Americans Believe In Conspiracy Theories

A Surprising Number Of Americans Believe In Conspiracy Theories - And Many Of Them Are Actually True - Photo by Philip Jackson

911 ~ Master Engineer Gordon Ross – video

Conspiracy to Tell the Truth | Interview with Lance deHaven-Smith

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Is this building falling or exploding? If you say “falling” you need to take your meds

 by Kevin Barrett

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled“Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.

Illuminati Used Same “Eye Witness” in 9-11 & Boston

silva.jpg(left, “Super Witness” Steve Silva, a “Boston Globe web producer.” Mass media
 collaborates in false flags.) 

Steve Silva did such a good job  
deceiving the nation on 9-11 that
the Illuminati brought him back for
the Boston Marathon bombing. 

(See Betsy McGee’s video report.)

by Betsy McGee (Mom Reporter)
(henrymakow.com)

In April, after the Boston false flag, I watched a video that was taken from the finish line that is now touted as the “gripping, definitive video” of the bombings.

I realized that the videographer was filming everything BUT the area where the action was, and I wanted to know why… was he just such an amateur and so frightened that he couldn’t get good footage?

A quick investigation revealed that the videographer was the Boston.com sports producer, a man named Steve Silva.  This, I thought, stunk to high heaven, as a “sports producer” would be someone used to taking video of fast-paced, exciting events…  I knew I was looking at a deliberately jumbled and choppy video, done exactly that way on purpose so that the false flag fakery could be put into place…  I even made a video about it..

STEVE SILVA AGAIN

A few days ago I found a video of two witnesses claiming that they just happened to see the first plane hit the first tower on 9/11… and one of the witness’s names was STEVE SILVA.  Imagine my surprise!  It did not, however, say “Boston.com’s Steve Silva” or anything like that, so I took the footage of the 9/11 witness call and pieced it together with the Boston witness footage and it’s the same person.  I supposed that the cabal felt that Steve did such a great job lying on 9/11, that they would use him as a star witness again, on their next big fake attack.

I joked to my son, “Well this guy is like a SUPER WITNESS!”… and the jokes ensued and – well, you’ll see…

I made a new video about Steve Silva. FAKE, LYING JOURNALISTS REALLY BOTHER ME, and it was either have some fun with him or be really, really brutal…

I think that the fact that the cabal would be so bold, and think that we are so blind and beyond stupid, that they’d use the same guy as a star witness at BOTH events, helps to show the fakery of it all…

The Killing of President Kennedy (very rare 1978 BBC documentary)

A Surprising Number Of Americans Believe In Conspiracy Theories – And Many Of Them Are Actually True

Have you ever noticed that whenever the government or the mainstream media wants to demonize a particular point of view they call it a “conspiracy theory”?  The unspoken message is that normal people such as us should never dare to question the official propaganda being put out by “official sources”.  But what if those “official sources” are wrong?  What if those “official sources” have a specific agenda that they are trying to promote?  Has it become a crime to ask questions?  Has it become a crime to think for ourselves?  The other day, Public Policy Polling did an opinion poll about “conspiracy theories”.  Just by reading the questions they asked, it is obvious that the goal was to make those that believe in those theories to look foolish.  When they released the results of the poll, they stated that some of the “conspiracy theories” could only be found in “the darker corners of the internet” – as if there was something unsavory or evil about them.  But is it really “crazy” to believe that sometimes bad people do bad things?  A conspiracy is just “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful”.  So do conspiracies ever happen?  Of course they happen.  They have happened for as long as humanity has existed.  But in this day and age, we are just supposed to assume that all of our politicians and all of the big corporations that dominate our society are just sweet and wonderful and would never want to do us any harm whatsoever.

Let’s take a look at some of the results of the Public Policy Polling survey about conspiracy theories.  Excerpts from the results are in bold, and my comments follow thereafter…

“37% of voters believe global warming is a hoax, 51% do not. Republicans say global warming is a hoax by a 58-25 margin, Democrats disagree 11-77, and Independents are more split at  41-51. 61% of Romney voters believe global warming is a hoax”

The planet has been warming up and cooling down for thousands of years, and most “climate change” can be directly attributed to the gigantic ball of fire that our planet is revolving around.  Even if “greenhouse gases” did play a significant role in “climate change”, the truth is that carbon emissions make up less than 5 percent of all greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and human activity accounts for less than 5 percent of all carbon emissions.  So to suggest that “global warming” could ever be significantly influenced by reducing carbon emissions is absolutely laughable.

“6% of voters believe Osama bin Laden is still alive”

They rapidly dumped his “dead body” into the ocean and the American public has still never seen any of the pictures that supposedly show that Osama bin Laden is dead.  Are we just supposed to trust our politicians when they tell us that the U.S. military killed him?  After all, our politicians lie for a living.  Plus, the truth is that there is a tremendous amount of evidence that bin Laden died many years before the now famous Seal team raid on a compound in Pakistan.

“28% of voters believe secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually rule the world through an authoritarian world government, or New World Order.  A plurality of Romney voters (38%) believe in the New World Order compared to 35% who don’t”

Whether you want to call them “the New World Order” or “the Illuminati” or “the global elite”, the truth is that nobody should be able to deny that there are ultra-wealthy individuals that are seeking to dominate the planet.  If you doubt this, please see the following article: “Who Runs The World? Solid Proof That A Core Group Of Wealthy Elitists Is Pulling The Strings“.

“20% of voters believe there is a link between childhood vaccines and autism, 51% do not”

At one time I didn’t believe that there was a link either.  But then I started looking into the evidence for myself. Why do they make us feel like criminals for asking questions about this? Is it because it threatens billions of dollars in pharmaceutical company profits? I put a lot of what I learned on this issue into this article: “Vaccines And Autism: The Secret That You Are Not Supposed To Know“.

“9% of voters think the government adds fluoride to our water supply for sinister reasons (not just dental health)”

Whatever the intention, the truth is that there is a tremendous amount of evidence that drinking fluoride is very harmful to humans.  A number of studies have shown that it actually causes brain damage, and it has been shown to accelerate the growth of cancer.  A blog post by Mary Bloomersummarized some of the other reasons why we should avoid Fluoride…

  • 41% of kids today have fluoridosis
  • The ADA and the CDC both advise that parents not use fluoridated water to make infant formula
  • Fluoride is used as an insecticide and a rat poison There’s plenty of fluoride in the food we eat!
  • A toddler gets as much fluoride in their system as a 250 lb. man
  • Toothpastes have warnings “keep away from children under 6 yrs. – if you swallow more than is allowed for brushing, contact a poison control center immediately”  (Ever watch a little kid brush their teeth?)
  • Sodium Fluorine (fluoride) is one of the basic ingredients in PROZAC® and Sarin nerve gas (yes, you read that right!)
  • Hitler added fluoride to the water of concentration camps to induce compliance in prisoners.
  • Fluoride increases your absorption of aluminum (a neurotoxin.)  Large amounts of aluminum are found in the brains of Alzheimer patients.

“51% of voters say a larger conspiracy was at work in the JFK assassination, just 25% say Oswald acted alone”

Does anyone actually still believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone?  Even though a majority of the American people now believe that there was a larger conspiracy at work in that assassination, the government and the media are still sticking to their story.

“5% believe exhaust seen in the sky behind airplanes is actually chemicals sprayed by the government for sinister reasons”

Do you see how they worded that question?  The exhaust trails that normal aircraft leave behind are called “contrails“, and they usually disappear within moments.  “Chemtrails” are something else entirely.  Once they are sprayed in the air, they can often remain up there for hours.  But apparently we aren’t supposed to notice the huge white lines that crisscross the sky right above our heads.  The only real debate about chemtrails should be about what their purpose is.  Are they being used for weather modification projects or is something more sinister happening?

“15% of voters think the medical industry and the pharmaceutical industry ‘invent’ new diseases to make money”

The pharmaceutical industry may not be inventing diseases just to make money, but they sure do love to invent new reasons to get people hooked on their legal drugs.  The sad truth is that the American people are the most doped up people on the face of the planet.  The following are some facts about pharmaceutical drugs from my recent article entitled “50 Signs That The U.S. Health Care System Is A Gigantic Money Making Scam“…

-During 2013, Americans will spend more than 280 billion dollars on prescription drugs.

-Prescription drugs cost about 50% more in the United States than they do in other countries.

-In the United States today, prescription painkillers kill more Americans than heroin and cocaine combined.

-Nearly half of all Americans now use prescription drugs on a regular basis according to the CDC.  Not only that, the CDC also says that approximately one-third of all Americans use two or more pharmaceutical drugs on a regular basis, and more than ten percent of all Americans use five or more pharmaceutical drugs on a regular basis.

-The percentage of women taking antidepressants in America is higher than in any other country in the world.

-In 2010, the average teen in the U.S. was taking 1.2 central nervous system drugs.  Those are the kinds of drugs which treat conditions such as ADHD and depression.

-Children in the United States are three times more likely to be prescribed antidepressants as children in Europe are.

-There were more than two dozen pharmaceutical companies that made over a billion dollars in profits during 2008.

-According to the CDC, approximately three quarters of a million people a year are rushed to emergency rooms in the United States because of adverse reactions to pharmaceutical drugs.

As you can see, there are usually at least two sides to every story.

So the next time someone tries to dismiss a particular viewpoint by dismissing it as a “conspiracy theory” just because it does not conform to the official propaganda being put out by the U.S. government and the mainstream media, perhaps you should say something.

We are living at a time when it is more important than ever to think for ourselves.  Our world is becoming increasingly unstable, and there are lots of people out there that want to tell us what we should believe.

Do not allow the government and the media to do your thinking for you.  That is the lazy way out, and it will only end in a whole lot of pain.

Question everything.

Do your own research and come to your own conclusions.

  By Dr. Kevin Barrett
In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.”
Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published inAmerican Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.

Evidence shows missile may have downed jumbo jet

7:43 AM Thursday Jun 20, 2013
FBI agents and New York state police guard the reconstruction of TWA Flight 800 in Calverton. Photo / AP

FBI agents and New York state police guard the reconstruction of TWA Flight 800 in Calverton. Photo / AP

Former investigators are pushing to reopen the probe into the 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 off the coast of New York, saying new evidence points to the often-discounted theory that a missile strike may have downed the jumbo jet.

The New York-to-Paris flight crashed July 17, 1996, just minutes after the jetliner took off from John F. Kennedy Airport, killing all 230 people aboard.

The effort to reopen the probe is being made in tandem with the release next month of a documentary that features the testimony of former investigators who raise doubts about the National Transportation Safety Board’s conclusion that the crash was caused by a center fuel tank explosion, probably caused by a spark from a short-circuit in the wiring.

“We don’t know who fired the missile,” said Jim Speer, an accident investigator for the Air Line Pilots Association, one of those seeking a new review of the probe. “But we have a lot more confidence that it was a missile.”

In a petition filed Wednesday seeking to reopen the probe, they say they have “reviewed the FAA radar evidence along with new evidence not available to the NTSB during the official investigation and contend that the NTSB’s probable cause determination is erroneous and should be reconsidered and modified accordingly.”

Those calling for a review of the investigation include former NTSB accident investigator Hank Hughes and Bob Young, a former senior accident investigator for the now-defunct TWA. Tom Stalcup, a physicist and co-founder of a group called Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organization, also questions the NTSB’s original findings and is featured prominently in the documentary, which is slated to air on the 17th anniversary of the crash next month.

The NTSB issued a statement Wednesday morning saying it is aware of the upcoming documentary.

“All petitions for reconsideration are thoroughly reviewed, and a determination is usually made within about 60 days,” spokeswoman Kelly Nantel said. “While the NTSB rarely re-investigates issues that have already been examined, our investigations are never closed and we can review any new information not previously considered by the board.”

She noted the TWA Flight 800 investigation lasted four years.

“Investigators took great care reviewing, documenting and analyzing facts and data and held a five-day hearing to gather additional facts before determining the probable cause of the accident during a two-day board meeting.”

Robert Francis, the former vice chairman of the NTSB who headed the investigation, declined to comment.

The former investigators calling for a new probe say new evidence that a missile may have taken down the jet includes analysis of radar of the jetliner.

Speculation of a missile strike began almost immediately after the crash. Theories that an errant missile may have been fired from a U.S. military vessel were widely refuted, but conjecture about a shoulder-fired missile launched by terrorists in a small boat has never completely gone away.

The petitioners contend that the testimony of more than 200 witnesses who reported seeing streaks of light headed toward the plane should be reconsidered. The NTSB said after the first investigation that it found no evidence of a missile strike. It explained that what witnesses likely saw was the jetliner pitching upward in the first few moments after the explosion, but some witnesses still maintain that the streak of light they saw emanated from the waterline and zoomed upward toward the plane.

The petition filed with the NTSB to reopen the probe claims “new analyses of the FAA radar evidence demonstrate that the explosion that caused the crash did not result from a low-velocity fuel-air explosion as the NTSB has determined. Rather, it was caused by a detonation or high-velocity explosion.”

John Seaman, the longtime leader of an organization of TWA 800 victims’ families, noted there have been several attempts over the years to reopen the investigation.

“Unless something was to develop that would be very clear and compelling, then a lot of these interested parties are not really helpful,” said Seaman, whose niece died on the flight. He spoke to The Associated Press in a telephone interview from upstate New York on Tuesday, ahead of the formal filing of the petition.

“They reopen wounds,” he said of the petitioners. “Personally I can’t keep going over it again and again. I think most families feel that way.”

The documentary airs on the EPIX premium television channel. An EPIX spokeswoman declined to say how much the filmmakers were paid for the documentary.

Syrian rebels used Sarin nerve gas, not Assad’s regime: U.N. official

  • ** FILE ** Syrian President Bashar Assad delivers a speech at the parliament in Damascus, Syria, June 3, 2012. Israel launched an airstrike into Syria on Friday, May 3, 2013, apparently targeting a suspected weapons site, U.S. officials said Friday night, May 3, 2013. (AP Photo/SANA, File)

Testimony from victims strongly suggests it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that used Sarin nerve gas during a recent incident in the revolution-wracked nation, a senior U.N. diplomat said Monday.

Carla del Ponte, a member of the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told Swiss TV there were “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof,” that rebels seeking to oust Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad had used the nerve agent.


SEE RELATED: Obama hunts for new strategy after misreading power of Syria’s Assad


But she said her panel had not yet seen any evidence of Syrian government forces using chemical weapons, according to the BBC, but she added that more investigation was needed.

Damascus has recently facing growing Western accusations that its forces used such weapons, which President Obama has described as crossing a red line. But Ms. del Ponte’s remarks may serve to shift the focus of international concern.

Ms. del Ponte, who in 1999 was appointed to head the U.N. was crimes tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, has sometimes been a controversial figure. She was removed from her Rwanda post by the U.N. Security Council in 2003, but she continued as the chief prosecutor for the Yugoslav tribunal until 2008.

Ms. del Ponte, a former Swiss prosecutor and attorney general, told Swiss TV: “Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals. According to their report of last week, which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated.”

She gave no further details, the BBC said.

The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria was established in August 2011 to examine alleged violations of human rights in the Syrian conflict which started in March that year.


SEE RELATED: Israel returns to ‘business as usual’ after strikes on Syria


It is due to issue its next report to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva in June.

Rebel Free Syrian Army spokesman Louay Almokdad denied that rebels had use chemical weapons.

“In any case, we don’t have the mechanism to launch these kinds of weapons, which would need missiles that can carry chemical warheads, and we in the FSA do not possess these kind of capabilities,” Mr. Almokdad told CNN.

“More importantly, we do not aspire to have (chemical weapons) because we view our battle with the regime as a battle for the establishment of a free democratic state. … We want to build a free democratic state that recognizes and abides by all international accords and agreements — and chemical and biological warfare is something forbidden legally and internationally.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/syrian-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-not-assads-regi/#ixzz2WHkaVdu8
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

US ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt’: Report

By wmw_admin on June 15, 2013

ANI — Jan 30, 2013

The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attackplan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad‘s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.
A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’.
As per the scheme ‘Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons,’ the Daily Mail reports.

Continues …

Introduction — June 14, 2013

If there wasn’t enough to confirm that the corporate media was in lockstep with the authorities, the above report is based on a story that appeared the day before in the UK’s Daily Mail.

A more detailed and extensive report, it quoted emails between two senior officials at Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining how Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.
In fact the Daily Mail’s report was based on a story by Paul Joseph Watson that first appeared on Infowars.com.
Strangely though the Daily Mail report has since been scrubbed from the Mail’sserver. Not a hint of it now remains on the Mail’s website.
Fortunately however, the appropriately named Black Vault website copied the report before it disappeared down the memory hole. Proving once again, how easily government and media lies can be exposed by the Internet.

The leaked email was allegedly sent from a top official at a British defense contractor regarding a ‘Washington approved’ chemical attack in Syria which could be blamed on Assad’s regime

U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’

By Louise Boyle — Daily Mail Jan 29, 2013

Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country.

A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam’s Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.

It reads: ‘Phil… We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.

‘We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.

‘They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.

‘Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?

‘Kind regards, David.’

Britam Defence had not yet returned a request for comment to MailOnline.

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumés and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.

Dave Goulding’s Linkedin profile lists him as Business Development Director at Britam Defence Ltd in Security and Investigations. A business networking profile for Phil Doughty lists him as Chief Operationg Officer for Britam, United Arab Emirates, Security and Investigations.

The U.S. State Department had not returned a request for comment on the alleged emails to MailOnline today at time of publication.

However the use of chemical warfare was raised at a press briefing in D.C. on January 28.

A spokesman said that the U.S. joined the international community in ‘setting common redlines about the consequences of using chemical weapons’.

A leaked U.S. government cable revealed that the Syrian army more than likely had used chemical weapons during an attack in the city of Homs in December.

The document, revealed in The Cable, revealed the findings of an investigation by Scott Frederic Kilner, the U.S. consul general in Istanbul, into accusations that the Syrian army used chemical weapons in the December 23 attack.

An Obama administration official who had access to the document was reported as saying: ‘We can’t definitely say 100 per cent, but Syrian contacts made a compelling case that Agent 15 was used in Homs on Dec. 23.’

Mr Kilner’s investigation included interviews with civilians, doctors, and rebels present during the attack, as well as the former general and head of the Syrian WMD program, Mustafa al-Sheikh.

Dr. Nashwan Abu Abdo, a neurologist in Homs, is certain chemical weapons were used. He told The Cable: ‘It was a chemical weapon, we are sure of that, because tear gas can’t cause the death of people.’

Eye witness accounts from the investigation revealed that a tank launched chemical weapons and caused people exposed to them to suffer nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, delirium, seizures, and respiratory distress.

The symptoms suggest that the weaponized compound Agent-15 was responsible. Syria denied using chemical weapons and said it would never use them against citizens.

Speaking to Pentagon reporters at the time, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said his biggest concern was how the U.S. and allies would secure the chemical and biological weapons sites scattered across Syria and ensure the components don’t end up in the wrong hands if the regime falls, particularly under violent conditions.

Government forces and rebels in Syria have both been accused by human rights groups of carrying out brutal warfare in the 22-month-old conflict, which has claimed more than 60,000 lives.

Source

The Woolwich Terror Hoax

By Nick Kollerstrom on June 15, 2013

Nick Kollerstrom — Terror on the Tube June 8, 2013

A short walk from the Woolwich DLR station takes you to a moving tribute scene, a huge mass of flowers, national flags and various gifts, to a ‘Fuselier Guard’ whose death became known on 22nd May: Drummer Lee Rigby. Deep are the passions aroused by this death, which have echoed around our world.
We are here dealing with a constructed terror event where nothing is what it appeared to be: actors act their parts and the media report as they are told.
The primal War-on-Terror theme has been powerfully reinforced by this mirage, as ‘the Phantom Menace’ strikes again.
We here go through the sequence of apparent events, examining a series of what I will call Absolute Physical Impossibilities.
A car ends up on the pavement of a busy street under some trees. Because of the way it is facing it would have had to veer over from the other side of the road, having just emerged from a traffic-lights crossing, somehow waiting for a brief gap in the traffic to cross over – and bump up onto a good 4” pavement, then somehow drive along until, whump! It hit DLR (Drummer Lee Rigby). He was walking away from them just by a traffic sign held up by two posts, wearing a ‘Help the Heroes’ T-shirt.
First Absolute Physical Impossibility: this could only have been synchronised by an overhead helicopter, to see DLR walking along, see the gap in the traffic, see the lights changing, and then give the car its instructions. There was no such helicopter.
On the story we are given, there is no way the car driver could have identified DLR, given the brief second or so between possibly seeing him and deciding to drive across the road. And yet the whole point of the story, is that ‘terrorists’ killed a British soldier.
Had such a car been coming towards him bumping up onto on the pavement, an army lad would have been trained to sense it behind him, and he only needed to spring forward a yard or so, other side of the big traffic sign, to have been safe.
Where you might expect the car to have crossed over the road there is a lamp post, ten yards or so from the afore-mentioned traffic sign, so the car would have had to skirt round that lamp post – then further down is a railing, near the traffic lights. We’re talking about Artillery Road, Greenwich where this whole drama was constructed.
Skid-marks on the pavement, coming from the tyres (see below, 2nd picture) – or possibly trails of car oil – point towards that lamp-post, not shown in this image. It could not have happened!
Second Absolute Physical Impossibility: the car had its whole front crumpled up, as if it had hit something, inches from the poles of the traffic sign right in front – yet those poles were untouched, with no scratch from any bump. That has to be a stage setup.  You can’t see the poles now, they are choc-a-bloc with flowers, messages etc but fortunately Morris Herman (‘Morris108′) went there early and reported this central fact. http://kentfreedommovement.com/video/woolwich-defies-common-sense-morris
And we are supposed to believe the two ‘evil terrorists’ then emerged unharmed from the car, one brandishing a meat cleaver and the other a gun? Why slam the front of the car into something if you have a gun you are intending to use?
On a busy city street, we are supposed to believe that no-one took any photos of this whole sequence of events?
Third Absolute Physical Impossibility: DLR is lying knocked over from the car bump, then one killer starts chopping his head off, causing death. But – there is no blood. Eight pints of red blood should have spurted out onto the pavement.

Picture: You can here two undamaged posts close-up (holding up a traffic sign) – which the car supposedly bumped into. You can see NO BLOOD on pavement. You can also see the lamp-past alluded to (with ‘Signal Timings’ on it) and behind it the railings, so the car would have had to come between these two.

While there is no blood on the pavement, shown by close-up photos of the scene, there is blood seen from an overhead police-helicopter photo. The latter has to be fake. Quoting here Jim Stone:
“When the helicopter flies over, you can see blood where they supposedly dragged their victim from under the bushes to the road. That blood is NOT THERE in the videos shot before the helicopter arrived, and ALL video is AFTER they drag their supposed victim into the road. That´s one obvious set up team blooper. In Hollywood, that’s what is called a continuity error.”     (May 24th)
The air photo supposedly shows a trail of blood as the body was dragged out into the road. Murderers usually try to hide themselves after committing the act – but, O no, not this one.
In the Daily Mirror video (part 2, v30 seconds) note various people standing around while the body is heaved out into the road. The road has to have been sealed off in advance – at 2.20 pm on 22 May. That is the only way something could have been dragged into the middle of a busy London road.
All this time there has not been a single photo taken by a civilian passing by.
Fourth absolute physical impossibilityThe corpse supposedly lies in the middle of the road, with no drop of blood around it – for twenty minutes, while the two perps (or rather, patsies) hang around waiting for the police to arrive. What were they waiting for?
2nd picture: again, not a drop of blood to be seen! This time you can just see the traffic sign which the car supposedly bumped into. Casual conversations are here meant to be going on, after a soldier has been hacked to death: clearly no-one expects the Fuselier guard to come storming out of the nearby barracks!
In no photos can the head / lack of head be seen. The t-shirt appears pulled up to possibly cover over the head.
The army does not arrive! This is right outside their barracks, one of their soldiers hacked to death by a ‘wicked terrorist.’  DLR was supposedly coming from London back to his barracks, so he would have had to carry ID to get in. But, the evening paper said merely that he was believed to be a soldier.  Then the identifying was done by his teeth? This is an impossible storyline. We express this as –
Fifth Absolute Physical Impossibility: If DLR was returning to his barracks, he would have to have had some physical ID.  Then he would have been identified and the army barracks told. They would have stormed out. If the army did not come out, after half an hour,  it basically means that DLR did not die there – he was already dead.
We see a large white lorry at one end of the road (away from the traffic lights) and a bus containing schoolchildren at the other end, and the road is blocked off for traffic. The bus has been parked opposite the lamp-post alluded to above- there is no bus-stop there.

The Rant

The ‘rant’ by Michael Adibelajo is the most famous image of the whole constructed sequence: the photoshopped blood on his hands, the lady-with-shopping walking by, his MI5 programming.
This was presumably shot well before whatever happened at Woolwich on May 22nd: to quote the perceptive ‘September Clues:’
they probably just filmed the guy as they would an interview, TV show or scene from a movie, on the corner of a regular street, somewhere in London. Onlookers and passer-bys don’t see anything out of the ordinary, just a guy giving an interview on a street corner. ..Blood on his hands added in post production.
You can see the extra red-glowing kerb-lines as his red, red hands move about. See the blurred red coming off his hands and sticking onto the trees behind him!http://kentfreedommovement.com/video/woolwich-massacre-deception-exposed-special-edition-22-may-2013 Note no red on his clothes after hacking someone’s head off!  (See here for how the fake blood was added) All the normal traffic on this busy road has been blocked off.
There are two different camera angles, ie two persons were standing a few feet in front of M.A. as he ranted at them, filming him. Watch the video as the old lady walks by with her shopping trolley, unperturbed. What did she see?  I suggest she saw no red colour on his hands, nor was there any corpse in the road.  And why did they not re-film it, after she had ruined the whole effect, turning it into a joke? Answer: M.A. has to have been programmed by MI5 to rant in this manner, which he did very effectively, however it might not have been easy to get him to ‘do it again.’
Sixth Absolute Physical Impossibility: The carelessly-photoshopped ‘blood’ moves around M.A.s hands, fades away & returns, at one point gets stuck onto the trees behind him.
May 25th: A longtime friend of M.A.was in the  BBC Newsnight studio, telling how he believed M.A. had been tortured and raped by MI5 agents – the security police turn up during te interview, and arrest him as he comes out. See Nafeez Ahmed’s commentshere.  His brother worked for MI6 for years.
M.A.’s ex-girlfriend Justine Rigden testified to how he had been ‘lovely’ and just a‘normal boy’. School friends testify to how he had lived a Western lifestyle, growing up in Essex as a Christian with hard-working Nigerian immigrant parents.

Bad Actors arrive

Twenty minutes after the ‘event’ some police lookalikes arrive, but not in real police cars (http://kentfreedommovement.com/video/woolwich-massacre-deception-exposed-special-edition-22-may-2013 Part 2, 4 mins) and are soon firing blanks around the place. One of them is wearing white, trainer-type shoes (5.30 mins) Their arrival is the cue for ‘the terrorists’ to start running towards the police car. How likely is that? These have to be programmed characters. They do not threaten to attack, but supposedly the police open fire. Note the unlikely way in which a ‘bad actor’ waves his legs about, after supposedly having been shot and lying on the ground (7.20 mins) See the dummy-type human figure dragged into the road by several people (Part 2, 45 seconds)
The Inquest would not comment upon the cause of death. The one thing we need to know from an Inquest, is how long the corpse had been dead. When the court case began of the 22-year old suspect, the cause of death was reported as from ‘multiple injuries.’ If he died from having his head hacked off, why would the inquest not confirm it?
When its all over, ‘The police remove a body bag from the scene:’ this image shows a yellow body bag rather too small, or the body would be quite folded up if it fit into there, and judging by how the two men are carrying it, it does not seem to weigh much. That bag does not have the weight of a human body. This reinforces the impression from the Mirror footage (above) that some sort of dummy was put into the road. That’s why it didn’t bleed. That’s why no pictures show its head, it was not DLR. Whenever DLR died, rigor mortis might by then have set, so it was not convenient to use his dead body.
In a normal murder scene one would expect to see the body lifted onto a stretcher and put carefully into an ambulance, for the post-mortem.  It would not be crumpled up into a 3-foot body bag! The men carrying it do not look like police.
How strange that we have heard nothing about a funeral of DLR. One would expect it to be  supported by his Fuselier guard regiment – with so many moving tributes on both sides of Artillery road even stretching round the corner, and for this to be given great publicity.
I predict that the two suspects in this case will remain forever silent, we will never be allowed to hear their view of what happened.
See also, ‘Queries over Woolwich terror event.
Kent Freedom Movement investigate the Woolwich false flag psy ops

Source

Boston Magazine Publishes More Leaked Photos of Tsarnaev Manhunt

 Reblogged from LeakSource:

Click to visit the original post

  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

08/27/2013

Boston Magazine:

Sergeant Sean Murphy, in his assignment as a tactical photographer with the Massachusetts State Police, was behind police lines, documenting the day’s events. Months later, Murphy walked into our offices … turned over a number of his photos to us. After 14 of his images were published on BostonMagazine.com, he was suspended for a day. (When the print edition of this story went to press, Murphy had been placed on restricted duty.

Read more… 78 more words

Americans Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror

Painting by Anthony Freda

Governments Admit They Carry Out False Flag Terror

Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror:

  • A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson
  • Soviet leader  Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939, and declared that the fire originated from Finland as a basis launching the Winter War four days later
  • Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)
  • The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
  • As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960′s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news reportthe official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.
  • 2 years before, American Senator George Smathers had suggested that the U.S. make “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.
  • And Official State Department documents show that – only nine months before the Joint Chiefs of Staff plan was proposed – the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The 3 plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals
  • A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists
  • The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing
  • An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)
  • Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion)
  • According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.
  • The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings
  • As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.
  • Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”
  • United Press International reported in June 2005:

    U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

  • Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians
  • Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this)
  • At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence
  • A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat
  • U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants
  • The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that  the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists

So Common … There’s a Name for It

This tactic is so common that it was given a name for hundreds of years ago. “False flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it blames. Or as Wikipedia defines it:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.

The term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy. Because the enemy’s flag, instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it was called a “false flag” attack. Indeed, this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for navalair and land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.

Leaders Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.” – Plato “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” – U.S. President James Madison “A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.” ― Friedrich Nietzsche “Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”. – Adolph Hitler “Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” – Hermann Goering, Nazi leader. “The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”. – Josef Stalin

People Are Waking Up to False Flags

People are slowly waking up to this whole con job by governments who want to justify war. More people are talking about the phrase “false flag” than ever before.

DHS Admits Boston Training Drill Involving Backpack Explosives Planned Months Before Marathon

 The Department of Homeland Security has gone public with an admission that an exercise was planned months before the Boston Marathon bombings that involved backpacks being used to detonate explosives by rogue terrorists.

Explosions at the Boston Marathon (Photo: My Fox Boston)

Explosions at the Boston Marathon (Photo: My Fox Boston)

By Anthony Gucciardi
Story Leak
June 11, 2013

According to the DHS documents acquired by the Boston Globe, the agents were planning on conducting training exercises centered around a fictitious terrorist group called ‘Free America Citizens’, a group that would plant backpacks full of explosives around Boston that the detectives would be forced to track down. Ultimately, of course, this ended up happening at the Boston Marathon itself with precise accuracy. The Globe report reads that “the city was hit with a real terrorist attack executed in a frighteningly similar fashion.”

And the DHS isn’t denying that the training exercise manifested itself at the Boston Marathon, as detailed in the back-end article on the Boston Globe that I discovered while browsing the news.

The real thing happened before we were able to execute,” a Boston police official told the Boston Globe in the report.

The exercise, labeled as “Operation Urban Shield,” was funded by a $200,000 Homeland Security grant. It was planned months before the Boston Marathon, and it was scheduled to ‘take place’ in official capacity this weekend, according to the sources. But the exercise admission lends further credence to the ignored eyewitness account of bomb sniffing dogs and bomb squads running a training exercise during the morning of the Boston Marathon. Was this training exercise part of Operation Urban Shield?

Interestingly, they specifically detailed that this terrorist group (that presumably is based off of ‘right wing extremists’ and the sovereign citizens movement) would carry a logo of a metal skull wearing an Uncle Sam hat. I’m not claiming there’s a relationship, but I find it funny that even their logo matched up with real events from the Boston Marathon bombings. It was in fact the apparent security at the event that was spotted wearing clothing adorning the image of skulls that turned out to be the logo for the Craft International private security firm.

Spy state shock: Gmail, Yahoo Mail, Facebook, Skype, AOL, Apple all secretly sharing private user communications with NSA

Friday, June 07, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles…)

(NaturalNews) In a week that has already been rocked by one explosive government spy scandal involving the NSA scooping up phone call data and geographic locations of Verizon customers, another scandalous discovery has just erupted that’s sure to “wake up” millions of Americans who have been living in denial.

“The National Security Agency and the FBI are tapping directly into the central servers of nine leading U.S. Internet companies, extracting audio, video, photographs, e-mails, documents and connection logs that enable analysts to track a person’s movements and contacts over time,” reports the Washington Post in an explosive investigative article.

Top secret documents obtained by the Washington Post show that nearly all the top internet services — Microsoft Hotmail, Google Gmail, Yahoo Mail, Facebook, Skype, AOL, Apple, Youtube and PalTalk — are all sharing ALL your user communications with the federal government. Dropbox is reportedly “coming soon.”

As the Washington Post explains:

Through a top-secret program authorized by federal judges working under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the U.S. intelligence community can gain access to the servers of nine Internet companies for a wide range of digital data. Documents describing the previously undisclosed program, obtained by The Washington Post, show the breadth of U.S. electronic surveillance capabilities in the wake of a widely publicized controversy over warrantless wiretapping of U.S. domestic telephone communications in 2005.

The types of data these services allow the government to surveil include emails, audio chats, video chats, text chats, photos, usernames, passwords, file transfers, VoIP sessions and much more. Users of Google Drive will be shocked to learn that the NSA has full access to all their private files stored on Google Drive. In effect, these services take every communication initiated by their users and turn it over to the NSA. All these internet services are operating in conspiracy with a criminal government that believes there are absolutely no limits to its power and that it can spy and snoop on all Americans.

When you are calling friends on your iPhone, or chatting over Skype, or emailing someone on Gmail or Yahoo Mail, everything you type, speak, attach or send is being systematically siphoned up, databased and tracked by the U.S. government.

This is all revealed in “PRISM slide #4,” which was leaked to the Washington Post. Here’s the slide image, just in case it gets yanked from WashPo:

Timeline of betrayal

The collection of private user data under the PRISM program began on September 11, 2007, with Microsoft (Hotmail) turning over private emails. Every Hotmail email sent since 2007 has been surveiled and tracked by the NSA.

Here are the dates of “activation” when the NSA began collecting private user data from internet service providers:

• September, 2007 – Microsoft / Hotmail
• March, 2008 – Yahoo Mail
• January, 2009 – Google Gmail
• June, 2009 – Facebook
• December, 2009 – Paltalk
• September, 2010 – YouTube
• February, 2011 – Skype
• March, 2011 – AOL
• October, 2012 – Apple

This is detailed in “PRISM slide #5″ shown below:

Total bust for any remaining trust in cloud computing

Beyond all the astonishing implications of this discovery which merit a full discussion separate from this article, this revelation is bound to shatter any remaining trust in so-called “cloud computing.”

Anyone and everyone using Google applications that store files online — or using online file backup or storage services — must now assume the NSA is capturing and scanning all their files. The internet police state is operating in full force, and absolutely nothing is safe from its prying eyes… not even your photos and private files.

And while many people were aware that services like Google and Yahoo were scanning their emails in order to show them related advertising on other websites they surf, virtually no one believed that Microsoft, Google, Yahoo and AOL were systematically turning over all their private emails to the government.

That very idea, in fact, was called a “conspiracy theory” until this very day. Anyone who suggested this was taking place — like Alex Jones — was branded a loon. (Will the media now apologize to him for warning of this exact thing? I doubt it…)

But now it’s all confirmed. The government isn’t just reaching down your pants at the airport; it’s reaching into your private phone calls, emails, bank account activities, family photos, online storage files, Skype chats, Skype calls and everything else.

The Bush-Obama surveillance nightmare

This police state surveillance nightmare was started by Bush but continued by Obama. Ron Fournier has penned an excellent article on this very topic, entitled Welcome to the Bush-Obama White House: They’re Spying on Us.

These revelations are so shocking that even the New York Times is starting to awaken to the reality of the police state, saying the Obama administration “…has now lost all credibility on this issue” and following that up with, “Mr. Obama is proving the truism that the executive will use any power it is given and very likely abuse it.”

The NYT goes on to call the Patriot Act “reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.”

It’s right about that, of course. And it brings up an inconvenient fact that many Republicans have forgotten: All this police state surveillance expansion was started in the Bush era. It was all “legalized” in the frenzied aftermath of 9/11, which now completely explains why rogue elements working within the government plotted the 9/11 attacks and allowed them to be carried out by standing down defense forces which could have prevented it.

The real purpose of the Bush-era Patriot Act

The entire purpose of 9/11 was to thrust Americans into a state of irrational fear so that they would support even the most insane, draconian, police state laws such as the Patriot Act. Republicans were beating their war drums and cheering the passage of this law!

Now, of course, they incorrectly blame Obama for the police state. But Obama is only half to blame: he didn’t start these activities but he sure continued them. And in some ways, Obama found new opportunities to exploit and abuse government power beyond what even Bush could have imagined. The due of Bush + Obama is an absolute train wreck of criminality, spookiness and the abandonment of all rights and protections for the People.

Everybody is to blame for this. Bush supporters let this happen and Obama supporters let it ride. All along, neither party demanded the government limit its powers and abide by the Constitution. Only Ron Paul and a few libertarians carried that torch for the last 12 years, but they were shouted down by the establishment media which pretended the police state didn’t exist at all.

So don’t expect any miracles to occur when talking about dismantling this police state nightmare that smacks of North Korea: both political parties are huge believers in government abuse of power and the use of government to dominate, intimidate, censor, oppress, track and surveil innocent Americans. In fact, their entire power base depends on this.

Because if Americans were free to openly share ideas without fear of intimidation, they might discuss truly revolutionary ideas like eliminating the IRS, arresting all the war criminals in the U.S. Senate, or even marching on the White House and throwing the gangsters out of office.

Read more about PRISM and government spying:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/06/NSA-ability-spy-Am…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/prism-collectio…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-d…
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/opinion/president-obamas-dragnet.ht…
http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/welcome-to-the-bush-obama-whi…

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040659_internet_surveillance_police_state_Facebook.html#ixzz2VgLFVjwP

It is not Terror if We do It

“Secret blanket surveillance,” “Obscenely outrageous”Al Gore, former USA Vice President,

Imagine a world in which illogical statements would be automatically nullified and prosecuted. A government would legislate a law saying that an organization – call it corporation, company or municipality – enjoys in the eye of the law the status of a person and … swishhhhh, the Logical Police would appear like Rambo in Vietnam and take the president to jail. What would happen to the American Administration in such a world?Soviet SurveillanceBy now, most people would have heard the headlines. Let me summarize them in a few words. On June 6, 2013, the Washington Post* and the Guardian** disclosed details about PRISM, an NSA surveillance program authorized by a court order. PRISM conducts overwhelming surveillance on Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Paltalk, YouTube, AOL , Skype, and Apple. Already in November 2009, I reported on scary Skype surveillance (and stopped using it, see On Iran, Skype and a Fallen Prince) while Facebook connection with Mossad is quite obvious.
PRISM Slide 2PRISM Slide 2

The slide presentation states that much of the world’s electronic communications pass through the United States because electronic communications data tend to follow the least expensive route rather than the physically most direct route and since the bulk of the world’s internet infrastructure is based in the U.S., then this country works as an electronic hub for most communications. The presentation claims that these facts provide U.S. intelligence analysts with opportunities for intercepting the communications of foreign targets.

A top secret court order issued in April gave the NSA the power to demand that Verizon, which with more than 100 million subscribers is one of America’s largest phone companies, hand over on an “ongoing, daily basis” information relating to phone calls made by all of its customers. The order includes information on calls made within the US and to parties outside its borders. The massive surveillance project was uncovered when the court order, made by the secret Foreign Intelligence Service Court (Fisa), was obtained by the Guardian. In 2006, a USA Today report claimed that the NSA was secretly collecting phone records of millions of customers of AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth.

The Obtuse (T)Reasoning of Civil Servants

“It is legal, I obtained a Court order,” summarizes the core statement made by Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence James Clapper.

I must give some credit to Mr. Clapper. As the picture below shows, he wasn’t laughing while he uttered this lie. Certain laws and court rulings are illegitimate. A law may pass through all the tedious processes of legislation; still it can be illegitimate, demanding automatic disobedience by the public. No government can pass a law violating Human Rights, which are International Law since 1994. No government operating under the Criminal Law system can legislate laws claiming to prevent a future crime.***

The real crime is accusing someone of “membership in an unidentified organization” and “being a security threat.” I read that time and again in the claims made by the State of Israel in Court, and can understand only one thing: “This man is innocent.” He committed no crime. He is illegitimately persecuted by the authorities.

Oppressive laws designed to benefit the few while violating the many cannot be accepted as legitimate. They are legal in the same way that the Nazi laws were legal, but they are not legitimate.

In the current case, the USA Government is violating three main principles. First, it is violating the Right to Privacy, protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which has become international law in 1994.Second, it assumes the violated people were about to commit a crime. Under the Criminal Law ruling the American legal system, it is the absolute right of any person to commit a crime (though he would be punished if caught). Then there is the extra-territorial issue; would you accept a Laotian law sentencing Americans chewing bubble-gum in Honduras to death?The USA Government actions are illegitimate.”You fool!” would Mr. Clapper utter under his withered moustache if he cared about reading me. “We do not violate privacy because we do not disseminate the material,” would be his next thought.Wrong again. The mere observation is the crime. The secrecy afterwards is intended to defend the surveillance criminals.
James ClapperUnder Secretary of Defense for Intelligence James Clapper—Tales of Soviet Surveillance in America

Systemic Evil

A closely related fact is that governments often rely on the ignorance of their citizens; this ignorance is easily supported by an irrelevant educational system controlled by the same governments. How can they expect the People to obey laws that are not taught? Are we still living in the days of the Roman Empire and its obsolete legal principles? I refer to ignorantia iuris non excusat (a.k.a. ignorantia legis non excusat and ignorantia legis neminem excusat) a legal principle whereby ignorance of a law does not allow one to escape liability. It sounds like the ultimate state-entrapment technique (“I legislated that two minutes ago! You are guilty!” The government said to the citizen who stepped on a cockroach).

The USA Government assumes that it can safely fool the People.

President Obama cannot claim that this is an isolated case perpetrated by an ill-prepared civil servant that stepped out of his legal boundaries. The Obama Codex was disclosed on the evening of February 4, 2013, by Michael Isikoff of NBC News. Issued by the USA Department of Justice, it deals with policies related to the USA drone war, including the government’s justification for killing American citizens. The 16-page memo was given to Congress in June, but is not the final Office of Legal Counsel memo that news organizations have sued to obtain. The Codex claims that high-level administration officials may order the killing of senior operational leaders of al-Qaida or an associated force even without evidence they are actively plotting against the U.S. In order to approve the assassination, the civil servant must determine that the target is an imminent threat, that capture is infeasible and that the operation is “conducted consistent with applicable law of war principles.” In order to undermine the propagandistic definition, let me remind the reader that a third-generation, 16-year-old American citizen was assassinated in such a fashion while sitting in a coffee shop. There is no proof that he was even remotely linked to any wrongdoing.

The Drones Terror is as illegitimate as the current affair. Both are chilling testimonies of the USA Government disregard for all the values presented in its Declaration od Independence. Is the USA a democracy? Is it peaceful? Is it honest and just? Is it better than the Soviets were?

President Obama, you are too busy reading my emails; thus I don’t want to still more from your time with my articles except for reminding you a few words: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness….But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government
” (from the Preamble to the United States Declaration of Independence).

“It’s called protecting America,” reacted to the publication Dianne Feinstein, the Democratic Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

“It is called violating the People,” a boy answered while pointing at the naked king.

Bloody confession: Tsarnaev ‘wrote note’ inside boat prior to arrest

By wmw_admin on May 17, 2013

Introduction — May 16, 2013

Dzokhar emerges from underneath boat cover during his arrest, apparently uninjured. Click to enlarge

Tsarnaev’s ‘confession’ will not silence the mounting questions over the flaws and inconsistencies in the official account of the Boston Marathon bombing. Particularly after officials have now admitted that Tsarnaev was NOT ARMEDwhen he was arrested, despite earlier police claims that he was wounded in a “shootout” during the arrest.
Such contradictions only add to suspicions as no one actually saw Tsarnaev write his alleged ‘confession’ in the boat.
All the more so as during his arrest Tsarnaev reportedly sustained injuries to his throat that have since rendered him “speechless”. So although he cannot testify in an open court U.S. authorities will now have a confession with which to prosecute him.
Or so we are being led to believe.
It’s all a little too convenient, especially as it ignores all the other suspect characters who were photographed at the scene and whom the corporate media have still not even mentioned.
How long has it been now? Those photographs clearly indicate that something odd was happening and the Tsarnaev brothers were not involved. Yet the corporate media still hasn’t breathed a word about them.
Instead, they’ve focused on the Tsarnaev brothers while U.S. authorities have built a case against them. So although it could be entirely fabricated, expect the corporate media to continue to focus on the Tsarnaev brothers while studiously ignoring the other characters who were photographed acting suspiciously at the scene.
Even more than with 9/11, the corporate media is helping the authorities piece together the official account of events and sell it to the public. Helping the real bombers to evade scrutiny as they fabricate the “news” and the public is distracted and the guilty evade justice.
In effect, that makes the corporate media complicit in these crimes.

Bloody confession: Tsarnaev ‘wrote note’ inside boat prior to arrest

Russia Today — May 16, 2013

Battered and bloody, Boston bombings suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev reportedly scrawled a confession inside the hull of a boat police found him in after a day-long manhunt. The note says the April marathon bombing was revenge for US actions against Muslims.

The confession specifically named US military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq as motives for the attack, and called the Boston Marathon bombing victims ‘collateral damage’ in the same vein that Muslim civilians had been killed in American led wars, CBS news reports.

“When you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims,” the note allegedly added.

Dzhokhar reportedly declared he did not mourn the death of his older brother Tamerlan – the other suspect in the bombings, who died from injured received during a shootout with police – saying he was already a martyr in paradise. Dzhokhar added that he expected to join his brother in the afterlife.

Law enforcement sources told the network the wall the note had been scribbled on was riddled with bullet holes. Police unloaded a volley of shots after Dzhokhar lifted up the tarpaulin, claiming they feared he had another bomb.

He had sustained multiple gunshot wounds and was severely bleeding from injuries to his left ear, neck and thigh. Initial reports said his neck wound was possibly from a self-inflicted gunshot wound in a botched suicide attempt, though it was later revealed that Dzhokhar was unarmed when captured in Suburban Watertown Massachusetts on April 19.

His arrest followed a massive manhunt which brought the greater Boston area to a standstill.

Police say the contents of the confession mirror many of the things he communicated to investigators while recovering from his injuries at a hospital several days later. The confession will be admissible in court.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, is currently convalescing in a federal prison hospital in Massachusetts and has been charged with using a weapon of mass destruction in the deadly attack which killed three people and injured 264 near the marathon finish line on April 15.

If found guilty, he could face the death penalty.

Source

Anomalies Emerge in Photos of Second Bomb Site 48

By Skeptical*

Memory Hole has a good many sharp readers and comment contributors. This detailed set of observations was submitted as a lengthy comment and addresses unusual elements of the far-less-photographed second bombing site. Given its especially important points I have requested the author’s permission to present the commentary as a guest post, to which she agreed provided her anonymity is preserved.-JT

http://timethemoment.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/lb_v2_img_9456_v2.jpg?w=735

1. In this photo of the second blast site a metal barrier is apparently thrown against the grey mailbox with such force that it bent at roughly a 90-degree angle. Why wasn’t the mailbox even slightly dented by the impact of the bomb and/or the metal fencing?

2. The direction of the bend (along with the absence of other structural damage) seems to imply that the bomb was immediately behind the left corner of the fence. Yet in this well-circulated picture, the bomb is claimed to be in front of the fence.

The moment the second explosion occurred near the

And in the highly-publicized photo of the second blast, the ordnance appears to be a significant distance from the street, perhaps on the patio of the Forum Restaurant. Indeed, according to the Forum’s management, “the second bomb exploded right on our patio.” If this is the case, is the bent fence a stage prop?

3. In the first photo above, one metal barrier is curled around the mailbox; the nearest one next to it is immediately behind the Tow Zone sign. But in the second photo, we see that there was another section of fencing between them. What happened to that section? It doesn’t appear in any of the post-blast photos. Did it vaporize?

Boston Marathon bombings: Shocking picture of Irish racer

4. In this photo, which appears to show Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in the background, a blue US postal box is seen leaning up against the grey one. When did that appear, and where did it go? Why is it there? Is it concealing some bent fencing? Is it reasonable to suppose that the Tsarnaev brothers installed a fake mailbox, and then somehow removed both it and a section of metal fencing? Were the photos widely distributed by major media outlets digitally altered to include the blue USPS box and perhaps even Tsarnaev?

Note that the above photo was not taken at the finish line, as an accompanying story claims, but outside the Forum restaurant, at the second blast site.

http://dailyfreepress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Explosion-photo-color.jpg

5. After the smoke has cleared and the victims (including, reportedly, 8-year-old Martin Richard) are lying dead or bleeding on the ground. Yet the faces of the people around them aren’t grim, shocked or anguished–-they’re calm and matter-of-fact. Are these people unaware of the child’s death? Is no one disturbed at the scale of tragedy?

If everything except the first explosion is real, then here’s another puzzling fact: CNN interviewed the same woman both at the marathon, and at the alleged shootout with the Tsarneav brothers in Watertown.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbqVqI1cWXc

Look especially at 0:34-0:40 and 1:36-1:39. What are the odds that this woman was in both places by accident?  Even more improbably, there’s video footage suggesting that this same woman was interviewed about Nancy Lanza in connection with the Sandy Hook incident.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SkHVuTL6v7Y

http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston-bombs/pict15.jpg

6. There are a couple of photos showing the state of nearby windows. For example, the above photo shows that one of the windows– but only one–was broken at the Starbucks, next door to the Forum. This photo also has a faint reflection overlaid on the door between the Forum and the Starbucks, showing a police car and a couple of officers near it. I’m not sure what surface is reflecting this image. I assume it’s a window just in front of the photographer.
http://www.motherjones.com/files/BH6ju2NCMAAzhqs.jpg_large.jpg
Next door, at the Forum, this photo shows the one upstairs window that broke (above the “m” of “Forum”).
http://hamodia.com/hamod-uploads/2013/04/FP-Boston-Bomb-Suspect-Spotted-On-Video-3.jpg
In a photo from the following day  we see the same broken window showing the glass below it, inside and outside the window.  We also see another broken window to the left of it, whose glass has been propelled quite far outwards.  I think it’s fair to say that this second shatter pattern could not have been caused by a bomb blast outside the restaurant.
http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston-bombs/pict14.jpg

On the other hand, this photo from shortly after the blast, as well as the photo from the following day, shows that some, if not all, of the ground-floor windows were entirely intact at the Forum after the bomb went off in front of it.

The New York Times reports that two windows were blown out at the Forum (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/04/17/us/caught-in-the-blast-at-the-boston-marathon.html?ref=us&_r=0). However, this may be an error; the panels lacking glass in the photo actually seem to be open doorways, not broken windows. Google Maps shows that all the glass panels along the front of the restaurant are narrow and door-sized; in the photos above, the gaps are twice as wide, with no door frames separating the missing glass panels. So we can reasonably conclude that the doors were simply open.

In fact, another look at that photo taken the next day seems to show that the missing door panels have been slid or (more likely) folded sideways, to a position either behind or in front of the adjacent door panels–note the double white line along the two panes of glass. There seems to be some glass on the ground in the next-day photo, but it is not clear where it comes from. No broken glass is seen at the edges of any of the visible door frames.

If the doors were instead open at a right angle to the sidewalk when the blast occurred, the blast likely would not have broken their windows. Bombs break glass because of a pressure wave that proceeds outwardly from the blast; if there was shrapnel, presumably that could break glass too. But if the blast was well in front of the restaurant, near the casualties, and the patio doors were open perpendicular to the sidewalk, the pressure wave and shrapnel would have been traveling mostly parallel to the glass, so it probably wouldn’t have broken.

If anything, we would have expected the closed ground-floor windows at the Forum to break, rather than (a) the open windows, (b) a second-floor window, or (c) a window next door at the Starbucks. Why do we see something different?

*”Skeptical” lives in Canada, is the mother of two small children, and has a damn good job. She is extremely fond of Boston, having lived there for several years, and still has many dear friends there. She has been observing news reports skeptically since watching Michael Moore’s film Farenheit 9/11, but the Boston Marathon bombing crossed a personal line, and has changed her from a consumer of knowledge into a contributor.

Amputee actors help make Boston Marathon Bombing Hoax look real!

Don’t be CIA’s Next Patsy – 10 Preventative Steps

47962_cover_full.jpg

( Step Seven. Make sure your complexion is not dark,  resembling a Muslim.) 

An increasingly common pitfall
in modern life is finding that you
have been blamed for a CIA false flag.
These practical steps will help
avoid this life threatening predicament.

by Henry Makow, Ph.D.

Modern life presents some unique challenges. STD’s. Student loans. Banks seizing your accounts,  etc.  None is greater than the danger of becoming a patsy. This short article will help you avoid becoming the object of a massive, televised manhunt, and being butchered in the process.

corpse.jpg(Patsy, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was 27) 

You see, being a patsy means you cannot be arrested and tried in a Court of Law. You cannot be allowed to speak publicly. That would defeat the whole purpose of blaming you for something they did. They will pretend you died resisting arrest. That’s when they will take a meat cleaver to your chest. (I should not be flippant here. This is the murder of an innocent man by the police.)

Step Number One:  Do not under any circumstances agree to participate in a “drill” designed to test precautions against “a terror attack.”  No matter how much money they offer, or how much they appeal to your patriotic instincts, this is a “sorry, no-can-do.” Also, wherever this “drill” is, make sure you are a hundred miles away.

Step Number Two:   Convert to Judaism. Patsies are never Jews. Your local synagogue will provide information on Talmud Torah classes.

menacing.jpg(left, patsies do not have to look menacing)

Step Number Three:  Patsies can be teenagers. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, right, is 19.
If you are a teenager, or even a child, do not assume you are safe. Babies can rest easy, for now.

Step Number Four:  Question your gender. Homosexuality also confers immunity against becoming a patsy.  If you are still in school, join a “gay-straight alliance.” They will help you with the conversion process.

Step Number Five:  If you cannot become a Jew or homosexual, at least establish your liberal bona fides. Let slip that you voted for Barack Obama, love Diane Feinstein, read the New York Times, and watch Jon Stewart and SNL religiously. Put a PBS bumpersticker on your car. Patsies are never liberals.

Barhoum-Quote-Not-the-Bomber.jpgStep Number Six:  Prepare a plan to follow in case they still make you the terrorist. When the bullets are flying, saying “I’m a patsy” won’t cut it. You will need a hideout that is better than a boat parked in the backyard.

Step Number Seven:  There are cosmetic products that will help you lighten your complexion. Avoid suntans. You should not be mistaken for a Muslim. Your life depends on it.

Step Number Eight: Make burial arrangements in advance. When the public has been incited to believe you are the incarnation of evil, funeral directors will have a hard time accepting your business.

oswald.jpg(left, the Patron Saint of Patsies) 

Step Number Nine - Study the lives of some of the great patsies in modern history. Lee Harvey Oswald. Timothy McVeigh. Osama Bin Laden. James Holmes. Adam Lanza. What mistakes did they make that you can avoid? Certainly, one is getting involved with a CIA-FBI front group.

Step Number Ten- Avoid friendly strangers with deep pockets who offer to arrange foreign travel and adventure for you and your friends.

I welcome other suggestions from readers for sidestepping this common hazard. Anyone who believes the mass media accounts of these “terror attacks” is also a patsy, as are people who support the West’s NWO-inspired aggression.  Don’t be one.
——–
Related - Are you a Terrorist? Take the Quiz
——– 10 Steps to Ensure Your Activist Group Has Not been Infiltrated

One way to avoid becoming a patsy is to learn where the terror originates — how it started and who started it.

A good source to trace the roots of terrorism is David Livingstone’s book :

” Black Terror, White Soldiers, Islam, Fascism, and the New Age” :

http://uploads.empire-newmedia.com/BTWS_preview_1.pdf

An excellent study about the origins of terror, and how terror serves The New World Order gang — “our” ruling class.

Livingstone’s website :

http://www.terrorism-illuminati.com/content/complete-online-version

Try the best you can to avoid Communists, Nazis, Neo-Nazis, Zionists, and Islamic Jihadists.

Violent, war-mongering groups — or “movements” — are never grass-root organizations. They’re set-up by the ruling-class to foment confusion, turmoil, and ultimately war. The NWO gang is drooling to get World War Three started.

There’s no room in the New World Order for true Christians — Christians who want peace ; No room in the NWO for Torah Jews, Jews who want peace ; No room in the NWO for those Muslims who want peace.

All three Abrahamic religions have been greatly distorted and twisted throughout history to better serve the ruling-class war-mongers. Still, there’s enough truth that remains in all 3 , we can build on the truth that does remain. We all need to “stand down”, so-to-speak, and not allow ourselves to get pushed around like cattle and sheep, so we become as war-mongering as our rulers are. That’s the goal of “our” rulers, to turn us into war-mongering cannon-fodder for their never-ending wars.

We’re all propagandized and lied to, the propaganda is a bit different, depending on what Abrahamic religion one belongs to, still it’s propaganda and lies, all designed to lead to massive war. We all need to “stand down”.

- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2013/05/How-to-avoid-becoming-a-patsy.html#sthash.P3EnX0R4.dpuf

Obama’s FEMA Director Planned Boston Mass Casualty Event in 2008

Craft International Services hired guns at the Boston Marathon:

Why Such Secrecy about Private Military Contractor’s Men Working the Event?

Thu, 04/25/2013 – 14:09
by:

Dave Lindorff

Speaking as an investigative reporter with almost 40 years’s experience, I can say that when government officials won’t talk, they’re generally hiding something embarrassing or worse.

I tried, and nobody will talk about those Craft International Services private security personnel who were widely observed and photographed near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, wearing security ear-pieces, hats and T-shirts bearing the company’s skull logo, and all wearing the same dark coats, khaki pants and combat boots, some carrying what appear to have been radiation detectors. (I got no hard answers, though there were some inadvertent hints given.)

I first contacted a man identifying himself as Jack Fleming, a public affairs person with the Boston Athletic Assn., sponsor of the marathon. Fleming advised me that “If you want to ask about that you should contact the Commonwealth (of Massachusetts) Executive Office of Public Safety.”

I called that agency and spoke with the public information office there, a man named Terrell. He first said, “Did you call the Marathon organizers?” When I replied that I had, and that they had said to call his office, he replied, “They did?” Then he said, “You should call the City of Boston Police Department. They released a security plan to some media organizations.”

Indeed they had released that plan to the Boston Globe. Based upon the information it got from the police the article theGlobe ran, did report that the Police had deployed “air patrols, K9 units, and more than 1,000 uniformed officers and soldiers along the 26-mile course and the finish line,” but it made no mention of the private contracting of soldiers-for-hire, which is what Craft International does (see the Craft website). News agency Reuters reported, meanwhile, that a top official for the Massachusetts state Homeland Security Department, Undersecretary Kurt Schwartz, told a group at Harvard U. that his agency had “planned” for a possible bombing attack on the marathon, even running a “table-top” exercise about such an event a week before the race.

I called the Boston Police to ask if they had hired the Craft International personnel who were observed at the scene just before and after the bombing, and was told by the public affairs office there that “Anything having to do with the investigation of the bombing would have to be referred to the FBI Boston Division office.” When I pointed out that I wasn’t asking anything about the investigation, but was simply asking who had hired the security personnel from Craft International, the answer was simply repeated: “You’ll have to ask the FBI.”

So I called the FBI, and got a public affairs person there named Amanda Cox. Her initial response to my question was, “I do not have any information on that.”

Seven apparent Craft International rent-a-soldiers behind and departing (top rt. with backpack) a communications van

Seven apparent Craft International rent-a-soldiers behind and departing (top rt. with backpack) a communications van

I then said I had been referred to her by the Boston Police Department, and said that photos of the scene after the bombing had shown Craft International personnel conversing with FBI agents. She then put down the phone, and I could hear her turn to a supervisor and ask, her voice muffled, “This guy’s asking about the Craft Security Consultants — who hired them and what they were doing.”

I next overheard the muffled voice of another woman to whom she had been speaking reply, “I think you could safely say, ‘I do know we worked with a lot of people who worked on security at the marathon…’” After that I couldn’t make out what was being said.

Cox later returned to the phone, and instead told me, “I’d refer you to the company on any information about who hired them.” (Taken together the overheard conversation and the official answer from Cox would at least seem to confirm that Craft’s people were hired for the event, and that the FBI knows a lot more than it is willing to say about them.)

Next I called Craft International. The company has no phone number listed on its website — just a general email address ofinfo@thecraft.com (to which I wrote to asking for information, but which elicited no response)–but I found one listed for their headquarters office at 2101 Cedar Springs Rd., Suite 1400, Dallas, TX, in a listing on the company published in a directory in Bloomberg Businessweek, This entry noted that the company, in addition to “providing security, defense, and combat weapons training services for military, police, corporate and civilian clients in the US and internationally,” also “offers corporate and private and civilian training services…” The number, published in a business magazine, was clearly meant as a contact for potential customers to call.

A woman answered the phone brightly with the company’s name. However, when I identified myself as a reporter, and said I was wondering if someone could tell me who had hired personnel from the firm to work at the Boston Marathon, she responded with a flummoxed: “Um, I um, don’t really have any information on that. I’m just an answering service.”

I replied, “Look, the number I called is listed as the number of the company’s corporate headquarters at 2101 Cedar Springs Road. You’re not an answering service.”

At that point she said, “Let me see who I can transfer you to.”

However, after a long pause, she was back, and said, “The answer I’ve been given is that you should go to the website, where there’s an email address you can write to with your question.”

I had already done that, I told her. She then said she couldn’t help me and hung up.

I also called the US Department of Homeland Security, but a women named Angela who answered the press office number for this public government agency (she refused to provide her last name despite being the public information office) said the DHS media office was “only taking inquiries sent in by email.” I sent in an inquiry asking if any unit of the DHS had hired Craft International to provide security at the Boston Marathon, but so far have received no response.

As things stand, since it’s highly unlikely that Craft International, a private for-profit enterprise founded by the late ace Navy Seal sniper Chris Kyle, would have “hired” itself to police the Marathon gratis, it seems pretty clear that we had rent-a-special forces-soldier people, hired by some agency, at the scene of the bombing ahead of the bombing.

And we have no reporting on this in the mainstream corporate media.

Why? I have no answer to that.

I did write to Andrea Estes, the lead writer of the Globe’s piece on police security planning mentioned above, who is described in her bio on the Globe’s website staff page as an “investigative reporter specializing in government accountability.”

I called and left a message on her phone, and sent her an email, asking if she had looked into the Craft Security personnel, to see who hired them, what they were doing at the race finish line, and why they appeared be carrying radiation detectors. She has so far not responded to my request for information and assistance concerning anything she had done or learned about this, or whether she had looked into it at all.

Certainly there is a big accountability question. A bunch of them actually. Here are a few:

* If Craft International people were hired, who hired them and why?

* If it was the Boston Police or the FBI that hired them, why won’t they just say so? Simply hiring outside security help should not be a secret, and could in no way affect the investigation into the bombing and the captured suspect, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, so why the secrecy about that? Given all the police presence, and the size of the FBI’s Boston division, why did they need those extra guys from a private rent-a-soldier firm?

* If it was not the Boston Police or the FBI, what agency did hire the company, and why?

* If it was the state’s Homeland Security Dept. or or the state Executive Office of Public Safety, or perhaps more likely, the US Department of Homeland Security, did they notify the FBI that they had done so, and tell the agency what had prompted them to do this?

* The big overarching question when it comes to who hired Craft International is, what possible gain in security could have been achieved by adding what appears to be seven guys (or perhaps a few more who didn’t appear in photos) from a private security firm when the Boston Police had in place over 1000 armed security people from their office and the National Guard, and when, as became evident immediately after the bombs went off, a large number of FBI personnel were also on hand?

Unless, of course, the Craft Security people were aware of something that we, the public, including the race participants and spectators, and perhaps even the police and FBI, were not aware of.

Transparency is critical to accountability. At this point, it is clear that we have had a massive failure of the national security state. Despite the fact that the FBI was aware of concerns about Tarmelan Tsarnaev, and the fact that the CIA had him on a watch list, he appears to have been able to work on line to learn how to build a powerful homemade bomb, to obtain the materials, including a substantial quantity of black powder, to build a number of them, and, allegedly with the help of his younger brother Dzhokhar, to place them near the finish line and detonate two of them, killing three people and injuring as many as 200. That’s a huge intelligence fail.

It would be an even bigger fail if it turns out that some agency had awareness of a credible threat and that it hired Craft International personnel to prevent it. We clearly need to know, and have a right to demand to know, who hired those men and why. After all, at a minimum, on the face of things, they did an abysmal job of preventing a bombing right in front of their supposedly well-trained noses.

And of course, as I wrote earlier, there is also another question, which is really disturbing: The image of the exploded backpack released by the FBI and identified as the remains of the pack that was carrying one of the two pressure-cooker bombs, prominently displays a white square on a black background. This is not a doctored photograph; it’s the photograph that was released by the FBI. There are also at least two photos depicting one of the Craft International men who is wearing a black backpack identical to several of the other Craft International personnel. The same white square is also visible on the top of his pack.

There does not appear to be any such white marking — square or otherwise — on the top of the black backpack worn by Tarmelan Tsarnaev, as observed in several security photos taken of him (Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was shown carrying a smaller white or light-colored pack, slung over one shoulder). Check out the images below of Tarmelan, the exploded bag and the Craft International character:

FBI image of exploded pack with white square, white square on Craft guy's pack, and Tamerlan Tsarnaev  with pack (no white mark)

FBI image of exploded pack with white square, white square on Craft guy’s pack, and Tamerlan Tsarnaev (left.) with pack but clearly no white square marking
I am not drawing any conclusions from any of this, but I will say that when government agencies at all levels and a private contracting firm are all this obtuse and secretive (and in some cases even deceptive) about what should be a simple question — who hired these men? — my suspicions are aroused.

Somebody’s clearly hiding something.

And by the way, why aren’t the mainstream media asking about this? Are corporate media journalists so intimidated about being labeled “conspiracy nuts” that they can’t do their jobs? At a minimum, this goes to the question of accountability. It also goes to the question of inter-agency communication or lack of it. And given what we know about how many times the FBI has been an active encourager and enabler of terror plots which it later thwarts and claims credit for preventing, there’s the question, too of potential official culpability. Furthermore, when an horrific incident like this is used to justify such new threats to our Constitutional freedom as an unprecedented martial law-style lockdown of an entire 1-million-person metropolitan area and a precedent-setting deliberately Miranda-free, attorney-free interrogation of a hospitalized, gravely wounded and sedated suspect, it is critical that the whole story be told, not just the official one.

The Case of Boston’s Disappearing Bomb Squad

Boston Truth Revealed

Explosive News: Dzokhar Tsarnaev’s back-pack was photo-shopped out

Category: Dick Eastman
Created on 24 April 2013
Written by Dick Eastman
Hits: 2816

FBI agent in charge says both bombs in black backpacks – photo is of black backpack – but Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s is white!

The photo and the FBI lead investigator says that both bombs were in black backpacks  —  see below  — BUT TSARNAEV’S BACKPACK IN EVERY SHOT OF IT  IS WHITE — except the shot released by the FBI to identify the “suspects.”

Don’t underestimate the importance of this.

Will someone watching a lot of news please tell me how this is being explained?

Details and photos establishing this follow:

At 2:49 p.m. EDT (18:49 UTC), about two hours after the winner crossed the finish line,[13] but with more than 5,700 runners yet to finish,[14] two bombs detonated on Boylston Street near Copley Square about 180 yards (170 m) apart,[15][16] just before the finish line.[11] The first exploded outside Marathon Sports at 671–673 Boylston Street at 2:49:43 p.m. EDT.[17] At the time of the first explosion, the race clock at the finish line showed 04:09:43.[18] The second bomb was located one block farther west at 755 Boylston Street and exploded at 2:49:57 p.m. EDT,[13][19]about 13 seconds after the first one.[3] fill the sidewalk behind race barricades after the explosions blow metal pellets and nails into victims’ legs. Race tents become makeshift trauma units.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation led the investigation, assisted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA);[57] treating the bombings as a terrorist attack and naming two alleged perpetrators officially as suspects.[42][58]

At the site of the explosion, investigators found shrapnel that included bits of metal, nails, and bearing balls,[35] as well as black nylon pieces from a backpack.[61] The lid of a Fagor-brand[62] pressure cooker was found on a nearby rooftop.[63] Investigators also found the remains of an electronic circuit board and wiring, possibly used as a timer of the bomb.[35] Rep. Mike McCaul said “most likely, gunpowder was used in the devices”.[64] All evidence was sent to theFBI Laboratory for analysis.[65] Both of the improvised explosive devices are reported to be pressure cooker bombs.[65][66]

Investigators believe the bombs were hidden in black nylon backpacks and housed inside sealable metal pots called pressure cookers. Pressure cooker bombs can help boost the power of relatively small devices by briefly constraining the blast. And when the cookers do explode, they can add large chunks of metal to the shrapnel spray. The IEDs have been popular with terrorists. Al Qaeda published a how-to recipe in an online Jihadi magazine. Several of the bombs were used in the 2006 attack on trains in Mumbai, India.

At a news conference late Tuesday afternoon in Boston, FBI Special Agent in Charge, Richard Deslauriers, indicated that the range of suspect and motive is “wide open,” and that the investigation is still in its “infancy.” He also mentioned that the FBI had received about 2,000 tips as of noon as agents looked for any photographic or video evidence from witnesses.

exploded bag

Deslauriers also said that both explosive devices appears to have been placed in a black nylon bag or backpack. A law enforcement source told CBS News senior investigative producer Pat Milton that investigators also found pieces of an electronic circuit board possibly indicating a timer was used in the detonation of the bomb.

Dick Eastman note:  The FBI released the ONLY picture in which you cannot tell that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is carrying a white backpack over his shoulder!!!!  Now we understand their selectivity and their reluctance to show more pictures to aid the manhunt.

blackbag2

Without an arrest three days after the blasts, investigators at about 6 p.m. publicly release images of the two alleged bombing suspects taken from a Lord & Taylor department store surveillance camera.

The man who became known as “Suspect No. 1″ is wearing a black baseball cap, and “Suspect No. 2″ has a white baseball cap on backwards and is carrying a black backpack. Authorities say they suspect the dark backpack was left in front of the Forum Restaurant on Boylston Street on Monday and then exploded — the second blast.

streets

If the second explosion was the black backpack than Suspect 2  Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should not be a suspect at all.  His backpack was white.

suspects

Some timeline:

While police hunted for suspects, and loved ones grieved their loss, University of MassachusettsDartmouth sophomore Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who would later be identified as a bombing suspect, spends the day working out in a gym, going to a party and sleeping in his dorm room that night, according to the Boston Globe.

A student quoted by the paper said that Tsarnaev had been at a party Wednesday night that was attended by some of his soccer friends. “He was just relaxed,” the female student said.

  • 5:10 p.m. Thursday: The FBI releases photos and videos of two suspects investigators believe are behind Monday’s Boston Marathon bombing.
  • 10:30 p.m. Thursday: An MIT campus police officer was found shot in his vehicle in the area of Vassar and Main Streets. According to authorities, the officer was found with multiple gunshot wounds. He was transported to Massachusetts General Hospital and pronounced dead.
  • Moments later, police received reports of an armed carjacking by two males in the area of Third Street in Cambridge. The victim was carjacked at gunpoint by two males and was kept in the car with the suspects for approximately a half hour. The victim was released at a gas station on Memorial Drive in Cambridge. He was not injured.
  • Authorities said the suspects threw explosives from the car as police followed it into Watertown, just west of Cambridge. The suspects and police exchanged gunfire, and one of the suspects was critically injured. A transit police officer is seriously injured.
  • 1 a.m. Friday: Gunshots and explosions are heard in Watertown. Dozens of police officers and FBI agents converge on a Watertown neighborhood. A helicopter circles overhead.
  • 2 a.m. Friday: The FBI releases a new photo of Suspect #1 and Suspect #2 on its website.
  • 4 a.m. Friday: Boston Police and Cambridge Police Chief confirmed that the two men involved in the fatal shooting of an MIT campus police officer, and a shootout-chase scene into Watertown were the same suspects believed to be involved in the Boston Marathon bombing.
  • The Middlesex County D.A. confirmed that Suspect #1 has died while Suspect #2 escaped.
  • Police release a new image of Suspect #2, apparently taken from a surveillance photo at a 7/11 convenience store that was robbed several hours earlier. He is wearing a grey hoodie-style sweatshirt.
  • 4:30 a.m. Friday: Massachusetts state and Boston police hold a short outdoor news briefing. They tell people living in that section of eastern Watertown to stay in their homes.
  • 5:30 a.m. Friday: Gov. Deval Patrick suspends all public transit service on the MBTA system.
  • People living in a number of communities were ordered to stay inside homes. The communities included Watertown, Waltham, Belmont, Newton, Allston-Brighton and Cambridge.
  • MIT, Harvard and other local colleges cancel classes.
  • 6:45 a.m.: The surviving Boston bomb suspect is identified as 19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who has been living in Cambridge, Mass.
  • 8:40 a.m.: A U.S. law enforcement official and the uncle of the suspects confirmed that the name of the slain suspect is Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s older brother.
  • 10:20 a.m.: Connecticut State Police say a gray Honda CRV believed to be linked to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been recovered in Boston.
  • 10:35 a.m.:University of Massachusetts Dartmouth says it closed its campus and ordered an evacuation after confirming that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is registered there. The school says it closed the campus “out of an abundance of caution” as the search continued.
  • Noon: State police in Watertown say officers are searching door-to-door but still have not found the bombing suspect.
  • 7 p.m. ET: Police surround a home in Watertown where they believe the suspect is holed up in a backyard boat
  • 8:50 p.m. ET: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is captured and taken into custody. Boston police soon announce via Twitter: CAPTURED!!! The hunt is over. The search is done. The terror is over. And justice has won. Suspect in custody.”

Eyewitness: ‘Tamerlan was run over by Boston police and then shot multiple times’

APRIL 27, 2013 BY  LEAVE A COMMENT

21st Century Wire says…We’re continuing to revisit the Boston Bombing crime scene – from the beginning. Here’s something we’ve uncovered recently which should be of interest…tamerlan-tsarnaev2.siThe official explanation told to the public by law enforcement and FBI is that the older brother in question was shot in a fire fight with police and then run over by a stolen Mercedes SUV driven by his younger brother Dzhokhar.We’ve also already shown that our original analysis was correct – that a police firing squad tried to murder the unarmed younger brother Dzhokhar when he  was discovered hiding under a tarp in a boat – and police still haven’t explained very well how his throat was somehow lacerated so badly that he has ended up in serious condition and unable to speak. This was one of numerous exhibitswe believe to have uncovered and highlighted – of police denial and misinformation that should further call into question their credibility regarding official accounts of what happened and when it happened.On top of this, we’ve also uncovered the video evidence where Boston Bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev appears to be alive, naked and escorted by police handcuffed and taken into a squad car. Whatever authorities claim happened after that is still at odds with the available evidence.New evidence…Now an additional piece of eyewitness evidence has surfaced from a radio broadcast which aired on Friday April 19, 2013 on WEEI 93.7 FM in Boston, where a caller named “Linda” explains how the shootout transpired on Dexter Street in Watertown during the early morning hours. She is describing how she saw the first suspect, Tamerlan, was run over by a police SUV and then mortally wounded by multiple police gun shots, after which time the police began their incredible manhunt for the second suspect Dzhokhar. She ends the interview by stating how the police had ordered her to stay inside for the rest of the night.More and more, it appears that perhaps suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev was terminated with extreme prejudice. So we are posing this question: does someone not want either of these two brothers to tell their story in public? Listen, and you decide…

Listen to the original audio clip at WEEI

Don’t expect your corporate media to do their jobs. Keep asking questions about Boston.

The Official Tsarnaev Story Makes No Sense

by craig on April 22, 2013 in Uncategorized

There are gaping holes in the official story of the Boston bombings.

We are asked to believe that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was identified by the Russian government as an extremist Dagestani or Chechen Islamist terrorist, and they were so concerned about it that in late 2010 they asked the US government to take action. At that time, the US and Russia did not normally have a security cooperation relationship over the Caucasus, particularly following the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008. For the Russians to ask the Americans for assistance, Tsarnaev must have been high on their list of worries.

In early 2011 the FBI interview Tsarnaev and trawl his papers and computers but apparently – remarkably for somebody allegedly radicalised by internet – the habitually paranoid FBI find nothing of concern.

So far, so weird. But now this gets utterly incredible. In 2012 Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who is of such concern to Russian security, is able to fly to Russia and pass through the airport security checks of the world’s most thoroughly and brutally efficient security services without being picked up. He is then able to proceed to Dagestan – right at the heart of the world’s heaviest military occupation and the world’s most far reaching secret police surveillance – again without being intercepted, and he is able there to go through some form of terror training or further Islamist indoctrination. He then flies out again without any intervention by the Russian security services.

That is the official story and I have no doubt it did not happen. I know Russia and I know the Russian security services. Whatever else they may be, they are extremely well-equipped, experienced and efficient and embedded into a social fabric accustomed to cooperation with their mastery. This scenario is simply impossible in the real world.

We have, by the official account, the involvement of the two Tsarnaev brothers, the FBI and the Russian security services. The FBI have a massive recent record of running agent provocateur operations to entrap gullible Muslims into terrorism. The Russian security services have form on false flag Chechen bombings. Where the truth lies may be difficult to dig out. But the above official version is not true.

The Tsarnaev Conundrum

by craig on April 20, 2013 in Uncategorized

Cui Bono? Putin. The alleged actions of the Tsarnaev brothers are a massive setback to the cause of Chechen nationalism. The Russian government have been trying for a decade to conflate the repression of Chechen nationalism with the western construct of “the global war on terror”, with very limited diplomatic success. Now expect to hear continually about “Al Qaeda in the Southern Caucasus” in the next few years. Events in Boston have been a massive diplomatic coup for Putin.

In the late 1830′s, Palmerston launched a (disastrous) secret service operation to ship weapons to anti-Russian rebels in modern Chechnya and Dagestan. This was contributory to the tensions that caused the First Anglo-Afghan War, and will feature in my forthcoming biography of Alexander Burnes. For almost two hundred years now there has been covert Western encouragement of anti-Russian movements in the Caucasus – which is not to say that the West was involved in or encouraged the urban terrorist wing of the Chechen nationalist movement in modern times. But links between Chechen nationalists and the US government have been maintained, and there is no support whatsoever among any significant Chechen nationalist leadership for the Boston bombings.

I cannot recommend too highly “Darkness at Dawn” by David Satter, a book which is crucial to an understanding of a key part of the modern world. Satter sets out an extremely strong case, from eyewitness interviews at the time, that The “Chechen” apartment bombings which paid such a crucial part in building the cult of Putin, were false flag – something which the British Embassy in Moscow also strongly inclined to believe. There is a history of false Chechen bombings being very helpful to Putin. These bombings are very helpful to Putin.

It is perfectly possible that this is not relevant at all, and the Tsarnaev brothers became radicalised in the United States by real, and non-Chechen related, terrorists, or simply auto-radicalised. But presuming the Tsarnaevs really did plant these bombs, just who was ultimately pulling the strings and why may be an extremely complex question – and one to which young Dzokhar Tsarnaev is most unlikely to know the real answer.

‘Boston Bombers’ Tsarnaev brothers: Where the dots won’t connect

Published time: April 21, 2013 19:37

Tamerlan Tsarnaev (Image from vk.com)

Tamerlan Tsarnaev (Image from vk.com)
After a dramatic and near unprecedented manhunt for the Tsarnaev brothers – accused of staging the Boston Bombings – what appears most clear is that very little clarity surrounds the case.

The whole world is now rehearsing the exotic names of the main suspects fingered as the ‘Boston bombers': Tamerlan and Dzhokhar.  The two young men have been treated with ‘celebrity’ attention by the media as the public is struggling to define the motives and circumstances that led to their recent actions.

The younger of the two – Dzhokhar – is in hospital with severe wounds he supposedly received from police after an extensive Friday night manhunt. His older brother Tamerlan was killed during the manhunt. He is said to have been wounded from head to toe when he was rushed into a hospital where he later died.

Also, he was reportedly wearing a suicide bomber’s belt.

The 19-year old Dzhokhar was between life and death, ‘intubated and sedated’ with a throat wound. Boston Mayor Tom Menino voiced concerns Sunday that authorities might never be able to question him at all.

One thing remains unclear though – how the young man could walk out of the boat he was hiding in already with a throat wound that he was later almost dying from.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing who was captured Friday night, April 19, 2013.(AFP Photo / CBS NEWS)

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing who was captured Friday night, April 19, 2013.(AFP Photo / CBS NEWS)

Since then, Dzhokhar has regained consciousness and is reportedly answering the police questions by writing.

Meanwhile, the FBI is actively searching for the two brothers’ ‘terror links’, scrutinizing Tsarnaevs’ contacts. However, so far there are more questions to the story than answers.

First, the ‘Chechen link’. Being ethnically Chechens, the brothers spent very little time in their historic motherland in the mountains of Caucasus. The reaction of the Republic authorities can be summed up as ‘We don’t know them, we have not heard of them’.

The former Soviet State of Kyrgyzstan was the family’s homeland for many years before the brothers emigrated to the US to receive a refugee status. Kyrgyz authorities confirmed the fact, saying they the Tsarnaevs left the country in 2001. While in Kyrgyzstan, the family lived in a town of Tormok, predominantly ethnically Chechen. ‘Kyrgyz’ Chechens were sent there on the orders of Joseph Stalin in 1944 amid the accusation – or pretext – of cooperating with the Nazi’s.

The Tsarnaev’s parents, after a few years in the US, are currently living in Dagestan, another turbulent republic in Russia’s south that draws a lot of active attention from the security forces. It might be believed to have some of the strongest and most conservative Muslim communities in the country but so far does not seem to have enough to qualify as a ‘radical Islamic breeding spot’.

When asked about the motives behind their moving to the US, the father of the family, Anzor Tsarnaev, said:

“Chechens are stereotypically not welcome in so many places. We hoped the US will be the place to leave peacefully and free from judgment. Now I see it was a mistake”.

Anzor Tsarnaev (Image from vk.com)

Anzor Tsarnaev (Image from vk.com)

Tsarnaev senior believes his children have been framed. He says it’s impossible that they could do something like that.

“I’m sure about my children, in their purity. I don’t know what happened and who did this. God knows and he will punish the guilty,” he said.

An RT’ team flew to Dagestan to speak to Tsarnaevs’ parents and neighbors. The psychological ‘portrait’ of the two brothers has little to do with what has been ascribed to them. Open and respecting, calm and friendly, the two brothers are described by people who’ve known them for some time in often the best terms.  The news of their involvement in the Boston bombing has largely been met with shock.

“I lived next to this family both in Chechnya and here, in Dagestan,” the neighbor told RT. “Their kids couldn’t have done that, they couldn’t have been involved.”

Also read: ‘Tamerlan was not a religious fanatic’ – Tsarnaevs’ relative to RT

A similar reaction was heard in outpourings from those who knew them in America.

“I’m in complete shock,” Rose Schutzberg, 19, who graduated high school with Dzhokhar told USA Today. “He was a very studious person. He was really popular. He wrestled. People loved him.”

None of the people around them had any suspicion something of this sort was cooking up. The only concern was that the brothers did not actually feel integrated into American society, judging by their comments made known to the public.

“I don’t have a single American friend,” Tamerlan said in a photo essay about his love of boxing. “I don’t understand them.”

Before refusing to give anymore interviews, the mother of the two, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva talked to RT and expressed confidence her sons were framed by the FBI, alleging that they had been following Tamerlan in particular for at least 5 years.

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva (Image from vk.com)

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva (Image from vk.com)

“They were controlling him, they were controlling his every step…and now they say that this is a terrorist act! Never ever is this true, my sons are innocent!” the mother exclaimed.

It would be indeed strange to suggest somebody so closely watched by the FBI could have plotted terrorist acts without setting off alarm bells. The FBI, however, has in the past been accused of enticing socially-aloof Muslims into plotting a terror act and then ‘disclosing’ and jailing them, claiming they just saved the world from another villain (watch Fox News report). Could it be another such case that went incredibly wrong?

So far the investigation has failed to spot and track any ‘real people’ who could be helping the brothers in their plot.

“I think it’s limited to the two brothers,” Edward Deveau, the chief of police of Watertown, said. “Every information that I have been seeing, where we looked at Boston, Watertown, the greater New England area, is safe.”

Little has been gathered from the Tsarnaev’s online activity. The US media is sending panic waves that Tamerlan had been visiting extremist web-sites and was becoming affiliated with conservative (you may read it as radical) Islam. However – there is again little proof of that in real life. For starters, the brothers are barely known in their local (or any other) mosque.

“The brothers were members of our community in Cambridge,” the head of the local Muslim center told RIA-Novosti. “They wouldn’t come very often and they had never expressed any radical views.”

Tamerlan is said to have set up a YouTube playlist that he labeled ‘Terrorist’. This and his visits to what is considered a radical source Kavkazcenter.com made the investigation suggest he could be linked to the notorious terrorist Doku Umarov. However, the website has denied any link to the Boston Marathon bombings that have been blamed on the brothers.

“The command of the Vilayat Dagestan Mujahidin… declares that the Caucasus fighters are not waging any military activities against the United States of America. We are only fighting Russia,” the Kavkazcenter.com website said in an official statement.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev (Image from vk.com)

Tamerlan Tsarnaev (Image from vk.com)

At the same time, Tamerlan failed to get hold of an American passport, instead obtaining just a Green Card. The New York Times reports his citizenship was held up because of an FBI interview in 2011 and not because of a domestic abuse episode – where he is said to have hit his girlfriend.

He still got married in the US – to Katherine Russell, who converted to Islam for him. The couple has a little daughter. Both the woman and the girl are choosing to hide out the media storm at Katherine’s parents.

The US media speculate that Tamerlan started to cling to radical Islamist ideas when already in the US, but cemented his beliefs while traveling to Russia (Chechnya and Dagestan) in 2012. His parents confirm nothing of this sort, saying he traveled to renew his Russian passport and decided to prolong his stay.

Tsarnaevs’ father, Anzor, is confirmed to be en route to the United States to be with his remaining son in hospital and try to iron the details of his arrest.

FBI investigators and Watertown Police officer walk in parking lot as they investigate the shooting scene near the boat where bombing suspect was hiding from police on Franklin Street on April 20, 2013 in Watertown, Massachusetts (Reuters / Kevork Djansezian)

FBI investigators and Watertown Police officer walk in parking lot as they investigate the shooting scene near the boat where bombing suspect was hiding from police on Franklin Street on April 20, 2013 in Watertown, Massachusetts (Reuters / Kevork Djansezian)

Now, however hard the FBI is trying to connect the dots, they still hardly can. Two young successful friendly men, the joy and pride of their family, with no history of radicalism, all of a sudden choose to commit a terror attack. No ‘Allah Akbar’ calls, no radical organization affiliation, not a hint of hatred noticed by those close to them. Tamerlan leaving a family behind, Dzhohar just a regular teenager with seemingly common teenage interests. Their actions have not brought around any evident benefit to either of them.

Moreover, it has sent curses and sorrow into their families’ lives, especially back in Russia since the traditional Caucasus cultures focus on immense respect towards parents, where fathers and mothers are idolized and honored by the younger generation – and are expected to take responsibility for their children’s action no matter what the age.

Runners continue to run towards the finish line of the Boston Marathon as an explosion erupts near the finish line of the race in this photo exclusively licensed to Reuters by photographer Dan Lampariello after he took the photo in Boston, Massachusetts, April 15, 2013 (Reuters / Dan Lampariello)

Runners continue to run towards the finish line of the Boston Marathon as an explosion erupts near the finish line of the race in this photo exclusively licensed to Reuters by photographer Dan Lampariello after he took the photo in Boston, Massachusetts, April 15, 2013 (Reuters / Dan Lampariello)

Nobody is saying Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev didn’t do what everybody is saying they did – nor the police words of violent resistance to arrest which caused further fatalities. It’s just their action looks bizarre and illogical based on how they lived their lives.

READERLINK

This claims that the mosque that was a 10-minute walk from the suspects’ apartment did not have them on their registry and they were “infrequent” visitors. Odd, at the very least, for the elder brother, who was “devout” and so “involved” in his religion, no?

LINK

(Not that I ever use FoxNews as a source, but this is interesting)…so after “assassinating” an MIT officer, then carjacking a man and ANNOUNCING they were the Boston bombers, they just let the guy out of the car, unharmed, at a gas station (reminiscent of false & overt Oswalds) and then just cruise across the street to another gas station, to presumably grab a soda and some chips? Seriously? How stupid do they think we are?

LINK

I find this photo interesting not because of the “Coexist” bumper sticker, which is irrelevant…but the fact that we’ve heard repeatedly that the suspects carjacked a Mercedes SUV. I can’t be 100% certain, but the insignia on the back of the car, which is admittedly unclear, resembles the Honda logo. Someone with the ability to check license plate numbers (unfortunately, not me) would be able to tell pretty quickly if this was registered to a Mercedes or not.

LINK

This article claims that one suspect carjacked the SUV and was followed by a Honda Civic (which I thought I saw in photos, as noted above)…which MIGHT feature a “Coexist” bumpersticker? Odd for terrorists. Then there’s this: “Once in Watertown, the victim was ordered to slide over to the passenger side, the report said. The two brothers then removed luggage from the Honda and loaded it into the trunk of the Mercedes, the report said.” So, they let the carjacking victim drive…OK. Then, they transferred their luggage into the SUV? That sounds like they planned to escape, not go out in a “blaze of glory.” There’s also this: “Inside the car, the brothers “declared to [the victim] that they were the Boston Marathon bombers and would not kill him because he wasn’t American,” the report said.” Well, that’s an odd line to draw in the sand…since Boston Marathoners and onlookers were from all all over the world. So, they had no issues with injuring/killing THOSE non-Americans. Weird.

Enough for tonight, from me…sorry to bombard you with this, as I know you must be overwhelmed right now. Just wanted to share, in case you missed these.

Mass Media Complicit in JFK Assassination

May 16, 2013

jfkw.jpg

Pfc. Eugene Dinkin, a cryptographic code operator for the US Army stationed in France
may have seen planning for JFK assassination more than a month before it happened.
The mass media stymied his attempts to sound an alarm and he was placed in a mental hospital. 

“The journalists who heard Dinkin’s story in Switzerland may have had it within their power to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy. By writing nothing about his documented allegations, they failed to exercise that power. In addition, they knew that he had been detained after coming forward–but in the wake of the assassination with the investigation proceeding, they remained silent.  How many other cases like Dinkins remain unreported?”

No pictures of Eugene Dinkin are extant online. This adds credibility to this story. 

JFK Assassination Enablers?
 by Hugh Turley

http://www.dcdave.com/

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and stories about that fateful day in November 1963 have already started appearing in the American media.  It is a popular belief that if there were a conspiracy, someone would come forward and the press would tell us.

Then why is there still no news about Pfc. Eugene Dinkin, a cryptographic code operator for the Army?   Declassified CIA and FBI documents released in the 1990s reveal a strange tale that raises the question: Could Dinkin have learned the details of an assassination plot from the classified documents he handled, or was he a paranoiac who somehow made a number of amazingly accurate prophecies?

On October 16, 1963, when Dinkin was stationed in Metz, France, he wrote a letter to Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy warning that the president would be assassinated on or about November 28 and requesting an interview by the Justice Department.  Dinkin sent the letter registered mail, and to prevent it from being intercepted, used the return address of an Army friend, Pfc. Dennis De Witt. He did not receive an answer.

Dinkin later changed the predicted assassination date to November 22 and said it would happen in Texas.  He believed the military was involved in the plot and that a Communist would be blamed.  The day after the murder, the Washington Evening Star reported that the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was a “pro-Castro Marxist.”

On October 25, 1963, Dinkin traveled to the United States Embassy in Luxembourg to apprise a Mr. Cunningham, the Charge d’Affaires, of the plot to assassinate President Kennedy.  He was turned away.

Dinkin was scheduled for a psychiatric examination on November 4, and fearing confinement as a psychotic, he went absent without leave from his unit.  He traveled to Geneva, Switzerland, using a false Army identification and forged travel orders. There, he appeared in the press room of the United Nations office on November 6 and 7 and “told reporters he was being persecuted.” Among those who heard his story were the editor of the Geneva Diplomat and representatives of Newsweek and the Time-Life media group.

The AWOL Dinkin was the subject of CIA cables on November 18 and again on November 29, 1963.  The latter cable advised the White House, State Department, FBI, and Secret Service of Dinkin’s assassination predictions and of his trip to Switzerland.

ARRESTED

Upon returning to his unit in Metz, he was arrested by Army intelligence officers and soon transferred to Walter Reed Army hospital in Washington, D.C., where he was treated for “paranoia,” according to an FBI report.  Afterwards, he was discharged from the Army.

The FBI interviewed him on April 1, 1964.  By then, perhaps fearing prosecution for revealing classified material, Dinkin said his theory came from newspaper articles and acknowledged that it “was extremely ‘wild’ and could be construed [as] ‘crazy’.”

FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover and CIA Deputy Director Richard Helms informed the Warren Commission about Dinkin’s predictions about the assassination, but his name was never mentioned in the encyclopedic official record.

The journalists who heard Dinkin’s story in Switzerland may have had it within their power to prevent the assassination of President Kennedy. By writing nothing about his documented allegations, they failed to exercise that power. In addition, they knew that he had been detained after coming forward–but in the wake of the assassination with the investigation proceeding, they remained silent.  How many other cases like Dinkins remain unreported?

Pfc. Dinkin miscalculated when he went AWOL to contact journalists whom he mistakenly believed were liberty’s guardians.  The Roman poet Juvenal asked, “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (“Who will guard the guards themselves?”) It’s still a good question.
________________________________________________________________________________
This article appeared originally in the May 2013 Hyattsville Life and Times with the more sweeping title of simply “Assassination Enablers?”

Makow Comment It’s obvious that treasonous crimes like the JFK assassination, 9-11, Newtown and Boston Bombing could not take place with a free press. But this little known story is a reminder that the function of the mass media is deception and mind control.

Related – Media Helped Sell the Lie of Lone Assassin
———    News Media Collaborated in 9-11 False Flag
———–   Background information, possibly designed to discredit Dinkin 
Youtube —  Mass media Lying About 9-11

Bush Family Fortunes: The Best Democracy Money Can Buy (Full Version)

WHERE HAVE ALL THE TOWERS GONE?

by Dr Kevin Barrett

“In this devastating critique of 9/11, Dr Kevin Barrett unravels the shocking truth: that this was a terrorist attack on innocent Americans by their own government — a government that has now morphed into an axis of evil with Israel and the NATO countries.” — Lasha Darkmoon

WHERE HAVE ALL THE TOWERS GONE?
AND WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE 1,116 MISSING 9/11 VICTIMS?

More than 11 years after the catastrophic destruction of the World Trade Center, New York City’s government is finally asking: What in the world could have happened to the missing 1,116 victims?

In every building collapse in history, all of the victims’ bodies have been recovered more or less intact. That is because falling buildings crush human bodies. They do not shred them into tiny pieces, or cause them to vanish into thin air.

Yet on September 11th, 2001, the most famous “building collapses” in history somehow caused the bodies of more than 1,000 victims to magically disappear. Not even a shred of skin, a fragment of fingernail, or a shard of bone from any of these bodies was ever recovered, despite meticulous “sifting and bucketing” efforts.

But that’s not the only mystery. Hardly anything was left of the 1,634 WTC occupants who did not completely vanish. Most of the human remains discovered and DNA-identified were in the form of tiny, shredded pieces, not intact bodies.

What happened to the nearly 3,000 human bodies that were annihilated during the ten-second disappearances of the 110-story Towers? Answer: The same thing that happened to the office furniture, filing cabinets, telephones, computers, and other contents of the Towers. Virtually no remains of these objects were ever recovered, either. They – like the human bodies – were somehow transformed into a mixture of tiny shards and sub-100-micron dust, which floated out to sea and slowly settled into the Atlantic. As one of the sifters-and-bucketers remarked, the biggest piece of office furniture recovered from Ground Zero was a tiny fragment of a telephone keypad.

“What happened to the 3000 human bodies that were annihilated during the 10-second disappearances of the Twin Towers?”

Now, more than 11 years later, the New York City government is finally acknowledging the mystery. In a memo to the 9/11 victims’ families, NYC official Casey Holloway announced that this Monday, April 1st, the city’s Chief Medical Examiner will begin sifting through 60 truckloads of World Trade Center construction debris at Fresh Kills Landfill on Staten Island. The city says it hopes to find remains of at least some of the 1,116 missing victims.

Unfortunately, the chances of finding remains of more than a few additional victims seem remote. After all, the Twin Towers debris – which amounted to less than 50% of the mass of the Towers (what happened to the rest of the mass?) – was already meticulously sifted and bucketed more than a decade ago. The city’s decision to sift through recent construction debris beginning April 1st bears more than a passing resemblance to George W. Bush’s decision to get down on his hands and knees to look under his desk for the missing Iraqi WMD. Is this some kind of cruel April Fools’ Day joke?

The absence of crushed-but-intact human bodies, office furniture and equipment, and 50% of the Towers’ mass suggests that the Twin Towers did not collapse – they exploded. (See the Youtube film “North Tower Exploding.”) This would explain why tiny human bone fragments were discovered scattered all over the roof of the neighboring Deutsche Bank building in 2006. No simple gravitational collapse, like the one posited by US government’s official NIST Report, could possibly blast human skeletons to smithereens and deposit those smithereens all over the roof of a neighboring building.

Were the Twin Towers, and the thousands of people inside them, blown to bits by explosives? That is what many of the 9/11 victims’ family members believe. Robert McIlvaine, whose son Bobby was murdered in the Twin Towers on 9/11, has stated that roughly half the family members share his suspicion that the Towers were explosively demolished in a false-flag attack. William Rodriguez, the famous 9/11 hero who has spoken to hundreds of thousands of people around the world, is another representative of the 9/11 survivors who asserts that the evidence for “controlled demolition” is an open secret.

Scientist Carl Sagan once pointed out that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” But sometimes absence of evidence IS a smoking gun. The absence of intact bodies, office contents, and half of the mass of the Twin Towers is a smoking gun proving that the Towers were explosively demolished.

THE THREE MUSKETEERS OF 9/11 ENJOYING A PRIVATE JOKE

The missing contents and mass of the Twin Towers are not the only mysterious “absence” connected with 9/11. Other notable “missing evidence” includes:

* The absence of the US government’s 80-plus videos of the attack on the Pentagon, some of which were confiscated by FBI agents just moments after the attack. Only a few frames have been released, and those frames show an explosion at the Pentagon but no big airliner.

* The absence of the 100,000 kilos of Boeing 757 airliner that supposedly entered the Pentagon. No record exists of those 100,000 kilos of airliner debris, or the plane’s luggage and passenger remains, ever being removed from any of the three widely-separated damaged areas of the Pentagon.

* The absence of the 100,000 kilos of Boeing 757 airliner that supposedly buried itself in the soft earth beneath a shallow fifteen-foot-diameter crater in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. There is no evidence of 100,000 kilos of airliner debris, along with passenger remains and luggage, being recovered from beneath the ground at the alleged crash site.

* The absence of the official airline passenger lists, security video footage, ticket stubs, testimony from airline employees, or any other actual evidence that the 19 young Arabs blamed for 9/11 were even on the planes.

* The absence of the audio recordings of FAA personnel debriefing each other about what they experienced on 9/11. These recordings were confiscated by an FAA supervisor and shredded into tiny pieces, which were discarded into many widely-separated trash receptacles so they could never be collected and reconstructed.

* The absence of the indestructible “black boxes” of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. The US government claims these flight data recorders were never recovered, but first responders say they were present when they were found and taken away by FBI agents.

* The absence of the government’s most important cited evidence: The audio and video recordings of the lengthy torture sessions and scripted false confessions of mentally-retarded “9/11 mastermind” Abu Zubaydah and his fellow “mastermind” Khalid Sheikh MohammedThe CIA admits that it illegally destroyed these recordings, anonymous second-hand reports of which are cited in the 9/11 Commission Report as its only evidence for the 19-hijackers scenario.

* The absence of any plausible innocent explanation for the BBC’s premature report of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, Larry Silverstein’s confession that he demolished WTC-7, and (of course) the obvious controlled demolition of that building.

In every one of these cases — as in the case of the 1,116 missing victims — the absence of evidence is a smoking gun.

The US government now faces a complete absence of legitimacy.

SEARCHING FOR CLUES AMID THE RUBBLE OF 9/11

LD: Nothing that could have embarrassed the US government survived the explosions. Even the “indestructible” black boxes containing key flight information had been complete vaporized, contrary to the laws of physics. Even more miraculously and conveniently for the US government, two charred passports of alleged Al Qaeda terrorists, one of them ringleader Mohammed Atta, had been found intact in the ruins — almost as if someone had placed them there on purpose to be found.  (See here)

The passport of Mohamma Atta… found intact in the rubble of Ground Zero  

Among the many missing items, $2.3 trillion, for which Rabbi Dov Zakheim had been personally accountable at the Pentagon, mysteriously disappeared into thin air. People are asking: what happened to this enormous sum of money? Did it end up in Israel? Was it perhaps Israel’s “payment” for services rendered on 9/11?

Altogether, 9/11 has proved to be a very successful heist: with over 1 million Iraqis dead and the warmongers of the military-industrial complex incomparably richer — and now eager for new conquests and money-making opportunities in Iran.

didyouknowzimm

  

The Globalists’ Agenda – New World Order Quotes from Politicians (1950 – 2013)

Did you see the recent Joe Biden Video where Joe discusses the New World Order?

Do you think this is the first time the people have been warned about the coming New World Order?

Well it’s not new, it’s just much closer than it’s ever been. If you have any doubts, Listen to them and read their own words as they gradually unveil to the world the plan for a new world order.

Please listen to these World Leaders, then share this with people who don’t understand what the New World Order means.

This Video is a collection of U.S. Presidents and World Leaders explaining the benefits of this New World Order from 1950 through today..

A historical overview of globalists’ and politicians quotes referring to ‘A New World Order’ or ‘ Global Governance’

Stumbling Joe Biden, he stammers and stutters, then tries to convince you that it is in America’s best interest to give away America’s Sovereignty.

If you haven’t seen Joe Biden yet, you will want to watch this short 2 minute video.

http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2013/04/the-globalists-agenda-new-world-order-quotes-from-politicians-1950-2013-video-footage-2507282.html

thescroll_headerthescroll_tagline thescroll_tagline_RSS

Multiple Explosions at the Boston Marathon

At least two dead, 49 injured

By Yair Rosenberg|April 15, 2013 5:39 PM|0Leave a comment

(Boston Globe reporter John Tlumacki )

This afternoon, two explosions were reported near the finish line of the Boston marathon. (One was caught on video.) Two other suspicious devices were then detonated by law enforcement, and the Boston Police Department has reported at least two people dead. City hospitals say at least 49 are injured. Eerily, the photo above depicts first responders after the explosion, with the Israeli flag visible in the background—on Israel’s own memorial day.

Our thoughts and prayers are with the people of Boston and their families. President Obama will be making a statement at 6:10 pm, and we’ll have more as this story develops.

As Fugutive ‘Bomber’ is Captured: My kids were framed, says Boston bombing suspects’ father

News Brief — April 19, 2013

No doubt the Tsarnaev brothers went there in search of the American Dream. As they discovered though, that dream has turned into a nightmare
According to Russia and India Report, the father of the two brothers who are suspected of being behind the Boston Marathon blasts believes they were set up.
An Interfax correspondent managed to talk on the phone with Anzor, the father of Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who are alleged to have carried out the bomb attack on Monday.
“I learned about the incident from TV” he said.
“My opinion is: the special services have framed my children, because they are practicing Muslims.
“Why did they kill Tamerlan? He was supposed to be caught alive. The younger is on the run now. He was a sophomore at a medical school in the U.S. We expected him to come home for vacation. Now I don’t know what’s going to happen.
“Tell you once again: I believe special services have framed my children,” he said.
He may be right.
Adding weight to his argument is the testimony of an FBI agent who said the two suspects stayed at the scene after the blasts. They didn’t depart the Boston Marathon finish line, as one might expect if they had been involved in the bombing.
Instead, unreleased video footage seen by the agent shows that rather than run-away, the two brothers remained at the scene and then walked away “prettycasually“.
That doesn’t sound like terrorists leaving the scene of their crimes. In contrast to operatives of the Private Military Firm The Craft, who hastily departed after the blasts and whom the mainstream media has not even reported on.
Many who knew the brothers are still in disbelief over claims they were involved in the bombing. One former classmate who studied with the younger brother Dzhokhar Tsamaev in Boston, described him as a “sweet guy”.
Rebecca Mazur told reporters that Dzhokhar didn’t fit the profile of a terrorist or a lone nut killer. “He was a familiar part of the community, he didn’t isolate himself,” she said.
Likewise, a neighbour to the suspect said there was absolutely no indication that anything was wrong. Larry Aaronson was reported to have told CNN: “He was a lovely, lovely kid. He was a wonderful kid … he was never in trouble.”.
No, the two brothers have been set up as fall guys. Possibly because from the surveillance footage at the scene of the blasts, they were dressed very similarly to The Craft operatives who were also at the scene.
Making them likely candidates to use as fall guys as cover for the real perpetrators behind the bombings.
Now however the U.S. authorities have an even bigger problem than a few photos of undercover bombers at work. Or a fugitive still on the loose.
The alleged bomber has just been reportedly captured alive. Meaning the whores in the corporate media will now have a job trying to convince us that he was in fact involved in the Boston bombings.

Craft-International-team-at-scene-of-Boston-marathon-blast

 

Illuminati Use Old Slave Methods On Us

May 4, 2013

slave.jpgleft. “You’ve got the nigger woman out front and the nigger man behind and scared.”

The science of enslavement was remarkably sophisticated
and resembled feminist social engineering. 

Discrediting the male in the eyes of the female was a precondition.
Ironically, slave makers yesterday and today are the same people. 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.
(from Nov. 4, 2009) 

When a reader tipped me to a talk entitled The Making of a Slave,”    delivered by a slave owner in 1712, I decided to compare past and present.

Past methods of enslavement were highly sophisticated, and closely resemble modern feminist social engineering.

Willie Lynch, a British slave owner in the West Indies, was invited to the colony of Virginia in 1712 to teach his methods to slave owners there.

He advised slave owners to foster division, “fear, envy and distrust for control.” Pit young versus old, light skinned versus dark skinned and most importantly, male versus female.

In a section called “The Breaking Process of the African Woman,”  he advocated shifting her dependency from the African male to the slave owner.  This is achieved by beating and humiliating the male in front of the female. Then, beating the female if she doesn’t get the message. This instills a kind of frigidity.

whip.jpg“We reversed nature by burning and pulling a civilized nigger apart, and bull whipping another to the point of death, all in her presence. By her being left alone, unprotected, with the male image destroyed, the ordeal caused her to move from her psychological dependent state to a frozen independent state. In this frozen psychological state of independence, she will raise her male and female offspring in reverse roles.”

“For fear of the young male’s life, she will psychologically train him to be mentally weak and dependent, but physically strong. Because she has become psychologically independent, she will train her female offspring to be psychologically independent. What have you got? You’ve got the nigger woman out front and the nigger man behind and scared. This is a perfect situation of sound sleep and economic [gain].”

She will teach her female offspring “to be like herself, independent and negotiable (…we negotiate her at will.)” She will raise her “nigger male offspring to be mentally dependent and weak, but physically strong, in other words body over mind.”

“We will mate and breed them and continue the cycle. This is good and sound and long range comprehensive planning.”

Sound familiar?  We recognize these patterns in the US Black community and, thanks to the hidden agenda of feminism, increasingly in White society as well.

AVOIDING SELF CORRECTION

“Willie Lynch” starts to sound like the Cabalist author of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” He continues:

“By reversing the positions of the male and female savages, we created an orbited cycle that turns on its own axis forever..”

But “our experts” warned us of the danger that the mind might correct itself  “if it can touch some substantial historical base.” They advised us to “shave off the brute’s mental history and create a multiplicity of phenomena of illusions, so that each illusion will twirl in its own orbit, sometimes similar to floating balls in a vacuum.”

I haven’t heard our culture described better. Our collective identity (race, religion,nation and family) is being systematically erased and replaced by a  rotating mobile of chintzy pop cultural baubles.

SIA2008-0235.jpg“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas…”wrote G. Brock Chisholm, left, psychiatrist and co-founder of the World Federation of Mental Health.

MISCEGENATION

Lynch goes on to promote miscegenation so the slaves lose their racial homogeneity. The slaves are different shades of color befitting different levels of labor and “different values of illusion at each connecting level of labor.”

“Cross breeding niggers means taking so many drops of good white blood and putting them into as many nigger women as possible, varying the drops by the various tones that you want, and then letting them breed with each other until another cycle of color appears as you desire.”

In true Cabalist fashion, Lynch concludes by stressing the importance of creating a new language befitting slavery.

“We must completely annihilate the mother tongue of the new nigger…”

Presaging Orwellian doublespeak, he says, “language is a peculiar institution. It leads to the heart of a people. The more a foreigner knows about the language of a country the more he is able to move through all levels of that society. Therefore if the foreigner is an enemy, the country is vulnerable to attack or invasion of a foreign culture.”

For example, the slave should learn the term “hog pen” but never “house.”

CONCLUSION

Some people think this speech is apocryphal. The language has been modernized. Was the term “nigger” used in 1712?

However, Blacks seem to think the speech is genuine. It is on many Black websites.

The point is that we are being socially engineered to be slaves in much the same way as Blacks were, and by the very same people.

The modern female has been “frozen psychologically” and now depends on the slave owner (government, corporation) for her security. The modern male is emasculated, strong in body but not in mind, grateful to be allowed to serve a master, often a woman.


Related– These ads turning third world females against their husbands, fathers, brothers and sons are all over the Internet. They are obviously backed by very deep pockets, and we know whose.

Makow “The Cabalist Plot to Enslave Humanity” 

Black, Asian Women Desperate to be White

Tolerance is a Guise for Social Engineering 

Jews in the Slave Trade

From Gareth in South Africa:

I’m a “Coloured” male from South Africa and my forefathers also come from history of slavery and colonialism. Ours is the best example of pitting different skin tones, male/female against each other.

I’ve been following your site for a few months and recognized that ‘they’ are basically trying to achieve with white people what was done to us through slavery. I see many white men maybe disillusioned with white women because of the effects of Feminism opt to go for coloured women. Maybe cause they feel they getting an old-fashion traditional wife. What they don’t know is that they’re getting the same “psychologically frozen” and “independent and negotiable” woman. The coloured woman opts for white males because her psychological dependency on “the slave owner” and ineffectiveness of coloured men.

From what I read, the same is happening in America with African American females and white men. I believe the objective in creating this interracial union is to destroy language and culture because the woman of color and their off-spring will adopt the her white male’s culture/customs and forget her own. This is how many indigenous cultures (including my own) were diluted around the world, by colonial men raping/marrying indigenous women after their own indigenous men has been rendered ineffectual.


Just to give you an outline of us ‘coloured’ people here in South Africa. We are basically the result of a mixture between colonial men and indigenous and slave women imported from Asia and other parts of Africa.

Those ‘Lynch methods’ were very much employed amongst us. The result of it all is that we are a “nation” with no cultural identity (because of our extensive mixture), no socio-economic or political foothold. We are like a political whore being passed around, putting our trust in every and anyone except ourselves.

I suspect that this is what the Illuminati has in store for everyone. The destruction of culture, race and religion as you’ve outlined in your articles. But ours is a classical example of it if you want to study and see it first hand. Strides are being made forward though and we are positive about our future. Many are rediscovering their previous cultural identities. – See more at: http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html#sthash.8ERVI3kT.dpuf

PHILIP BUMP70,707 ViewsAPR 2, 2013

About 90 million Americans believe aliens exist. Some 66 million of us think aliens landed at Roswell in 1948. These are the things you learn when there’s a lull in political news and pollsters get to ask whatever questions they want.

Public Policy Polling has raised weird polls to an art form. During last year’s presidential campaign, the firm earned a bit of a reputation for its unorthodox questions; for example, “If God exists, do you approve of its handling of natural disasters?”

Today PPP released the results of a national survey looking at common conspiracy theories. Broken down by topic and cross-referenced by political preference, the results will not inspire a lot of patriotism. If you need to defend your fellow countrymen, be sure to note that the margin of error is 2.8 percent.

We took the findings and arranged them from most- to least-believed. And, just to inspire additional shame, figured out how many actual Americans that meant must believe in things like the danger of fluoride in water. (28 million, if you’re wondering.)

View the full question asked for each conspiracy.

Conspiracy Percent believing Number of Americans believing
JFK was killed by conspiracy 51 percent 160,096,160
Bush intentionally misled on Iraq WMDs 44 percent 138,122,178
Global warming is a hoax 37 percent 116,148,195
Aliens exist 29 percent 91,035,072
New World Order 28 percent 87,895,931
Hussein was involved in 9/11 28 percent 87,895,931
A UFO crashed at Roswell 21 percent 65,921,948
Vaccines are linked to autism 20 percent 62,782,808
The government controls minds with TV 15 percent 47,087,106
Medical industry invents diseases 15 percent 47,087,106
CIA developed crack 14 percent 43,947,966
Bigfoot exists 14 percent 43,947,966
Obama is the Antichrist 13 percent 40,808,825
The government allowed 9/11 11 percent 34,530,544
Fluoride is dangerous 9 percent 28,252,264
The moon landing was faked 7 percent 21,973,983
Bin Laden is alive 6 percent 18,834,842
Airplane contrails are sinister chemicals 5 percent 15,695,702
McCartney died in 1966 5 percent 15,695,702
Lizard people control politics 4 percent 12,556,562

Just to further inspire conversation, PPP broke down belief in each theory by whom the respondent supported in the 2012 election. This yielded some genuinely interesting results.

For example, only three conspiracies were more commonly believed by Obama supporters: that Bush intentionally misled America about Iraq’s WMDs (a massive 69 percent of his supporters believe that one), that the CIA launched the crack epidemic, and that the moon landing was faked. There are two theories with equal support among Obama and Romney supporters: that aliens exist and the one about fluoridation. Everything else, from lizard people to vaccines and autism to global warming being a hoax? Believed by more Romney supporters.

No conspiracy was less commonly believed than one suggesting that the government is populated by lizard people. But that’s mostly because only 2 percent of Obama supporters believe the theory while 5 percent of Romney supporters do.

Video: Monsanto + Google + Bilderberg = End of Humanity

Posted on May 27, 2013by 

The Bilderberg Society is holding its annual meeting this June in Watford just north of London. The theme this year is Google which is the tip of the modern Surveillance State. The video below discusses an earlier meeting in 2005 which was followed by a select meeting at which it was decided that Monsanto genetic manipulation of plants and animals was to be followed by gene spicing of animals and then humans. The video emphasizes that they plan to make it impossible for you to live and to reproduce without accepting genetic manipulation of our genes by Monsanto.  This is the End of Humanity.

A Bilderberg select meeting was held after the 2005 regular conference at a castle in the Bavarian Alps. David Rockefeller, Timothy Geithner, Etienne Davignon, Chairman of the Bilderberg Society Europe, and Richard Haas. President of the Council on Foreign Relations, attended. Geithner’s father was a Director of the Ford Foundation in Asia. Geithner was born in Asia and speaks Chinese. He is a second generation Globalist. His first job was working for Kissinger Associates. That meeting at the castle in the Bavarian Alps was written up in two papers by the British Ministry of  Defence.  Those papers were Future of Mankind in 2006 and a 91 page report in December of 2007 Strategic Trends 2007-2036.

Finally, Civil Disobedience is now listed in the same category as terrorism by our newly federalized police. DHS is forming red armed band units called RED Squads. RED is an acronym for Rapid Emergency Development. They were created to deal with terrorists and protesters so presumably protesters will be treated mire frequently as if they were terrorists.

Note: MIT is talking about the ability to turn off your free will.

TSA confession describes security screenings as ‘a complete joke'; ‘It’s all for show’

Sunday, March 10, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles…)
(NaturalNews) Last week, an undercover TSA inspector managed to quite easily sneak a mock explosive device through airport security and onto an airplane. He simply stuffed the fake bomb down his pants and went right through the screenings, including a pat-down. Out of several covert TSA agents attempting to sneak mock explosive devices onto the airplane, only one was pulled aside, and she was carrying a child’s doll with wires hanging out the back, making it ridiculously obvious. (SOURCE)“This episode once again demonstrates how Newark Airport is the Ground Zero of TSA failures,” said a source published in the NY Post, a newspaper that’s been breaking huge news on the TSA (and actually doing a far better job reporting on this than the NYT).But the real news isn’t the fact that, time and time again, government officials can easily sneak explosives onto airplanes. The real story is what happened a few days later, when a TSA employee who works at Newark went public with allegations that the TSA is nothing more than pure theater and that TSA employees have no ability or motivation to catch any terrorists whatsoever.

“A LOT of what we do is make-believe.”

That’s how the confession begins. It’s a confession of a TSA agent, published once again in the New York Post. And it continues:

We’re not any big deterrent. It’s all for show. Most TSA screeners know their job is a complete joke. Their goal is to use this as a stepping stone to another government agency. We work in a culture where common sense has no place. All but a very few TSA personnel know they’re employed by a bottom-of-the-barrel agency.

Although TSA agents can’t seem to catch bombs or terrorists, TSA supervisors are apparently really good at catching TSA officers chewing gum:

Supervisors play absolutely no role in day-to-day functions except to tell you not to chew gum. Gum chewing is a huge issue with management.

TSA tests are rigged and sneaking devices onto airplanes “happens all the time”

Those of us who pay attention to reality know that the TSA is a complete joke when it comes to stopping terrorism. The entire purpose of the TSA is not to stop terrorists but to indoctrinate the American population with “prisoner training” — to get people used to having their children undressed and touched by strangers while government agents stick their hands down your pants and literally go inside your body wearing the same pair of gloves they used on their previous victim. (Hygiene be damned!)

TSA is an affront to human dignity. Its very existence is wholly unconstitutional, unethical and completely ineffective from a security point of view. When asked about the recent failure of TSA to catch a mock explosive device carried onto the airplane by a federal investigator, this TSA confessor said, “That’s not even news to anyone who works there. It happens all the time. The failure rate is pretty high, especially with federal investigators, and the pat-down itself is ridiculous.”

He then went on to explain how all the Newark airport internal TSA security tests are a hoax:

When there are internal tests, conducted by the Newark training department, it’s easy to cheat because they use our co-workers. You could be working with someone all morning, and then they’re gone. Word gets around the checkpoint. Someone will come over to you and say, “Hey, it’s Joe. He’s got a blue duffel bag.”

TSA was also recently caught handing out security badges to workers with criminal records. As reported in CNS News:

[The TSA issued] security badges to aviation employees resulted in at least 11 individuals with criminal backgrounds obtaining badges that allowed access to secure areas of U.S. airports.

[The DHS Office of Inspector General] concluded that there still may be individuals with criminal records who are working in secured areas of airports.

The new class of incompetent, lazy, pathetic government workers

TSA is the perfect example of the problem with big government. According to this TSA confession, TSA workers are “bottom of the barrel” employees but are compensated almost like royalty:

[They are] only there for the paycheck and generous benefits. For every 40 hours you work, you receive four hours of vacation and four hours of sick time. These are the employees who could never keep a job in the private sector. I wouldn’t trust them to walk my dog.

And then there are the power-hungry zealots, he says:

A small number of screeners are delusional zealots who believe they’re keeping America safe by taking your snow globe, your 2-inch pocket knife, your 4-ounce bottle of shampoo and performing invasive pat-downs on your kids.

TSA officers also spend a lot of time visually dressing-down female passengers, he says:

There is also a lot of ogling of female passengers by the male screeners. So, ladies, cover up when you get to the airport. These guys are checking you out constantly.

See the hilarious “TSA Help Wanted” video that turns out to be amazingly accurate in its depiction of TSA officers:

Sources for this story:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/confessions_of_tsa_agent_we_re_bun…

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/tsa-allowed-least-11-airport-employee…

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/newark_tsa_bomb_boozled_eTIZBp2X7B…

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039424_TSA_confession_security_theater.html#ixzz2NHEwkGi7

Hindenburg another Zionist False Flag?

July 27, 2013

According to Hillaire de Berrier,
the man responsible for the Hindenberg disaster was
Zionist activist and baseball catcher Morris Berg, who later
worked for Nelson Rockefeller and the OSS.

by James Perloff(henrymakow.com)On May 6, 1937 the German zeppelin Hindenburg burst into flames while docking at Lakehurst, New Jersey.  The spectacular disaster brought an end to the airship era.Before the Internet, “truthers” had limited access to alternative news.  One source was the newsletter of Hilaire du Berrier, who had served in the OSS during World War II.  After the war, the OSS, which changed its name to the CIA, and “downsized,” a euphemism for eliminating the genuine anti-Communists within its ranks.One was du Berrier.  But he maintained numerous international contacts and ran his intelligence newsletter out of Monaco from 1958 to 2001. His very last report was on 9-11 at age 96.I had the pleasure of meeting du Berrier during one of his visits to Boston, and have read all of his newsletters.   His September 1984 newsletter exposed  Victor Rothschild, as a Soviet spy, 11 years before Roland Perry’s 1995 book The Fifth Man.

(Berg, left, was also a Princeton graduate)

According to du Berrier, the man behind the Hindenburg disaster was  Moe Berg — a major league baseball player, master of languages, Zionist, and like du Berrier, OSS agent.  The source of du Berrier’s report was Tim McAuliffe, a legend in the Boston sports equipment industry.

Quoting and necessarily condensing du Berrier:

“McAuliffe became the friend, adviser, and uncle to most of the athletes in the Boston area. The Red Sox made his apartment their hang-out…. Moe Berg, the catcher, told him, ‘ We had to do something that would make that maniac (Hitler) attack us.’ 

“All McAuliffe could think of to say was, ‘Moe, you didn’t kill twenty-five people just for that!’ He was too upset to say more and finished the meal in silence while Berg went on talking.

“‘I couldn’t be there myself,’ he said, ‘I was scheduled for a game, but I did the planning and four of my men carried it out.’

“According to Berg, they used a rifle with a telescopic sight, though the sight was unnecessary with a target that big. When the ship came in the men were hiding in the bushes at Lakehurst and the first shot with an incendiary bullet set the after end on fire.

“Tim lay awake that night, looking at the ceiling and thinking about Berg’s [confession]. He was too frightened to tell his story to the FBI. What if they charged him with being an accomplice? The more he thought about it the more he realized it was not the work of a single man. There was teamwork, but McAuliffe had no way of knowing how deep it ran. It was at the height of the depression and he was afraid he might lose his job.

“It was some years before he started besieging editors and government officials with his story and when he did no one would listen to him. Some editors were afraid of being called anti-Semite. When he offered to testify before a government committee, Secret Service men descended on his apartment. A man named Kent Tyler had seen the shots fired but Tyler was silenced by the government. Herb Morrison, who covered the disaster for NBC, never answered his letters.”

Du Berrier further reported that “both Washington and Germany wanted the affair dropped. Herman Goering ordered German intelligence to make a report and suppressed its findings ‘lest passions be aroused in Germany and around the world.'”

Du Berrier was not a man to invent things; McAuliffe, as a sports equipment dealer, was not a “political” person and should not have had any reason to invent the story about Berg, who did not become publicly known as a spy until the first book was published about him some 40 years later. I find it too much of a coincidence that the Hindenburg exploded from the accepted explanation, “static electricity”   just as she was docking, when no such explosion occurred during the course of her many other trips.An incendiary bullet, fired under the cover of night’s darkness, would have been the perfect tool to set the zeppelin ablaze.

 Add the Hindenburg to the long list of Illuminati false flags intended to provoke war.

———-

James Perloff is author of The Shadows of Power and Tornado in a Junkyard. His newest new book, Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, available in Kindle format, is a comprehensive look at the satanic drive for world government.

First Coment from Dan:

Hilaire du Berrier was a spook, and the full story of Moe Berg remains ‘classified’.  That’s ‘man of mystery’ to general public.
My hunch is that there’s a lot more to the Hindenburg fire than some NY Jews getting a wild hare to shoot down down some rich Krauts with a hunting rifle.
The very nature of Berg’s known role with the OSS means anything did had to go through the Pentagon or White House, which would have precluded acting on direct order from Victor Rothschild or anybody else.

Also, the air ship was experiencing problems during it’s approach to the docking tower at Lakehurst New Jersey.   The crew had difficulty getting it level to dock.  The maneuvers delayed landing by  3 and half hours, creating a great deal of tension among spectators and passengers even before it burst into flame.

Caught on newsreel complete with Germans leaping to their deaths from the burning hulk the Hindenburg was a prototype for 9/11. Surely it was a psyop.
It was a symbol of the Third Reich:  large and impressive to watch, but full of volatile hot air.  Ultimately unsustainable.   The destiny of the Hitlerian vision was encapsulated in 30 seconds of footage of the Hindenburg crash of 1937.   For people of the day, Herb Morrison’s voice breaking ‘oh the humanity’ with the footage of the flaming death of 35 passengers and crew burned an unforgettable meme of horror into the mind.  Only a harbinger of 17 million violent deaths in Europe to come.

“Oh the humanity!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YY0xw5r1ro

As you can see the instant of the explosion was missing from the newsreels.   By todays standards it smacks of a ‘rough cut’.  It looks like the footage of the initial explosion was censored out.

The Hindenburg exploded because it was full of highly flammable hydrogen.  The United States had locked up the world sources of non flammable helium.  In  1927 the US Senate passed the Helium Control Act.   Neither Roosevelt or the Nazis were in power at that time. There was no helium embargo against Germany, rather, helium was scarce at the time and airships were the spy satellites of that era.   That’s why the US locked up the world supply of helium at the time for the US military.

The Germans could have requested helium from the US government but they never did.  The likely reason is that hydrogen was cheap, and helium would have been prohibitively expensive for passenger transportation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s