denial Laws, may actually have been passed to save the Goyim from the inevitable inflation of future demands for further compensation such as reported above.

For now, I would advise the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC to adopt a more universal approach and, rather than focusing solely on the suffering of Jews,  to look into the suffering inflicted on Palestinians by the Jewish State because, as far as we can see, the whole of Palestine is now an open air prison.

Oh, and while they’re at it, The Holocaust Memorial Museum can also look into the role Jewish lobbies are playing in the destruction Palestine – a crime taking place before our very eyes.

THE UNITED JEWISH KINGDOM

MONDAY, MAY 28, 2012 AT 10:01AM GILAD ATZMON

BY GILAD ATZMON

http://www.deliberation.info

The Telegraph reported yesterday that “ministers have criticised Britain’s biggest exam board after pupils were asked to explain ‘why some people are prejudiced against Jews’ as part of a GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education).

Apparently more than 1,000 teenagers are believed to have sat the religious studies test papers, which challenged pupils to assess the reasons behind anti-Semitism.

The Assessment and Qualifications Alliance, which set the exam, rightly said that the question acknowledged that “some people hold prejudices” – they probably expected the students to examine the reasons that lead to anti Jewish feelings rather than simply justifying them.

Michael Gove, the Education Secretary who is notorious for his pro Israeli stand and his intimate relationships with the Jewish lobby, has managed to produce a particularly lame statement that should disqualify him from any holding any position related to education.

To suggest that anti-Semitism can ever be explained, rather than condemned, is insensitive and, frankly, bizarre,

antisemitism

Gove told The Jewish Chronicle.  The ‘education’ minister should actually accept that every social phenomenon or tendency should be subject to an academic scrutiny, scientific research and critical examination. The education minister should actually encourage critical thinking and freedom of thought, however, being one of the pillars of the CFI (conservative Friends of Israel) we shouldn’t really expect a drop of integrity from Minister Gove.

Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the infamous ultra Zionist Board of Deputies of British Jews  (BOD), said:

Clearly this is unacceptable and has nothing whatsoever to do with Jews or Judaism.

Benjamin and the BOD have been pouring news about the ‘rise’ of anti Semitism for years. One would wonder why are they now tormented by the attempt to question the reasoning behind the phenomenon that concerns them so much and for so long.

The exam board insisted that the question was part of a paper focusing on Judaism and the “relevant part of the syllabus covers prejudice and discrimination with reference to race, religion and the Jewish experience of persecution”.

But here comes the interesting bit. While the question is fully legitimate and deserves a thorough examination, one may wonder how would the exam board expect to mark some academically valid possible answers. For instance, how would a board’s examiner mark a young truth telling British student who may suggest that anti Jewish feelings could be realised as a direct reaction to the concerning facts that it was the Jewish Lobby led by Lord Levy that financed the Labour government that took us into an illegal War in Iraq? The student may argue that some people mistakenly identify Jews (as a collective) with the horrendous non-ethical acts of just a few Jews, this is where prejudice, plays its role.  Bearing in mind it was also Jewish chronicle writers such as David Aaronovitch and Nick Cohen who were supporting this criminal act in the mainstream media, such an answer is coherent and consistent with the facts.  Another honest student may suggest that with 80% of the Tory MPs (including education minister Michael Gove ) being CFI  members there is a reason to believe that the British Government is under the control of a foreign power. Following the pressure of the CFI, the Tory government recently amended the British Universal Jurisdiction law just to allow Israel war criminal to visit the Kingdom. I guess that some students must be clever enough to notice that acts taken by British politicians who shamelessly attempt to appease their pro Israeli paymasters on the expense of British values and ethical consideration actually expose Jews in this country to some potential animosity. How would the exam board mark such a reasonable and critical young and innocent thinking?

It seems as if the exam board is not really prepared to tackle the issue seriously. Its representative told the Jewish Chronicle

we would expect [students to refer] to the Holocaust to illustrate prejudice based on irrational fear, ignorance and scapegoating.

In other words, the British education system admits here openly that it expects students to repeat textbook ready-made answers rather than thinking critically and thoroughly. Is it really ‘irrational’  to be tormented by the irritating idea that the vast majority  of your leading party MPs are friends of a non-ethical, racist and expansionist foreign power? Is it reasonable to wonder why Jewish Chronicle Writers were over represented in some pro war advocacy? Is it really unreasonable for a young British student to ask why the American Jewish Lobby AIPAC is pushing for a war against Iran that can escalate into a nuclear conflict? Shouldn’t British students try to examine the relationships between the Jewish Lobby and the Jewish community? Shouldn’t Religious students try to examine the complex relationship between Jews, Judaism and Jewishness? Shouldn’t they look into the relationship between The Old Testament and IDF’s crimes against humanity? For sure they need do, this is actually the real meaning of education.  To educate is to teach how to learn said Martin Heidegger, but in Britain 2012 Education means to teach student how to answer the appropriate kosher answer.

As it happens the exam board reacted quickly and submissively to Jewish pressure. Its representative said

the board is obviously concerned that this question may have caused offence, as this was absolutely not our intention.

I guess that the exam board who were obviously subject to some relentless pressure may now be able to form their own answer to the question. They may grasp by now what is to root cause of ‘anti Jewish prejudice’ and it has nothing to do with the ‘holocaust’, ignorance’ or ‘irrationality’. It is actually the natural reaction to abuse of our most precious intellectual right, the freedom to think.

Another uniquely banal mind Rabbi David Meyer, the executive head of Hasmonean  High School, told the Telegraph that the question had “no place” in an exam.

The role of education is to remove prejudices and not to justify them,” he said.

It is pretty amusing or actually sad to find out that a Rabbi and an executive head of a Jewish school doesn’t know the difference between  ‘question’ and  ‘justification’. However, Rabbi Meyer, surely knows that Rabbinical and Talmudic education encourages debate and critical thinking. I wonder why Rabbi Meyer doesn’t approve the idea that Goyim teenager should also learn how to think critically and even learn how to debate?

Seemingly, the Telegraph found only one single voice of reason in the entire kingdom.  Clive Lawton, formerly an A-level chief examiner for religious studies, said: “I do understand why people might react negatively to the question, but it is a legitimate one.”

If anyone including Michael Gove and the BOD want to prevent the rise of anti Jewish feelings and prejudice in general they may want to look briefly in the mirror. It is their attitude that put Jews at a growing risk. As it happens, it is always Jewish power exercised by just a very few that introduces danger to the entire Jewish community and beyond.


For a further expose of the lobby..

The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics

The book can be  ordered  on Amazon.com  or Amazon.co.uk

Daily Life in Auschwitz
from British Intelligence decrypts, 1942

British Intelligence successfully decoded messages from the German labour-camps through the year 1942. It happened at Bletchley Park, where the famous Enigma codebreaker, with the huge calculating-engine called Colossus beside it, opened the German codes. That had a key role in Britain winning the War by giving vital info about submarine positions etc, – but, little attention has been given to its disclosures about the concentration-camps. Kept as top-secret for fifty years, that material was finally released in the mid-1990s. Before that, historians had little more to go on, than a summary of it made by the British intelligence-analyst F.H. Hinsley, back in 1981, where he obscurely stated:

“The return from Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.”[1]

Once this data was released, an unexpected problem arose: the priceless decrypts – the most authentic information anyone could possibly want about daily camp life under the Nazis – yielded no crumb of evidence that any ‘Final Solution’ had been ongoing! Quickly, experts had to start started apologising for how British Intel had somehow ‘failed to apprehend’ the Holocaust.[2] More recently the historian Nick Terry has concluded, ‘It would therefore seem as if British intelligence was largely hoodwinked in the first half of 1942.’[3]

Was it?

Rather feebly, experts were obliged to conjecture – as Holo-historians had been doing through the previous decade – that innocuous-sounding phrases concealed the fiendish meaning and intention. For example, sending Jews ‘to the East’ alluded to mass gassing.[4] But is that really how historians are meant to behave? Should not their conclusions be drawn from the data, rather than imposed upon it? We here explore the view, that the understanding by British Intelligence of these decrypts, was sound.

I came to peruse these top-secret wartime documents in the Public Record Office in the autumn of 2012[5], thrilled to turn over the crinkly pages with old, blue typewriter-print and MOST SECRET… NEVER TO BE REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE red-inked across the top. Here were confidential wartime documents from the head of MI6 to the Prime Minister Winston Churchill, plus decrypts straight from Auschwitz! I apprehended why the Holo-historians had not wanted to know about these priceless wartime texts…

Summer of 1942
The year 1942 is a turning-point in our story, when Exterminist historians believe that the terrible mass gassing of Jews began, at Auschwitz. The ‘machinery of mass murder’ to use Jean-Claude Pressac’s phrase, got going! As Dr Terry explained, ‘the machinery of the death camps was in place and the policy of “selection” on the ramps at Auschwitz was instituted from July 17, 1942[6].’ August was the month when the biggest and worst typhus epidemic hit the camps. That shock reverberated though Auschwitz in particular as the long-extinct disease of typhus, a bacillus carried by body lice, returned to haunt the labour-camps. A Polish resistance movement might have introduced it to the German military:[7] civilians entering the camp had brought it, not the inmates deported there.[8] New protocols called ‘special treatment’ (‘Sonderbehandlung’) were swiftly developed and implemented,[9] for all camp members, that involved routines of hair shaving, cleansing and delousing of clothing, bedding and living quarters.[10] Two uttely different interpretations of that summer, one Exterminist and the other Revisionist, stand before us when reading the following decrypts.

Here are inmate figures[11] from the decrypts, for Jews, Poles and Russians, at quarter-year intervals:

Total Jews Poles Russians
January 1942 9884 191 9186 2095
April 10242 1296 8475 354
July 16369[12] 6241 7676 153
October 16996 7500 6470 -
January ’43 28350 11332 12646 -

There were more Poles than Jews in the camp: Jews comprised 39% of the inmates on average, Poles 65% and Russians a mere 3%. (The two categories of Poles and Jews are overlapping, maybe why the ‘totals’ here given don’t add up.) Many people have conjectured that far larger numbers than these had been arriving but not departing, unmentioned in any monthly reports:[13] but in that case, what would have been the point of keeping meticulous daily records of people coming and going? Some eighty-five thousand persons arrived at the Auschwitz camp that year.[14] It’s hard to see more than forty thousand Jews arriving, from those figures, plus others coming and going. The camp’s Monthly Reports often have many Jews leaving the camp, as well as arriving. Of the deaths in the camp that year, nearly sixty percent were Jewish[15], and in such a nightmarish situation one can appreciate how stories got going.

Each monthly bulletin reports on the previous month. The report for June (with camp names in capitals) said:

V Labour and Industry
The shortage of manpower leads to a considerable employment of prisoners outside as well as inside concentration camps. There are constant enquiries regarding the trade of prisoners and evidence on the part of undertakings and firms of demand for prisoner labour.
On May 1st, LUBLIN can provide: 1200 clerical workers and students, 200 bakers, 150 butchers, 350 agricultural workers and 800 workers of various trades, total 2700. (85/7). On the same date DR. Caesar is informed that KL RAVENSBRUECK disposes of 3 German speaking women horticulturalists and 2 botanists. (85/12). The transfer of 95 skilled workers and 180 unskilled workers to the GUSTLOFF works is arranged on May 13th at the rate of RM 5,00 per day and per prisoner for skilled workers, and RM 4,00 for unskilled workers. (60/8). KL DACHAU sends 18 prisoners to the Versuchsanstald fuer Ernaehrung und Verpflegung on May 15th., at a rate of RM 0,30 per day per prisoner. (70/8) 20 prisoners are required on June 22nd. For laying a field cable from ENNSDORF to MAUTHAUSEN (139/15). In KL FLOSSENBUERG, prisoners who are not fit for heavier work will be employed on repair work, and the finishing of children’s toys. (80/28). A demand for 30 to 40 prisoners comes from a cement factory (131/18). Himmler himself requires by 10 a.m. on May 27th the number of glass blowers available in KLA (86/34); and canvassing of makers of musical instruments is proceeding in July (174/1).[16]

At last it can be told – prisoners not fit for heavier work had to finish off children’s toys.
Beside the monthly totals, comments such as these were written:
Dachau: on 19 May, 18 prisoners to be transferred. 20 May, 67 prisoners leave. 20 carpenters sent from Dachau to Mauthausen.
Auschwitz: A Pole escaped, 13 May. 15 May, Himmler expresses his interest in the tanning experiments.[17] 9 June: Typhus, 18 out of 106 died.
August: ‘On 5 June AUSCHWITZ is told that for political reasons they will not receive 2,000 Jewish workers, but on 17 June Jewish transports from Slowakia are announced..’ June 9: ‘Typhus dominates the camp: 18 out of 106 cases have died before 15 June; 22 out of 77 further cases have died before 22nd June.’ Camp MAUTHAUSEN: ‘They are told that Dr. Ruscher is allowed to use coloured photography which is necessary for his experiments. On 4 May a prisoner is shot in flight.’

September ‘For the first time returns are given for deaths of prisoners: the figures for August are: NIEDERHAGEN 21, AUSCHWITZ 6829 (or 6889) men, 1525 women; BUCHENWALD 74; FLOSSENBURG 88. The AUSCHWITZ figure represents about 30% of the total given in the IPCC figures; the cause is likely to be typhus, as typhus was rife in June (see last summary) and a policeman is suspected of typhus in September. Deaths must constitute a large proportion if not all of the “departures” mentioned in the GPCC figures, which total 5325 for 19 days of August. During 19 days of August arrivals total 4989 so that they nearly balance deaths. About half of the prisoners are Jews. AUSCHWITZ is said to be under a ban on 4th September. Deaths in BUCHENWALD represent a tiny proportion of the departures.’[18]

Suddenly, a vast mortality was reported in one camp – viewed by British historian Nick Terry as part of a covert Jew-extermination program.[19] But that is not a logical inference, on account of the way camp mortality then plummeted after September,[20] once the epidemic had been brought under control. Typhus plus typhoid fever and dysentery, diahorrea etc., were raging in the camp, a real nightmare with inmates banned from leaving owing to the risk of infection: as David Irving wrote: ‘There was evidently a deadly epidemic raging at the camp, since a message of September 4 in reply to a request for a thousand prisoners for building the Danube railway, stated that Auschwitz could not provide them until the ‘ban’ (Lagersperre) on the camp had been lifted.’[21] The ‘ban’ confirms that the terrible peak in mortality was caused by infectious diseases and not something else.

Camp Kommander Rudolf Hoss applied for some rubber truncheons, but was advised they were ‘unobtainable in Breslau.’[22] There is a report of some executions taking place: ‘Executions are reported: a Russian civilian is shot when attempting to escape from NIEDERHAGEN. FLOSSENBERG is allowed a lorry and a bus to convey Polish civilians to a wood for execution. A prisoner is hung in HINZERT and nine more are shot.’ One may conjecture that, if a Polish resistance movement had indeed started the typhus epidemic, the execution of a whole busload of Poles in September could have been payback.
October: ‘The large influx of Russian civilians, Jews and Poles continues and it is reasonable to suppose that deaths from typhus are still high in AUSCHWTZ and probably in other camps such as NIEDERHAGEN and HINZERT. Concentration camp prisoners are being used in large numbers in COLOGNE, and there is evidence of a cutting down of outside commitments to increase the number of prisoners available for war work. A new camp is intended at DEBICA. SACHSENHAUSEN evidently contains Englishmen as it has asked for an English interpreter. Some light on conditions in Concentration camps is shown by the instruction that a visiting labour commission is not to be shown either “special quarters” (Sonderunterbringung) or, if it can be avoided, “prisoners shot when escaping.”

A fall in the inmate population was discussed:
Auschwitz: ‘The total falls from 22,455 on 1st Sept. to 17,365 on 30th Sept. and to 16966 on 20th Oct. No figures for deaths have been given this month and therefore it cannot be said what proportion of the daily departures, which amounts to 2395 on 7th Sept, 1429 on 8th Sept, and otherwise vary between 550 and 47, are due to death: it is however known that at least 11 SS men have been taken into hospital on suspicion of typhus during October. As about 2,000 men in the total are always unaccounted for, it is difficult to be certain in what categories the arrivals and departures belong. But on 7th Sept. the numbers of political prisoners, Jews and Poles have fallen by 1, 2020 and 284 respectively, a net loss of 2305; the net loss in the total column in 2379; therefore it is clear that the majority of the departures are Jews.

That sudden drop of several thousand in inmate population was due, the analyst concluded, not to illness but to departures, chiefly Jews. He was scrutinising the several columns of data. Some ten percent of the total camp inmates are ‘always unaccounted for’ he concluded – which helps to resolve the vitally-important issue: with all the comings and goings in the labour-camps, about ten percent – which here amounts to two thousand out of some twenty thousand – remain unregistered. In this situation, there cannot be tens of thousands of Jews continually arriving, as Hilbert wants to believe. Instead, a majority of the departures are Jewish. That ought to settle quite a bit of the ongoing debate.
November: ‘the use of prisoners for war industries on a large scale is discussed below…the largest transference is the move of Jews to AUSCHWITZ for the synthetic rubber works. Another major movement is the transference of sick prisoners to DACHAU. Meanwhile typhus continues, particularly at AUSCHWITZ… the women’s camp remains stationary at about 6500 because arrivals balance departures.’

Jews are here being imported into AUSCHWITZ as skilled industrial labour, at the Buna-Monowitz plant. The report for Dachau confirmed this: ‘Large departures .. due to prisoners being sent on war work to Auchwitz and other places, which removes all but 9 of the Jews and many Russian civilians.’ The camp total was around ten thousand. Thus, sick prisoners were being farmed out to the Dachau camp, while fit-to-work Jews went the other way.

In December there were over twenty thousand inmates at Auschwitz: ‘half of these numbers are Jews and large numbers arrive and depart every day.’

For January of 1943 at Auschwitz, ‘The Buna-werk is still employing 2210 men of whom 1100 are on the actual work. Jewish watchmakers are sent to SACHSENHAUSEN where they are urgently needed. Typhus cases continue to be reported although strenuous measures have been adopted and 36 cases were found among the new batch of prisoners on 22 Jan.’

Jews are alluded to in these decrypts with a respectful tone, being imported into Auschwitz as skilled industrial labour, or urgently needed as watchmakers somewhere else. Clearly, one can either have an ongoing program of extermination or have workers capable of doing skilled work – but, not both. This new and detailed info about the camps has to comprise a final stake through the heart of the Exterminist thesis.

These decrypts allude several times to Heinrich Himmler in relation to the camps: that he took an interest in some tanning experiments, that he asked about how many glass blowers were available, and that he sought out makers of musical instruments. On 17 July, 1942 he visited Auschwitz and it’s always claimed that he ‘witnessed a mass gassing.’[23] One has a choice here, between two different stories, between two different worlds.

These primary-source documents show a momentous change in the summer of 1942, with the outbreak of typhus and the initiation of ‘special treatment’ routines. Sudden death arrives, but I suggest that no intentional extermination is happening. Winston Churchill’s speech about ‘We are in the presence of a crime without a name…’ on 24 August 1940, no doubt alluded, as Dr Terry has made clear, to what decrypts had been telling him about the brutal Russian campaign – and not, as has been alleged in certain quarters, to ‘the Holocaust.’[24] [25]

A focus upon these British Intelligence decrypts could exert a terminal effect upon the ‘Holocaust’ industry. Holo-tomes tomes roll off the press (Dr Terry had kindly sent three hundred titles published since 2000), but have they not ignored this primary-source data? They omit discussing what the decrypts describe, for the very reason that we are here concerned to expose it.

The Primary Sources
We seek out the primary-source data, in order to find the truth. For example, there are two raw-data sources, which are more or less independent, for how people died in the German labour-camps: the Death-Books of Auschwitz, and the Arolsen Archives (now called the International Tracing Service), a database collected by the International Red cross over the last sixty years. The latter covers all the German labour-camps. These two sources have two important things in common: a roughly similar number of Jewish deaths recorded, around thirty thousand, for the Auschwitz camp, and also that neither source records one single death by gassing.

The British-intel decrypts didn’t record the deaths but only ‘departures’ – which includes deaths – except for the one month of August 1942 when it gave a figure, and we’ve shown how this is fully compatible with the number given by the Death-Books for that month.
But, if anyone still wants to believe in huge numbers of Jews brought into the camps, not being recorded as ‘arrivals’ and then gassed right away – a quintessentially unverifiable concept – then a different kind of argument will have to become relevant, of intact coke records. This has not here concerned us, but the records of coke consumed by the cremation-ovens do impose a strict ceiling upon the number of bodies that can have been cremated.

Thus we emerge from Storyland, we leave behind us the Fairy Tale from Hell, which a Culture of Untruth wanted to manipulate. Instead we choose to analyse the actual, primary-source data. Nowadays hardly anyone believes the words of politicians, and we respectfully suggest that uncensoring the truth would be the best way to make progress towards a civilisation that would be worth living in. We politely request open debate concerning the meaning of these British-intelligence decrypts.

[1] British Intelligence in World War Two, HMSO, 1981 F.Hinsey Ed., Vol. II, p.673.
[2] BBC Radio 4 ‘Holocaust Documents Released’ 20 May 1997: Holocaust-historian Sir Martin Gilbert on how historians ‘failed to notice….’ etc. http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/holocaust/5114.shtml
[3] Nick Terry, Conflicting Signals: British Intelligence on the ‘Final Solution’, 1941-1942’, Yad Vashem Studies 32, 2004, pp. 351-396, p.382.
[4] Robert van Pelt, Auschwitz 1270 to the Present, 1996: ‘…the words “further East” meant gas chambers.’ Also, of course, ‘passing through’ (as in the numbers that ‘passed through the camp’) alluded to ‘the process of extermination,’ p.326. The East was a ‘domain of redemption’ for the German nation, he explained!
[5] Search for ‘Public Record Office’ then go to the Discovery catalogue, and insert a file name, eg HW 16/65.
[6] N. Terry, Op. Cit. p.382.
[7] Irving, Churchill’s War, p.964 ref. 28 (citing archive sources in US)
[8] Rudolf Report, 2003, p.60.
[9] On July 29, a radio message authorized the camp administration to pick up gas for disinfestation: “The permit for travel by truck, from Auschwitz to Dessau for the collection of gas, which is urgently required for the disinfestation of the camp, is hereby issued.” Mattogno, Special Treatment, p.45.
[10] See Carlo Mattogno’s book Special Treatment in Auschwitz for evidence of the meaning of this term.
[11] Go to our What really happened site and click on ‘Auschwitz population in Excel’ and the excel spreadsheet will give you the monthly means: or for raw data examine the decrypt-data starting here.
[12] This total for July was published by the Red Cross, see Mattogno op cit p.23.
[13] That number cited by Hilberg is wholly impossible in relation to mortality figures: the muffle-furnaces or cremation-ovens, about fifty of them in Auschwitz-Birkenau, take one hour per body-cremation, were operated over twelve hours of the day, and were each online for about half of the time: which gives a maximum of around one hundred thousand cremations possible in the year: see Carlo Mattogno, ‘The Crematoria ovens of Asuchwitz and Birkenau’, in Dissecting, ed. Rudolf.
[14] For that computation, see our ‘Deaths at Auschwitz in 1942.’
[15] This figure comes from ‘The Death Books of Auschwitz,’ analysed in Ref. 13. But, there was a far lower proportion in 1943, a mere 24%: see our ‘Deaths at Auschwitz, 1942’
[16] Decrypt HW 16/65 August 1942, p.21.
[17] But NB Himmler’s visit to Auchwitz was on 17-18th July: Mattogno, ref. 10, p.17
[18] This September report is enormously important, as giving a link or a comparison with the monthly deaths recorded in the Death Books of Auschwitz (2005) – discussed here.
[19] Terry op. Cit., p.386.
[20] For analysis, see NK, Deaths at Auschwitz in 1942.’
[21] David Irving, Churchill’s War, p548.
[22] Decrypt HW 16/6 5 Oct 1942: Irving ibid., p.700 (NB I couldn’t find that decrypt).
[23] This claim is ‘ incessantly repeated and never proven:’ Mattogno, ref 10,, p.17.
[24] See Terry op. Cit. P.360.
[25] See Jurgen Graf’s Giant with Feet of Clay for this topic: it’s a rebuttal of Raol Hilberg’s three-volume ‘classic’ Destruction of the European Jews, 2003, which treats of the Russian campaign in its 2nd Volume.

Copyright: You may freely copy any original material here, provided you acknowledge the source as whatreallyhappened.info. Any quoted or linked material is the property of the original owner.

Denying Holocaust Forgeries, Hoaxes, and Fabrications

“While in the United States, protected as it is by the 1st Amendment, the Holocaust has become a secular religion, with state support in the form of a national museum. Accusations of ill will or bad faith are often made against anyone with reservations about the elevation of this project into something combining a cult, an entertainment resource and an industry, each claiming to represent the unvoiced dead”—Christopher Hitchens[1]

    …by  Jonas E. Alexis

Deborah Lipstadt

Deborah Lipstadt, the author of Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, is the Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University. Jewish writer and historian D. D. Gunttenplan declares that Lipstadt came to teach at Emory not because of her serious scholarship, but because of the Jewish influence.[2]

One can say that Lipstadt’s scholarly endeavor began when she started to assign the book Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood 1939-1948 to her students.

Written by Benjamin Wilkomirski, the book came out in 1995 and received immediate success. The book was also translated into nine languages.[3]

Journalist Melissa Katsoulis writes that sales

“across Europe and the English-speaking world were impressive. It won the prestigious Prix Memoire de la Shoah in France, the Jewish Quarterly’s prize in London and also its American equivalent, the National Jewish Books Award. Feted by critics, historians and book-buyers alike, Wilkomirski found himself finding off interview requests from television, newspaper and magazine editors, and for the next three years rose to become one of the most sought-after and well-loved survivors of Hitler’s astrocities. He was even sent on a lecture tour of America by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.”[4]

Jewish professor Daniel Jonah Goldhagen of Harvard, who also has been known for summoning historical fiction and fabrication,[5]also supported the book,[6] as well as major newspapers such as Publishers Weekly and theJewish Quarterly.[7]

The sad part of the story is that the whole story turned out to be a complete hoax, a fabrication by a non-Jew. As Norman Finkelstein puts it, “Half-fruitcake, half-mountebank, Wilkomirski, it turns out, spent the entire war in Switzerland. He is not even a Jew.”[8]

After three years, Wildomirski was discovered to be a liar by a real Jew, Daniel Ganzfried, “himself the child of a survivor…Writing for the news magazine Weltwoche, he presented his dossier of research into the man he had been secretly studying for over a year: a close reading of Fragments, he argued, showed that the author had not actually been in the camps at all—his accounts of the workding, layouts and customs of those places simply did not chime with the testimonies of those whose presence in them could easily be verified (which Wilkomirski’s could not).”[9]

Though Wilkomirski defended the book’s accuracy, the fraud was obvious to Ganzfried. To set the record straight, his literary agent Eva Koralnik hired Stefan Machler, a historian, to “separate fact from fiction…Six months later, in 1999, Marchler’s report was complete.”[10]

When Fragments was discovered to be a hoax, Wilkomirski faded into obscurity. “I feel pity for him because I know him personally,” declares Heide Grasnick, one of his editors, “He’s not a happy person.”[11]

But the fraud and complete fabrication do not matter to publishers who want to cash in on the hoax: “Arthur Samuelson (publisher): ‘[It] is a pretty cool book…It’s only a fraud if you call it non-fiction. I would then reissue it, in the fiction category. Maybe it’s not true—then he’s a better writer!”[12]

A better writer? What about the thousands of people who spent money to buy a real memoir? Are they just losers? Doesn’t Samuelson owe them an apology?

As the late Jewish historian Raul Hilberg himself wrote, “How did this book pass as a memoir in several publishing houses? How could it have brought Mr. Wilkomirski invitations to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum as well as recognized universities? How come we have no decent quality control when it comes to evaluating Holocaust material for publication?”[13] Hilberg continues to say that the book “hovers between the highly unlikely and the utterly impossible.”[14]

Despite the revelation of Fragments as a hoax, Deborah Lipstadt stated that the book was still “powerful as a novel.”

The problem with this vacuous assertion is that Wilkomirski did not write a novel and never intended his book to be read as such! Wilkomirski went around telling the entire world that the story was true. Lipstadt was supposed to seize that moment and issue an apology, which would have placed her in a historical context. But she once again had to succumb to ideology and in the process knock herself out of any meaningful historical discussion.

Moreover, on behalf of her website hdot.org, Lipstadt claims that she received $120,000 from the Claims Conference, the Jewish organization we have exposed in the article entitled “The Rise and Fall of the Holocaust Industry.”[15]

This brings to light the driving ideology behind those who use the Holocaust as a weapon to subvert history.

As the Israeli writer Boas Evron once declared, “The memory of the Nazi extermination” became “as a powerful tool in the hands of the Israeli leadership and Jews abroad.”[16]

This tool is powerful because the Jewish establishment tells us who can and cannot wear the badge of the Holocaust.

There are other powerful novels that turned out to be complete forgeries. Norman Finkelstein writes,

“The first major Holocaust hoax was The Painted Bird, by Polish émigré Jerzy Kosinski. The book was ‘written in English,’ Kosinski explained, so that ‘I could write passionately, free from the emotional connotation one’s negative language always contains.’ In fact, whatever parts he actually wrote—an unresolved question—were written in Polish. The book was purported to be Kosinski’s autobiographical account of his wanderings as a solitary child through rural Poland during World War II…The book’s motif is the sadistic sexual torture perpetrated by the Polish peasantry….

“In fact, Kosinski conjured up almost all the pathological episodes he narrates. The book depicts Polish peasants he lived with as virulently anti-Semitic. ‘Beat the Jews,’ they jeer. ‘Beat the bastards.’ In fact, Polish harbored the Kosinski family even though they were fully aware of their Jewishness and the dire consequences they themselves faced if caught.”

In the New York Times Book Review, Elie Wiesel acclaimed The Painted Bird as ‘one of the best’ indictments of the Nazi era, ‘written with a deep sincerity and sensitivity.’ Cynthia Ozick later gushed that she ‘immediately’ recognized Kosinski’s authenticity as ‘a Jewish survivor and witness to the Holocaust.’ Long after Kosinski was exposed as a consummate literary hoaxer, Wiesel continued to heap encomiums on his ‘remarkable body of work.’”[17]

Here is more bad news: “The Painted Bird became a basic Holocaust text. It was a best-seller and award-winner, translated into numerous languages, and required reading for high school and college classes.”[18]

Wiesel also falls under the category of Holocaust fabrication. He says he is a Nazi survivor and has made claims that he saw Jewish babies “thrown into flames…with my own eyes.”[19] Not only that, Wiesel claims that he read Emmanuel Kant’s The Critique of Pure Reason in Yiddish.[20]

Elie Wiesel

There is more: Wiesel recalled that he once got hit by a taxi in Times Square and “I flew an entire block. I was hit at 45th Street and Broadway, and the ambulance picked me up at 44th.” Just in case you think that Wiesel was simply dreaming about being a superhero, he laid all doubts to rest when he went on to say, “The truth I present is unvarnished. I cannot do otherwise.”[21]

Pierre Vidal Naquet, a French-Jewish historian whose book Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of Holocaust we shall examine in the future, declared that “You just have to read parts of Night to know that certain of his descriptions are not exact and that he is essentially a Shoah merchant. . . who has done harm, enormous harm, to historical truth.”[22]

The late Christopher Hitchens, who found out late in life that he was Jewish, said, “Is there any more contemptible poseur and windbag than Elie Wiesel? I suppose there may be. But not, surely, a poseur and windbag who receives (and takes as his due) such grotesque deference on moral questions.”[23]  Wiesel used to work for the newspaper Zion in Kampf, a propaganda machine for a terrorist group named the Irgun.[24]

Wiesel, like Simon Wiesenthal, turned out to be a pathological liar who cooked up his story as he went along.[25] Wiesel, like Wiesenthal and in many cases Deborah Lipstadt and Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, has the tendency to force his subjective fantasy into historical and objective reality as opposed to letting historical reality undergird his weltanschauung.

Pierre Vidal Naquet

Moreover, virtually everyone has to be subservient to this weltanschauung. How else could Wiesel have gotten a Nobel Peace Prize? How else could he have been called a “messenger to mankind” by the Norwegian Nobel Committee?[26]

And how else could he have gotten honorary degrees from major institutions such as Lehigh University, DePaul University, Seton Hall University, Michigan State University, University of Vermont, Bucknell University, Washington University, University of British Columbia, University of Warsaw, etc?[27]

Wiesel did not like the publication of Norman Finkelstein’s The Holocaust Industry. The book probably would have slipped into obscurity had it not been endorsed by Raul Hilberg. Wiesel and the U.S. Holocaust Museum, says Finkelstein, “relentlessly pleaded with [Hilberg] to retract his endorsement of my book. He refused.”

After David O’Connell exposed Wiesel for the lies and contradictions that his own testimony entailed, thought police Deborah Lipstadt tried to get O’Connell fired from Georgia State University, where he teaches French. The university took almost a year to straighten the facts out, and found out that the errors were not O’Connell’s but Wiesel’s.

Although Lipstadt was upset that O’Connell did not get fired, she found out to her surprise that, as E. Michael Jones put it, “academic life still had a remnant of integrity.”[28] But it would have been very interesting if the university fired O’Connell. E. Michael Jones wrote:

“There is probably another reason why the attempt to oust Professor O’Connell failed. The administration at GSU knew if they fired O’Connell on trumped up charges of fraud, that he would then sue them, and the lawsuit would lead to a discovery process that would have been disastrous for both the university and the system of thought control run by the powerful Jews who were orchestrating the campaign, demanding vengeance.

“In a way, it’s a shame this case didn’t go to trial. It would have been interesting to learn how Professor Lipstadt heard about Professor O’Connell’s article in the first place, and it would have provided a nice counterpoint to the Lipstadt-Irving libel trial in London. It would also have exposed the inner workings of Jewish thought police like Deborah Lipstadt and the role she plays as an enforcer of the Jewish hegemony over academe today…Professor O’Connell has challenged Professor Lipstadt to a debate, but…Professor Lipstadt doesn’t debate Holocaust deniers.”[29]

Another individual who fooled the public, particularly Oprah Winfrey, about his experience during the Holocaust was Herman Rosenblat. Rosenblat told the entire world that

“he met his wife while he was a child imprisoned in a Nazi concentration camp and she, disguised as a Christian farm girl, tossed apples over the camp’s fence to him. He said they met again on a blind date 12 years after the end of war in Coney Island and married. The couple celebrated their 50th anniversary this year. Ms. Winfrey, who hosted Mr. Rosenblat and his wife, Roma Radzicki Rosenblat, on her show twice, called their romance ‘the single greatest love story’ she had encountered in her 22 years on the show.”[30]

The Rosenblats

This “single greatest love story” also turned out to be one of the greatest hoaxes ever concocted in Holocaust history. Later, Rosenblat had to issue a letter of apology declaring, “To all who supported and believed in me and this story.

I am sorry for all I have caused to you and every one else in the world. Why did I do that and write the story with girl and the apple, because I wanted to bring happiness to people, to remind them not to hate, but to love and tolerate all people. I brought good feelings to a lot of people and I brought hope to many. My motivation was to make good in this world.”[31]

The sad part is that Rosenblat’s tory had previously and approvingly appeared in books such as Chanukah by Shimon Apisdorf way back in 1997.[32] Rosenblat’s story got another boost by two psychologists Greg Smalley and Shawn Stoever back in 2009.[33] Rosenblat had also “won a contest sponsored by the New York Post for ‘the best love story sent in by a reader.’”[34] Marjorie Gaber of Harvard writes:

“When the Rosenblats returned to The Oprah Winfrey Show eleven years later, Winfrey lauded their romance as ‘the single greatest love story, in twenty-two years in doing this show, we’ve ever told on the air.’ The story was picked up in the ‘couples’ volume Chicken Soup for the Soul…”[35]

Fabrications and forgeries like these happen precisely because in certain arenas individuals are condemned if they question the veracity of popular “historical” events.

Yet this abuse of the truth should compel honest historians to challenge the damage that has been done in the name of the Holocaust. As Finkelstein puts it, when falsehood is passed off as historical evidence, “restoring the integrity of the historical record and the sanctity of the Jewish people’s martyrdom”[36]  gets overlooked.

John McCain

We certainly want everyone to know what the historical records allow and do not allow. The physical persecution of all people, including Jews, Christians, Muslims, Russians, etc., must never be overlooked.What everyone should resent is the elevation of one group almost to the exclusion of everyone else.

Current events have taught us that the people who are being physically persecuted are the precious Muslims and Christians in the Middle East by the Zionist ideology. We have seen at least 500 people die by violence in Iraq alone.[37] Who cares about those people, since they are not Jews? Who cares about their lives and children?

This Zionist dream is being spread virtually all over the West. How else would John McCain ally with terrorist groups such as the Syrian rebels?

Here’s a man who knows very well that the rebels are terrorist groups, but he still goes out of his way to say “hi” to them in Syria! “Every single day, more and more extremists flow in…” McCain declares in a recent interview, “But they still do not make up a sizeable portion.”[38] 7,000 terrorists cannot be considered as a great portion? The only way that McCain can come up with nonsense like this is because he is trapped in Zionist matrix.He has to think “zionistically.” As some have already pointed out, should we send McCain to Guantanamo for associating with terrorists?

An Issue of Great Importance

 In the next few articles, we will be discussing history as it relates to Nazi Germany. To this end, the reader is asked to put on his or her thinking cap in order to examine the issues that will be raised and thoroughly discussed.

Emotion, by the way, is not part of our thinking cap. While emotion can be a good virtue, if used properly, when it comes to truth, facts, and objective reality, emotion should take a back seat.

Professor Walter E. Williams once said that “There are some ideas and feelings that sound plausible but given just a wee bit of thought can be shown to border on lunacy.” In a similar vein, Thomas Sowell declared, “Fallacies are not just crazy ideas. Usually they are notions that sound very plausible, which is what enables them to be used by politicians, intellectuals, the media, and all sorts of crusading movements, to advance their causes or their careers.”[39]

I disagree with both gentlemen on many issues, and this will be pointed hopefully in the fall. But they are both correct here.

We will give fallacies about the history of Nazi Germany a wee bit of thought and will discover that those fallacies, whether held ignorantly or willfully, border on flimsiness. Therefore, I ask the reader to drop emotional feeling and be ready to look at the facts through the lens of logic, reason, and historical and intellectual honesty.

But before we move on to this extremely important topic, we need lay out what history is about and what serious historians ought to be doing. Our story will begin with the next article entitled, “What is history?” In the process, we will meet one of the most controversial historians of our time and discover that much of what he has said so far has been right in line with historical thought.


[1] Christopher Hitchens, “The Strange Case of David Irving,” L.A. Times, May 20, 2001.

[2] D. D. Guttenplan, The Holocaust on Trial (New York: W. W. Norton, 2002), 67-68.

[3] Stefan Maechler, The Wikomirski Affair: A Study in Biographical Truth (New York: Random House, 2001).

[4] Melissa Katsoulis, Literary Hoax: An Eye-Opening History of Famous Frauds (New York: Skyhorse Publishing, Inc., 2009), 237.

[6] Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, 67.

[7] Harvey Peskin, “Holocaust Denial: A Sequel,” The Nation, April 1, 1999.

[8] Ibid., 60.

[9] Katsoulis, Literary Hoax, 237-238.

[10] Ibid., 238.

[11] Ibid., 240.

[12] Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, 60.

[13] Ibid., 60.

[14] Peskin, “Holocaust Denial: A Sequel,” The Nation, April 1, 1999.

[16] Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, 41.

[17]Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, 56.

[18] Ibid., 56.

[19] Elie Wiesel, Night (New York: Hill and Wang, 2006), 32. As soon as this book was chosen by Oprah Winfrey in 2006 for her magazine, it then reached the New York Times best seller list.

[20] Yair Sheleg, “The Finkelstein Polemic,” Haaretz, March 30, 2001.

[21] Quoted in Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, 82.

[23] Ibid.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Ibid.

[27] Ibid.

[28] E. Michael Jones, “Holocaust Denial and Thought Control: Deborah Lipstadt at Notre Dame University,”www.culturewars.com.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Motoko Rich and Joseph Berger, “False Memoir of Holocaust is Canceled,” NY Times, December 28, 2008.

[31] Katsoulis, Literary Hoaxes, 251; see also Marjorie Garber, The Use and Abuse of Literature (New York: Anchor Books, 2012), 189.

[32] Shimon Apisdorf, Chanukah (Baltimore: Leviathan Press, 1997), 138-139.

[33] Greg Smalley and Shawn Stoever, The Wholehearted Marriage (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009), 253-254.

[34] Marjorie Garber, The Use and Abuse of Literature (New York: Anchor Books, 2012), 189.

[35] Ibid.

[36] Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, xiii.

[37] “Iraq Death Toll In May Passes 500,” Huffington Post, May 28, 2023.

[39] Thomas Sowell, “Summer Reading,” Creators.com, May 20, 2005.

The Anne Frank Diary Fraud

By on January 12, 2010

Introduction – Rixon Stewart February 22, 2006

In today’s London Times Daniel Finkelstien reflects on David Irving’s sentencing and asks:“The test that David Irving set me: do I really believe in the power of truth?”

The answer to that is an emphatic no. If anything Finkelstien is working in the opposite direction. This becomes apparent half-way through the article when he writes: “With her own eyes, my mother saw Anne Frank arrive in Belsen (she knew the family), yet still Irving and people like him contend that Frank’s story is fake.”

The Anne Frank story may not be an outright fake but as Brian Harring reveals in the article below, it is an elaborate piece of story telling. However, the fact that Finkelstien uses it to condemn Irving says all there is to say about his detractors and Finkelsteim’s belief in the “power of truth.”

So we should be wary when Finkelstien concludes: “no David Irving should not be in jail. We can do better than that. I wish I could tell you that the Irving trial is the only way in which my belief in the power of truth is being tested.”

Here Finkelstiem’s apparent balance and restaint is being used as a ruse to further beguile the reader into believing his deceit. Just as the Anne Frank story was contrived, so Finkelstiem’s article is little more than fiction and his concern for the “truth” an attempt to bolster its credibility.

In fact the Times itself has become a Zionist propaganda mouthpiece that often resorts to lies to make its point. Last year it described Israel Shamir, a former Israeli paratrooper now a writer and political activist as “a Swedish-domiciled anti-Semite also known as Jöran Jermas”. Now, as revealed below, it uses an proven fake to bolster the case against Historical Revisionists.

The Anne Frank Diary Fraud
by Brian Harring – TBR News.org

When Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote Uncle Tom’s Cabin, she did so prompted by the highest of motives. Yet she, herself, relates the incident that when she first met Abraham Lincoln in 1863, he commented “So you are the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war!”

Few will deny that the printed word in this instance fanned the flames of passion which brought about one of the bloodiest and saddest wars of American history, with brother sometimes pitted against brother, father against son. Perhaps if there had been less appeal to the emotions the problems might have resolved themselves through peaceful means. However, almost universally read at the time, few people then recognized the potency of one small book or the injustice done the South through its wide acceptance as a fair picture of slavery in the South.

Propaganda, as a weapon of psychological warfare is in even wider use today. Communists were masters of the art. Often they used the direct approach; just as often they employed diversion tactics to focus the eyes and ears of the world in directions other than where the real conflict was being waged. For many years, through propaganda alone, the dead threat of Hitler and Nazism had been constantly held before the public in a diversion maneuver to keep attention from being directed against the live threat of Stalin, Khrushchev and Communism.

Such has been the effect, if not the deliberate intention of many who have promoted its distribution, of a book of popular appeal-The Diary Of Anne Frank. It has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse and horror.

Many Americans have read the book or seen the movie version, and have been deeply moved by the real life drama it claims to present. But have we been misled in the belief that Anne Frank actually wrote this diary? And if so. should an author be permitted to produce a work of fiction and sell it to the world as fact, particularly one of such tremendous emotional appeal?

The Swedish journal Frio Ord published two articles commenting on The Diary of Anne Frank. A condensation of these articles appeared in the April 15, 1959 issue of Economic Council Letter, as follows:

“History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth. and may become more effective than truth.

The Western world has for some years hem made aware of a young Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to he her personally written story, “Anne Frank’s Diary.” Any informed literary inspection of this book has shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.

A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50.000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the “Anne Frank Diary.”

Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin. not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.

Inquiry of the County Clerk. New York County. as to the facts of the case referred to in the Swedish press, brought a reply on April 23, 1962, giving the name of a New York firm of lawyers as “attorneys .far the respondent.” Reference was to ”The Dairy of Anne Frank 2203-58.”

A letter to this firm brought a response on May 4, 1962 that “Although we represent Mr. Levin in other matters, we had nothing to do with the Anne Frank case.”

On May 7, 1962, came the following reply from a member of a firm of New York lawyers to whom the original inquiry had been forwarded:

“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman. on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled between the litigating parties, while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.

I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman’s decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported. both in 141 New York Supplement. Second Series 170. and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk‘s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one which must include Judge Coleman’s decision. Unfortunately, our file is in storage and 1 cannot locate a copy of that decision as it appeared in the New York Law Journal early in the year 1960.”

The Diary Of Anne Frank was first published in 1952 and immediately became a bestseller. It has been republished in paperback, 40 printings. It is impossible to estimate how many people have been touched and aroused by the movie production.

Why has the trial involving the father of Anne Frank, bearing directly on the authenticity of this book, never been “officially reported”? In royalties alone, Otto Frank has profited richly from the sale of this book, purporting to depict the tragic life of his daughter. But is it fact, or is it fiction? Is it truth or is it propaganda? Or is it a combination of all of these? And to what degree does it wrongfully appeal to the emotions through a misrepresentation as to its origin?

School publications for years have recommended this book for young people, presenting it as the work of Anne Frank. Advertising in advance of the movie showing has played up the “factual” nature of the drama being presented. Do not writers of such editorials and promoters of such advertising, “fan the flames of hate” they rightly profess to deplore?

Many American Jews were shocked at the handling of the Eichmann case, the distortions contained in the book Exodus and its movie counterpart, but their protests have had little publicity outside of their own organ, Issues, by the American Council for Judaism. Others who have expressed the same convictions have been charged with anti-Semitism. Yet it is to be noted that both Otto Frank and his accuser Meyer Levin, were Jewish, so a similar charge would hardly be applicable in pursuing this subject to an honest conclusion..

File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office should be opened to the public view and its content thoroughly publicized. Misrepresentation, exaggeration, and falsification has too often colored the judgment of good citizens. If Mr. Frank used the work of Meyer Levin to present to the world what we have been led to believe is the literary work of his daughter, wholly or in part, then the truth should be exposed.

To label fiction as fact is never justified nor should it be condoned.

Since actual period documentation does not exist in support of the Holocaust myth, it has always been incumbent on its supporters to create it.

Not only is the “Anne Frank” diary now considered to be a fake, so also is “The Painted Bird” by Jerzy Kosinski. This book, which is a mass of pornographic and sadistic imagery which, had it not been taken so seriously by the Jewish community, would be merely the pathetic manifestation of a self-serving and very sick person.

This was duly exposed as a shabby, though much revered (by the Jewish community) and quoted, fraud. When this was exposed, Kosinski committed suicide. Later, in Kosinski’s footsteps we find the next fiction entitled “Fragments, ” by a Swiss Protestant named Bruno Dosseker who spent the war in Switzerland as a young child. Dosseker posed as a very young Baltic Jewish concentration camp inmate named Binjamin Wilkomerski. This work consists of allegedly fragmented “memories” and is very difficult to read

Dosseker became the poster boy for the Holocaust supporters and was lionized by the international Jewish community, reaping considerable profit and many in-house awards for his wonderful and moving portrayal of German brutality and sexual sadism.

Another book, allegedly by a Hungarian doctor, concerning his deportation from Budapest in 1944 and subsequent journey by “Death Train” to Auschwitz is another fraud. There was never such a doctor in Hungary during the period involved and the alleged route of the train from Budapest to Auschwitz did not exist.

These sort of pathetic refugees from the back wards seem to be drawn to the Holocausters…and they to them. There are now “Holocaust Survivors” as young as thirty which is an interesting anomaly because the last concentration camp was closed in 1945. Perhaps they consider the last frenzied spring sale at Bloomingdale’s department store to be what they survived.

Next we can expect to see a book based on twenty-seven volumes of secret diaries prepared on a modern word processor within the current year by an alleged inhabitant of the Warsaw ghetto, describing the Nazi slaughter of tens of millions of weeping Jews by means that would shame a modern African state.

And, predictably, the publication of these howlers would be greeted with joy on the part of the fund raisers and fanatics, praised in the columns of the New York Times and scripted by Steven Spielberg for a heart-wrenching and guaranteed Oscar-winning film.

Hundreds of thousands of DVD copies will be donated to American schools and the Jewish community will demand that subservient executive and legislative bodies in America create a Day of Atonement as a National Holiday to balance the terrible Christian Christmas and the wickedly Satanic Halloween.

Conservationists must hate these books because so many otherwise beautiful and useful trees are slaughtered for their preparation

Insofar as the Anne Frank diary is concerned, herewith is some background on Anne Frank, her family and her alleged Diary.

The Franks were upper class German Jews, both coming from wealthy families. Otto and his siblings lived on the exclusive Meronstrasse in Frankfurt. Otto attended a private prep school, and also attended the Lessing Gymnasium, the most expensive school in Frankfurt.

Otto attended Heidelberg University. After graduation he left for a long vacation in England.

In 1909, the 20 year old Otto went to New York City where he stayed with his relatives, the Oppenheimers.

In 1925 Anne’s parents married and settled in Frankfurt, Germany. Anne was born in 1929. The Frank’s family business included banking, management of the springs at Bad Soden and the manufacture of cough drops. Anne’s mother, the former Edith Holländer, was the daughter of a manufacturer.

In 1934, Otto and his family moved to Amsterdam where he bought a spice business, Opekta, which manufactures Pectin used in making household jellies.

On May 1940, after the Germans occupied Amsterdam Otto remained in that city while his mother and brother moved to Switzerland. Otto remained in Amsterdam where his firm did business with the German Wehrmacht. From 1939 to 1944, Otto sold Opeka, and Pectin, to the German army. Pectin was a food preservative, and a anti infectant balm for wounds and as a thickener for raising blood volume in blood transfusions. Pectin was used as an emulsifier for petroleum, gelatized gasoline for fire bombing. By supplying the Wehrmacht, Otto Frank became, in the eyes of the Dutch, a Nazi collaborator.

On July 6, 1942 Otto moved the Frank family into the so-called ‘Secret Annex’. The annex is a three story, mostly glass townhouse that shares a garden park with fifty other apartments.

While he was allegedly in hiding, Otto Frank still managed his business, going downstairs to his office at night and on weekends. Anne and the others would go to Otto’s office and listen to radio broadcasts from England.

The purported diary begins on June 12, 1942, and runs to December 5,1942 . It consists of a book that is six by four by a quarter inches. In addition to this first diary, Anne supplemented it with personal letters. Otto said Anne heard Gerrit Bolkestein in a broadcast say: ~ “Keep a diary, and he would publish after the war”, and that’s why Anne’s father claimed she rewrote her diaries second time in 1944.

In this second edition, the new writer changed, rearranged and occasionally combined entries of various dates.

When Anne allegedly rewrote the diaries, she used a ball point pen, which did not exist in 1945, and the book took on an extremely high literary standard, and read more like a professional documentary than a child’s diary. In Anne’s second edition her writing style, and handwriting, suddenly matured.

The actual diary of Anne Frank contained only about 150 notes, according to The New York Times, of October 2 ,1955.

In 1944, German authorities in occupied Holland determined that Otto Frank had been swindling then via his extensive and very lucrative Wehrmacht contracts. The German police then raided his apartment attic, and the eight Jews were sent to Westerbork work camp and forced to perform manual labor .Otto himself was sent to Auschwitz.. Anne, her sister Margot, and her mother, subsequently died of typhus in another camp.

In 1945, after being liberated from German custody, Otto returned to Amsterdam, where he claimed he found Anne’s diary cleverly hidden in the Annex’s rafters. However, another version has a Dutch friend, Meip Geis finding Anne’s diary of fictional events, which she then gave to Otto Frank.

Otto took what he claimed were Anne’s letters and notes, edited them into a book, which he then gave to his secretary, Isa Cauvern, to review. Isa Cauvern and her husband Albert Cauvern , a writer, authored the first diary.

Questions were raised by some publishers as to whether Isa and Albert Cauvern, who assisted Otto in typing out the work used the original diaries or whether they took it directly from Mr. Frank’s personal transcription.

American author, Meyer Levin wrote the third and final edition

Meyer Levin was an author, and journalist, who lived for many years in France, where he met Otto Frank around 1949.

Born in 1905, Meyer Levin was raised in the section of Chicago notoriously known in the days of gangster warfare as the “Bloody Nineteen Ward.” At the age of eighteen he worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and during the next four years became an increasingly frequent contributor to the national literary magazine, The Menorah Journal. In 1929 he published THE REPORTER, which was the first of his sixteen novels.

In 1933 Levin became an assistant editor and film critic at the newly-created Esquire Magazine where he remained until 1939.

Perhaps his best-known work is COMPULSION (1956), chronicling the Leopold and Loeb case and hailed by critics as one of the greatest books of the decade. The compelling work was the first “documentary novel” or “non-fiction novel.”

After the enormous success of COMPULSION, Levin embarked on a trilogy of novels dealing with the Holocaust. The first, EVA (1959) was the story of a Jewish girl’s experiences throughout the war and her adjustment to life after the concentration camps. This was followed by THE FANATIC (1963), which told the hypnotic story of a Jewish poet dealing with the moral questions that arose from his ordeal at the hands of the Nazis. The last in the triptych, THE STRONGHOLD (1965), is a thriller set in a concentration camp during the last days of the war.

At the outset of World War II Levin made documentary films for the US Office of War Information and later worked in France as a civilian expert in the Psychological Warfare Division. He eventually became a war correspondent for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, with the special mission of uncovering the fate of Jewish concentration camp prisoners. Levin took his role very seriously, sometimes entering concentration camps ahead of the tanks of the liberating forces in order to compile lists of the survivors.

After the war Levin went to Palestine and turned his attention again to the motion picture camera. His film MY FATHER’S HOUSE told the story of a child survivor searching for his family in Palestine. He wrote this story as a novel as well and the book was published in 1947.

Levin also joined the Hagana underground and helped smuggle Jews from the interior of Poland to Palestine, then basically an Arab country under the control of the British..

In 1951 Levin came upon a copy of the French edition of the Anne Frank diary He made a number of attempts to have the work published in English, and conceived it as a play and film. When the diary finally found an American publisher, his play was accepted for production but then suddenly barred, ostensibly for being “unstageworthy,” and another writer’s version was commissioned.

Levin fought for the rights to perform his version of the play, claiming that the real reason the producers refused to stage his work was because they thought it “too Jewish.” He saw the suppression of the play as an extension of the Stalinist attack on Jewish culture and, outraged that even Anne Frank could be censored, he took the producers to court and began an agonizing, prolonged struggle that dragged on for years.

Levin eventually won a jury award against the producers for appropriation of ideas, but the bitterness of the trial made him many enemies in the Jewish and literary communities.

Although Levin’s version of the play is still banned by the owners of the dramatic rights, underground productions of the work are frequently staged throughout the world.

Meyer Levin died in 1981

Levin rewrote the various post-war treatments of the Anne Frank diary with an eye toward a Broadway production, but Otto decided to cut him out, refusing to honor his contract or pay him for his work. Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the New York Supreme court awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his ‘intellectual work’.

In 1980, Otto sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German handwriting experts that determined everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until 1951 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.

Because of the lawsuit in a German court, the German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment.

The results of tests, performed at the BKA laboratories, showed that “significant” portions of the work, especially the fourth volume, were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, the BKA concluded those sections must have been added subsequently.

In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne’s handwriting. The German magazine, Der Spiegel, published an account of this report alleging that (a) some editing postdated 1951; (b) an earlier expert had held that all the writing in the journal was by the same hand; and thus (c) the entire diary was a postwar fake.

The BKA information, at the urgent request of the Jewish community, was redacted at the time but later inadvertently released to researchers in the United States.

http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2153.htm#002

The Anne Frank Diary Fraud

The Western world has for some years hem made aware of a young Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to he her personally written story, “Anne Frank’s Diary.” Any informed literary inspection of this book has shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.

A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50.000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin’s work on the “Anne Frank Diary.”

Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, had promised to pay to prominent Jewish author, Meyer Levin. not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.

Inquiry of the County Clerk. New York County. as to the facts of the case referred to in the Swedish press, brought a reply on April 23, 1962, giving the name of a New York firm of lawyers as “attorneys .far the respondent.” Reference was to ”The Dairy of Anne Frank 2203-58.”

A letter to this firm brought a response on May 4, 1962 that “Although we represent Mr. Levin in other matters, we had nothing to do with the Anne Frank case.”

On May 7, 1962, came the following reply from a member of a firm of New York lawyers to whom the original inquiry had been forwarded:

“I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman. on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled between the litigating parties, while an appeal from Judge Coleman’s decision was pending.

Anne Frank’s diary isn’t pornographic – it just reveals an uncomfortable truth

Instead of banning the diary from schools, as Gail Horalek would like, we should teach girls not to be ashamed of their bodies

The dwarves of Auschwitz

The story of a family of dwarves snatched from the gas chamber by Josef Mengele himself sounded incredible. But how to verify the testimony of Holocaust survivors? And should you even try?

The Ovitz family

The Ovitzs (from left): Elizabeth, Perla, Rozika, Frieda, Franziska and Avram

‘I was saved by the grace of the devil,” Holocaust survivor Perla Ovitz told us. Again and again, she recounted in detail how she and her familywere taken to the gas chamber and ordered to strip naked. A heavy door opened and they were pushed inside. “It was almost dark and we stood in what looked like a large washing room, waiting for something to happen. We looked up to the ceiling to see why the water was not coming. Suddenly we smelled gas. We gasped heavily, some of us fainting on the floor. With our last breath we cried out. Minutes passed, or maybe just seconds, then we heard an angry voice from outside – ‘Where is my dwarf family?’ The door opened, and we saw Dr Mengelestanding there. He ordered us to be carried out and had cold water poured on us to revive us.”

The Ovitz family, from the village of Rozavlea in Transylvania, was the largest recorded family of dwarves: a dwarf father who sired 10 children, seven of them dwarves. Perla, born in 1921, was the youngest. In that remote part of Romania in the early 20th century, it was difficult for anyone to eke a living from the land and livestock, and impossible for someone standing less than 3ft tall.

Their mother, anxious for her children’s future, guided them towards a common skill, a profession in which they could together make a living and would be neither isolated nor ostracised. As the five sisters and two brothers were all good-looking and musically gifted, the stage seemed the perfect choice: for where else could they be applauded, courted, honoured?

Throughout history, dwarves had been entertainers, often part of a circus or vaudeville show. But the Ovitzs wanted the stage all to themselves. They appropriately named their musical ensemble the Lilliput Troupe, and for 15 years had a flourishing career in central Europe. Their two-hour show consisted of popular hits of the day, skits and music. Perla had a tiny, four-string pink guitar that looked like a toy, her sisters Rozika and Franziska played on quarter-sized violins, Frieda struck on the cimbalom, Micki played both a half-sized cello and accordion, while the energetic Elizabeth took on the drums. Their elder brother Avram was the scriptwriter, actor and general manager.

The Ovitzs lived a communal life in one big house in the village. When any one of them got married, the spouse moved in and joined the enterprise. While the dwarves basked in the limelight, the average-height family members worked behind the curtains as stagehands and wardrobe mistresses. It was the only all-dwarf ensemble with a full show of their own in the history of entertainment.

When the Nazis came to power, the Ovitzs were doubly doomed: under the Aktion T-4 euthanasia programme, the Germans set out to kill people who were physically or mentally disabled, whose lives were considered “unworthy of living”, “a burden on society”; and, as Jews, the Ovitzs were the target of the Final Solution.

On 19 May 1944, they were brought to the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp because they were Jews. But, by a twist of fate, their disabilityplayed for them. It was rare that one person from an entire family survived the camp, let alone two, but all 12 members of the Ovitz family – the youngest a baby boy just 18 months old, the oldest his 58-year-old dwarf aunt – emerged alive.

Listening to the unimaginable horrors of Holocaust survivors, you shrink, stunned. But historians are reserved about oral testimonies. The witness may get the timeline wrong, forget facts or infuse memories of others into his or her own. Close to the event, the witness often finds it difficult to convey details of the trauma they endured. Crucial events can be forgotten, and trivial ones take centre stage. Consciously or unconsciously, shame and guilt can obliterate vital facts.

The Ovitzs leaving the camp in May 1944The Ovitzs leaving Auschwitz-Birkenau in May 1944We embarked on the trail of the seven dwarves of Auschwitz with the notion that we would subject their story to the same rigorous examination that would be applied to any other historical source. So we not only collected their testimonies, but crosschecked them with those of dozens of other survivors, inmates and doctors, either first-hand or in archives and libraries. We unearthed medical documents in Poland and Germany. Still, we followed the advice of Professor Yehuda Bauer, a Holocaust historian and himself a survivor, that “one must never argue with a survivor”.

Descending the ramp at Auschwitz-Birkenau, the seven dwarves and their five average-height family members were immediately separated from the others in the transport. They were told to wait for the arrival of Mengele. In rotation with other physicians, he was sending the multitudes to their immediate death, and selecting the few fit enough for slave labour. He was also using his long shifts on the ramp to pluck out twins, as well as hunchbacks, hermaphrodites, giants, dwarves, obese men and corpulent women – in general, anyone suffering from a growth disorder.

On the night the Ovitzs arrived, Mengele was asleep in his room at the nearby SS headquarters. All the troopers on duty at the ramp, however, knew well of his passion, of his collector’s mentality. To gain favour with the freak-hunter, they were always on the lookout for new specimens to enrich his “human circus”. While a lone dwarf did not provide reason enough to knock on Mengele’s door in the middle of the night, seven dwarves, along with their tall siblings, seemed good cause for disturbance.

While the SS were brutal towards the newly arrived, they were cheerful with the dwarves. Realising this, two families from the Ovitzs’ village approached and told the officer they were related. The Ovitzs kept silent and did not prove them wrong. Now they were 22. Mengele hurried out to see his new acquisitions. He was delighted: “I now have work for 20 years,” he exclaimed.

A black army truck took them to a building at the edge of the camp. They were pushed in, stripped naked and smelled the fumes. The event indelibly etched the imminence of death not only on Perla’s memory; three other members of the group, whom we interviewed, as well as Elizabeth, Perla’s sister, who wrote her memoir, all attested that they were beginning to be gassed and would have died if Mengele had not suddenly reappeared.

Though we had five first-hand eyewitness accounts, we wanted to verify the story. The only way to do so was to study the procedures and manuals of operating a gas chamber. These were designed to kill between 500 and 2,000 people at once, depending on the size of the hall. Cyclone B was effective only at a room temperature of 27C, which was achieved by cramping a mass of people together. Gas chambers were simply not operated for merely 22 people; small groups were shot.

Furthermore, according to the camp’s rigid safety orders, SS personnel had to wear gas masks when operating Cyclone B. Although the victims died within 15 minutes, the SS men routinely waited half an hour before turning on the powerful fans that dispersed the gas from the chamber. Only then were the doors opened. The operators themselves did not enter; instead, Jewish inmates from the Sonderkommando were sent in to drag out the bodies for cremation. Once the extermination process had begun, it could not be halted, because by then it would have been impossible to open the doors.

What actually happened was that the Ovitzs and their neighbours were taken to the camp sauna for disinfection, where the water poured over heated stones produced much steam and fumes, as well as temperatures intense enough to cause someone to faint. The sauna had a particularly traumatic effect on both small children and fragile dwarves that might easily have created the impression of being gassed.

And what about the appearance of Mengele at the door? They regarded him as their saviour, and there were several later incidents in the camp when he indeed rescued them from imminent death at the hand of one of his rival doctors. So, for the Ovitzs, every narrow escape that they had in the camp was thanks to him.

Mengele had several hundred twins at his disposal, and he carried out notoriously cruel experiments on them that led to countless deaths. But he had only one family of dwarves, so he was careful not to put his precious guinea pigs at risk. He gave them special living quarters and their food portions were larger. Their hair was not shorn, because he needed it for his experiments. They were allowed to wear their own clothes, because prisoners’ uniforms did not fit their bodies. Former inmates told us that they thought they were hallucinating when they saw a colonnade of seven dwarves dressed warmly and elegantly, as if for aShabbat stroll.

In the research on twins, Mengele was the field worker for his mentor,Professor Otmar von Verschuer, in Berlin. But he was looking for a research niche of his own and he found it in dwarfism. Mengele was aiming not only to discover the biological and pathological causes of the birth of dwarves, but to demonstrate the racial theory that in the course of its long history, the Jewish race had degenerated into a people of dwarves and cripples.

Members of the Ovitz group described to us in detail the painful blood-taking that they underwent. Often they fainted and water was poured over them to revive them, only for siphoning their blood to resume. Medical science of the time was obsessed with blood and its constituents, and it was generally believed that plasma contained all genetic traits. But only the medical records, all bearing Mengele’s flamboyant signature, clarified what he was looking for: signs of kidney problems, liver function,typhus and syphilis.

Written accounts of inmate doctors shed further light on the endless anthropological measurements and comparisons between the Ovitzs and their neighbours, whom Mengele mistook for family. The doctors extracted bone marrow, pulled out healthy teeth, plucked hair and eyelashes, and carried out psychological and gynaecological tests on them all.

The four married female dwarves were subjected to close gynaecological scrutiny. The teenage girls in the group were terrified by the next phase in the experiment: that Mengele would couple them with the dwarf men and turn their wombs into laboratories, to see what offspring would result. Mengele was known to have done it to other experimental subjects.

Inmates in Auschwitz-Birkenau tried to improve their lot with whatever talents they had. A barber would hope to shave a kapo (prisoner supervisor) for a piece of bread or two cigarettes; a seamstress might mend the block elder’s clothing; a painter would get a piece of sausage for making portraits for the SS guards; and one champion chess player was kept alive to play with Mengele.

Professor Israel Gutman, an Auschwitz survivor and prominent historian, recalls that “feasts and saturnalias were celebrated at kapos’ and block elders’ quarters. The artistic programme consisted of obscenities and dirty jokes. Sometimes a prisoner with a sweet voice would sing prewar hits in various languages. The kapos especially favoured melancholy tunes. The famous stars were very popular among the kapos and enjoyed a special income, thanks to their art.”

Perla and Elizabeth OvitzPerla (right) and Elizabeth Ovitz: as the five sisters and two brothers were all good-looking and musically gifted, the stage seemed the perfect careerHowever, Perla Ovitz insisted that she and her family never took part in the “nightlife” of the death camp: they never performed in these drunken revelries, never sang in public nor entertained parties of kapos and SS men. She did remember one event. Sunday 30 July 1944 was the fast of Tishah Be’av, commemorating the destruction of the Holy Temple in Jerusalem. Being familiar with the Jewish calendar, Mengele perversely ordered the leader of the women’s orchestra to prepare a special concert to desecrate the holy day. Perla remembered that the programme consisted of romantic, melancholy German songs that moved her and her sisters to tears as they watched the performance from their tiny stools in the audience.

Yet in her autobiography, Playing For Time, singer Fania Fénelon remembers it entirely differently: “We start with a foxtrot, Mengele waving his hand, the dwarves filling the stage, some couples dancing, other participants only managing a kind of grotesque, depressing twist. The men bow with a touch of servility; the women follow. Their jewellery, silk, ornaments glitter in the sun, igniting thousands of sparkles, dancing, swinging, intermingling. These creatures emit joyful sounds, trying to sing along with Clara, Lotte and me. They have high shrieking voices. The orchestra plays a march and they accompany with clapping and stamping.”

Against the bleak backdrop of the death camp, the concert was so vivid that it became deeply etched in the memory of the survivors whom we interviewed. Isaac Taub was part of a group of twin boys enlisted to carry chairs and benches and arrange them in rows. The teenagers were allowed to stand at the back during the performance and Taub clearly remembered the Ovitzs on stage. “We all knew that the dwarves were performing for the Nazis.”

Yet Perla denied that they ever took part. As pious, God-fearing Jews, the Ovitzs deemed performance in Auschwitz to be an abomination, like singing and dancing in a graveyard. Nor would performance under coercion have lessened their shame – not with a painful awareness that while they were entertaining Nazis, the chimneys never stopped smoking. No wonder they strove to erase their experience from their history, and their minds.

Death was the master of Auschwitz and its toll was piled outside for all to see, like so much garbage waiting to be collected. A space suddenly empty in a bunk did not shake heaven and Earth. Those who survived the night walked about as if wrapped in an invisible shell, praying to live one more day. But the Lilliput Troupe drew the inmates beyond their shells, to care about them and their whereabouts. Subsequently, many survivors referred to the fate of the dwarves in their own memoirs.

In her autobiography, Auschwitz: True Tales From A Grotesque Land, Sarah Nomberg-Przytyk describes in appalling detail the horrible death of two members of the Ovitz group, one of them an 18-month-old baby boy who died as a result of one of Mengele’s experiments: “Around him, like pillars of stone, stood a large woman, along with the child’s mother, slim and frail; the three midgets sat in miniature chairs.” In the evening, the dead toddler was placed outside the block with the other corpses to be taken to the crematorium. Nomberg-Przytyk also recounts the death of Avram Ovitz, the leader of the group: “The old midget wanted his wife” and tried to slip through the barbed wire; a guard spotted him and, when Avram got close enough, shot him. “He never made it to his wife.”

But the little boy and his uncle Avram were not killed, and lived to see liberation day. What, then, caused Nomberg-Przytyk to make such grave mistakes? Most likely she was compressing a number of events, and attributed to the dwarves two common occurrences in the daily life of the camp: the death of a child in his mother’s arms and the shooting of an inmate who approached the electrified fence.

And there were others, such as Renee Firestone, who described the death of the Ovitz dwarves: “The Germans found a community of midgets, transported them to Auschwitz, shot them en masse and then were forced to let them sit in a pile for three days until the crematoria could take them.”

One plausible explanation for the discrepancy between fact and remembrance is that the survivors, who regarded their own deliverance as miraculous, found the chances slim that someone as helpless as a dwarf could escape death. The fact that the Ovitzs were transferred several times from one side of the camp to the other caused their fellow inmates to lose touch with them, and in Auschwitz, when you stopped seeing someone, it could mean only one thing.

The seven dwarves, as well as their entourage, all survived the war, and emigrated to Israel in May 1949. Three months later, the Lilliput Troupe was back on stage. In 1955 they made their last bow, but dwarfism did not affect their life expectancy. The first-born, Rozika, reached the age of 98 and her sister Franziska died aged 91. Perla Ovitz died in September 2001.

• Giants: The Seven Dwarfs Of Auschwitz, by Yehuda Koren and Eilat Negev, is published by the Robson Press at £16.99.

Israelis flock to Berlin for better life

AljazeeraBy Victoria Schneider | Aljazeera – Sat, Mar 9, 2013

  • Israelis flock to Berlin for better life

    View PhotoAljazeera – Israelis flock to Berlin for better life

Their new life began four hours by plane away from Tel Aviv. Everything they owned fit into 23 boxes and two animal cages. Altogether, these weighed roughly 300kg – but the load felt incredibly light.

“It’s strange,” says Avisar Lev, 35, nestling into the snug armchair near the window. “I immediately felt at home in Berlin, for the first time in my life.” When he and his wife, Noa Golan, moved to the German capital three months ago, they only took their most important belongings: their cat Buja and their dog Lucy.

All the restrictions and constraints of their Israeli life were left behind.

When they arrived in Germany in early December, their flat was waiting for them. Noa Golan, a slim 29-year-old with dark hair, had found the ground floor flat in an old building in one of Berlin’s hippest quarters, Neukölln, which is known for its tatty and multicultural vibe. It looks like home: The wooden floors, the stove in the corner of the living room. The firewood stacked between dozens of books they brought from Tel Aviv.

They left Israel for many reasons. “Living became very much impossible in Israel,” says Lev. The couple had saved money in order to buy a flat and start a life together. “But you can’t start a life in Israel,” explains his wife. “If they want, landlords in Tel Aviv can increase the prices for their properties by 200 percent.”

According to Israeli newspaper Haaretz, property prices in Israel’s business hub have risen by 71 percent between 2000 and 2011. In 2012, the price of homes in Tel Aviv rose by an additional 3.7 percent. The rising living costs led to mass demonstrations in Tel Aviv, “but while the whole world was watching it in the news, our government didn’t do anything”, Lev says.

He started looking into flats elsewhere. “There was this buzz about Berlin,” he says. His wife adds: “Everyone who is like us moves to Berlin. It’s cheap and it’s cool.” Over the past decade, the once-divided city of Berlin has become a hub for young liberals and intellectuals from around the globe.

Golan and Lev are just two of thousands of young Israelis who have moved to Berlin. The trend has been going on for some time now, and their numbers are increasing. The Israeli embassy in Berlin puts the estimate at around 15-20,000, but some say they are closer to 30,000.

Exactly how many Israelis there are is hard to pinpoint, however, because many are of European descent and hold European passports – and so they don’t count as “Israeli immigrants”.

“You can compare Berlin to New York City in the ’80s”, says Emmanuel Nahshon, the Israeli embassy’s envoy in Berlin. “The city stands for freedom and tolerance. There are a lot of young people from around the world here, not just Israelis. It is cheap to live and study here and there are many cultural and intellectual activities.”

These are not the only reasons the immigrants have for moving. Lev, who worked as a human rights lawyer for Yesh Din, an Israeli NGO that files petitions against illegal construction by settlers on privately owned Palestinian land, says: “It came to a point where I just felt I had to leave. It’s the way people in Israel treat you; some called me a traitor.” The 35-year-old says he was worried he might be followed or photographed. “If you oppose, the society pushes you aside.”

Berlin has the space to breathe. “I felt Israel was very narrow,” says Maayan Iungman. The actress, model and director moved from Tel Aviv just before her 30th birthday, less than a year ago.

Being abroad made her realise many things: “People here don’t have this stress like we do. Israel is not bad – that’s not what I am saying. But the reality is hard, in a quiet way. It’s hard to make a living. There’s the occupation, the army, the religion. The society teaches you that this is the only place for you and you’re not welcome in other places. It’s a country that is occupying another country and it makes its own people crazy. And I am not even talking about the Palestinian people.”

Iungman fell in love with a German and decided to move to Berlin where her sister was already living. The day she arrived in Berlin was Holocaust Remembrance Day in Israel. It was then she realised that where she was going was a place of the past. “I was picked up at the airport by a German guy who I had spent a night with in Israel, but actually didn’t know – and, yes, it did feel strange. We went to his house and were so close to each other. Then I thought: What would be better to give to this day than love?”

A poll by the Center for Academic Studies conducted in 2011 revealed that 70 percent of Israelis don’t forgive Germany for the past. Many young Israelis have grandparents who either fled or survived the Holocaust. Yet now, some of them are returning to the scene where the atrocities of the Nazis were forged, where Joseph Goebbels declared total war and where the “final solution” to annihilate the Jewish people was determined.

Today, Jewish history is still perceptible in Berlin, a city whose streets are sprinkled with Stolpersteine, small memorials the size of cobblestones embedded in the pavement. The memorials quietly remind you where you are and what happened.

Golan remembers. Her grandmother was born in Berlin, and her silhouette hangs neatly above the couple’s bookshelves. Although Golan’s grandmother left Germany before Hitler came to power, she is fascinated by the history. “I notice everything. When I go for a walk along the canal, I wonder: ‘what have these waters seen?”” And yet, as much as Golan is aware of the history, she thinks it is time to strip off the complex that she finds both Israelis and Germans have. “Come on, it’s behind us,” she says, speaking for many of her compatriots who live in Berlin.

Zionism and the Holocaust

 By Mr Chicken.

Zionism is a major strand of the Elite control structure imposed upon this entire planet.  It is an undeniable fact that most large organisations are controlled and run by Zionists, primarily Jews.  Zionist Jews have an almost absolute monopoly in the media in all its forms and also in the entertainment industry, from Hollywood to the major recording labels etc. plus finance and banking.

“Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel.  We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”  Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister of Israel, 3rd October 2001.

“You know very well and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House.  You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable.  What can they [Americans] do to us?  We control Congress, we control the media, we control showbiz and we control everything in America.  In America you can criticise God, but you can’t criticise Israel…”  Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache.

 

“These are the facts of Jewish media control in America.  Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy.  I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least.  Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mould our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests.  Interests, which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people.  By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.”  Pakalert Press, 2011.

“Goebbels was somewhat of a prophet pariah, he understood organized Jewry like few Americans do today, he understood that their collective calls of anti-Semitism directed at the Nazi leadership and indeed the German people themselves was a technique they had successfully used, even perfected, in order to advance their interests while at the same time suppressing any dissent from the gentile majority.  We see this same technique at work today, all around the world, anytime anyone honestly divulges the actions of a Jew in some crime; they are immediately smeared with the label of ‘anti-Semitism’.”  Curt Maynard, researcher.

This ‘label’ of ‘anti-Semitism’ is actually utterly meaningless, yet it has been hijacked by a small group of people to inhibit you (and indeed everyone) from criticising their actions.  To fully comprehend this point, it is firstly necessary for me to define three commonly misunderstood or even possibly unfamiliar terms.

Judaism – The Jewish religion.  Jews can be split into two distinct sub-groups, Ashkenazi (Khazarian) Jews who comprise by far the majority (over 90%) and Sephardic Jews.  These two sub-groups are racially as different as chalk and cheese and so, despite what you may believe or more accurately have been urged to believe; Judaism is a ‘religion’ and not a ‘race’.  In fact many people of Jewish background and parentage are not even religious and so their being described as ‘Jews’ is actually erroneous.

Zionism – a political movement that was originally established to lobby for a Jewish homeland and now exists to promote the superiority of Israel above all other countries, with the ultimate goal of a one-world government based in Tel Aviv.  Zionism is comprised primarily of Jewish people, but many non-Jews are Zionists and indeed many Jews are anti-Zionist.

Semitism – Not the state of being Jewish as is generally believed and promoted by Zionism for its own ends but simply the racial group to which inhabitants of a small area of the Middle East belong.  Semites may be Sephardic Jews or they may be Arabs, there is no racial difference between the two.  However Ashkenazi Jews, despite their loud and raucous protestations to the contrary are definitely not Semitic.

“… it is important that you understand what Zionism really is.  Zionist propaganda has led the American people to believe that Zionism and Judaism are one and the same and that they are religious in nature.  This is a blatant lie”.  Jack Bernstein, assassinated by the Mossad.

“The meaning of the term ‘anti-semite’ has significantly changed in recent years.  There was a time when this term referred to those who despised Jews.  Later, the term referred to those who promoted myths about a global Jewish conspiracy to rule the world.  Today the term ‘anti-semite’ is used by the ruling elite to lambast human rights activists who advocate equal rights between Jews, Christians and Muslims, the right of return of Palestinian refugees to their homeland and the vision of a common, democratic state for both Palestinians and Israelis.  The word ‘anti-semite’, which initially conveyed a negative and even sinister meaning, refers now to positive and highly commendable attitudes that can be carried with honour.  One may lament this change of meaning, but one should remember that a word does not carry any particular meaning.  It is merely a conventional symbol that refers to external contents.  By convention, society could agree to name animosity towards Jews ‘xakaculca’, democracy ‘zbzb’ and elephants ‘democracy’.   Inasmuch as the term ‘anti-semite’ now refers to human rights advocates and radical democrats, I declare myself a radical anti-semite.”  Elias Davidsson, June 2011.

“Zionists from the beginning welcomed anti-Semitism as a means of undermining what Zionists believed was the sense of false security of Jews in western, liberal societies, and as the means by which Jews would be kept in a permanent state of neurosis.  Large and powerful organizations such as the US-based Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith exist mainly for the purpose of exaggerating the extent of anti-Semitism in order to keep Jews under the Zionist heel and keep Israeli coffers filled.”  Rabbi Silverstein, ‘The Lies of Zionism’.

“Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.”  Theodor Herzl, founder of Zionism in the 19th century.

It is important here to make the point that Zionists are not the friends of the Jews in any way despite what many Jews believe.  Jews worldwide have been and continue to be used, often unknowingly in the Zionists plotting and scheming for world domination.

Ashkenazi Jews originated from the plains of South-Eastern Europe / Western Asia and were originally a large nomadic tribe, the Khazars, who inhabited these regions in the Dark and early Middle Ages.  They converted en-masse to Judaism, not through faith but simply in order to bring respectability to their previously god-less reputations when integration with other societies became necessary, more than a thousand years ago.  This was the group of ‘Jews’ who were discriminated against for centuries and expelled from many European nations for their usury, anti-social practices and their own discriminatory practices against non-Jews.  I repeat that these people had no racial or genetic ties to the ‘Holy Land’ whatsoever and so the oft-repeated cries for a Jewish state in their ancestral ‘homeland’ in the early to mid-twentieth century, was simply Zionist propaganda and deception.  Sephardic Jews however, are native to the Holy Land or Palestine and were the original biblical Jews.

So, in effect the Zionists have deliberately blurred the boundaries, between race, religion and politics to prevent criticism of their actions.  They have hi-jacked the term ‘anti-Semitism’, strictly speaking an accusation of racism and managed over time to associate this with discrimination against Jews in general by deceitful social engineering, whilst also turning the distinction between ‘Jewish’ and ‘Zionist’ into a grey area, to the same effect.  How have they achieved this?  Their almost total control of banking, media and the entertainment industries makes this task fairly straightforward via their vast propaganda machine.  Many Hollywood movies subtly promote the superiority of the Jews and the weakness and immorality of non-Jews.  Anyone who criticises or stands up to them in any way is subtly and sometimes unfortunately, not so subtly, destroyed.  At the very least their detractors are accused of being, shock-horror, anti-Semitic with all the attendant stigma this terminology carries.  Anti-Semitism is closely related and linked to Nazism in the minds of most people today.  The immense power of propaganda, social engineering and mind control should be underestimated only at one’s peril.

“We must distinguish between political and racial anti-Semitism.  It’s obvious that organized Jewry has a political program synonymous with the Rothschild satanic world government agenda.”  Henry Makow, Jewish-born researcher and author of ‘A Cruel Hoax’.

Think about this for a moment.  Political criticism is valid today (at least for now anyway) whilst racial criticism (racism) is totally frowned upon and even legislated against.  In making their cause a racial rather than a political one by rendering the two distinctly separate terms ‘Jewish’ and ‘Zionist’ interchangeable, they have succeeded in duping the world and protecting their own insidious views and actions from any form of censure on pain of being branded by them as an anti-Semite and therefore by implication, a Nazi sympathiser.

So, an ‘anti-Semite’ strictly speaking, by definition is someone who discriminates against people of the area known as the ‘Holy Land’, Palestinian Arabs and Sephardic Jew alike and not simply someone who is a ‘Jew-hater’ as it has been engineered to be construed.

Personally speaking, I am not anti-Semitic (or anti-Jewish, to be clear).  Jews have been duped and suffered at the hands of these wolves in sheep’s clothing more than any other group and in many ways still are.  I believe strongly in the freedom of all to do as they choose as long as it harms no-one, but I am definitely anti-Zionist politically, as their actions and beliefs are calculated to cause maximum harm to those who do not share their fascist, racist views.  However, the views expounded herein will no doubt have me labelled as anti-Semitic by the Zionist attack-dogs.  If anti-Semitism did not exist, the Zionists would have to invent it.  Actually, they already have done so.

Of course there are anti-Jewish people in the world (anti-Semites if you will).  To deny that fact would be ridiculous.  But there are also anti-British, anti-American, anti-Muslim and anti-almost-anything-you-can-name elements abounding throughout the world today, too.  However, in my view it is highly significant that to be anti-anything-else does not carry the same stigma as being ‘anti-Semitic’.  This has been successfully inured into our culture to become a heinous act far more serious than any other form of prejudice.

But the Zionists are not content with merely labelling you or I as a ‘Nazi’ for any criticism, overt or implied, of their actions and policies.  No, by using their enormous influence over western societies and governments alike it has now actually become illegal not just to deny that the holocaust of WWII took place but to even question their sacred number of 6 million dead.  Yes you did read that correctly, it isillegal in the Zionist-controlled EU where communitarian European law now trumps that of each individual nation, Canada, USA and Australia / New Zealand (amongst other places) to question the myths and legends of the holocaust on pain of a mandatory prison sentence.  Although you could not actually be prosecuted in the UK for holocaust denial, a UK citizen can certainly be extradited to Germany to face charges even if the ‘offence’ was committed for example, in England.

Please now think a moment on this point; if anything is the truth, why would it need to be protected by law?  If something, anything is the truth then it is surely a simple matter to prove it, is it not?  If this is not the case, then the question needs to be asked why this course is not taken rather than passing laws to protect a point of view.

Is it illegal to question or criticise any aspect of Christianity or Muslim culture?  Is it illegal to question the numbers of American dead in Vietnam or the numbers of British soldiers killed in Afghanistan or even the victims of 9/11 for example?  Is it actually specifically illegal to simply question anything else at all?  You may well be unjustly criticised by your masters and even your peers for having the sheer audacity to question Government-supplied figures, but illegal?  The spirit of ‘1984’ and the ‘thought-police’ is alive and well.

“You can tell if something’s the truth or not by this one criterion.  If they pass a law that says you have to believe a certain story in a certain way, you can be certain that that certain story they’re trying to get you to believe is a lie.”   John Kaminski, researcher, ‘A Certain Truth’, 28th January 2011.

“What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?”   John Swinton, editor New York Times, 1863.

“What they did with their holocaust laws was to make the questioning of their version of what happened during ‘the war’ sacrosanct and undeniable.  What this means is that it doesn’t matter how many irrefutable facts you may have, the law says you can’t question, period.  This fact escapes many people.  You are not allowed to mount a defence and it is inadmissible in any and all cases.”  Les Visible, researcher, April 2011.

Stifling open discussion and debate also does a gross injustice to the other, many non-Jewish victims of the Nazi concentration camps; the Romany people, black people, Polish and Russian soldiers and citizens, Jehovah’s Witnesses, assorted political prisoners, homosexuals and the mentally and physically disabled.  It marginalises the slave labourers starved, beaten and worked to death in German war industries and the horrors suffered by anyone expressing anti-Nazi views.

The real threat to the Zionists posed by ‘deniers’ is that others might be influenced to undertake further in-depth study and uncover embarrassing facts that would refute Israel’s ‘victim’ status.  This would threaten Israel’s moral legitimacy, underpinned by the world’s supposed, collective  shame for looking the other way.  All it takes to invoke that shame is the term ‘anti-Semite’, either stated or implied.

The previously well-respected British historian, David Irving was first labelled a Neo-Nazi and then jailed for 3 years in the last decade for daring to question ‘official’ holocaust dogma – all at the behest of the Elite, Zionist thought-police through their corrupt and controlled legal and courts systems.  In fact, most such ‘revisionist’ historians are of the opinion that Irving does not go far enough with his questions regarding the validity of the Zionists claims.  Irving merely publicly queried the 6 million number, not the event itself.

“If the Holocaust undoubtedly occurred as alleged, then why are laws needed to support said allegations?  Why not simply confront deniers with facts instead?  Recent court cases in Germany have shown that judges are unwilling (unable?) to present facts; they hide behind ‘Offenkundigkeit’ (obviousness).  Their claim: The Holocaust obviously happened, so there’s no need to substantiate it any further.  In any other trial, ‘obviousness’ would not stand up in court; the defendant is always allowed to present his/her evidence.  One has to also wonder why, if all is ‘obvious,’ this book had to be written?  If the Holocaust has been investigated and evidence exists proving without any doubt that mass murder was committed, then why not present this evidence — why the laws?”  Inconvenient History, 18th February, 2011.

On 13th May 1988 the historian, Professor Ernst Zündel was sentenced by Judge Ronald Thomas of the District Court of Ontario, in Toronto, to nine months in prison for having distributed a revisionist booklet entitled, ‘Did Six Million Really Die?’

“No-one in the USA was more knowledgeable about the functioning of [penitentiary] gas chambers than Fred A. Leuchter, an engineer from Boston.  I went to visit Leuchter on February 3 and 4, 1988 and found that he had never asked himself any questions about the ‘gas chambers’ in the German camps.  He had simply believed in their existence.  After I began to show him my files, he became aware of the chemical and physical impossibility of the German ‘gassings’ and he agreed to examine our documents in Toronto.

 

After that, at Zündel’s expense, he left for Poland with a secretary (his wife), a draftsman, a video-cameraman and an interpreter.  He came back and drew up a 192-page report (including appendices).  He also brought back 32 samples taken, on the one hand, from the crematories of Auschwitz and Birkenau at the site of the homicidal ‘gassings’ and, on the other hand, in a disinfection gas chamber at Birkenau.  His conclusion was simple: there had never been any homicidal gassings at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Majdanek.”  Robert Faurisson, historian

 “After reviewing all of the material and inspecting all of the sites at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, your author finds the evidence as overwhelming.  There were no execution gas chambers at any of these locations.  It is the best engineering opinion of this author that the alleged gas chambers at the inspected sites could not have then been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.” Fred Leuchter 1988, p.33; Leuchter et al 2005, p.57

Dr. Fredrick Töben, an Australian scholar and educator, was taken into custody in Mannheim, Germany on 8th April 1999 and detained without bail, for having disputed holocaust extermination allegations.  Töben is a leading holocaust revisionist writer and publicist in Australia, where he founded and directed the Adelaide Institute, a prominent revisionist research and publishing centre.

At the conclusion of his three-day trial on 10th November 1999, a Mannheim district court found Töben guilty on charges of incitement to racial hatred, insulting the memory of the dead and public denial of genocide, because he had disputed holocaust extermination claims in writings sent to persons in Germany.  Presiding Judge Klaus Kern said that there is no doubt that Töben is guilty of ‘denying the holocaust’ and that because there is no sign that he would relent his views and activities, a prison sentence was required.  The court then sentenced him to ten months imprisonment.

Taking into consideration the seven months he had already served in custody, Judge Kern ruled that Töben could be released on payment of a fine of DM6000 (about US$3500 or £2500) in lieu of the three months remaining of his prison sentence.  German sympathisers raised this money and he was freed within 24 hours of the verdict.

A really disturbing neo-Orwellian by-product of Töben’s imprisonment was that his defence lawyer was also indicted for the same ‘offence’ merely for having the audacity to attempt to defend him.  So, to be clear, apparently not only is it a crime to merely question the supposed ‘truth’ and put forward an opposing viewpoint, it is also by implication now a crime to attempt to legally defend someone who has committed this so-called crime.  Would we condemn the legal defender of a murderer or other criminal in this way as being complicit in their crimes?  Absolutely not.  Truly outrageous I am sure you will agree.

How can a political opinion, especially when backed by factual evidence be treated as a crime in the civilised society in which we are supposed to live?  Sadly, the answer is that we do not live in a civilised society any longer, if indeed we ever have done so.  We exist in a quasi-police state, governed by dupes and shills whose sole aims are to fulfil the whims and orders of their Elite masters whilst totally subjugating its own citizens and eliminating all forms of dissent in any way deemed necessary either within or if necessary, outside the laws of the land.  Even if all these ‘dissenters’ are genuinely mistaken, after rationally considering all the evidence, surely prison is not the answer to so-called ‘thought-crimes’ and differences of opinion.  However, what was good enough for the Nazis….!

Step by step, this is how we are being slowly but surely condemned ultimately to a life of slavery under the Elite, Zionist jackboot.  Amazing is it not how the people who dare to question or speak out against their blatant lies, deceptions, statements, proclamations and motives have somehow become the ‘Nazis’, the ‘terrorists’ or whatever other label they wish to pin on them, thus enabling the guilt to be deflected from themselves onto their detractors and by so doing give them an inside track through to their ultimate goals, virtually unchallenged?  I would suggest that the holocaust, playing the role it was originally designed to play, has been another major leap down the route of fulfilling their sadistic agenda.

However, for the biggest ‘shock to the system’ and de-bunk of all the propaganda and lies disseminated by the Zionists and the Nazis, it is necessary to backtrack a little once again, to the mid-1930s.

The simple truth is that the Zionists in their quest to set-up a Jewish homeland in Palestine were funded covertly by the Nazis.  Yes, you did read that correctly.  Captured SS records after the war documented an agreement between the SS and the Haganah, the forerunner of the Israeli Defence Force (IDF).  Under this arrangement the Haganah was permitted to run training camps for Jewish youths inside Germany.  These young people, as well as other Jews driven out of Germany by the Nazis, were financially encouraged to immigrate to Palestine.

Haganah, in return, agreed to provide the SS with intelligence about British activities in Palestine.  Captured German records claim that Haganah’s view was that the increasingly brutal Nazi persecution of the Jews could be turned to Zionist advantage, at least temporarily, by compelling Jewish immigration to Palestine and that the Haganah commander’s sole source of income was by way of secret funds from the SS.  Thus, German brutality against and repression of the Jews was openly encouraged by Zionists.

It is also known that the Nazi regime actually offered all of Europe’s Jews to the Zionist leadership, unharmed on condition that they were re-settled somewhere outside Europe.  For instance, Madagascar was proposed at one stage but this was turned down out of hand by the Zionists on the basis that several million dead Jews would be more likely to fulfil their twisted agenda than several million merely displaced ones.

European Jews were in fact betrayed by the Zionist leadership.  Zionists collaborated with the Nazis to victimise and expel Jews and conspired to manipulate the facts of the holocaust in order to strengthen the case for a Jewish homeland through sympathy for ‘Jewish suffering’.  Furthermore, Zionists in effect were responsible for the creation of Hitler as a ‘bogeyman’ to fulfil the role of the persecutor of the Jews, simply in order to build up a strong case for a Jewish homeland.

The vast majority of German Jews vehemently rejected Zionism as an enemy from within as they saw themselves as Germans, first and foremost.  80,000 German Jews had fought in the trenches of WWI and 12,000 died.  “Nowhere was the opposition of Jews to Zionism so widespread, principled and fierce as in Germany.” a Zionist historian wrote.

In order to manipulate Jews into leaving for Palestine, Germans had to be painted with a racist nationalist ideology just like Zionism and in fact, Julius Streicher and other Nazis admitted that their ‘Master Race’ ideology was modelled on Zionism.  Through their bogus, contrived ‘conflict’, Zionism and Nazism were subsequently able to advance the Elite goal of establishing a private army, secret service and nuclear arsenal in Israel.

Past Jewish suffering at the hands of these Elite-controlled Zionists, exhibits parallels with today.  Their leadership was usurped by Freemasons (ie. Zionism is a Masonic order) bent on sacrificing them to advance the grand plan and now we are all in the same situation.  The banksters today are using debt to disinherit and enslave us.   Bush, Clinton, Obama, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Clegg, Sarkozy et al are all 33rddegree Freemasons who agreed to assume trillions of dollars of ‘debt’ on behalf of us all, from the Elite masonic banksters who are in reality all working towards the same ends.

A contemporary example of how Zionist symbolism infiltrates and influences almost all of our lives on a daily basis can be seen in the case of the official logo of the London 2012 Olympic Games.

Although it cannot be proven beyond doubt that this is another example of our arrogant Zionist leaders mocking the ordinary people of the world as they continue to covertly act against our best interests, I believe there to be a strong chance that this is the case.  People of the ilk of the openly Zionist, Lord Sebastian Coe (former athlete and now the British 2012 Olympics chief) and all senior politicians are merely puppets of the Zionist Elite, lapdogs to their every whim.

If our so-called leaders represented the interests of the ordinary people, they would let banks fail as they did in Iceland and default on all debt created by banksters out of ‘thin air’.  This is a warning to us all and we will continue to be permanently enslaved (and much worse) as long as we continue to elect and accept leaders who are 100% in league with the Elite-Zionists.

The Holocaust – the real truth

Firstly, a short quiz for you:

Question 1.  How many British died in World War II?

Question 2.  How many Americans died in World War II?

Question 3.  How many Germans died in World War II?

Question 4.  How many Russians died in World War II?

Question 5.  How many people died in World War II in total, to the nearest 10 million?

How are you doing so far?  Not too well I suspect.  OK let’s make it a little easier…

Question 6.  How many Jews died in World War II?

So, you scored one out of six then?

How do I know?  Could it be because since as long as all post-war generations can remember, we have had this almost sacred figure of six million dead Jews constantly force-fed to us until it has become indelibly imprinted in our psyche and woven deeply within the very fabric of our culture to such an extent that it has become unthinkable that it may be inaccurate?

“The Western World has been inundated with Holocaust documentaries, Holocaust movies, Holocaust museums, Holocaust books, and Holocaust curriculums.  The aim?  To immunise Jewry and Israel from valid criticism and most conveniently, to obscure the Allied war crimes perpetrated against millions of German civilians.  Perhaps the ‘Holocaust fatigue’ now infecting German youth will create a thirst for what REALLY happened during World War II and an appreciation of their own, factually-substantiated, Holocaust.  And that, ironically to say, will be a very ‘inconvenient’ history lesson for world Jewry.”  Brother Nathanael Kapner, October 2011.

Actually, you were also wrong with your answer to question no. 6.

Six million is quite easily proven as false and this is not just mere supposition or statistical juggling on my part or on the part of any other serious researcher on the topic.  Consider this for a moment:

In the 1950s a plaque was placed at the entrance to the ‘death camp’ at Auschwitz.  Firstly, it categorically stated that 4.1 million Jews died there.  Then some time later it was surreptitiously replaced with one denoting a figure of 2.6 million.  Now, the plaque has been changed again to claim that ‘about 1.5 million’ ‘mainly’ Jews died in Auschwitz and discussions are already being mooted to decide whether or not this figure should be further lowered to around 700,000.  Is it not strange indeed then that these reductions never seem to be deducted from the sacrosanct 6 million total still quoted and treated as indisputable today?  Meticulously administered, independently audited Red Cross figures after the war had ended, stated that around 280,000 European Jews actually perished from all causes including ‘old age’ during the war whilst noting the fact that the Jewish population of Europe actually increased by around half a million between 1939 and 1945.  How strange.  However in the mid-1990s the Red Cross, of course by this time now totally infiltrated and controlled by Zionists anyway, ‘apologised’ for its previous statement.

In answer to question 5 above, although figures vary somewhat, my research has led me to conclude that approximately 65-75 million people in total, lost their lives in this hideous conflict, so it seems incredibly strange to me that we are meant to honour and laud one tiny percentage of that figure and ignore the other 60 or 70 million that died the most futile of deaths in a war waged to secure a Jewish homeland amongst other reasons.  Perhaps all those other people’s lives were not as important?  Yes, that must be the reason.

For well over six decades now, the world has been held under political blackmail with the story of the slaughter of millions of Jews in the gas chambers of the Third Reich and this has received the full treatment of the Zionist propaganda machine, primarily via Hollywood and the media, which still continues to this day in the form of the seemingly endless and  innumerable ‘holocaust’ and WWII movies and documentaries emphasising the suffering of the ‘six million’ and the brutality of the Germans, still being relentlessly churned-out.  Apparently, there are ‘over one million Jewish survivors’ of the death camps still living today (2011), 70 years after the event and still claiming reparations payments from Germany whilst Germany’s own Zionist leadership happily continues to fund them.

From whence did all these ‘millions’ originate when it is known for certain and recorded by several independent and impartial sources that there were only 500,000 Jews in Germany prior to the war and only approximately two million in total in the countries bordering Germany?

In fact this was not the first time that similar ‘holocaust’ stories have been propagated by these people.  There are literally dozens of other examples.  In the Talmud (the Jewish holy book), Gittin 57b claims that four million Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar.  Gittin 57b also claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans.  Thirdly and more recently, the precise figure of 6 million saw light of day for the first time shortly after WWI.  “Six million [Jewish] men and women are dying” in the Ukraine, announced The American Hebrew periodical on the 31st October 1919, the very same claim that the Zionists made twenty-odd years later.  It would appear that the tendency for extreme exaggeration, if not downright lies, remains alive and well in certain quarters.

The Zionists actually thought that Israel would become a reality immediately following WWI, due to the Balfour Declaration’s promise of Palestine in exchange for America entering into the war against Germany.  And since Jewish Talmudic prophecy demands that there be a ‘6 million’ holocaust offering prior to the Jews returning to the Promised Land, it was incumbent upon them to fabricate the holocaust in order for the prophecy to materialise.  The Talmud calls for cleansing the ‘chosen souls’ through the sacrifice of ‘6 million’ (that ever-popular figure again) in ‘burning ovens’, since unclean souls could not be allowed to return to the Promised Land.   That alone is the real source of the ‘6 million’ myth, as well as the myth of the ‘ovens.’

However, Britain was unable to deliver Palestine to the Zionists as promised by Arthur Balfour in 1917, since Palestine was still governed by Turkey at this time.  It took another twenty years and another World War to fulfil Balfour’s illegal promise.  The original 6 million lie was allowed to die a silent death once it was realised that the Homeland would have to be postponed, only to be resurrected again during WWII, prior to the entry of America into the conflict.  The exact same claim about 6 million Jews dying was made, as part of the propaganda to once again force America to enter a war in which it had no stake-holding whatsoever.

“Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s ‘The Second World War’ (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954) and the Mémoires de Guerre de General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959).  In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.   Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de Guerre is 2,054 pages.  In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers’, a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”  Dr. Robert Faurisson, historian and historical document expert

“It is certain that if there had been ‘killing factories’ in Europe murdering millions of civilians, then the Red Cross, the Pope, humanitarian agencies, the Allied governments, neutral governments and prominent figures such as Roosevelt, Truman, Churchill, Eisenhower and many others would have known about it and would have often and unambiguously mentioned it and condemned it.  They didn’t.  Winston Churchill wrote the six volumes of his monumental work, ‘The Second World War,’ without mentioning a program of mass-murder and genocide.  Maybe it slipped his mind?  Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his memoir ‘Crusade in Europe,’ also failed to mention gas chambers.  Was the weapon used to murder millions of Jews unworthy of a passing reference?  Was the future President being insensitive to Jews?”  Unknown source

Moreover, there are apparently no media references to any ‘holocaust’ of any kind nor radio, film newsreel or newspaper stories until towards the end of the war when the myth had been propagated and was just beginning to gain momentum.  Is it really credible that this supposed heinous act was taking place so openly without the knowledge of the Allies and their vast intelligence network in Europe at that time?  I believe not.  Had it really been happening, the Allied propaganda machine against the Germans would have been cranked-up into overdrive and stories of the atrocities would have been widespread.  Why would the Allies need false stories of German atrocities if there were real ones to be had?  The railway lines to and from the ‘death camps’ would also have been destroyed, especially in the latter stages of the war when the Allies were attacking targets both military and civilian all over Germany and Eastern Europe with impunity and with little danger of retaliatory attacks due to German defences being in total disarray or non-existent.  In fact the transport trains themselves were often the victims of Allied attacks and many Jews died as a result of these.

Auschwitz has become synonymous with the holocaust, as the place of methodical extermination of the Jews.  Such is the power of propaganda that if anything, true or false, is repeated often enough and forcefully enough, it becomes accepted without any real attempt to verify the facts.  Surely ‘they’ would not lie to us on this scale would they?  Errr, yes they would, actually and ‘they’ have done so many, many times over the millennia.

Could such an alleged house-of-horrors as Auschwitz is popularly depicted have been equipped with (for the use of the inmates) a post office, a library, a theatre complete with its own resident orchestra, a hospital staffed by 20 Jewish doctors and 300 nurses complete with an intensive care unit and operating theatre?  There was also a swimming pool where inmate swimming galas were known to have been regularly organised in the summer months and the camp also staged regular soccer matches complete with its own mini-leagues?  There was also a fully-equipped court room for the trial of prisoners accused of misdemeanours.  Strange is it not that the Germans would actually bother with trials when they were supposedly randomly murdering millions of people indiscriminately and without need of a trial?  How about brothels too?  Auschwitz is known to have had a brothel for the inmates staffed by female Jews and as it was illegal and punishable by death for a non-Jewish German to have sexual relations with a Jew, this could hardly have been a facility for the use of the SS guards.  Indeed, they had their own similar ‘facility’ in any event, populated by good Aryan stock.

Are we also supposed to believe that the thousands of babies and children survivors from Auschwitz and other ‘death camps’, would not have immediately been selected for extermination upon arrival at the camp as we are told over and over in Zionist propaganda that the only ones to survive the ‘selection’ process were ones who were able to contribute to the Nazi war effort?  They could hardly have been used as work-horses for the Nazi war machine as were the other survivors, yet many survived.  For example, take the case of Anne Frank of ‘diary’ fame.  She was sent to Bergen-Belsen a so-called ‘death camp’ in late 1944 where she lived for at least two months before finally succumbing to Typhus along with many thousands of others.  As a (by this time) very sickly fifteen year old girl, surely she should not have survived the ‘selection’ process.

Indeed, all the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the Jewish inmates were not able to work but nevertheless were not killed.  For example, an internal German telex message dated 4thSeptember 1943, from the chief of the Labour Allocation department of the SS Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of approximately 25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work and that all of the remaining Jewish inmates, some 21,000+ or about 85 percent, were unable to work.

In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm counter-measures.  The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated 28th December 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps.  It sharply criticised the high death rate of inmates due to disease and ordered that “…camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps.”  Furthermore, it ordered:  “The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp commandants … The camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labour places are improved as much as possible… The Reichsfuhrer SS [Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced.”

Official camp regulations also make it abundantly clear that Auschwitz was not an extermination centre.  They stated:

“New arrivals are to be given a thorough medical examination and if there is any doubt about their health, they must be sent to quarantine for observation. 

 

Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp physician.  If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to a hospital for professional treatment.

 

The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply.  Any deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.

 

Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.

 

Prisoners who are to be released or transferred must first be brought before the camp physician for medical examination.”

 

Not exactly what one would expect of a ‘death camp’ is it?  The truth is that Auschwitz-Birkenau was in fact a labour camp (the preserved sign over the entrance is somewhat of a clue, the almost Orwellian – ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ – work makes you free) and included many different races, religions and political persuasions.  There is no dispute that many thousands of people died miserably in Auschwitz and all the other so-called ‘death camps’ before, during and after the war, some possibly even from the alleged callous Nazi experimentation at the hands of the so-called ‘Dr. Death’, Dr. Mengele, but the simple fact is that no-one died in gas chambers.

A problem that always faces any group of people living in unsanitary conditions, severe privation or close confinement is lice and the multitude of diseases they cause.  Auschwitz and the neighbouring camp at Birkenau had a serious outbreak of typhus in the summer of 1942, during which many people died, both inmates and guards.  To contain the outbreak, the ‘gas chambers’ were used for disinfection of the inmates’ clothes using the ‘Zyklon B’ disinfectant.  And towards the end of the war when the German nation was on the point of collapse, the fact that the transportation system was in disarray – as a result incidentally of the Allies indiscriminate carpet-bombing of civilian road and rail transport links, totally contrary to the Geneva Convention – and that no supplies of any kind, neither food nor medical assistance were getting through, only exacerbated the situation.  Hundreds, if not thousands of innocents subsequently died of starvation and hunger-related diseases (on both sides of the divide).

“Mike’s real name was Olitsky and he was a Lithuanian Jew who’d fled into Germany to escape Stalin’s Red Army.  He wound up in Dachau for four years.  He inadvertently introduced me to Holocaust ‘revisionism’ when I ventured to ask him about his experience.  He shrugged and said, ‘It was a factory.  We worked during the day and stayed in a dormitory at night’.  ‘But what about the, uh, the…‘?  ‘The what?’  ‘You know, the killings’.  ‘I never saw any of that’.  Four years in Dachau, never saw any of that?  OK, he did see the US Army ‘liberate’ the camp in April, 1945.  The SS and Alpine troops recuperating there had negotiated surrender to the Americans, who entered the camp and started shooting the guys who thought they were surrendering.  Then the Americans marched the surviving soldiers (all the prison guards had fled days earlier) up to a wall near the hospital and set up a machine gun.  Three hundred and forty-six German soldiers on R&R [rest and recuperation] were slaughtered in a few minutes, five hundred and twenty in all, that morning.”  J. Bruce Campbell, ‘Veterans Today’

I am afraid it is all an elaborate hoax.  We have all been ‘propagandised’ and duped over the decades into believing that 6 million Jews were systematically and brutally exterminated by a Jew-hating race (the Germans) for no other reason than their religion (race).

“Were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the number one weapon in Israel’s propaganda armoury would disappear.”  Prof. William Rubinstein, Melbourne University.

The enormity of this utter lie and the abundant evidence available to counter it, is so overwhelmingly huge that I barely know where to start.  However, here are a few simple facts to consider (in no particular order):

Many detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979.  These photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematoria chimneys or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly alleged and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz had been the busy extermination centre it is alleged to have been, despatching thousands of Jews daily.

The Germans were known as an efficient race and indeed still are.  They were the kind of people who meticulously and methodically documented every single action they took.  Why then amongst the hundreds of tonnes of official Nazi documents recovered after the end of the war is there not a single document in existence that even alludes to the ‘final solution’ being a genocide of the Jews?  Could it have been because the Germans destroyed them all before they could fall into Allied hands?  This I believe is highly unlikely.  Surely at least one or two would have evaded destruction as with many other incriminating policy documents that were painstakingly unearthed by the Allies.

Then could it have been because the Germans did not document their policy of genocidal gassings for fear of it being discovered after the war?  Also unlikely in the extreme.  At the time the ‘final solution’ was allegedly proposed at the Wannsee conference in January 1941, the Germans were comfortably winning the war and it is simply unrealistic to assume that they considered that they would ever end up, let alone forward plan for being, on the losing side.  Indeed, war crimes trials were the last thing they would ever consider as there was no such concept until 1946.  War crimes trials had never been utilised to deal with the losers in past wars.  The Nazis had no reason to try to create an illusion for posterity because they thought they were going to be posterity.  They never, ever imagined that they would need to answer to anyone for anything they did and yet are we now supposed to believe that even in 1941 they were planning ahead to a post-war era in which it would be necessary to cover up their actions?

“The ‘Final Solution’ spoken of in the German documents was a program of evacuation, resettlement, and deportation of Jews with the ultimate objective of expulsion from Europe.  During the war, Jews of various nationalities were being moved east, as one stage in this Final Solution.  The legend claims that the movements were mainly for extermination purposes.”  Arthur Butz, ‘The Hoax of the Twentieth Century’.

“If there were documents covering the whole sequence of events, then there would be no such thing as revisionism.  The problem is that the documents one would expect to find do not exist.  We have documents relating to every aspect of the war, including every aspect of the holocaust, except for the gassing of the Jews.  It is not possible to gas six million people, or to do anything else involving millions of people, without leaving a paper trail.  If the gassing happened, there would be thousands of documents to verify it, starting with the planning stages and continuing throughout the course of events.  But no such paper trail exists.”   geniebusters.org

On the contrary in fact, a paper-trail making the whole scenario impossible does exist and more of that shortly.

If there were photographs of the entire sequence of events, including photographs of piles of corpses in gas chambers, then the question would be a non-issue and revisionism would not even be an issue.  That would absolutely and definitively settle the matter immediately.  The problem is that no such pictures exist.  We have photographs of every aspect of World War II, including every aspect of the ‘holocaust’,except for the gassing of the Jews.  There are photographs of Jews being coerced on to the trains, disembarking from the trains, photographs of Jews in the camps and photographs of bodies in mass graves and piled in heaps on the ground (many of which incidentally are the remains of German soldiers and civilians murdered by starvation by the Allies after the war), but there are no photographs at all of anyone being gassed, thus rendering all the other evidence merely circumstantial.  We already know that the Nazis transported thousands of Jews (and others) in cattle wagons and we already know that there were piles of bodies at camps after outbreaks of disease and extreme food shortages.  We also know that Jews were taken to de-lousing facilities and made to undress en-masse, so what exactly do these photographs prove, I would venture to ask?

I recently sat through the full ten hours of the ‘epic’ 1970s, supposedly definitive, but in my view frankly risible, Hollywood docu-drama cum Zionist propaganda-piece ‘Holocaust’, for research purposes – not in a single-sitting I may add, I value my sanity a little more than that.  This abject piece of over-sentimentalised, corny, nonsensical, melodramatic drivel actually ‘won’ no less than eight ‘Emmys’ (TV’s equivalent of ‘Oscars’) – hardly surprising really when we take into account who runs the TV and film industry, I suppose.  Its historical inaccuracies are legion but that does not really matter as it serves its purpose extremely well in aiding the re-writing of modern history and the propagandising of the masses.  Indeed, I would argue that it was this series that was responsible almost single-handedly for the propagandisation of my generation, the so-called ‘baby-boomers’, into all things ‘holocaust’, such was the impact that the programme made upon western society.

In one of the last scenes, at or near the end of the war, the fictional character SS Major Erik Dorf played by the American actor Michael Moriarty, is confronted by his American captors who show him a sequence of photographs depicting the various stages of the supposed extermination process.  Dorf is shown photographs of the Jews being rounded-up, deported on the trains, being ‘selected’ for gassing, being led to the ‘gas chambers’ and undressing, all of which are shown ‘on camera’ and then… whilst his American interrogator is saying ‘being gassed’ the camera immediately cuts from the series of photographs to the horrified face of the Dorf character and then immediately resumes the photographic sequence… bodies being moved to the crematoria etc. etc.  Obviously and unfortunately for them, the Zionist/Jewish producers of this slick piece of propaganda, unsurprisingly as there are none, could not find one single appropriate photograph for this particular part of the alleged event.

What about the thousands (millions?) of eye-witnesses though?  Not only were 6 million Jews supposedly exterminated but there also, even in the second decade of the twenty first century, more than 70 years after the event, seems to be many millions more ‘survivors’ still alive.  Incredible really when there were only probably a maximum of 4 million Jews in the entire continent of Europe in 1939 according to official, audited Red Cross figures.

1) There are also six other important points that need to be made about so-called witnesses to the events. The witnesses are far from consistent in their allegations.  Some witnesses said nothing at all about gas chambers.  For example, Jan Karski wrote a report in the autumn of 1942 in which he stated that he visited the camp at Belzec to investigate rumours of extermination.  He said that Jews were being killed by electrical shocks in a room with a metallic floor and in 1944, he published a book in which he said that the Jews were being loaded into wagons filled with quicklime and left to die outside the camp.  Neither the article nor the book says anything about gas chambers.  And of course, the ‘official’ history of Belzec says nothing about electrical shocks or wagons filled with quicklime.  We are now supposed to believe that the Jews at Belzec were killed in gas chambers but Jan Karski, who was there at the time (so he said), said nothing at all about gas chambers.

2) Many witness testimonies about gas chambers do not stand up to close examination.  For example, one of the most well-known witnesses quoted as an authoritative source is Dr. Miklos Nyiszli, the supposed author of ‘Auschwitz, a Doctor’s Eyewitness Account’.  Dr. Nyiszli did actually exist.  He was a Hungarian doctor who was sent to Birkenau (not Auschwitz), where he worked in the pathology laboratory under the command of the infamous Dr. Josef Mengele.  After the war, he testified at the Nuremburg trials and he died in 1949, his book being published in 1951.  Throughout the book, the author says he was in Auschwitz and that there were four crematoria at Auschwitz.  In fact, there was one crematorium at Auschwitz, and four at Birkenau. Obviously anyone who was there would know that and also they would doubtless know which camp was which.  At the end of the book (page 206), in the section describing the evacuation of Auschwitz in the January of 1945, the author says:

“We left, filled with the feverish sensation of liberation.  Direction: the Birkenau KZ, two kilometres from the crematoriums.”

Dr. Nyiszli certainly did not leave Auschwitz and go in the direction of Birkenau as he was already in Birkenau.  This is one of the most glaring impossibilities in a book full of much impossibility and as a result of this I would strongly suggest that this book was not written by Dr. Nyiszli at all.  It certainly could not have been written by anyone who was there and yet this book is cited by apologists as one of the most authoritative of all witness statements.

 

3) Witness testimony alone proves nothing.  Suppose a hundred thousand witnesses claim that something happened, does that constitute absolute proof that it happened?  There are probably more than one hundred thousand people who have ‘seen a UFO’ at one time or another in the last fifty years.  Does that prove that flying saucers exist?  Our Elite run and controlled media would say ‘definitely not’ in that example yet there are thousands of people who say they have not only seen UFOs, they have been abducted into them.  They will tell you in vivid detail about their experiences and these people have no obvious motive for lying, unlike holocaust ‘survivors’.

4)  Witnesses can easily be ‘bought’ and influenced by the promise of large amounts of money in the form of ‘holocaust reparations’ and it is my firm view that this is exactly what enticed most of them.  It is also fairly easy to convince someone that an event happened in a certain way and encourage them to link these fictional events to their own experiences.  This will then have the effect of creating a false memory which over time becomes more and more embellished until that person actually believes those events really happened.

5)  To the contrary, many former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of extermination at Auschwitz at all.  For example, an Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988.  She was interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced labourer.  On the long train journey to the camp, a gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz.  Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower.  The terrified women were sure that they were about to die, but then instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads – to their enormous relief.

Auschwitz was certainly no holiday-camp, Maria confirmed.  She witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by hunger and disease, particularly typhus and more than a few committed suicide.  But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination programme.

A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly being gassed and cremated daily.  She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of ‘gas chambers’ during the time she was interned there.  She heard the gassing stories only later, after the war had ended.

Some Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were even released and returned to their home countries.  If Auschwitz had actually been a top-secret extermination camp, the Germans would certainly not have released inmates who ‘knew’ what was happening in the complex.

6)  Wiesel is one of the most celebrated eye-witnesses to the alleged Holocaust, yet in his supposedly autobiographical book Night, he makes absolutely no mention of gas chambers at all.  He claims instead to have witnessed Jews being burned alive, a story now dismissed by all historians.  Wiesel gives credence to the most absurd stories of other ‘eyewitnesses’ and he spreads fantastic tales of 10,000 Jews sent to their deaths each day in two flaming pits in Buchenwald – one for the adults and another for the children.

… Conventional historians account for the lack of photographs and documents by claiming that the holocaust was so secret that no photographs were ever taken, and no incriminating documents were allowed to exist.  This is supposed to have been true even when the ‘Final Solution’ was in the planning stages, as far back as 1941.  However, Hitler talked about exterminating or annihilating the Jews on many occasions.  For example, here is a sentence from Mein Kampf.  Hitler wrote:

“The nationalisation of our masses will succeed only when, aside from all the positive struggles for the soul of our people, their international poisoners are exterminated.”

So we are supposed to believe that Hitler announced to the world that he would have liked the Jews to be exterminated and yet at the same time went to great lengths to maintain the pretence that they were not being systematically exterminated?  The intention was declared openly, but the action itself was so secret that the Nazis never even discussed it among themselves?  This is abject nonsense akin to clutching at straws I am afraid.

He also said this:

“If at the beginning of the War and during the War twelve or fifteen thousand of these Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas, as happened to hundreds of thousands of our very best German workers in the field, the sacrifice of millions at the front would not have been in vain.  On the contrary, twelve thousand scoundrels eliminated in time might have saved the lives of millions of Germans, valuable for the future.”

At this point the ‘secret’ was now out.  Having broached the idea of gassing the Jews in Mein Kampf, it would make no sense for Hitler to pretend it was not happening, if he was actually doing it, but there is no other reference to gassing in anything else he ever said or wrote.

There are voluminous records of everything Hitler, Himmler, and the other senior Nazis said in public and much of what they said in private and there is no mention of gassing anywhere, even on occasions when they were talking about getting rid of the Jews.  For example, when Himmler addressed a private meeting of the senior officers of the SS (the Poznan speech), even if he wished to refrain from mentioning gassing publicly, he would have felt free to speak plainly at a private meeting of the SS.  But the fact is that nothing was said about gassing, even though he was discussing the transportation of the Jews to concentration camps.

The Nazis were certainly not coy about killing people.  They committed atrocities openly and even flaunted it.  There are pictures of Nazi soldiers shooting Jews (and other prisoners) in cold blood and laughing about it and these pictures were not taken surreptitiously by someone else, they were taken by the Nazis themselves, but we are supposed to believe that the gas chambers were so secret that no photographs were ever taken.   Are we also supposed to believe that it would be possible to cover up an action involving six million people or that they would not openly flaunt the fact that the killings were taking place?  Really?

The mechanics of the extermination process are alleged to have been:

A train-load of Jews arrives at Auschwitz railway station or indeed any other alleged ‘death camp’.  They are then immediately separated into two groups, the so-called ‘selection’ of those who are fit for labour and those who are not.  The latter group is led directly to the gas chambers immediately.  Firstly they enter the changing room, where under protest they are told to remove their clothes and leave behind their possessions.  They are then led into another room, which is ‘mocked-up’ to resemble a shower room or a delousing room.  Once in this room, they are locked-in and gassed using Zyklon B granules poured through an open hatch or window in the roof or the top of the wall, the deadly fumes supposedly emanating from the fake shower-heads or even just simply being poured-in directly.  A few moments later the guards enter, hose down the bodies (the last act of any victim of asphyxiation/gassing apparently is to involuntarily defecate and urinate) and then drag the bodies out and take the saturated bodies to the ovens on handcarts to be cremated and immediately make the gas chambers ready for the next batch of victims to keep the ‘conveyer belt’ rolling.

Firstly the commonly described and widely accepted, casual approach to the manual ‘pouring-in’ of Zyklon B granules is utterly risible.  As will be demonstrated later, this dangerous substance, a) once it is stimulated to produce cyanide gas is absolutely and totally deadly and could not safely be handled by anyone using such a casual approach, even whilst wearing a gas mask and b) in order to make the substance unstable enough to begin vapourising, it has to first of all reach the relatively high temperature of at least 26 degrees Celsius (Centigrade) again unachievable by the simple act of pouring directly from a can by hand.

So, if six million Jews were gassed, this scenario must have been repeated thousands of times.  Even being generous, if on average 100 at a time were gassed (a much higher average figure than claimed), this scene must have played-out sixty thousand times at all the different camps, over a period of several years.

Assuming for purposes of illustration of the point that these were split equally over 10 ‘death’ camps, that is six thousand events per camp and over a time period of 3 years (1942-45).  This means that on average at each camp there were 2000 gassings per year of 100 people at a time.  Break these figures down even further and this produces an average figure of 550 people per day, every day, gassed and cremated for 3 years at every single camp.  I submit that this is totally ludicrous in the extreme and such figures if presented as evidence in any impartial court of law would quite rightly be rejected as nonsensical.  In addition, please consider that these figures only take account of the alleged six million Jews and not all the hundreds and thousands, if not millions of non-Jews said to have suffered the same fate but obviously not emphasised to the same extent.

In 1998 Frederick Töben the historian, visited all the major death camps still in existence in order to inspect the facilities and gather information.  He was not alone.  He also took with him, independent scientists and engineers in order to elicit their opinions about the practicalities of the Zionist claims.  In conjunction with his many years of intensive study of documents and eye-witness testimonies he had already concluded that the collaboration between the Zionist leaders and the Nazis had led to the establishment of the camps in the first place as evacuation or emigration would not produce the Zionists desired results ie. the inception of a Jewish homeland.

Concentration camps were not unique to the Nazis, neither were they their invention.  In the Boer War in South Africa, another manufactured conflict at the behest of the Elite banksters, the British occupiers constructed several camps resulting in the deaths of several hundred thousand Boer men, women and children through disease and malnutrition.  Even in WWII, the Americans herded thousands of Japanese-American citizens into camps as did the Australians with their Japanese residents.  The Swiss also had such camps for refugees from Nazi-occupied Europe.

Worse still, in the aftermath of WWI, Poland built several dozen camps to house the ethnic German residents of the formerly German territories they ‘acquired’ as a result of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919, many of whom suffered terribly from disease and starvation, resulting in hundreds of thousands of preventable deaths of innocents.

However back to the subject in hand, the prisoners of Auschwitz and all its ‘sister’ camps scattered through eastern Germany and eastern Europe, were given rations of 1300-1700 calories per day, according to captured documents and whilst this is nowhere near the standard, modern diet of today especially for those partaking in gruelling physical labour, it is considerably better than the average German citizen received in the last two years of the war.  They were lucky to receive 1000 calories per day and often had to make do with much less.

Töben’s conclusions about the gas chamber scenario may be summarised as follows:

The rooms and buildings named as being those which were used for the executions of millions of people, firstly were easily provable as fakes.  Giveaways such as non-airtight doors, the lack of holes or shafts down which to administer the Zyklon B granules, the lack of any kind of heating equipment to stimulate the emission of the gas, ventilation or extraction systems to deal with the deadly fumes are but a few of the improbabilities, if not downright impossibilities noted by Töben in his research.

For example, are we expected to believe that the gas chamber, open to the public at Auschwitz which is a mere twenty metres from the Commandant’s quarters and the SS dining hall was actually used in anger?  The dangers of this particular arrangement should be apparent to anyone who understands the way hydrogen cyanide gas kills.  Every time the doors were opened, hundreds of cubic metres of deadly fumes would have leaked outside, instantly killing anyone and any other living thing in its path.  There were provably no filtration units to automatically safely disperse or neutralise the ‘used’ gas, either then or now.

The real gas chambers used at Auschwitz, Töben believes were nothing more or less than fumigation chambers for the delousing of clothes and bed sheets.  These are also available for inspection by the public and are placed well away from the inhabited areas of the camp and are fitted, as one would sensibly expect, with all the necessary heating (for the raw granules), pumping and filtration equipment.  However as stated previously, the alleged ‘human’ gas chambers contain no evidence whatsoever of any of this equipment.

Zyklon B was used worldwide in the 1920s, 30s and 40s as a pesticide against rats, fleas and lice.  Its primary reason for being in situ at the camps was to save human lives and not to kill.

After Zyklon B has been used, according to the manufacturer’s own instructions which still survive intact, the room or chamber must be thoroughly aerated for at least 10 hours before entering and gas masks would have been effective for 10 minutes only, before the poison saturated the filters, killing the wearer.  It is also known however, having had access to all supply requisitions, invoices and manifests that there were no gas masks of any kind present at Auschwitz.   Another telling argument against the practicality of its large scale use is that the granules only begin to emit the deadly cyanide gas at a temperature sustained at over 26⁰ Celsius, equivalent to a very hot summer day.  There is no evidence whatsoever that the rooms named as human gas chambers were ever heated at all and Central Europe experiences some bitterly cold winters with temperatures often in double-figures below zero.

Dr. Töben interviewed on film, an Australian expert on crematoria and the disposal of human bodies without actually explaining to him the background reasons for his questions to avoid possibly compromising the answers with pre-existing prejudices of any kind.  The expert maintained several opinions and divulged facts that prove absolutely fatal to the gas chamber myths and legends.

Modern, present day crematoria ovens burn at 800-1000⁰ Celsius (whereas the Auschwitz ovens were probably able to manage around half that temperature with the available technology of 70+ years ago).

One single corpse takes around two hours to burn to ash at this temperature (1000⁰) and even then it does not fully incinerate the bones.  The bones have to be powdered as a further separate exercise.  If the corpse is excessively cold or wet it would take almost twice as long to incinerate.  If two or more corpses were burned together then these times would be increased in ratio.  (Remember that according to the myth, all the bodies were thoroughly hosed-down immediately prior to transportation to the crematoria).

Regarding the oft-cited by so-called eye-witnesses ‘body-burning pits’, simply pouring copious amounts of fuel on a pile of bodies and setting them alight is just simply fiction.  Living and recently deceased bodies contain at least 75% water and this severely impacts on their flammability meaning that witnesses (and there are many, including one of the most feted, Elie Wiesel) who blithely state that they saw the Germans pile thousands of bodies in large pits, liberally dose them with petrol (gasoline) and burn them to ashes in a few hours (some have said 20 minutes!) are nothing less than outright liars and charlatans.

Auschwitz was constructed on extremely wet, marshy land sited as it was at the confluence of three rivers and with an unusually high water table making it impossible to bury bodies in the ground due to the extreme danger of polluting the drinking water, which was extracted from small reservoirs in the surrounding land.  It is this wetland environment that encouraged the proliferation of diseases and the vermin that cause them.  Over 74,000 people, friend and foe were officially recorded as Typhus victims alone at Auschwitz.

It is a well-known scientific principle that a fire needs free oxygen (ie. not oxygen mixed with hydrogen in the form of water) in order to burn and that is one major ingredient that would be completely missing once we go further down than the top-most layer of bodies.  The amount of fuel that would be needed to incinerate one small pit of bodies would probably be considerably more than the entire German army would use in one day, one suspects.  Petrol (gasoline) or indeed any other fuel will always burn itself out long before it has had time to cause combustion in predominantly water-based substances such as human bodies.  And this of course all presupposes that the pits themselves were dry which is of course impossible due to the presence of the aforementioned, abnormally high water-table.  Indeed the whole scenario would be truly laughable were it not so serious a subject.

The crematoria expert also made the point that even in the most fiercely-burning house fires and for example, after an airplane crash, bodies are only superficially charred and not reduced to ash, even after being subjected to direct flames for many hours.

In addition, Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematorium in Calgary, Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremations story is technically impossible.  The allegation that 10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944 in crematoria and open pits is ‘simply preposterous’ and ‘beyond the realms of reality’, he declared under oath.

However, another issue fatal to the credibility of this huge improbability is the absolute impossibility of the disposal of all the bodies in crematoria in the time allowed and by the methods deemed to be used.  A single body according to our expert requires 40kg (90 lbs) of coke to incinerate it whilst still leaving the bones to be disposed of separately.  Put another way, one tonne of coke could incinerate 25 bodies.  If the body was damp or wet then it would require as much as double this amount, so the following facts and figures are all absolutely, exceptionally generous, best-case scenarios.

We know how many tonnes of coke were ordered by the quartermasters at Auschwitz because all the invoices and delivery manifests are all still in existence.  The period of greatest consumption of coke was an 8 month period including the winter of 1942-43, where 641 tonnes of coke were ordered and consumed.   641 tonnes of coke is the equivalent of 16,025 cremations, erring grossly on the generous side.  16,000+ cremations in 8 months and this is the busiest period at by far the largest, most prolific camp?  The numbers simply do not stack-up.  These figures, extrapolated over the three years that the alleged gassings took place, would produce a grand total of 72,000 cremations only.  Furthermore, it is known for a fact that the camp’s heating system and food ovens were coke-fired.  These figures account for no coke being set-aside for use in the heating boilers and the food ovens.

Also, generously assuming that the Zionist-quoted death figures are correct, how were the literally millions of unburned bones destroyed?  There is no evidence whatsoever of any machinery designed to perform this task nor is there any evidence of the requisitioning or delivery of such a machine.

Furthermore, as proof of the reluctance of even bone-dry substances to burn freely and easily, Dr. Töben enlisted the services of a skilled pyrotechnic expert in order to try to replicate, albeit on a much smaller scale, the body-burning pits alleged to have been in use at Auschwitz.  A small drypit was dug – around 0.5 cubic metres in size and in it were placed 4 dry normal size telephone books one on top of the other.  A fire was then set using a liberal amount of a mixture of methylated spirits and highly flammable oil.  The fire burned quite strongly for about 10 minutes then slowly petered-out.  When the pit contents were then examined it could be seen that the top 10% only of the top book had burned, but even then only around the very edges.  When the pages were fully opened, the middle portions were entirely untouched by fire.  So, another attempt was made, this time the proportional equivalent of 1500 litres (totally impossible at Auschwitz) was used and the fire indeed became a raging inferno, albeit a relatively small one.  Twenty minutes passed and again the fire burned itself out.  Even with the air able to circulate freely, less than half of the top book was burned and again the bottom three books remained virtually untouched apart from the exposed edges which were slightly scorched – and all this please remember, was dry paper under totally dry conditions.  Wet bodies upon wet bodies in wet earth would have no chance whatsoever of burning to ashes.

Töben also set-up another experiment, again on film, whereby two volunteers were locked in a tiny room about the size of a small garden shed, complete with a stone surface, upon which a generous amount of hydrogen cyanide (exactly like Zyklon B) granules were manually poured – mere inches from their exposed faces.  They wore no protective clothing, no gas masks of any kind and were locked in the room for a total of two hours.  The room was then unlocked and they casually walked out, laughing and talking as normal.  How is this possible?  It is easily possible when the ambient room temperature is maintained at less than 26⁰ Centigrade.

The granules are only stimulated to produce the deadly gas once this critical temperature is attained.  Until that specific point, the granules are entirely harmless and as the volunteers knew that this temperature would not be reached, they were perfectly happy to take part.

However, let the last words on the subject be these from P. Samuel Foner in ‘The Spotlight’, Volume XIX No. 2, 31st May 2004:

“In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview, Dr. Franciszek Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz State Museum admitted on camera that ‘Krema 1,’ the alleged ‘homicidal gas chamber’ shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by the Soviet Union – apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.

 

What Piper said – in effect and on camera – was that the explosive 1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took place in the buildings designated as ‘homicidal gas chambers’ at Auschwitz.

 

With this admission by none other than the respected head of the Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred ‘facts’ of history has been destroyed.  This ‘gas chamber’ is the major historical ‘fact’ on which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western nations since WWII is based.

 

It is the basis for the $100+ billion in foreign aid the United States has poured into the state of Israel since its inception in 1948 – amounting to $16,500 for every man, woman and child in the Jewish state and billions more paid by Germany in ‘reparations’ – not to mention the constructing of Israel’s national telephone, electrical and rail systems…all gifts of the German people.  It is the basis for the $10 billion ‘loan’ (read ‘gift’) made to Israel for housing its immigrants in the occupied territories… while Americans sleep on the streets and businesses are bankrupted by the thousands.  As of 2004, not a single ‘loan’ of US tax money made to the state of Israel by Washington has ever been paid back.

Germany is paying ‘reparations’ – the United States is making major contributions – to atone for the ‘gassings at Auschwitz’ and elsewhere.  If the ‘homicidal gas chambers’ were post-war creations of the Soviets, in which no one was gassed regardless of race, creed, colour or country of national origin, then these ‘reparations’ were unnecessary, and were based on fraud. 

The videotape on which Dr. Piper makes his revelations was made in mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole and follows 12 years of intensive investigation by dozens of historians, journalists and scientists who have tried to get to the bottom of what really happened at Auschwitz.

Like most Americans, since his youth, Cole had been instructed in the ‘irrefutable fact’ that mass homicidal gassings had taken place at Auschwitz.  The number of those executed – also declared irrefutable – was 4.1 million.

Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988 which was followed with an official ‘re-evaluation’ of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to 1.5 million).  As a budding historian – and a Jew – Cole was intrigued.

Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted or questioned the official 4.1 million ‘gassing’ deaths at Auschwitz was labelled an anti-Semite or neo-Nazi at the very least. Quietly, because of revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.5 million.  No mention was made of the missing 2.6 million.

The Cole videotape interview proves that the people who run the Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating ‘proofs’ of homicidal gassings.  Keep in mind that over the years millions of tourists have been told that ‘Krema 1′ is in its original state, while officials knew that ‘original state’ is a lie.

The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of this proof of no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be measured.  Coupled with the Leuchter Report, the Cole interview with Dr. Piper on videotape proves that what Western governments have taught about the Auschwitz gas chambers since WWII is a lie.  It proves that what televangelists such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have been telling their flocks is simply not true.

No one, regardless of race, creed, colour or country of national origin was gassed to death in any building so designated at Auschwitz.  And without ‘homicidal gas chambers’ at Auschwitz, where is the reasoning for the special treatment of the state of Israel?”

Suffice to say that David Cole has been in hiding, in fear of his life for the past, almost 20 years, labelled by the Zionists, as is their custom in these circumstances as a ‘self-hating Jew’.

I now rest my case on this issue.

The Liberation of the Death Camps

Posted by admin On October – 7 – 2013

How Dare I, with thanks to Ann

The article below from the ‘How dare I’ website, documents the liberation of prisoners from the so called Nazi Extermination/concentration camps.

“yawn”.

Why yawn voice of reason?

“Its boring Spiv. The Condensation camps probably happened a long time ago, in the War with Heil Hitler or something… Move on… Get over it”.

Well, I would “get over it” if the Israelis, who continue to perpetuate the myth as a means to run riot throughout the world, would.

But they don’t. And not only is that detrimental to our future and worse still our childrens and childrens children’s futures, the myth is built on a lie.

A very costly lie at that.

The following is from the Times of Israel:

Germany has paid — primarily to Jewish survivors — some $89 billion in compensation overall for Nazi crimes since the agreement was signed in 1952.

In one change to the treaty that Germany agreed to earlier this year, the country will provide compensation payments to a new category of Nazi victims — some 80,000 Jews who fled ahead of the advancing German army and mobile killing squads and eventually resettled in the former Soviet Union. READ MORE

Eighty Nine Billion Dollars and rising!  That is more than you could count in a fucking lifetime.

Imagine how much good that money could have done if ploughed into say, education, or healthcare?

Instead, it has been spunked  on the back of a lie, for the benefit of a corrupt, depraved, perverted, country, hell bent on world domination.

Equally as bad is the fact that Our Prime Minister (and many others), the Cunt Cameron is helping to spread the lie, and donating our money to assure the continuance of the lie being forced down the throats of future generations.

And that is wrong, wrong and wrong again.

Why should we be forced to believe what is a blatant lie?

Why should we let Israel commit Genocide because of the lie?

Why should we sell ourselves into poverty and servitude because of the lie?

The lie is a cancer and needs to be cut out of history.

You can find another excellent article on the ‘six million’ by clicking HERE, which I would have reprinted was it not for the time that it would take me to restructure all of the photos of newspaper clips and add the many video links.

Source: The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies, by Theodore J. O’Keefe
Presented with pictures, captions and extensive commentary by Lasha Darkmoon
Why is it illegal in 16 countries to doubt the gas chambers when not a single gas chamber has ever been found?
Buchenwald_Victims_04508

Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes that US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at the close of World War II.

At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers, supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed from dead inmates.
US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to “document” what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown, and Dachau and Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history of this planet.
For Americans, what was “discovered” at the camps — the dead and the diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of torture and terror — became the basis not simply of a transitory propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas chambers.
What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to “re-educate” the German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a united, independent national state, imposing in their place overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence. And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were told about Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the human record.
A Different Reality
LarsonBut it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching military public information officers, government spokesmen, politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.
When American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors. [1]
Dr. Larson’s findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: “What we’ve heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax.” [2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer that to his knowledge he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theater” of Allied military operations, [3] confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.” [4]
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease, above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in Germany at war’s end, where, despite such measures as systematic delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the virtual collapse of Germany’s food, transport, and public health systems led to catastrophe.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that “The outbreaks in concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus infection encountered in Germany.” Dr. Gordon summarized the causes for the outbreaks as follows: [5]
Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity traveling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them …
Germany was in chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor, housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring such as few countries and few times have experienced.
Dr. Gordon’s findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that “Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II weren’t deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of diseases.” [6]
a1006Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed each day.
Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy of extermination through starvation in the German camps.
No ‘Human Skin’ Lampshades
What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other artifacts? What of the innumerable “torture racks,” “meathooks,” whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their way into the record at Nuremberg.
Ilse Koch, known as “Buchenwälder Schlampe” or the Bitch of Buchenwald. We are told that “she reveled in torture and obscenity”, making lampshades out of human skin showing the tattoos of Jewish camp inmates. The alleged human skin, upon forensic analysis after WW2, turned out to be goat skin. Ilse Koch hanged herself in despair  at Aichach women’s prison on September 1, 1967 — yet another innocent victim of Jewish lies still which are still being perpetrated to this day. Here she is listed as one of the “10 Most Evil Women in History”,  along with Countess Elizabetrh Bathory of Hungary and childkiller Myra Hindley.  The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch, dubbed by journalists the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” who was reported to have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned hides of luckless inmates.

Ilse Koch, known as “Buchenwälder Schlampe” or the Bitch of Buchenwald. We are told that “she reveled in torture and obscenity”, making lamp shades out of human skin showing the tattoos of Jewish camp inmates. The alleged human skin, upon forensic analysis after WW2, turned out to be goat skin. Ilse Koch hanged herself in despair at Aichach women’s prison on September 1, 1967 — yet another innocent victim of Jewish lies which are still being perpetrated to this day. Here she is listed as one of the “10 Most Evil Women in History”, along with Countess Elizabeth Bathory of Hungary and child-killer Myra Hindley.

But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in Washington: “There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch] selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins or that she possessed any articles made of human skin.” [7] In an interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material for the infamous lampshades: “Well, it turned out actually that it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial.” [8]
Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German jail in 1967.
______________________________________________________________
†   Lasha Darkmoon comments: It is now common knowledge that all the tall stories relating to Jewish skin being turned into lamp shades are grotesque fabrications. There is not a single Holocaust scholar in the world today who believes these fairy tales any longer. Even Jewish Wikipedia asks the question, “Did the Germans make lamp shades from prisoners’ skin?” and gives the answer: “No, they didn’t…it seems to be a popular urban legend.”
In spite of this, “Holocaust survivors” still continue to spread these false stories in schools across the country, perverting the minds of children with their vicious lies. One such is Czechoslovakian Jewess Frida Herskovits who told schoolchildren quite recently that she had learned of Nazi surgeries in which Jewish “organs were removed and human skin was used to make lamp shades and picture frames.”
Frida had not only seen Nazi guards throw sick Jews into a ditch and burn them alive after dousing them with kerosene—“The screams were unbelievable!”—she had also witnessed with her own eyes a pregnant mother have her baby ripped out of her womb by German Shepherd dogs!
If you want to see a photo of Frida, looking unusually jolly for a woman so traumatized, clickhere.

______________________________________________________________

It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich Himmler, commander of Hitler’s SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption on the part of camp personnel.
As he explained in sworn testimony at Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more than 200 convictions. [9] Punishments included the death penalty for the worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin (Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse’s husband), commandant of Buchenwald.
While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual beating. [10] After all, throughout most of the war the camps were important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks, chief of the office that supervised the concentration camps. It held the camp commanders “personally responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical strength of the detainees.” [11]
Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with Stalinist ruthlessness.
Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their commander, who wrote a preface to the report, “how the prisoners themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror.” [12]
Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and Communists as follows:
The [Jewish] trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death … The Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the brutalities at Buchenwald.
Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an article published in an American magazine shortly after the war. Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators’ findings:
“It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the Communists ate; those who didn’t starved to death.” [13]
Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau “the prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities on their fellow prisoners.” [14]
______________________________________________________________
†   Lasha Darkmoon comments:  Another Jewish Holocaust survivor, Yanina Cywinska, tells us she had witnessed evil Nazis “parade around briefcases and lamps made of human skin while washing their bodies with soap composed of Jewish bones.” She is obviously unaware that the human soap story has been proved every bit as false as the human lamp shade story.
In 1981, professor of Modern Jewish History and Holocaust expert Deborah Lipstadt wrote in a letter to the Los Angeles Times that “the fact is, the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter, anyone else, for the production of soap. The soap rumor was thoroughly investigated after the war and proved to be untrue.”
Shmuel Krakowski, Director of Archives of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, confirmed in a Chicago Tribune article titled, “A Holocaust Belief Cleared Up” that: “historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat.”
This doesn’t stop Yanina Cywinska and other “Holocaust Survivors” like her from manufacturing human soap and lampshade stories ad infinitum.
Yanina had seen some horrible things happen in the concentration camps, including “nails and eyes pulled out of Jewish people.” This would probably account for her pessimism and negative attitude toward Yaveh. “If God is so almighty power,” she asks grimly, “why didn’t he stop the atrocities?” Good question. We’ll leave that to God.
If you want to see a photo of Yanina, looking particularly jolly for a woman so traumatized, click here.

______________________________________________________________

‘Gas Chambers’
In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their superiors, who subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division. While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a “so-calledlethal gas chamber,” and to claim it was “allegedly used as a lethal gas chamber.” [15] (Emphasis added)
Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the German words for: “Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don’t open!,” was identified as showing the murder weapon. [16]
Revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson: "Show me a gas chamber!"Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous reports in the press as to the operation of this second “gas chamber,” no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they “dummies,” or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory has appreciable support in journalistic and historiographical literature.)

Revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson: “Show me a single gas chamber!”

As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of propaganda about “gas chambers,” “gas ovens,” and the like, but so far not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at that time and today, has come to light.
Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany after all. (We are now told that “gassing” and “extermination” camps were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)
Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History, which is funded by the German government, stated categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: “Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other prisoners gassed.” [17] Professional “Nazi hunter” Simon Wiesenthal stated in 1975 and again in 1993 that “there were no extermination camps on German soil.” [18]
Dachau “gas chamber” No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the modern Dachau “memorial site” in these words: “This gas chamber, camouflaged as a shower room, was not used.” [19]
The Propaganda Intensifies
More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, and trained American investigators established the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust. Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy, no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the camps.
______________________________________________________________
†   Lasha Darkmoon comments:  The story of Holocaust survivor Rivska Yosselevska is even more horrific and bizarre than those of Frida Herskovits and Yanina Cywinska related above. Despite being shot in the head and thrown into a pit with a mass of Jewish corpses piled on top of her, Rivska managed to claw her way to the top of the seething heap of limbs and somehow make her escape under the vigilant eyes of the Nazi guards. It wasn’t an easy job, given that the “dying victims” in the pit were “biting my legs, pulling me down.”
Other Jews also managed to crawl out of the pit and do a bunk for it, but the Nazis tracked them down and killed them all. Only Rivska survived to tell the tale. She lay three days by the side of the pit, utterly traumatized, “and saw blood spurting out of the ground.”
If you want to see a photo of Rivska, looking suitably traumatized, click here.

______________________________________________________________

Time for the Truth
It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they didn’t die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans, eastern Europeans, the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their supposed failure to stop it.
Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers, Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in determining America’s foreign and educational policy, as well as its selection of past events to be memorialized in our civic life.
Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the government of this country, and governments and international bodies throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945, so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace based on justice.
Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result of a German policy of “extermination,” but rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp commanders and guards.
On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German policy and German orders.
The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional “Nazi-hunters” have quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps captured by the Soviets.
______________________________________________________________
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people -- but not their leaders -- and the entire Palestinian people.” Robert Faurisson, the famous "60 words sentence", formulated in 1980. †   Lasha Darkmoon comments:  Did you know that that there is a Holocaust memorial center in Cuba where bars of soap allegedly made from Jewish fat are buried and held in high honor by endless streams of gullible tourists? The plaque reads: “Honoring their memory. In this place are buried pieces of soap made from Jewish human fat, part of 6 million victims of Nazi barbarism of the 2oth century. Peace to their remains.”
To read the plaque in Spanish, click here.
It’s the same old story in superstitious Rumania. In the town of Targu Mures, pilgrims pray over bars of soap allegedly made of “pure Jewish fat.” Quite a brisk trade is apparently done in these soap bars, each inscribed with the initials ‘RJF’—Reine Jüdisch Fett (pure Jewish fat). Needless to say, the soap is not meant to be used but to be buried in the cemetery at Targu Mures where people come to pray over the holy soap. Forensic analysis of the soap is not permitted; it is too sacred. (See here)
______________________________________________________________

Robert Faurisson formulated this famous “60-word sentence” in 1980. It constitutes the position of most Holocaust Revisionist scholars today, in open defiance of the mainstream narrative:  “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people—but not their leaders—and the entire Palestinian people.”

ALFRED HITCHCOCKS PART IN WWII

The history books on W W II are one big lie from start to finish, the bankers and elected politicians cooked up a world war that was totally unnecessary, there used to be a saying in intelligence circles that “no knowledge once gained was ever wasted” and some of what you will read was given to me almost 60 years ago.

Secret gas and germ experiments were carried out on the British people from at least the 1920s up until the present day, the 1918 Influenza pandemic which affected 500 million people was possibly an experiment, because scientists are still experimenting on this viral strain now, the head of the British Government poison gas unit was Sir Joseph Barcroft, his official position was head of the Physiological Dept. at Porton Down and his specialty was integrational science and fetal development, his assistant was Lady Moran, the wife of Churchills doctor, Lord Moran who had a close relationship with Edith Meadowcroft better known as Lady Morrison of Lambeth, who herself had connections to the Catholic convent in Rochdale run by German nuns, Lord Moran was part of the secret eugenics tests done on orphaned children and twins, and I believe from missing documents children from this convent school were used for some genetic/breeding type programme.

Oriel College had connections through Cecil Rhodes to child hothousing experiments, to enhance intelligence and psychic abilities, personality fragmentation was carried out as was ritual sexual abuse, one of my contacts could read very well at 3 years of age, Ex Pres. Clinton had strong connections here, Rothchild and Oppenheimer have links through Rhodes and Lord Moran to much child experimentation, this was part of the Rockefeller funded Kinsey sex experiments to alter natural sexual proclivities, children’s TV programmes and children’s books would later carry subliminal messaging content, the children’s books by CIA approved Dr. Seuss are a case in point.

Dr. Stephen Ward the brilliant osteopath and healer who helped Winston Churchill so much in battling his alcoholism and depressive bouts, was said by insiders to have headed the British side to the US/MK/Ultra experiments, Dr. Joel Elkes opened the LSD unit at Birmingham Uni. Hospital with a $84,000 Rockefeller grant, the local health authority paid for the upkeep and running costs, in recent years there have been successful court cases against the Hospital for cruel experimentation on human guinea pigs.

These tests were in direct competition to those done in the USA and in Germany, we hear constantly of Dr. Mengeles tests on German twins but never the eugenics experiments done at Porton Down, now Lady Morrison lost her father at age 18 in W W 1 to what was said to be a gas attack, so got funding for the medical and gas experiments from her beloved Switzerland which is famous for three things, drug companies, arms manufacturers, and banking headquarters, which is really all headed by the same people.

Lady Moran’s father was involved with credit companies with loans and finance and Edith Morrison frequently travelled to the USA to the Rockefeller building where she was told after the death of Herbert Morrison in 1965 to join the explosion of right wing groups and did get involved with the NAF ( National Assoc.Freedom) who did so much to bring Margaret Thatcher to power, Thatcher was MP for N.Finchley a constituency with a large Jewish base and Rothschild greased her path into number 10 over his other favourite Edward Heath.

The intel services at the time questioned why the wife of the Deputy prime Minister of the labour party should be involved with something from the other end of the political spectrum, she was also very close to Thatcher’s speech writer Robert Moss. One of several high level Jews in Thatcher’s cabinet, the Queen mother summoned Edith Morrison to explain herself, it should be said that at this time a group of concerned ex-servicemen banded together to form the National Front to safeguard British jobs and way of life against concerted attacks by the Left, the newspapers showed pictures of people queuing round the blocks to sign up for membership, and the powers that be were very rattled and within 10 years had destroyed it.

The investigator Cathi Morgan traced Lord Moran as the tutor to William Sargant who advised him to go into psychiatry to work on mentally injured servicemen, the policy up to that point had been to patch up damaged men and drug them with analgesic pain killers and put them back on the front lines, the last thing the authorities wanted after the war was hordes of injured men claiming pensions, Lord Moran was considered an expert in drugging and “mental manipulation” ( brainwashing)

William Sargant had a “sleep room” at St Thomas hospital which had a small secret military wing for what he called “therapies” Lady Moran was given something undisclosed in the files and spent a year in a coma before marrying Lord Moran who secretly accompanied and controlled the drug raddled beaten and half crazed Rudolph Hess to the Nuremberg show trials.

Dr. Alexander Cannon was psychiatrist in charge at Colney Hatch psychiatric hospital and refused point blank to create any Manchurian candidates and in fact started to whistleblow and was confined under Churchill and Rothschild’s orders for this to house arrest in the Isle of Man for the wars duration.

Morrison along with many Jews in both World wars was a conscientious objector and did farm work in W W 1 and kept long written treatises on socialist ideas Eugenics and other plans.

The National Child Development Survey in 1958 meant monitoring on the 1700 children involved every 3 months until age 6, Oriel College documents show twins were given many extra tests, some involving extreme cruelty which was later vehemently denied, the name Peter Parker comes up continually in the files and I believe is a pseudonym. Peter Parkers wife is listed as setting up the False Memory syndrome in the UK, Parkers name is continually linked with the Cambridge traitors and Prince Philip, and was visited fairly frequently by the Queens mother who also ceremoniously opened Alice Park which was linked to Oppenheimer money from the Kimberley diamond mines, and was known for many large organised children’s games at the park.

Interestingly the Oppenheimer funded children’s experiments continued when Tony Blair appointed Margaret Hodge (Oppenheimer ) as children’s minister the Alice park Pavillion was designed in Masonic symbolism by a financial director of S G Warburg named Jellico, who also worked closely at the foreign office with Kim Philby, Donald Mclean, and Guy Burgess whom he described as “just perverts.” Jellico was godson of King George V and incidentally Jellico loaned money to the Benz Motor Corp, and part of the deal was that the cars be named after his daughter Mercedes.

This park had a huge underground bunker and its base was connected by extensive tunnels to Burlington bunker at Corsham, Winston Churchill had several luxurious bunkers built to continue the bloodletting if the Germans ever did come across the channel, and if they got too close had a huge bunker built in Canada, leaving the people as he said to fight on the beaches on the landing grounds etc, while he lived it up in comfort and safety.

The 60 miles of underground roads had connections to both the M.O.D. and Porton Down as did all those people listed above, many horses were brought here for rifle and ammunition tests before being replaced with pigs who have a closer resistance to bullets as humans, after the war German nationals were used in experiments as in the Alexander Scotland tests at the London Cage.

Lord Dawson of Penn was chief doctor to King George V, it was said that the King was a heavy smoker and his death was hastened to meet the deadline for the next day’s papers, this nonsense was entirely contradicted by members of the wartime Jewish underground based in London who said the King had lived through the pointless carnage of W W I and would not see another war with his relatives, who were the royalty of neighbouring countries, so he had to go.

The famous rhymes of the day explain it well “Lord Dawson of Penn, killed many men, that is why we sing, “God save the King.” Lord Dawson of Penn killed the King; he wanted peace, an evil thing. Similarly Churchill who had the Kings brother the Duke of Kent murdered, and fixed it so the popular King Edward 8 would abdicate, this really was nothing to do with Mrs. Simpson as he had had a string of married lovers, but because he kept trying to act as go between for peace, something Churchill refused to countenance, one of my informants said the folowing; I’m 55 next month (hence I was part of the 1958 NCDS study – all children born in a particular week in 1958). Funding for this study came through the National Birthday Trust – an organisation that medicalised childbirth. I believe the NHS was set up primarily for monitoring and experimentation and to create wealth for big pharma, although many admirable people worked for the organisation, their ability to practice true healing was impeded by the strict hierarchy and mismanagement of funds. Lord Moran was instrumental in setting up the institution for strictly personal motives.

At the end of W W II the British mandate in Palestine was becoming very unstable and under the same Jewish pressure that took us into W W II Rothschild Jews Herbert Morrison representing Britain and Henry Grady representing the USA trusted Palestine into Jewish control.

The needless saturation firebombing of defenseless German cities had to be rationalised, Harry Etting close friend of Lord Moran, Abram Games and particularly of Herbert Morrison and the London Jewish wartime underground told me some of this some years back which has latterly proved to be true, to justify what was done to Germany from British and US bombing to the Soviet rape squads sent it to rape German women and kids to upset the genetics tables a plan was hatched using Churchill’s War Dept. artist and forger Abram Games ( Abraham Gamse) and these key figures, Herbert Morrison Lord Dawson Lord and Lady Moran and others working with the British army and Hollywood, to use the film making skills of Alfred Hitchcock to make a film called “Memory of the Camps” and be so awful it would eclipse what was done to Germany and put it in the shade, Hitchcock asked for as much uninterrupted film as possible to be taken of the German work camps, now the originals which I saw on this many years ago all bore the signature in the corner of Sefton Delmer of the IRD, ( Information research dept) which was just a government propaganda body, anyone who drew out these intel files had to give a signature, and if any “grouping ” occurred you would have to explain what you were doing, grouping is when you look up a series of related documents or letters.

Alfred Hitchcock came from Leyton in East London, and I spoke with people who did his background checks and produced letters from him sent from the USA, it should be said the first people into the German camps were bomb disposal, to check everything was safe, these men went in took photographs, checked for booby traps, put a chalk cross on the door and blew a whistle, these archived photographs and statements show no gas ovens, in fact bomb disposal documents and photos say they were small bread ovens which were enlarged after the war to claim 6 million people were gassed in them, Kim Philby has said many times, 6 million people just cannot all go up a chimney, and offered to come back to Britain from Russia to testify against Lord Rothschild in exchange for a full pardon.

Kim Philby was very aware that the Moscow archive held all the German documents for the “Final solution” which was in fact to send all the Zionist Jews to the island of Madagaskar, while 150,000 Jews who were in full support of the German international position fought bravely in its armies.

The Military use of mental confusion and fear with distorted information and trauma was in 1950 called MK/ULTRA and received massive funding to expand psychological operations (psy-ops) into the main public sectors through hospitals, newspapers, and TV news mainly in the form of subliminals, Hitchcock had been at discussions with the military, my source was old and could not be sure but thought this was primarily funded by Rockefeller.

Alfred Hitchcock’s letters which were stolen in a burglary at Bedford Row solicitors back in 1984, show he was working in Hollywood at the time, his collaborator Sydney Bernstein who also produced the film for the army claimed Hitchcock was only “treatment advisor” as he had expertise in creating horror movies, the reams of film taken were sent over to Hollywood cut had sections put in and then improvised.

Sefton Delmer claimed that truckloads of bodies were ferried in from Dresden etc. and piled up for film effects, he said they were not even Jewish as Abram Games later confirmed, Hitchcock was also helped by Edith Head costume expert, screenwriter Ben Hecht, Bernard Herrman, Lew Wasserman, and David O Selznick who repaid Hitchcock with big Jewish contract pictures on Jewish themes, Hitchcock always played on guilt which he said was “the great equaliser regardless of race colour or creed.”

Hitchcock saw what was happening and tried to lighten his films by having short walk on parts, the talented actress Tippi Hedren who worked closely with Hitchcock was one of those who said Hitchcock was also into fear and control in his relationships which bore aspects of S & M, the actress who preceded her, Grace Kelly, signed studio gagging orders on what she saw and knew, she did say Hitchcock would roughly steamroller young blonde Anglo-Saxon looking women to give in to him, Grace Kelly said several times if she spoke out she would fear for her life which ended in a suspicious car crash similar to Princess Diana.

Incidentally the severely airbrushed Wikipedia entry on Alfred Hitchcock bears no relation to reality.

My old friend in the Cold war Dr. Louise Jacobs told us once that what you read about in the Holocaust is untrue but was a very necessary lie at that time. Phil Sher who with Harry Etting ran the black marketeering for the wartime Jewish underground told me that Lew Wasserman and David O Selznick arranged all the people necessary and did the special effects behind the shrunken heads and the human skin used for wallets, SS officers gloves lampshades and chair backs was baloney, the heads came from a museum and the skin was goat not human, and the famous story about boiled down Jews being used to lubricate the Berlin tram system just never happened. Moshe Solomons the Israeli dissident repeated the story of Flora Solomons and Litzi Freidman the Jewish underground message runners and part time prostitutes who said “the holocaust is Hollywood at its absolute best” Abram Games said this man Hitchcock has a penchant for horror and will scare people shitless.

Very few people realise that the film of the camps was as much a false theatrical piece as the war itself, which was fought to give Germany back to the bankers thrown out by Hitler.

Twenty Facts About The Holocaust

 Written by Cig Papers

pic012

1. International Committee of the Red Cross Records:

The International Red Cross was stationed in all German labour, internment, concentration and prison camps throughout World War Two.

The Red Cross were never given access to any Russian camps before, during or after World War Two. At his trials in Canada, during the 1980s and 1990s, Professor Ernst Zundel finally got the Red Cross to release their records from the German camps despite strong Israeli objections.

The  Red Cross records seem to suggest that there were no gas chambers, and a total of 271,301 died during World War Two in these camps, mostly from typhus.

In a letter to the US State Department dated November 22nd 1944 The Red Cross, who were stationed in all the camps, stated : “We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.”

red

2.United States Airforce Aerial Photos Of Camps:

From 1942, until the end of World War Two, the United States Airforce performed low flying, low-speed photography of all the alleged “death camps” to obtain evidence of what was going on.

This followed Jewish claims in the West that a mass murder was occurring. All these photographs were released in 1979 when they were declassified.

None of these photographs show any sign of mass murder or disposal of millions of bodies.

scan2

3. Western Allies Never Liberated Any Death Camps With Gas Chambers:

None of the Western Allies ( Britain, Canada, USA, Australia, France etc. ) liberated any camps that had gas chambers, or other systems of mass murder in them.

All the alleged death camps with gas chambers were liberated by the Russians. Consequently any alleged evidence of death camps and/or gas chambers was forthcoming solely from Soviet Russia.

The Western Allies liberated a total of 12 main camps and the Soviet Russians 8 main camps.

scan4

4.The Leuchter Report:

One of the pieces of evidence Professor Ernst Zundel produced at his trials in Canada was the “Leuchter Report” compiled by Fred Leuchter on his commission.

Fred Leuchter is the World’s foremost expert on gas chambers, and holds the patents for nearly all the gas chambers used for executions in the World. He has also personally built, or supervised the building, of all gas chambers in the USA and most in the rest of the World.

After inspecting the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Leuchter concluded they were unsuitable for use as gas chambers due to their lack of airtight doors, lack of a gas extraction system and general shoddy build.

He also chemically analysed the walls for ferrocyanide ( produced when Zyklon-B reacts with brick walls ) and concluded there was none – the Auschwitz authorities took the same tests with the same results and now admit there was no gas chamber in Auschwitz.

scan5

5. The British Secret Service Monitored All Concentration Camp Deaths:

Using some of the World’s first computers the British Secret Service had cracked the German top-secret Enigma code and had access to most German Military communications by 1942.

Sir Frank H. Hinsley, in his book British Intelligence In The Second World War ; It’s Influence On Strategy And Operations,stated “The returns of Auschwitz mentioned illness as the main cause of death but included references to shootings and hangings. There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.”

The numbers of dead in the decoded messages tallied exactly with Red Cross and German Military records of the time. The British Secret Service also monitored various atrocities carried out by the Germans across the rest of Europe – why would the Germans report these to Berlin but not the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz and other camps?

6. The French Resistance Denied The Holocaust:

During World War Two Germany invaded France and occupied Northern France from 1940 to 1944.

A secret army of French Patriots known collectively as “The French Resistance” fought the German occupiers in various ways. A large number of French Resistance members were imprisoned, tortured and executed including their leader, and French National hero, Jean Moulin.

After World War Two French resistance members were released from various German concentration camps, including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps. On their return to France they all gave horrific accounts of their treatment by the Germans, and were full of hatred for them because of the events of World War Two.

However they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder programme in the concentration camps.

scan10

7. The Gas Chambers Of World War One:

It was widely reported during World War One ( 1914 to 1918 ) that the Germans, and their allies, were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners.

However, in 1919, after the end of the War British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin admitted in Parliament that it had been propaganda and no such gas chambers had existed. He also apologised publicly to the German People for this racist slur on them.

8. Amounts Of Zyklon-B Used At The Camps:

Zyklon-B was the trade name for of a cyanide-based pesticide  invented in the early 1920s. It was used in Germany, before and during the Second World War, for disinfection and pest extermination in ships, buildings and machinery.

Zyklon-B consisted of diatomite, in the form of granules the size of fine peas, saturated with prussic acid. In view of its volatility and the associated risk of accidental poisoning, it was supplied in sealed metal canisters.

One of the co-inventors of Zyklon-B, the chemist and businessman Bruno Tesch, was executed by the British in 1946 for his role in the alleged Holocaust.

In the concentration camps it was used for sanitation and pest control. There were disinfectant chambers, in all the camps, where inmates clothes were disinfected to combat typhus and other diseases.

When you break down the amount of Zyklon-B used in all the camps, those not alleged to have gas chambers and those alleged to have gas chambers, the amount per inmate is very similar. This means the alleged death camps would have had to have had a secret supply for the “gas chambers”.

9. The Nuremberg Trials 1945 to 1949:

The Nuremberg Trials were held in the German City of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949.

These Trials were held by the victorious Allies ( France, Britain , USA and Soviet Russia ) with the Germans as defendants. They were the worst sort of show trials with the main Judge being Nikitchenko, who had presided over Stalins’ show trials of 1936 to 1938 in the Soviet Union.

The Court came up with ridiculous findings like Jews being turned in to lampshades and even soap, these claims are now discredited and even the Jews admit they were untrue.

The Chief Justice of the United States Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. He said “Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg,” he wrote. “I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretence that he is running a Court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.”

Associate Supreme Court Justice William O Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of “substituting power for principle” at Nuremberg. “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled,” he wrote. “Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.”

According to British General Montgomery, the Germans had only one sin : They lost the war.

President John F Kennedy in his book,  Profiles in Courage, criticised Nuremberg as a show trial.

Out of 139 German witnesses who testified that the Holocaust had occurred, the British Medical Officer recorded that 137 had “damage to their testicles that is beyond repair”. A number of Germans had died under interrogation by the Allies. There was also the threat of sending Peoples’ families to Soviet Gulags.

scan13

10. The Concentration Camp Crematorium:

One of the main problems with the 6 million Jews being murdered claim was disposal of the bodies. It was claimed at Nuremberg that they had been disposed of in the camp crematorium.

There were crematorium in each camp, but they simply didn’t have the capacity. Each crematorium oven could burn a body in about one and a half hours, meaning a maximum capacity of 16 bodies every day or just less than 6000 bodies per year per oven. The camps had between four and twelve ovens each giving 24,000 to 72,000 bodies per year maximum at each camp – this still wouldn’t be possible as you can’t run these ovens non-stop without the metal fracturing.

Even double or triple loading wouldn’t help as this increased the time to three hours for two bodies or four and a half hours for three bodies. Also bodies aren’t totally reduced by this process and usually leave the pelvis and thigh bones which need crushing with special machinery – no such machinery was found at any of the camps.

There is also the problem of fuel as each body would need about 40 kilograms of coke to burn – there is no record of the massive amount of coke required being supplied.

11. The Liberation Of Belsen Concentration Camp Film:

The whole World has probably seen the film of the liberation of Belsen concentration camp, it is horrific to say the least. Human skeletons are walking round with dead bodies covering the ground.

This film was shown Worldwide at the time to show the evil of Nazi Germany.  However Belsen was liberated by the Western Allies, and was never alleged to have had any gas chamber or be part of a systematic mass murder programme.

The victims are in fact all dying from typhus which is confirmed by German Military, Red Cross and British Military medical records – this is never pointed out whenever this film is shown. Ironically the deaths were mostly due to a lack of Zyklon-B, at the end of the war with Germany collapsing, leading to a mass typhus outbreak in the camp.

scan18

12. No Film Or Photographs Of Any Gas Chambers:

The Nazis were technology freaks, to say the least, and filmed and photographed virtually everything they did during World War Two. Hitler even had executions of his political enemies filmed so he could watch them with his cronies.

However there has never been a single photograph or film found of any of the alleged gas chambers in operation. The Nazis did film, and photograph, themselves committing many atrocities across occupied Europe so it seems unlikely they wouldn’t film the alleged gas chambers. All the films we are shown of gas chambers are Hollywood recreations made after the war.

scan19

13. Sir Winston Churchill Never Mentioned The Alleged Holocaust:

In his monumental six volume The Second World War Sir Winston Churchill, British wartime Prime Minister, never makes any reference to gas chambers or a planned mass extermination of European Jews.

This is despite the fact he goes in to great detail about virtually every facet of World War Two including many atrocities committed by the Nazis. The same can be said about Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe. After the Second World War, with the Cold War starting, Churchill stated “I think we slaughtered the wrong pig here” a clear reference to the fact Britain would have been better helping Germany defeat Soviet Russia, or at least staying out completely.

scan22

14. Star Witness To The Alleged Holocaust Elie Wiesel:

One of the star witnesses to the Auschwitz allegations is Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel. Wiesel was born in Sighet, Romania on September 30th, 1928. Wiesel has given evidence at various trials around the World on his alleged experiences in German camps during World War Two.

Wiesel is a well-known writer of fiction with over 40 published books. However it is his autobiography of Auschwitz, Night ,  which has come under scrutiny. Firstly, Wiesel claims the bodies were disposed of by a secret Nazi method of using bodies to burn bodies – if this was scientifically possible wouldn’t they just use this method to burn the bodies? Secondly Wiesel claims that his concentration camp number  A7713 was tattooed on his left arm like all inmates, however video evidence shows no such tattoo and he has never explained where his tattoo went.

Thirdly his camp number, A7713, was assigned to a different prisoner and there is no record of him at Auschwitz despite all camp records being recovered after the War. Fourthly in all his different accounts of Auschwitz Weisel never mentions any gas chambers. Fifthly Wiesel makes bizarre claims about mass graves that would shoot fountains of blood up in to the air, this is also scientifically impossible.

Sixthly Wiesel claims he spent three weeks in the Auschwitz Camp hospital with an infected leg – would a death camp bother curing prisoners? There are many other major discrepancies to his claims, and a read of his book Night is recommended.

For a more precise look at Elie Wiesel and why his allegations don’t stand up to any scrutiny please visit: http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/

scan6

15. Fake Photographic And Film Holocaust Evidence And The Ever Changing Numbers:

The first time fake evidence was used was during the Nuremberg Trials. This however became an industry in its own right after 1945, with large rewards paid to investigators for “finding” Holocaust evidence. At the time a lot of this evidence was very cutting-edge, but under modern scrutiny it simply doesn’t stand up.

pic0121

16. The Balfour Declaration, World War One And 6 Million Jews:

During World War One the British Government had agreed with leading jews that they would support a Jewish homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Jewish lobby in America getting the USA to join the Allies.

This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government promising the Jews a homeland in Palestine. After World War One the British Government were unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Jews claimed 6 million Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine.

This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.

17. Holocaust Denial And The Holocaust Deniers:

In most parts of Europe questioning any aspect of the findings of the Nuremberg Trials is a very serious criminal offence on par with rape, murder or armed robbery. In France you can receive up to 20 years in prison, which may have to be served in solitary confinement. Even where it is not illegal questioning the official Holocaust narrative will probably cost you your job, family, house etc.

Despite this a lot of top writers, academics, historians and scientists have questioned the official Holocaust narrative or denied it entirely. Professor Ernst Zundel was put on numerous trials around the World, had his house firebombed, received death threats, his family broke up, was deported from several countries and eventually was imprisoned for five years in Germany. No other historical event can attract this type of punishment for questioning the official narrative.

Despite these threats, the official narrative is constantly exposed as being a lie and the jews have to constantly change their claims when faced with irrefutable evidence of their lies.

scan25

18. The Main Stream Media And The Alleged Holocaust:

The Main Stream Media never question the official narrative of the holocaust, and go on an all-out attack on anyone who does. They have created the term “Holocaust Denier”  for anyone who doesn’t believe, or dares to question, the official narrative.

“Holocaust Denier” is one of the multicultural buzz-words like “Fascist/Nazi/racist/homophobe” designed to denigrate the person described as such,  and lead to “pack-attacks” by the media, politicians and the general lefty PC crowd.

However bear in mind that around 96% of the Western World’s media is controlled by Jews and/or Zionists. You will notice that the Jews/Zionist are willing to keep running newspapers/TV channels and other media outlets at a financial loss simply to keep control of the MSM.

19. There’s No Business Like Shoa Business:

“Shoa” is the term used by Jews and Zionists to describe the alleged Holocaust. After the Second World War Germany was forced to pay trillions of Dollars in compensation to set up Israel, and is still paying to this day.

There are now second and third generation, the children and grandchildren of alleged Holocaust victims, who receive compensation from the German Government and various German Corporations.

The American Government also use this as an excuse to give billions of American taxpayers’ money to Israel, although the real reason behind these payments is the strength of the Israeli lobby in America.

As early as 1941, two years before the alleged Holocaust was even meant to have started, the World Jewish Congress had been demanding that the Germans pay for the resettlement of Jews in Israel as reparations.

pic006

20. Inmate Facilities At Auschwitz:

With two very different witness versions of what was going on in the camps, let’s have a quick look at the facilities available to inmates to see if that can clarify matters. The Jews have now admitted there wasn’t any gas chambers in Auschwitz following the two sets of scientific tests, but there were some facilities that certainly were in Auschwitz and can still be seen today.

Break His Bones:

The Private Life of A Holocaust Revisionist

Chapter Eighteen

One night in late December I dream that I’ve been gassed at Auschwitz. In the dream, as I become aware of myself inside the gas chamber, the gassing itself is already over. I see myself sitting naked in the center of the floor; the room around me choked with naked cadavers heaped to the ceiling. The dead are filthy with feces, urine, vomit and menstrual blood. The scene is faintly illuminated in an ugly green light.

I’m not dead and I’m not suffering. Before I have time to evaluate my situation two large doors at the rear of the chamber are thrown open and there, revealed against a somber gray sky, is the gang of work-Jews, the sondercommandos as they are called in the literature. They are ready to begin their filthy labor of dragging out the dead, searching the mouths and rectums and even the vaginas of their murdered families and friends for diamonds and gold. Soon they will be using iron tools to pry open the mouths of their slaughtered children to search for contraband. It is these same work-Jews who will drag the violated cadavers to the crematory ovens. Then, as this sordid story has it, they will grind the very bones of their wives and children until their gravel can be disposed of in the Vistula. They will do this contemptible work to gain another week, another day, another hour of life for themselves.

There are about a dozen workers in the sondercommando. They’re on the short side, stocky in build, dressed in shabby clothes and billed caps. They looked like men you have seen in photographs of Jewish immigrants in the streets of the Lower East Side in New York City after the turn of the century. The workers appear to be posing there in the doorway, turning this way and that as if modeling themselves for me. They give off an air of self-satisfaction, of self-importance even. Some are smoking cigarettes and I notice that they are all barehanded. None is wearing a gas mask.

When I wake from the dream I feel stunned. I can still see the individual faces of the work gang as they pose before the open gas chamber doors. They have the faces of ordinary working class Jews. In my mind’s eye I can still see the piles of corpses heaped up in their own filth. I think about what it is the work-Jews are going to do next, according to the story. I don’t just think about it. I see it. And it’s at this moment of seeing when I know, once again, I am going to do something about the Holocaust story.

I’m lying on my pad on the floor in the front room of Mother’s apartment. The first light of day is edging the drawn window blinds. I go on seeing the faces of the work Jews posing in the open gas chamber doorway. I know in my heart, without reservation, that those men would not have done what it is claimed they did. I’ve worked and lived among such men and their children for twenty-five years. They would not have done it.

Once maybe. Twice. A handful of them. But not all of them. Not day after day, week after week, month after month. They would not have done it. The gas chamber story is a lie. For half a century I have observed historians all over the world work to help legitimate the injustice, repression and lies of the orthodoxies for which they toil. At the same time I have seen artists from every discipline protest all that and cry out for liberty, truth and generosity. How could it have come about that I would chose to join with the historians all those years in a silent pact to repeat and even to exploit the lies and platitudes used to institutionalize as truth the alleged genocide of the Jews? Human-skin lamp shades, hand soap made from cooked Jews, Jewish babies thrown alive into raging furnaces, millions of people exterminated like animals and all of it proven by State decree, State courts seething with corruption and the usual army of bought bureaucrats and corrupt intellectuals. I’d bought it all, and as an artist I’d used it all.

No more. Four months earlier, when I had read the Robert Faurisson’s article about the “problem” of the gas chambers at Auschwitz, I had felt in my bones that something was badly wrong. Faurisson claimed that the gas chamber stories and the genocide of the Jews are one and the same historic lie. I had felt an immediate and deep anxiety that he might be right. The news didn’t make me happy, it made me fearful. It made my hands sweat.

Faurisson’s paper turned on a statement made by Rudolf Hoess, the SS colonel who claimed to have dreamed up the Auschwitz gas chambers, overseen their construction and murdered millions of victims in them, mostly Jews. In his confession Hoess wrote that after the gassings took place the work-Jews would enter the gas chambers “immediately” to drag out the dead. They would do this while “eating and smoking.” If they were eating and smoking, Faurisson wrote, it was unlikely they were wearing gas masks. But if they were going to enter the gas chamber immediately after a mass gassing Faurisson believed they would have had to use gas masks with special filters or be “gassed” themselves. This alone suggested to Faurisson that Hoess didn’t know diddly about mass gassings with Zyklon B, his poison gas of choice, and that his famous gas-chamber confession was the invention of a tortured mind. We hadn’t yet learned that Hoess, after his capture by British military intelligence, had in fact been tortured to obtain his confession.

I remember how thought wouldn’t let go of Faurisson’s thesis. It was doing a wild dance inside my skull. Thought wouldn’t go along with it either. It wouldn’t make a decision. It was like having an insane bee in my bonnet. Endless movement but no destination. Then thought did what it sometimes does with me. One night while I was asleep, thought went underground as it were. Thought treated me the way it treats children and other primitives, putting its argument into pictures so that I would see clearly what I had been unable to assure myself rationally. The pictures convinced me that it was all right, that it was good to doubt what I had begun to doubt.

In that stupefying first moment of recognition, I knew in my heart that the faces in the dream would not do what the Nazi commandant of Auschwitz claimed they had done. They would not eat their sandwiches and smoke their cigarettes with hands slimy with the blood and shit of their murdered families and neighbors. They would not jam their filthy fingers into the vaginas and rectums of their dead little girls to search for jewels and coins for their German bosses while enjoying a fag and a snack. The story was a lie. It was a lie even if “eyewitnesses” themselves repeated it. It was a lie. My heart told me that it absolutely had to be a lie. The dream was a powerful aesthetic experience. It was the quality of the pictures that moved me to finally go to the library that week, the last afternoon in December 1979, and confirm some of Faurisson’s claims.

Argument alone had left me uneasy. There’s no end to argument. A new thought, new information is always turning argument back on itself. There’s no end to it. At the same time, you have to make decisions. Little leaps of faith. Faurisson’s argument had stirred things up for me but it was the direct experience of the dream that forced me to admit that I at least half-suspected it was possible that he was right and that Hoess had lied about himself, the Jews and the SS too. The dream went beyond doubting, beyond a movement of the intellect. It permeated the whole body. There was completeness to it that thought can’t produce. It was a holistic experience. Thought and its tools of doubt and fear were overwhelmed. Still, if it wasn’t thought that caused me to see through the gas chamber hoax, what was it? It would seem that intellection is only one of several means of expression in thought’s kit bag.

So I became a Holocaust revisionist because of a dream. Without the dream, who knows? I might still be evading my responsibilities as an artist and as a man. I didn’t tell anybody about the dream, and after awhile I half-forgot about it. There are thousands of books and countless articles written by respected academics and survivors demonstrating that both Jews and Germans did what they are accused of doing in the camps. I suppose I wasn’t really very eager to challenge the history of the 20th century on the grounds that I had seen through it in a dream.

Some artists pride themselves on their uniqueness. I rest secure in my ordinariness, my vulgarity and ignorance, my insensitivity to the social standards of the day. I excuse my careless intellectual life with Whitman’s observation that while his words may mean nothing, the drift of them means everything. Where are the human-skin lampshades? You don’t have to be a historian to ask that question. You can ask it if you are only an artist. Where are the human skin riding breeches, the boots, the saddles, gloves and pornographic books made from human skin that are reported by “survivors” in documents signed, sealed and delivered to the Nuremberg court? Where are they?

We don’t have to be geniuses to ask these questions. We don’t have to be historians-or artists. We only have to be willing. Not asking the questions has been of small consequence to our historians, who routinely avoid doing such work as part of their perceived obligation to those who pay and oversee them. For we artists, however, our collaboration with the State in the promotion of the gas-chamber lie has been a catastrophe. It has coarsened our sensibilities and vulgarized our art. We have made ourselves invulnerable before those who played the role of our enemies in the past. We have encouraged neurosis and other sicknesses of character in those we have chosen to sympathize with, no matter what.

With the Holocaust story as with no other we have closed off our artist-minds and our artist-hearts to the accused. Even in law, that clumsy attempt to formalize the ideals of the good and the just in everyday life, the accused is innocent until proven guilty. Where are the human skin lampshades? Where is the soap made of Jewish fat? Where is the documentation that proves the soap? Where is there a single scientific or scholarly paper that demonstrates that the pesticide Zyklon B did what is claimed for it in the manner that’s claimed for it? Who do we make our art for if it does not embrace the accused, the vanquished and the despised?

More subtly, more insidiously perhaps for the artist, we have closed our selves off from the accusers as well as the accused. Denying “survivors” the benefit of our rationality and the delicateness of our sensibilities, we have denied them our full humanity and the burden of it. We respond to survivors, to the “eyewitnesses” with- Yes! Yes! We believe you. Absolutely! Every word of it! Not one of you has ever exaggerated an important story, merely imagined an atrocity! Not one among you has ever lied or ever would! Not one of you has ever revenged yourself on a stranger for what was done to you by another or allegedly done to others! You are a survivor, perfect in the truth. In your virtue, you are like no other!

Can Jewish cadavers really spurt geysers of blood from their graves for months after they are buried? Of course they can! At Buchenwald did German SS really throw a Jew into a cage every morning where a bear would eat him and his bones would be picked clean by an eagle? Yes! Yes! At Auschwitz did Jewish fathers really take their sons by the hand and leap into flaming ditches to be burned alive? Did the work-Jews, to save their own miserable lives for another day, really attend to the cremation fires by basting their families and neighbors with ladles of Jewish fat? Yes, of course they did! Of course!

For half a century we have said Yes! to such stories and a thousand like them. For half a century we have camouflaged our baseness as artists in expressions of empathy for the tellers of these unspeakable lies. We know-it’s our business to know-that every misrepresentation of human life made by a so-called survivor, as by anyone else, becomes a moral burden on the falsifier himself. With our mindless acceptance of false accusation against Germans and our heartless sympathy for those Jews who repeat them, we have made of ourselves the thieves of their virtue. There must be a very special place in Artist Hell for a generation of men and women who have done what we have done.

Who can argue that artists of every discipline do not promote the orthodox Holocaust story? Our television, our cinema, our stages are run over with fake Holocaust drama. Our novels and memoirs are full of it. Our universities and even our high schools employ the arts to urge Holocaustomania onto our children. Our poets poeticize over the Holocaust, our painters paint it, our sculptors sculpt it, while great philanthropist-thieves chat up the funding of a Holocaust ballet so that our dance artists can at last express themselves about the Holocaust.

Our scholars co-mingle with our artists to thrive on the holocaust story, using it to illustrate their speculations and support their politics. The holocaust is universally perceived among our intellectual elites to be the most morally significant story of the 20th century. Every citizen is expected to know the outline of the story and have a clear understanding of who the villains and particularly who the heroes are-the victorious allied governments. No less can be expected of the artist, and in the event we have dedicated ourselves to the project with all our fervor. Where is there a single artist in this great nation of 250 millions who has not gone along with whatever charge of filthy criminality and moral debasement has appeared in the press about Germans and Jews alike? Where is there a single artist among us who has not substituted the theories of the intellectuals for his own direct experience when making art about the Holocaust? Where has one artist among us made one artistic statement about the alleged genocide of the Jews that does not stand in conformity with the State and the State factotums responsible for overseeing State policy on this issue?

One of the things I do as a writer is to use my art to stand witness to the intellectual and moral corruption of the society in which I live. I do no more or less than artists of every discipline have always done. It’s what is expected of us, and it’s especially what we expect of ourselves. But am I not being insensitive to the feelings of Jews, I am asked? I respond that Jewish feelings are no particular concern for me. I’m an artist. My responsibility is to human feeling, human sensibilities. The German bleeds from the thrust of a lie just as the Jew does.

The Great Debate on the Holocaust that’s beginning to rumble around through the countryside is being organized and implemented by citizens from every walk of life, excepting academics, media intellectuals and artists. Long-haul truck drivers, computer programmers, sci-fi enthusiasts, engineers, pilots, plumbers, house framers and housewives, small time journalists, country preachers, retired machinery salesmen, bankers- the list is more varied than our artists have any idea of. Artists in this country haven’t a hint yet that with respect to the holocaust story they have chosen to stand with the intellectuals against the people. Artists pretend they’ve been thinking about all this, content to believe that the professors have given us the real skinny on the holocaust. The State and those who serve it to serve it ourselves have intimidated us, and to make our art from images created by others.

What is so powerful in being an artist is that you don’t have to wait. Unlike the historian, it isn’t necessary for you to undo what has gone before. You don’t have to set old records straight. You don’t have to disprove yesterday’s truths in order to tell your own truth today. In the passion of the moment the artist tells the truth of the moment. Our history and our museums become irrelevant in that instant of passionate impulse. Afterward, history and the museums will take care of themselves, moving slowly in the direction of least resistance.

Was I wrong yesterday? Did I do something I regret? It’s all right! In this very moment I’ll right myself. In this moment I will make art that will uplift and liberate us all. I’ll make it for the accused and the accursed, for the shamed and for the guilty too and for those who are wrong about everything and all the rest. None of us is wrong about everything. I’ll make something even the rich, successful and influential can use. I’ll make art that’s good for the bigots. I identify with bigots of every persuasion for my art has taught me that when your mind is closed to some you are unable to open your heart to all and you are lost to the joy an open heart brings and to the quiet movement of ecstasy that comes with the full experience of brotherhood.

Am I going to be wrong about something on this very day? Am I going to do something stupid or vulgar, something I’ll regret? You can almost bet your ass on it. But I’m an artist. I don’t have the right to remain silent about what I’ve seen. So stand aside. Tell the professorial class and the holocaust hate industry to stand aside too. I’m making art. Their reputations are doomed. I’m making art for the people, without qualification.

HOLOCAUST exposed

Rival Anne Frank Film, TV Projects Spark Furor

Introduction — Jan 24, 2014

An acknowledged fraud that was recognised as such by the courts in a little publicised verdict, the Anne Frank Diary is more about making money than historical fact.
This may explain why there are disputes over projects connected to her tragic life. They aren’t about historical facts, although maybe they should be, these disputes are essentially about money and brand name.
Even in covering the dispute however, the Hollywood Reporter gets its facts wrong and perpetuates the myths surrounding Frank. For instance she wasn’t “murdered” by the Nazis, as the article claims. Anne Frank actually succumbed to Typhus as did many others who died in Nazi concentration camps.
She didn’t die in a “gas-chamber” but was one of the many who died in the epidemics that swept the camps, which were compounded by Allied bombing that destroyed the camps water supplies.
Yves Kugelmann, a member of the board of the Anne Frank Fund, even admits her legacy has “become incredibly commercialized — Anne Frank has become a brand”.
Like Coca-Cola or Yvez Saint Laurant this isn’t about history, this is about product recognition and placement. Like the Holocaust Industry itself, this is more about generating profit and guilt for political leverage than historical fact.
Contrast the attention paid to Anne Frank’s tragic death with that accorded to the many Palestinian children who are regularly, and in many cases deliberately targeted and murdered, by Israeli forces.
No stage plays, films or profitable book deals for them. For most of these deaths are recorded by a few brief lines in the corporate media without the lucrative lamentations.
But that, as they say, is business and in the Holocaust Industry it is all that really counts.

Rival Anne Frank Film, TV Projects Spark Furor

Scott Roxborough — Hollywood Reporter Jan 2014

In 2015, it will have been 70 years since the Nazis murdered Anne Frank, and the anniversary coincides with renewed interest in the Jewish girl and her famed diary chronicling a life in hiding.

At least three major biographical projects on Frank’s life are in the works, including two feature films (one live-action, one animated) and a miniseries. But the question of who gets to tell Frank’s story — and how that story will be told — has ignited a battle in Europe.

On Jan. 13, German production firms Moovie and Constantin Film, together with public broadcaster ZDF, unveiled plans for a German-language miniseries based on Frank’s life. The project immediately was condemned by the Anne Frank Fund, the Swiss foundation that holds rights to Frank’s diary and the Frank family archive. The fund accused Constantin and ZDF of violating “all standards of convention, fairness and decency” by going ahead with a Frank project without the fund’s participation and accused the producers of “disrespecting the Frank family, which was largely massacred in the Holocaust.” It wants ZDF and Constantin to cancel their project, set to begin shooting in the summer, and has threatened legal action if they don’t.

“This is not about money for us,” Yves Kugelmann, member of the board of the Anne Frank Fund, tells THR, noting that the fund is a nonprofit with proceeds going to education and charitable projects. “This is about Anne Frank’s legacy. She has become incredibly commercialized — Anne Frank has become a brand, separated from the real person and her identity.”

Frank’s diary, first published by her father, Otto, in 1947 after her death in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, has sold more than 30 million copies worldwide. The 1959 biopicThe Diary of Anne Frank, featuring Millie Perkins as Anne, won three Oscars. A 1980 TV movie starring Melissa Gilbert received three Emmy noms, and the 2001 ABC miniseriesAnne Frank: The Whole Story won two Emmys.

The fund recently gave its blessing to two other Frank projects: an animated take on her life from Waltz With Bashir director Ari Folman and a German-language live-action feature to be written by Fred Breinersdorfer (who penned the Oscar-nominated Sophie Scholl: The Final Days) and directed by Hans Steinbichler (Winter Journey). The fund offered ZDF an opportunity to partner on the German project, says Kugelmann, but the broadcaster said no.

Although producers of the Folman and Breinersdorfer biopics say they will adhere to the facts as recorded in the Anne Frank archive, the TV project intends to link the story to a fictionalized modern narrative. ZDF says it hopes its project will appeal to younger viewers, noting it has the support of the Anne Frank Foundation, a fund rival that runs the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam, and Salomon Korn, vp at the Central Council of Jews in Germany.

Despite the dustup, ZDF argues that multiple projects about Frank can only help raise awareness of her life and legacy.

Nazi Germany Unfairly Demonized?

February 28, 2014

nazisg.jpg
Heinz Weichardt (1915-2011) was a German Jew
who fled to the US in 1938.
In spite of this, he felt Nazi Germany
was misrepresented in the West.
Was he a dupe?

by Victoria Malcolm Story 
(henrymakow.com) 

Heinz Weichardt’s 28-page booklet, ‘Under Two Flags’ is so much at variance with conventional accounts of pre-WWII Germany as to elicit instant ‘cognitive dissonance’ in the reader.

Living in Berlin from 1929-1938, the son of an important  newspaper editor, Weichardt had every reason to hate the Nazis. Even though his father was a gentile, the Nazis prevented him from serving in the military and marrying the Ayran girl he loved because of his Jewish mother.

The first part of his booklet sets some of the historical context including his remarks upon WWI and the notorious Versailles Treaty and the second discusses his experiences living as an ‘enemy alien’ in the U.S.  He concludes with some remarks upon what he sees as dubious calculations regarding the number of holocaust victims.

Of particular interest are Weichardt’s experiences living under the Nuremberg Laws.  He describes a couple of run-ins with the authorities, including one that involved an inspection of his gun collection, including ammunition, without confiscation.  He also reveals that he and his Jewish mother were allowed to vote in elections and even as ‘non-Aryans’ were given the protection of the state, if not all the privileges of full-citizenship.

Weichardt heaps scorn upon other world leaders of the day noting their often, less-than-honorable dealings with Hitler and Germany.  He mentions a League of Nations conference held amongst thirty-three countries at Lake Geneva in 1938 and observes with sarcasm how, despite their criticism of Germany’s racial policies, not one of them would alter their laws to facilitate the immigration of Germany’s remaining 300,000 Jewish population.

995382381.gifIt is remarkable how many of our most entrenched ideas about pre-WWII Germany Weichardt challenges in his short booklet.  He writes of the post WWI  British blockade of Germany that led to mass starvation among its populace which was exacerbated by world Jewry’s ‘declaration of war’ upon Germany in 1933.

‘Kristalnacht’ becomes more understandable with the revelation that it was the murder of a German official at their Paris embassy by a young, Jewish assassin that finally lit the fuse that led to that event.  Weichardt claims that National Socialist leaders, cognizant of world prejudice against them for their policies towards the Jews, were appalled by the outburst and took immediate steps to quell the violence and protect Jewish businesses.

Weichardt’s discusses the ‘Transfer Agreement’   that facilitated Jewish immigration to Palestine.  He reveals the startling information that the Zionists even had their own department within S.S. headquarters.  The exchange-starved German Reich paid about 50 million pre-war dollars to assist approximately 50,000 young Jews in moving to Palestine, a cost necessitated by British demands that each of them pay 1,000 pounds sterling in gold for the privilege.  As Weichardt observes, “So much for the “planned destruction” of the Jews”.

Under Two Flags shows how little we hear of the German side of that story.  Interestingly, Weichardt partially blames the Germans who lived in America for abandoning their homeland. Once away from Germany, they bettered themselves individually but failed to organize politically and were, therefore, unable to defend their countrymen against false accusations.

Even Weichardt took until 1995 to set-pen-to-paper in this unique memoir of a German Jew.  He says:  “The complete lack of veracity in reporting anything about Germany and the outbreak of the war became obvious to me shortly after I arrived in this country [the USA] and my conviction that a colossal fraud was imposed on the American people by the Jewish-controlled media has been reinforced ever since”.

The more one delves into history we are not supposed to, especially the, mostly Jewish, takeover of Tsarist Russia in 1917, and when one considers the Palestinian situation in present-day Israel, the more the accusations against the Germans begin to sound like a conspicuous case of ‘the pot calling the kettle black’.  Weichardt’s booklet is a notable contribution to telling the other side of the story.

 

 

More Solid Proof that the holoHOAX DID NOT HAPPEN

Where Brains are Tenderly Washed, Disinfected and Made Usable Again — July 3, 2014

“The Zionists dare to use their power to expel the Arabs, and even today in Lebanon, they kill and butcher the Arabs; they wipe out whole villages with the airplanes they get from the United States.”
Deceased Rabbi Boruch Kaplan, who was principal of the Beis Yaakov Girls School in Brooklyn.

Hitler movie poster

Thanks to “Justice4Germans“ for the pic!

“Himmler – “Reduce Deaths at all Costs

Heinrich Himmler, chief of the Concentration Camps issued orders on December 28, 1942, that “The death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs” (Reitlinger, “The Final Solution”). The camps had been hit with a deadly typhus epidemic that spread by fleas and body lice. Stomach pain, high fever, emaciation and death can quickly follow. All of the camps were factories and the loss of workers was hurting war production. Inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks responded to Himmler’s order on January 20, 1943, “Every means will be used to lower the death rates” (Nuremberg Tribunal Document No. 1523). Yes, those nasty Nazis actually said that, here’s the copied portion from the “Harvard Law School Library Nuremberg Document Collection”

Nuremburg trial document

On April 10, 1943, Oswald Pohl, head of the Economic Administration Office of the camps issued a letter stating that persons with tuberculosis were being sent to the camps resulting in the “shockingly high mortality figures” (Nuremberg Documents). Later, on September 30, 1943, Pohl was able to show that the camp death rate had been reduced from 8.5% in July, 1942 to 2.8% in June 1943.
The German SS arrested Buchenwald Commandant, Karl Koch in 1943 for mistreating and even executing some prisoners. After an investigation Koch was found guilty by SS Judge Konrad Morgen and shot. Does this sound like a policy of “extermination?”
After the War, with suspicion rapidly rising about the holocaust claim, a committee of Jewish leaders from New York and Paris met with communist leaders in Warsaw. There they established the “Committee for the Investigation of War Crimes and War Criminals”. It was after this meeting that the announcement was made that all gas chambers were located in Poland.

The Problems of Mass Gassing

In 1945 it was announced that gas death chambers existed in all concentration camps in Poland, Germany, Austria and Alsace. Some 15 years later, in 1960, this was revised to the new claim that gas chambers existed only in camps located in Soviet held Poland. Simon Weisenthal of the Los Angeles Holocaust Center states in the paper, “Books and Bookmen”, April 1975, page 5, “No gassing took place in any camp on German soil.” The pressure had been growing since The Vatican, Red Cross, English Intelligence and German Intelligence chiefs Canaris and Oster (who collaborated with the British) either did not know or did not believe in rumors of gassings.
Here’s a typical street at the Auschwitz labor camp, which also had a cinema, swimming pool, hospital, library, post office, even a brothel for inmates. Does that sound like a death camp, a LIE which the holoHOAX industry wants you to believe, and BTW sucker, donate some more money to these scam artists.

ausch_zps61389ebe

What the Jew Bankers don’t want you to know about Hitler and the National Socialists:
Bottom Line Facts:
Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn’t backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government.
Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.”
The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.
Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.
Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation:
“The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times (May 24, 2005).
Can’t have that kind of economic miracle here in the USA, our wealth gets routed to the Jew bankers and our kids get fed into the latest ‘War for Wall Street.’
Featured Image -- 5501

The Manufacturing Of The Ebola Al-Qaeda And ISIS Terror Virus!

Originally posted on Political Vel Craft:

Brzezinski with CIA Osama.

Brzezinski with CIA Osama.

Much like Al Qaeda, the Islamic State (ISIS) is made-in-the-USA, an instrument of terror designed to divide and conquer the oil-rich Middle East and to counter Iran’s growing influence in the region.

The fact that the United States has a long and torrid history of backing terrorist groups will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore history.

The CIA first aligned itself with extremist Islam during the Cold War era. Back then, America saw the world in rather simple terms: on one side, the Soviet Union and Third World nationalism, which America regarded as a Soviet tool; on the other side, Western nations and militant political Islam, which America considered an ally in the struggle against the Soviet Union.

The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan, General William Odom recently remarked, “by any measure the U.S. has long used terrorism. In…

View original 1,436 more words

Only in America–Disgraced televangelist now selling food for the apocalypse

Originally posted on The Ugly Truth:

 

ed note–as much as some may (with good reason) snicker at the UTTER ridiculousness of the situation described in this story, remember that Jim Baker is just the evangelical version of other creatures who engage in the same thing, including John Stadtmiller at RBN, Alex Jones, Jeff Rense & others who promote and profit off of the ‘bunker mentality’ that pervades much within what we would call ‘the movement’ these days with their sale of apocalypse water filters, apocalypse food, apocalypse herbal tea, apocalypse iodine tablets, apocalypse body armor, apocalypse toilet paper, apocalypse hemorrhoid creme, etc.

continue reading

View original

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City

Originally posted on THE INTERNET POST:

World events most of which are ‘engineered’ leave a trail that leads to the architects. We next discover that there are 3 cities on earth that come under no national authority, they have separate laws, they pay no taxes, they have their own police force and even possess their own flag of ‘independence’. These 3 cities control the economy, military onslaughts and the spiritual beings of those in powers. The 3 cities are actually corporations and they are the City of London, District of Columbia and the Vatican. Together they control politicians, the courts, educational institutions, food supply, natural resources, foreign policies, economies, media, and the money flow of most nations as well as 80% of the world’s entire wealth. Their ultimate aim is to build a totalitarian rule on a global scale where people will be divided into rulers and the ruled after they have depopulated the world to…

View original 50 more words

GAZANS FLEEING TO EUROPE VIA TUNNELS, TRAFFICKERS AND BOATS

Originally posted on The Ugly Truth:

‘It’s better to die at sea than to die of despair and frustration in Gaza,’ says resident of Strip.

ed note–just a little reminder to those idiot WN types who are constantly bemoaning the ‘brown tide’ sweeping across Europe that indeed it is the deliberate destabilization of dark-skinned countries, whether through war or economic exploitation–being waged by ‘white countries’ against places such as Syria, Gaza, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Egypt, etc–that is the primary cause of immigration into Europe and other ‘white’ countries and not simply because horney, brown-skinned men want to go to ‘white’ countries to rape white women and steal the jobs of white men.

Those of you out there who have made a holy crusade of sorts out of the immigration issue, if you truly want your countries back, then start attackingthe source of your immigration problem, which are the policies being waged by your…

View original 13 more words

Jewish Groups Pay to Send U.S. Police to Train in Israel

Originally posted on Aletho News:

By Danny Biederman and Noel Brinkerhoff | AllGov | September 19, 2014

The militarization of American police forces hasn’t been paid for by just the federal government. Pro-Israel groups in the U.S. have also played a role by financing trips for hundreds of law enforcement officers to travel to the Middle East for counterterrorism training, according to Ali Winston, a contributor to the Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR).

Monies provided by such groups as the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee’s Project Interchange and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs have made it possible for “at least 300 high-ranking sheriffs and police from agencies large and small – from New York and Maine to Orange County and Oakland, California” to attend privately funded seminars in Israel since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Winston discovered.

There, they have learned how Israeli security forces deal with demonstrators and…

View original 312 more words